A Study Of Water And Sediment Quality As - TO THE TAR SANDS .ca

Recommendations

Info

Table 7. Summary of water quality values for the four sites. Parameter Rochers River at Mission Creek LA <strong>Water</strong> Intake Fletcher Channel Tap <strong>Water</strong> Arsenic Total 3.4 µg/L 2.6 µg/L 1.6 µg/L
Table 8. Concentrations of dioxins and furans from water at four sites near Fort Chipewyan. Values are in pg/L. Site T4CDD P5CDD H6CDD H7CDD O8CDD T4CDF P5CDF H6CDF H7CDF O8CDF Rochers R. at Mission Creek LA water intake Fletcher ^ ND (0.3) ND (0.6) ND Channel (0.2) Tap water ND (0.3) 2.2 ND (0.1) 1.1 3.7 ND (0.2) 7.9 ND (0.2) ND (0.2) 1.6 ND (0.2) ND (0.2) ND ND (0.1) ND (0.1) (0.2) 3.4 ND (0.2) 3.1 ND (0.1) ND (0.4) ND (0.1) 35 ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ^ ND = not detected. The value in parentheses is the sample detection limit. Total Coliforms / 100 mL 450 300 150 14 Aug 2002 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 Observation Number ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.2) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.2) ND (0.2) Figure 8. Total coliform colonies per 100 mL in “raw water” at Fort Chipewyan, with “less than” values included, 3 Dec 1996 to 3 July 2007, n = 103 (100 values between 6 June 2001 and 3 July 2007). Y-axis is power transformed (power = 0.1), line is a distance-weighted least squares regression, tension = 0.5. Data provided courtesy of Kathleen Pongar, Alberta Environment, 23 July 2007.
Page 1 and 2: A STUDY OF WATER AND SEDIMENT QUALI
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page SUMM
Page 5 and 6: (9) A peer-reviewed epidemiologic a
Page 7 and 8: concerned citizen of Fort Chipewyan
Page 9 and 10: and fecal coliform bacteria. These
Page 11 and 12: options. Geologic deposits may diff
Page 13 and 14: Coliform bacteria are useful indica
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. Water quality parameters a
Page 17 and 18: a b Canoe Pass 17 Sample Site Figur
Page 19 and 20: a b Water Treatment Plant Water Int
Page 21 and 22: RESULTS and DISCUSSION 1. Regulator
Page 23 and 24: Table 3. Canadian water and sedimen
Page 25 and 26: Table 5. A summary of some water an
Page 27 and 28: maximum 5 mg/L; median 1 mg/L AR be
Page 29 and 30: Comparison of the various datasets
Page 31 and 32: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (P
Page 33: The largest exceedences were for al
Page 37 and 38: Arsenic, Mercury, and Other Heavy M
Page 39 and 40: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (P
Page 41 and 42: Table 13. Exceedences of sediment q
Page 43 and 44: Total PAHs (mg/kg) 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3
Page 45 and 46: Table 14. Concentrations of dioxins
Page 47 and 48: Ducks in the spring, beavers, and m
Page 49 and 50: Air pollution. The other day, at Bi
Page 51 and 52: iver was opened approximately ½ mi
Page 53 and 54: From the Edmonton Journal, 23 Octob
Page 55 and 56: The Tar Island Dike is a hydraulic
Page 57 and 58: 3. Mercury in Walleye (Pickerel) an
Page 59 and 60: Mercury Concentration (mg/kg) 0.8 0
Page 61 and 62: 4. Fish Deformities Scientific Data
Page 63 and 64: Possible Causes for the Fish Abnorm
Page 65 and 66: 4. The arsenic levels assumed by th
Page 67 and 68: at the Fort Chipewyan water intake
Page 69 and 70: In water, chemical constituents of
Page 71 and 72: moot is that levels of some environ
Page 73 and 74: The people of Fort Chipewyan deserv
Page 75 and 76: ATSDR. 1995. Public Health Statemen
Page 77 and 78: Health Canada. 2006b. Guidelines fo
Page 79 and 80: Page, D. S., P. D. Boehm, G. C. Dou
Page 81 and 82: Treasury Board of Canada. 2005. Sit

A Study Of Water And Sediment Quality As - TO THE TAR SANDS .ca

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?