08.04.2013 Views

Oslo Clearing ASA Self Assessment ESCB-CESR Recommendation

Oslo Clearing ASA Self Assessment ESCB-CESR Recommendation

Oslo Clearing ASA Self Assessment ESCB-CESR Recommendation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Clearing</strong> holds its main liquidity facility with commercial banks, but has also pledged<br />

securities for a liquidity facility at the Central Bank of Norway (Norges Bank).<br />

For the derivatives segment, and subject to the clearing member having full<br />

segregation of its end-client, <strong>Oslo</strong> <strong>Clearing</strong> has an unconditional right to port out the<br />

end clients from the defaulting clearing member to another clearing member, but also<br />

to appoint this clearing member as the receiver of the end clients.<br />

Assignment of assessment:<br />

<strong>Oslo</strong> <strong>Clearing</strong> measures the potential exposures of participants at least once a day<br />

and the information on which the calculations are based is timely. <strong>Oslo</strong> <strong>Clearing</strong> has<br />

the capacity to recalculate the exposures on an intra-day basis. The risk management<br />

system has thresholds indicating breaches on pre-specified limits (Q1).<br />

<strong>Oslo</strong> <strong>Clearing</strong> has in place margin requirements and other risk control mechanisms<br />

designed to limit its exposures to potential losses from defaults by its participants so<br />

that the operations would not be disrupted and non-defaulting participants would not<br />

be exposed to losses that they cannot anticipate or control (Q2).<br />

The recommendation 3 on measurement and management of credit exposures is<br />

observed<br />

4 - Margin Requirements<br />

A CCP should to the greatest extent feasible impose margin requirements to limit its<br />

credit exposures to participants. These requirements should be sufficient to cover<br />

potential exposures that the CCP estimates to occur until the liquidation of the<br />

relevant positions. The models and parameters used in setting margin requirements<br />

should be risk-based and reviewed regularly.<br />

Observing the <strong>Recommendation</strong><br />

1. Are margin requirements imposed where feasible? What is the intended coverage<br />

of margin requirements? Are they sufficient to cover at least 99 pct. of the price<br />

movements that the CCP estimates to occur in the interval between the last margin<br />

collection and the time the CCP estimates it will be able to liquidate the relevant<br />

positions? What are these price estimations based on? What is the time interval<br />

consistent with a reasonable assumption about how quickly a defaulting participant's<br />

positions could be closed out? How does the CCP validate the models and parameters<br />

used to determine the margin levels consistent with the intended coverage? How<br />

frequently does it review and validate the models?<br />

Are margin requirements imposed where feasible? What is the intended coverage of<br />

margin requirements?<br />

Margins requirements are imposed on all clearing members for all open positions.<br />

Margins are risk based, and shall cover the expected price movements for a given<br />

closing period within a confidence level of at least 99 pct. for the equity segment and<br />

99,8 pct. for the derivatives segment.<br />

22/69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!