Incest in Pardon and Marriage - People Fas Harvard
Incest in Pardon and Marriage - People Fas Harvard
Incest in Pardon and Marriage - People Fas Harvard
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Incest</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pardon</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Marriage</strong><br />
are <strong>in</strong>formed.49<br />
(In this sense Christianity casts off the dist<strong>in</strong>ction be-<br />
tween nature <strong>and</strong> culture.)<br />
Moreover, the Fathers' position makes clear how promiscuity gives<br />
rise to <strong>in</strong>cest. One becomes k<strong>in</strong> to the k<strong>in</strong> of anyone with whom one<br />
sleeps, whether with<strong>in</strong> marriage (<strong>in</strong> which case these new k<strong>in</strong> are "<strong>in</strong>-<br />
laws") or without. Thus Jacob's Well states that "whan a man hath<br />
medlyd wyth a womman, or a womman wyth a man, neyther may be<br />
wedded to otheres kyn, <strong>in</strong>to the fyfte degre, ne medle wyth hem; for<br />
if thei don, it is <strong>in</strong>cest."50 As J. H. Fowler summarizes the medieval<br />
theologian Rabanus Maurus: "There is someth<strong>in</strong>g like a communi-<br />
cable disease metaphor <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> early medieval notions of sexu-<br />
ality. If one sleeps with a woman who sleeps with another man who<br />
sleeps with another woman who sleeps with me, then whether I will it<br />
or not my flesh is <strong>in</strong>extricably bound up with the flesh of that first<br />
man's. A term which cont<strong>in</strong>ually shows up <strong>in</strong> these canons <strong>and</strong> letters<br />
to describe fornication is contugzo carnalis-carnal contagion." 51 Thus<br />
fornication not only leads to venereal disease <strong>and</strong> to <strong>in</strong>cest through<br />
illegitimacy, it also leads to <strong>in</strong>cest through the secret spread of k<strong>in</strong>ship<br />
by contagion of the flesh. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, Isabella is the "cous<strong>in</strong>" of Juliet<br />
(who is Claudio's lover) <strong>in</strong> ways other than the one she tells Lucio.<br />
In the trial that allowed Henry VIIl to marry Anne Boleyn, the<br />
doctr<strong>in</strong>e of carnal contagion was used aga<strong>in</strong>st that of the Jewish levi-<br />
rate, accord<strong>in</strong>g to which a man must marry the childless widow of a<br />
deceased brother (Deut. 25 : 5-6), <strong>in</strong> order to claim that Henry's mar-<br />
riage to his sister-<strong>in</strong>-law Cather<strong>in</strong>e was <strong>in</strong>cestuous. If the k<strong>in</strong>g's brother<br />
had slept with a woman, it was argued, then she was the k<strong>in</strong>g's k<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
his marriage to her was null <strong>and</strong> void. Had this argument not been<br />
judged successful, the Pr<strong>in</strong>cess Elizabeth, later the Queen, would have<br />
had to be judged a bastard.<br />
Someth<strong>in</strong>g like the idea of carnal contagion underlies most notions<br />
of k<strong>in</strong>ship <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cest <strong>in</strong> the West, allow<strong>in</strong>g marital sexual relations to<br />
create k<strong>in</strong>ship, or "<strong>in</strong>-laws." But by conflat<strong>in</strong>g extramarital with mari-<br />
tal sexual <strong>in</strong>tercourse, the Christian doctr<strong>in</strong>e of carnal contagion un-<br />
derm<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> transcends the ord<strong>in</strong>ary notion of k<strong>in</strong>ship, which can-<br />
not hypothesize a pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of <strong>in</strong>cest without an absolutely opposite<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of chaste marriage. Catholic celibates hold the transcendent<br />
position that there can be an <strong>in</strong>cest (literally "non-chastity") beyond<br />
the dist<strong>in</strong>ction between chastity <strong>and</strong> its opposite. In the last analysis,<br />
Measure for Measure, if it can be said to be "about" anyth<strong>in</strong>g at all, is<br />
about a similarly transcendent position: the perfect reciprocal ex-<br />
change, or end of exchange, where marriage is at once both wholly