08.04.2013 Views

Andris Kronbergs, Eriks Kronbergs, Ritvars Rozinskis Latvia ...

Andris Kronbergs, Eriks Kronbergs, Ritvars Rozinskis Latvia ...

Andris Kronbergs, Eriks Kronbergs, Ritvars Rozinskis Latvia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT Jelgava, 24.-25.05.2012.<br />

10<br />

( )<br />

4,<br />

7<br />

3 3<br />

⋅ p<br />

∆ρ = f P =<br />

(5)<br />

The results of the calculation and compacting experiments are shown for comparing. It can be<br />

stated that the calculated average bulk density difference includes in deviation limits ± 20 kg·m -3<br />

experimentally determined density difference for all screen mesh size grinds.<br />

·<br />

Fig. 4. Bulk density dependence on compacting pressure<br />

The comminuted material bulk density can be calculated as a sum of the primary bulk density and<br />

the bulk density difference. The comminuted material bulk density mathematical model was:<br />

Bulk density, kg·m -3<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

3 3<br />

−0.<br />

205 10 ⋅ p<br />

ρ = ρ0<br />

+ ∆ρ<br />

= f ( D)<br />

+ f ( p)<br />

= 289 ⋅ D +<br />

(6)<br />

4,<br />

7<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

Screen mesh size, mm<br />

20<br />

Fig. 5. Bulk density dependence on hammer mill screen mesh size and compacting pressure<br />

The comminuted material bulk density mathematical model can be used for the hammer mill<br />

screen mesh sizes within 1 and 20 mm, and the compacting pressure up to 0.17 MPa.<br />

260<br />

0<br />

0.05<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

Compacting pressure, MPa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!