09.04.2013 Views

Hindoostan Mills Limited - BSE

Hindoostan Mills Limited - BSE

Hindoostan Mills Limited - BSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28 September 2012<br />

CMP: Rs.360<br />

Industry: Textiles & Machinery<br />

<strong>BSE</strong> Group/Index: Group ‘T’<br />

Promoters<br />

Chandrahas Thackersey & family<br />

Year of incorporation<br />

1873<br />

Corporate office<br />

215-219, 2nd Floor,<br />

Sir Vithaldas Chambers<br />

Mumbai – 400001<br />

Maharashtra, India<br />

Company website<br />

www.hindoostan.com<br />

Write to us at:<br />

equityresearch@outlookindia.com<br />

Initiative of the <strong>BSE</strong> Investors’ Protection Fund<br />

Key Data (as on 28 Sep’12)<br />

<strong>Hindoostan</strong> <strong>Mills</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />

<strong>BSE</strong> 509895 ISIN INE832D0100<br />

Face Value (Rs.) 10 Mkt Cap (Rs.mn) 597.5<br />

Current P/E - Current P/BV 0.6<br />

52 week high-low (Rs.) 526.6-240.0 30 day avg trading vol (nos.) 504<br />

Equity capital (Rs.mn) 16.64 Net worth (Rs.mn) 898.2<br />

Company Business<br />

<strong>Hindoostan</strong> <strong>Mills</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> (‘HML’) is primarily engaged in the manufacture and sale of<br />

textile fabrics. The company, which is promoted by the Thackersay family, offers its<br />

products under the TF, Cholee, and Everfresh brand names.<br />

It currently has an installed capacity to produce 13 mn meters of cloth and 2880 metric<br />

tonnes of yarn annually in its textile plant at Karad, Maharashtra. The company also has a<br />

machinery unit in Ambernath which produces textile related equipment like calendar<br />

bowls/liquid extraction rollers.<br />

Peer group analysis<br />

FY12,<br />

Rs in million<br />

<strong>Hindoostan</strong><br />

<strong>Mills</strong><br />

Textile-Fabric Textile-Machinery<br />

Morarjee<br />

Textiles<br />

Super Sales<br />

<strong>Limited</strong><br />

Indian Card Clothing<br />

Company<br />

Total Income 1,050 2,908 1,409 763<br />

EBIDTA 25 440 92 218<br />

EBIDTA margin 2% 15% 7% 29%<br />

PAT (19) 31 (142) 112<br />

PAT margin (2%) 1% (10%) 15%<br />

EPS (11.1) 0.3 (46.0) 24.7<br />

Cash accruals 24 164 37 165<br />

BV/share 549.5 11.7 212.9 191.0<br />

Debt/EBIDTA (x) 0.4 4.8 10.4 0.3<br />

Debt/Equity (x) 0.0 2.2 1.5 0.1<br />

ROANW neg 3% neg 13%<br />

ROACE neg 10% neg 12%<br />

P/E neg 11.4 neg 4.7<br />

P/BV 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.6<br />

Source: Moneycontrol, Company<br />

Increasing raw materials costs and lack of operating efficiency have dented the financial<br />

performance for HML in FY12. The margins of the company, which have declined rapidly<br />

in the last three years, are significantly lower as compared to some of its industry peers.<br />

Page 1 of 6


Business capacities and production Share Price Performance<br />

Business Capacity Annual<br />

Cloth 13,000,000 meters<br />

Calendar Bowls 400 nos.<br />

Yarn 2880 metric tonnes<br />

Production Annual<br />

Cloth 12,799,000 meters<br />

Calendar Bowls 351 nos.<br />

Yarn 2669 metric tonnes<br />

figures for FY11<br />

Top Public Shareholders with >1% shareholding<br />

Sl. No. Name of the Shareholder<br />

Initiative of the <strong>BSE</strong> Investors’ Protection Fund<br />

No. of Shares held<br />

(thousands)<br />

<strong>Hindoostan</strong> <strong>Mills</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />

Shares as % of<br />

Total No. of Shares<br />

1 CZAR Realty Pvt Ltd 35.3 2.1<br />

2 Harsha Hitesh Jhaveri 20.0 1.2<br />

3 Hiren Naresh Kara 65.4 3.9<br />

4 Hitesh Ramji Jhaveri 22.7 1.4<br />

5 Naresh Ranjitsinh Kara 32.2 1.9<br />

6 National Insurance Company Ltd 30.0 1.8<br />

7 Yogesh Uttamlal Mehta 20.2 1.2<br />

Total 225.9 13.6<br />

Change in Shareholding Pattern (%)<br />

Year Promoters DII FII Others<br />

Jun-12 51.6% 1.9% - 46.5%<br />

Mar-12 51.6% 1.9% - 46.5%<br />

Dec-11 51.6% 1.9% - 46.5%<br />

Sep-11 51.6% 1.9% - 46.5%<br />

Mar-11 63.8% 4.3% - 32.0%<br />

Mar-10 69.1% 3.6% - 27.3%<br />

Mar-09 69.1% 3.6% - 27.3%<br />

Mar-08 69.1% 3.6% - 27.3%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

-10%<br />

-20%<br />

-30%<br />

-40%<br />

-23%<br />

*2 yr = October 2010 to September 2012<br />

Shareholding Pattern (%)<br />

46.51%<br />

-32%<br />

1.93%<br />

4%<br />

2 YR 1 YR<br />

HML <strong>BSE</strong> Small Cap<br />

51.56%<br />

Promoters DII FII Others<br />

1%<br />

Page 2 of 6


Debt free company<br />

Shift in consumer preferences<br />

Increased competition in exports<br />

Volatility in raw material prices and<br />

availability<br />

Key contributor to economy<br />

Fragmented industry structure<br />

Roll manufacturing business<br />

Government intervention<br />

Key strengths<br />

<strong>Hindoostan</strong> <strong>Mills</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />

Due to the prevailing high interest rate environment, most of the debt-laden textile<br />

companies have faced downward pressure on their margins due to increased interest<br />

expenses. However, HML has not availed of any loans from banks in the last few years.<br />

The debt-free status has been one of the key strengths of the company vis-à-vis its<br />

peers and is expected to facilitate its recovery process.<br />

Key concerns<br />

While cotton fabric constituted 60% of the total textile production in the mid-90s, the<br />

share has steadily come down over the last 15 years and by 2008-09, the share of<br />

cotton fabrics had decreased to 48%. This is attributable to a shift in consumer<br />

preferences and growing demand for non-cotton fabrics such as polyester, silk, wool<br />

and khadi.<br />

Textile exports from neighboring countries like China, Pakistan and Bangladesh have<br />

stared posing a severe threat to Indian textile companies. The availability of low-cost<br />

labour in these countries has negated the cost-advantage for Indian exporters, thereby<br />

resulting in intense competition for access to the international markets.<br />

The company uses cotton as one of its primary raw materials. Due to lack of local<br />

availability, cotton prices have been extremely volatile in the last two years and<br />

reached a peak price of Rs.65000 per candy (356 kg) towards the end of FY11 (up from<br />

the average range of Rs.30000-40000). Any further adverse movements in rates would<br />

further suppress the operating profits.<br />

Further, there is also a limited availability of fine count cotton hard waste (a waste<br />

product of spinning mills and a major raw material for the roll manufacturing division),<br />

which may constrain the roll manufacturing/calendar bowl business of the company.<br />

Industry overview<br />

The Indian textile industry plays a major role in the economy and contributes 3% to the<br />

GDP and 14% to the overall industrial production in the country. The industry is also<br />

one of the largest exporters and India has set an export target of $40.5 bn (Rs.2106 bn)<br />

for the fiscal year 2012-13.<br />

The industry, which produced around 60,996 million sq meters of fabric in FY11, is<br />

dominated by unorganized small scale units. The segment is highly fragmented and<br />

there are more than 77,000 textile fabric manufacturers in the country.<br />

Due to high barriers of entry and lack of technical know-how, the roll manufacturing<br />

business in India continues to remain a niche segment. However, the end-users<br />

(unorganized small scale fabric manufacturers) are extremely price sensitive, which<br />

makes it difficult for companies to charge a high premium on their products.<br />

Government policy<br />

The textile industry is highly regulated with excess government intervention in export<br />

policies of cotton (and other related products) with regards to pricing, quotas, and<br />

other limitations/restrictions. Uncertainty and policy delays by the government<br />

therefore have a huge impact on the strategic plans of the entire industry.<br />

With the removal of trade barriers under the WTO, both the domestic and international<br />

competition in textile products like cotton yarn and fabric have increased manifold. In<br />

order to ensure that the local textile players are able to match international standards,<br />

the Government had launched the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) to<br />

Technology Upgradation Fund (TUF)<br />

provide capital at subsidized interest rates and longer repayment periods to textile<br />

companies in order to become more cost effective and quality oriented. While the<br />

scheme was due to expire in March 2012, the Government has expresses its intent to<br />

include the TUFS under its 12<br />

Page 3 of 6<br />

Initiative of the <strong>BSE</strong> Investors’ Protection Fund<br />

th five-year plan (2012-2017).


Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy<br />

Efforts to boost roll manufacturing<br />

business<br />

Labour problems<br />

Declining profitability<br />

Quarterly results<br />

Initiative of the <strong>BSE</strong> Investors’ Protection Fund<br />

<strong>Hindoostan</strong> <strong>Mills</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />

Particulars (Rs in mn) Apr ‘12 to Jun ‘12 Apr ‘11 to Jun ‘11 % Change 1<br />

Jan ’12 to Mar ‘12 % Change 2<br />

Total income 313.1 231.7 35.1% 332.2 (5.7%)<br />

Total expenditure 286.5 215.0 33.3% 305.0 (6.1%)<br />

EBIDTA 26.6 16.7 59.3% 27.2 (2.2%)<br />

PAT 12.0 7.5 60.0% 16.4 (26.8%)<br />

EPS 7.2 4.5 60.0% 9.9 (27.3%)<br />

1<br />

compared to corresponding quarter in the previous year<br />

2 sequential comparison<br />

The government has approved 100% FDI in the textile sector under the automatic<br />

route. The ministry of textiles has also set up a FDI Cell to attract foreign investments in<br />

the textile sector. The role of the cell will be to assist foreign companies in finding out<br />

potential joint venture partners in India and to provide support for co-ordination with<br />

state governments.<br />

Company fundamentals<br />

In a major thrust to increase its capacity of textile machinery units, the company is<br />

currently in the process of developing an additional roll manufacturing unit at Karad,<br />

Maharashtra. HML is also stepping up on its efforts to boost the production and export<br />

of its calendar bowls (liquid extraction rollers) by entering into a technical collaboration<br />

with Voith GmbH, Germany, who is one of the leading manufacturers of textile-based<br />

machinery worldwide. The collaboration is expected to provide technical know-how to<br />

HML and help produce better quality products at a premium price.<br />

Further, in order to reduce its dependence on the textile segment, SML is also exploring<br />

opportunities to foray into roll manufacturing for the steel and automotive industries.<br />

The textile industry is highly labour intensive and management of human resources<br />

therefore becomes an extremely critical issue for determining overall performance of<br />

the company. HML’s relations with its employees have been strained over the last few<br />

years and the company continued to have labour unrest at the factory in FY12. This has<br />

resulted in several disruptions over the course of the year, especially in the last quarter.<br />

Such labour problems in the future may further affect the company’s growth and<br />

expansion plans.<br />

Key financial indicators<br />

The FY12 income of HML fell marginally to Rs.1050 mn (from Rs.1065 mn) on account<br />

of a slowdown in the domestic and international markets. Material costs however,<br />

went up by 21% due to a sharp rise in the prices of key raw materials. As a result,<br />

EBIDTA margins were down to 2% from 11% and the company reported a net loss of<br />

Rs.18 mn for the year.<br />

Q1FY13 performance<br />

The first quarter of FY13 has witnessed a slowdown in revenue growth as compared to Q4FY12. However, expenses have also come<br />

down in line with the revenues which have resulted in a marginal impact on profitability. The y-o-y performance has been<br />

significantly better, and most key financials have registered healthy growth rates during this period.<br />

Page 4 of 6


4,000.0<br />

3,500.0<br />

3,000.0<br />

2,500.0<br />

2,000.0<br />

1,500.0<br />

1,000.0<br />

500.0<br />

-<br />

15.0%<br />

10.0%<br />

5.0%<br />

-<br />

(5.0%)<br />

3,477.1<br />

Book value per share Key ratios<br />

3.1% 3.1%<br />

Profitability ratios Leverage ratios<br />

Initiative of the <strong>BSE</strong> Investors’ Protection Fund<br />

<strong>Hindoostan</strong> <strong>Mills</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />

Segment-wise contribution to total revenue Geography-wise contribution to total revenue<br />

6.7%<br />

Inner ring represents FY11 data<br />

Outer ring represents FY12 data<br />

13.4% 14.2%<br />

FY10 FY11 FY12<br />

(2.0%) (1.6%)<br />

7.8%<br />

92.2%<br />

ROAE ROACE<br />

93.3%<br />

566.4 549.5<br />

FY10 FY11 FY12<br />

Textile<br />

Machinery<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

-<br />

200.0<br />

150.0<br />

100.0<br />

50.0<br />

-<br />

(50.0)<br />

4.3%<br />

5.3%<br />

172.9<br />

50.0<br />

94.7%<br />

95.7%<br />

Inner ring represents FY11 data<br />

Outer ring represents FY12 data<br />

- - 0.0<br />

FY10 FY11 FY12<br />

Debt to EBITDA Debt to Equity<br />

47.7<br />

(11.1)<br />

10.0 5.0<br />

FY10 FY11 FY12<br />

EPS DPS<br />

India<br />

0.4<br />

Rest of World<br />

Page 5 of 6


Initiative of the <strong>BSE</strong> Investors’ Protection Fund<br />

<strong>Hindoostan</strong> <strong>Mills</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />

Financials<br />

P&L (Rs. mn) FY10 FY11 FY12 Balance Sheet (Rs. mn) FY10 FY11 FY12<br />

Total income 89 1,065 1,050 Share Capital 7 17 17<br />

EBIDTA 21 118 25 Reserves & Surplus 236 926 898<br />

EBIDTA margin 23% 11% 2% Net worth 243 943 914<br />

Depreciation 5 20 42 Borrowings - - 9<br />

EBIT 16 98 (18) Other liabilities 39 161 163<br />

Interest 1 - 1 Total liabilities 282 1,103 1,087<br />

PBT 15 98 (19) Net fixed assets 43 312 544<br />

Tax 3 19 - Other non-current assets 60 5 5<br />

PAT 12 79 (19) Loans and Advances 17 175 145<br />

PAT Margin 14% 7% (2%) Current Assets 161 612 393<br />

Valuation ratios FY10 FY11 FY12<br />

Total assets 282 1,103 1,087<br />

P/E 0.26 1.38 neg Cash Flow (Rs.mn) FY10 FY11 FY12<br />

P/BV 0.01 0.12 0.63 PBT 15 98 (19)<br />

CF from Operation 21 (136) 14<br />

CF from Investment 39 176 (137)<br />

CF from Financing (20) (4) (8)<br />

Inc/(dec) Cash (0) 142 (130)<br />

Closing Balance 8 149 19<br />

Disclaimer<br />

The information contained herein is from publicly available data or other sources believed to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate<br />

or complete and it should not be relied on as such. Our company shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any<br />

person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. This document is provided for assistance only and is not intended to<br />

be and must not alone be taken as the basis for any investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information.<br />

Each recipient of this document should make such investigation as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation which may affect<br />

their investment in the securities of companies referred to in this document (including the merits and risks involved). The discussions or views<br />

expressed may not be suitable for all investors. This information is strictly confidential and is being furnished to you solely for your information.<br />

Page 6 of 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!