09.04.2013 Views

Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies

Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies

Corporate Governance in Commonwealth Authorities and Companies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix B – Exist<strong>in</strong>g CAC<br />

<strong>Governance</strong> Structures<br />

The governance structure of a CAC body is fundamentally different to an FMA body<br />

because a Board of directors rather than a CEO is primarily accountable for the activities<br />

of the organisation. This accountability can be blurred by unclear def<strong>in</strong>ition of the roles of<br />

the participants. Indeed, the governance structures can vary from one CAC to another<br />

<strong>and</strong> should, particularly given the diversity <strong>in</strong> activities <strong>and</strong> size of these organisations <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> public sector.<br />

While CAC bodies vary markedly <strong>in</strong> their organisational complexity, size <strong>and</strong> client base,<br />

they currently have a largely common <strong>in</strong>ternal structure which supports their Board’s<br />

decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g processes. These same structures are essential build<strong>in</strong>g blocks to form a<br />

robust public sector governance framework. They <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

Legislative structures: comprehensive legislative structures generally regulate the<br />

activities of the Board, CEOs <strong>and</strong> their staff. They may also impose obligations on the<br />

stakeholders <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g external parties. The general requirements for CAC bodies are<br />

governed by their enabl<strong>in</strong>g legislation <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Commonwealth</strong> <strong>Authorities</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Companies</strong><br />

Act 1997.<br />

Ethical structures: Ethical structures with<strong>in</strong> agencies are ideally an <strong>in</strong>tegral, pro-active<br />

<strong>and</strong> educational component of fraud control <strong>and</strong> risk management. These structures<br />

provide a basis for the Board to have confidence that there is consistent ethical behaviour<br />

at all levels of the organisation <strong>and</strong> that its employees comply with public sector st<strong>and</strong>ards,<br />

codes of ethics <strong>and</strong> applicable codes of conduct; act with <strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>in</strong> the performance of<br />

official duties; ensure due process <strong>in</strong> the use of official <strong>in</strong>formation, equipment <strong>and</strong><br />

facilities; exercise consideration <strong>and</strong> sensitivity <strong>in</strong> their deal<strong>in</strong>gs with members of the<br />

public <strong>and</strong> employees; <strong>and</strong> identify <strong>and</strong> deal with any real or perceived conflict of <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

Internal accountability structures: Internal accountability structures provide assurance<br />

to the Board on <strong>in</strong>ternal control <strong>and</strong> management of the organisation, the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

review of its operations <strong>and</strong> progress, <strong>and</strong> ensure consultation <strong>and</strong> constructive feedback<br />

on all its activities.<br />

Accountability structures for <strong>in</strong>ternal management start with the Board <strong>and</strong> can <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

executive <strong>and</strong> other committees set up for specific tasks at executive level. CAC bodies are<br />

also required to operate Audit Committees to assist them <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> compliance<br />

issues. Structures for organisational plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> review <strong>in</strong>clude the corporate plan;<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess plans; risk management plans; <strong>in</strong>ternal delegations; quality control systems; <strong>and</strong><br />

checks <strong>and</strong> balances, benchmark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> performance monitor<strong>in</strong>g to ensure that all<br />

responsibilities under the control of the Board are carried out with due care <strong>and</strong> diligence.<br />

Ideally, accountability will exist at an <strong>in</strong>dividual level where every member of the<br />

organisation underst<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> is committed to Australian Public Service values <strong>and</strong> those<br />

of the agency; underst<strong>and</strong>s their roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities; <strong>and</strong> is clearly accountable for<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g them.<br />

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN COMMONWEALTH AUTHORITIES AND COMPANIES<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!