Eskippakithiki, The Last Indian Town in Kentucky - The Filson ...
Eskippakithiki, The Last Indian Town in Kentucky - The Filson ...
Eskippakithiki, The Last Indian Town in Kentucky - The Filson ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Vol. 6] <strong>The</strong> <strong>Filson</strong> Club History Quarterly 371<br />
South. <strong>The</strong>n they tried to stem the Ohio to their k<strong>in</strong> at Lower<br />
Shawnee <strong>Town</strong>, but were worsted by the spr<strong>in</strong>g floods and were<br />
obliged to put <strong>in</strong>to the mouth of the Wabash, where they built a<br />
town on the site of the present Shawneetown, Ill<strong>in</strong>ois, and rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
until 1761, when they made their peace with the English<br />
and jo<strong>in</strong>ed their k<strong>in</strong> at the mouth of the Scioto.,, Peter Chartier<br />
settled among the French <strong>in</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois. <strong>The</strong> Chartier affair is the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> of the local tradition <strong>in</strong> Clark County that <strong>Eskippakithiki</strong>--<br />
<strong>Indian</strong> Old Fields--was once the site of a French fort.<br />
Some of our historians have not been able to see anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
the story of our Little Pict <strong>Town</strong> save the Chartier episode and,<br />
like Dr. Lyman C. Draper, thought it disappeared with Chartier's<br />
departure <strong>in</strong> 1747 or 1748. On Lewis Evans' General Map of<br />
the Middle British Colonies <strong>in</strong> America, 1755, our town is located<br />
between "Warrior's Branch" [Red River] of the "Keatucke" and<br />
"Great Salt Lick River" [Lick<strong>in</strong>g River], and on "<strong>The</strong> Common<br />
Path to the Cuttawas Country" [<strong>The</strong> Warrior's Path]. On page<br />
44 of Frankl<strong>in</strong>'s Ohio Settlement, published <strong>in</strong> London <strong>in</strong> 1772, is<br />
the follow<strong>in</strong>g: "In the year 1752, the Six Nations, Shawnees, and<br />
Delawares had a large town on <strong>Kentucky</strong> River," which statement<br />
gives us a "large town" there when John F<strong>in</strong>dley arrived.<br />
JOHN FINDLEY'S ADVENTURE AT ESKIPPAKITItIKI: ° Dr.<br />
William Walker, <strong>in</strong> his trip to <strong>Kentucky</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1750, did not come as<br />
far west as <strong>Eskippakithiki</strong> and, therefore, does not mention it.<br />
Christopher Gist <strong>in</strong> 1751 must have been very near it, s<strong>in</strong>ce he<br />
passed through Clark County on his return to Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, but he<br />
avoided it, doubtless because the <strong>Indian</strong>s were not hospitable to<br />
the land hunter. However, they were hospitable to the trader,<br />
and this leads us to John F<strong>in</strong>dley's adventure, which, to Kentuckians,<br />
is the most important <strong>in</strong>cident <strong>in</strong> <strong>Eskippakithiki</strong>'s<br />
history.<br />
A few years ago I wrote a biographical sketch entitled "John<br />
F<strong>in</strong>dley: <strong>The</strong> First Pathf<strong>in</strong>der of <strong>Kentucky</strong>." It is published <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Filson</strong> Club History Quarterly, April, 1927 (Volume 1, No. 3,<br />
pages 111-122). As far as I am aware, it is the only attempt ever<br />
made at a history of John F<strong>in</strong>dley, except Draper's brief account.<br />
I shall not present F<strong>in</strong>dley's life here; it is too long and most of it<br />
impert<strong>in</strong>ent to our story, but his character and two of his adventures<br />
are parts of the story of Eskippakithikl. <strong>The</strong>y are also es-