09.04.2013 Views

Eskippakithiki, The Last Indian Town in Kentucky - The Filson ...

Eskippakithiki, The Last Indian Town in Kentucky - The Filson ...

Eskippakithiki, The Last Indian Town in Kentucky - The Filson ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

362 <strong>The</strong> Fdson Club History Quarterly [ Vol. 6<br />

of 1720 (but'made from data probably gathered four or five years<br />

previously) shows a Shawnee town there, which must have been a<br />

transient town, as it does not occur on other maps, before nor<br />

after. Because there is no record of southern Shawnees settl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

anywhere else save <strong>in</strong> the Delaware country of Pennsylvania, and<br />

because this is the only group of Shawnces which the Cherokees<br />

kept away from the roads of eastern Tennessee and southwestern<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, which led to the Delaware country, these must have<br />

been the founders of the new <strong>Eskippakithiki</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Kentucky</strong>. All<br />

other Shawnee movements from the South about this time seem to<br />

be accounted for by their go<strong>in</strong>g to the Delawares <strong>in</strong> Pennsylvania ,<br />

or to the Creeks.<br />

On De Lisle's map of 1718 there is a "Tongoria" town <strong>in</strong> northeastern<br />

<strong>Kentucky</strong>. This word is thought to be a variant of "Taogria"--!ndians<br />

whom the French missionary, Father Gravier, <strong>in</strong><br />

his Relation of 1700, says "spoke the Chaouanon tongue." <strong>The</strong><br />

location of this town is not just where <strong>Eskippakithiki</strong> would be,<br />

but, of a map made up from verbal reports of <strong>Indian</strong>s and ignorant<br />

traders, too much exactness must not be demanded. As we<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d no evidence of any other <strong>Indian</strong> town <strong>in</strong> <strong>Kentucky</strong>, at that<br />

time nor subsequently, we may safely beg<strong>in</strong> to date the history of<br />

Estdppakithiki from a year or so before 1718, the date of this map.<br />

<strong>The</strong> late Dr. Cyrus Thomas, of the national Bureau of Ethnology,<br />

thought it was established about 1724--but upon what<br />

authority is unknown. Dr. Daniel G. Br<strong>in</strong>ton, one of our greatest<br />

authorities on the eastern <strong>Indian</strong>s, thought it was founded by<br />

those Shawnees who went from Carol<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> 1731., But the report<br />

of James LeTort, the Pennsylvania <strong>Indian</strong> agent, shows that they<br />

came directly to the Potomac and thence to Pennsylvania.,° Besides,<br />

the Pennsylvania Shawnees were of the Hathawekela<br />

branch of the Shawnecs, while the <strong>Eskippakithiki</strong>ans were of the<br />

Pict branch, for which reason the traders always called it <strong>The</strong><br />

Little Pict <strong>Town</strong>, to dist<strong>in</strong>guish it from the larger Pict town near<br />

present Piqua, Ohio.<br />

Colonel John Johnston says that Black Hoof was born <strong>in</strong> 1731 ;<br />

and Black Hoof, while visit<strong>in</strong>g the people of <strong>Indian</strong> 01d Fields <strong>in</strong><br />

1816, told them that he was born there. Colonel Johnston also<br />

says that Black Hoof told him he was born <strong>in</strong> the South and remembered<br />

bath<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the sea when he was a boy. If he was born<br />

at Eskippakithild <strong>in</strong> 1731 and his family jo<strong>in</strong>ed Chartier--of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!