10.04.2013 Views

Volume I. Part I - California Public Utilities Commission

Volume I. Part I - California Public Utilities Commission

Volume I. Part I - California Public Utilities Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

changes in pricing and transmission access. The CAISO is proposing that MRTU<br />

take effect in November 2007.<br />

FERC recently accepted the MRTU tariff, subject to a number of<br />

modifications, conditions and compliance filings to be made by the CAISO. 42 The<br />

CAISO is now proceeding with efforts to implement FERC’s order and to develop<br />

and test the MRTU systems and software so that MRTU can become effective. The<br />

effect of MRTU on PG&E’s procurement practices is still evolving. MRTU will add<br />

significant market complexity and will require major changes to PG&E’s systems and<br />

software interfacing with the CAISO. While the full effect of MRTU is uncertain,<br />

PG&E is cautiously optimistic that it will not substantially impact the results of<br />

PG&E’s resource planning and the majority of the procurement processes that<br />

typically happen in timeframes that extend well beyond the day-ahead and day-of<br />

focus of MRTU market changes. However, there are a number of elements of MRTU<br />

that remain open to change. Thus, MRTU is an important area of future uncertainty<br />

that will effect procurement and PG&E’s planning process.<br />

d. Community Choice Aggregation<br />

Community Choice Aggregators (“CCA”) are governmental entities formed by<br />

cities and counties to serve the energy requirements of local residents and businesses.<br />

The <strong>California</strong> legislature enacted AB 117 in 2002 to permit and promote CCA.<br />

CCAs are subject to certain statutory requirements, such as the RA requirements<br />

under AB 380, and the relationship between CCAs and the IOUs is subject to<br />

<strong>Commission</strong> rules and decisions. In December 2004, the <strong>Commission</strong> issued a<br />

decision addressing certain rate, tariff and cost allocation issues between the IOUs<br />

and CCAs. 43 In December 2005, the <strong>Commission</strong> issued a second decision that<br />

addressed issues including jurisdiction, tariffs and services, CCA implementation<br />

plans and some cost allocation issues. 44<br />

To date, there are no CCAs in PG&E’s service area. However, a number of<br />

entities have expressed interest including the City and County of San Francisco<br />

(“CCSF”), the cities of Emeryville, Berkeley and Oakland, and a number of cities in<br />

Kings County. If any of these entities becomes a CCA, it could have a significant<br />

42 <strong>California</strong> Independent System Operator, 116 FERC 61,274 (2006).<br />

43 D.04-12-046.<br />

44 D.05-12-041.<br />

II-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!