10.04.2013 Views

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION - Orissa High Court

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION - Orissa High Court

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION - Orissa High Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 386<br />

B.P.RAY, J.<br />

DALU @ SAILENDRA PRADHAN -V- STATE OF ORISSA.*<br />

DECEMBER 19,2009.<br />

131<br />

PENAL CODE,1860 (ACT NO.45 OF 1860) – SEC.376.<br />

Rape – Victim was 16 years old when she was subjected to sexual<br />

intercourse – Sexual intercourse continued for more than three years<br />

by the time information lodged and victim was conceived through the<br />

appellant which was aborted later – No convincing evidence on record<br />

that the accused had extended any threat on her or forced her to have<br />

sexual inter course with him – Victim has not made any whisper before<br />

any one complaining such conduct of the appellant – Held, the victim<br />

is a consenting party and the appellant can not be held guilty of the<br />

charge U/s.376 IPC. (Para 6)<br />

Case law Referred to :-<br />

AIR 1983 SC 753 : (Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirijibhai -V-State of Gujarat).<br />

For Appellant – Mr.D.P.Dhal.<br />

For Respondent – Addl.Govt. Advocate.<br />

*CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.216 OF 1995. From the judgment and order dated<br />

29.7.1995 passed by Shri S.K.Mohanty, Asst.Sessions Judge, Khurda in<br />

S.T.Case No.7/467 of 1995/94.<br />

B.P. RAY, J. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment and order of<br />

conviction and sentence passed by the Asst. Sessions Judge, Khurda in S.T.<br />

Case No. 7/467 of 1995/94 in its file. Learned Asst. Sessions Judge vide the<br />

impugned judgment of conviction and sentence held the appellant guilty of<br />

charge U/s. 376 I.P.C and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for 8 years and to<br />

pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to undergo R.I. for two months more.<br />

2. The case of the prosecution against the appellant is that the appellant<br />

had brought the victim (P.W.9) along with her brother, when she was a child<br />

of 8 years old, from their native place and kept them in his house and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!