92 where candidates prosecuting P.G.( Medical) Classes in non-clinical subjects are not required to render their service in KBK/Tribal areas. The said clause-20 of the prospectus of P.G. (Medical) Selection, 2007 as well as 2008 is accordingly quashed. DR. IPSITA MISHRA -V- STATE OF ORISSA [M.M.DAS,J.] 11. The writ petitions are allowed, but, in the circumstances, without any cost. Writ petition allowed.
2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 348 M.M.DAS,J. STATE OF ORISSA, REP. THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, PURI -V- SANTI KUMAR MITRA & ANR.* NOVEMBER 13,2009. Khasmahal lease – Lessee not applying for renewal within time as stipulated in the lease deed – Held, it does not ipso facto take away the right of the lessee for renewal of the lease. (Para 6) Khasmahal lease – Application by lessee for renewal – Resumption Proceeding by the lesser – No ground that the lessee failed to perform all the conditions of the lease or the state requires the land for public purpose – Held, during pendency of the renewal application the lessor can not start unilateral resumption proceeding without taking recourse of law for evicting the lessee. (Para 6) Khasmahal lease – Property in a Khasmahal lease shall be treated to be akin to a private land of the lessee, which is both heritable and transferable. (Para 6) Case laws Referred to :- 1.(1997) C.L.T. 762 : (Pabitra Kumar Swain -V- State of <strong>Orissa</strong> & Ors.). 2.ILR 1976 (Cuttack) :1392 : (Republic of India -V- Prafulla Kumar Samal.) 3.1993 (I) OLR. 187 : ( Shankarlal Verma & Ors.-V-Smt.Uma Sahu & Ors.). 4.28 (1962) CLT 209 : (Janab Jahada Begum Sahib -V- State of <strong>Orissa</strong>). 5.2004 (II) OLR 332 : (Sourindra Narayan Bhanja Deo -V-Member, Board of Revenue, <strong>Orissa</strong> & Ors.). For Appellant – Addl.Government Advocate. M/s. Prasant Mohanty, P.K.Mohapatra, A.K. Rath, P.K.Rath, D.R.Ray, S.P.Choudhury, D.N.Mohapatra, R.K.Mohanty, D.Mohapatra, A.P.Bose, B.P.Routray, B.Naiak & G.Mishra. (For respondents 1 & 2) M/s. G.K.Mohanty, G.P.Samal, C.Panigrahi, D.K.Nanda, B.Ghadei & N.M.Mishra. (For Intervenor). SECOND APPEAL NO.98 OF 1993. From the judgment dated 23.12.1992 and decree dated 6.1.1993 passed by Shri B.K.Mishra, Sub-Judge, Puri in T.A.No.2/100 of 1992-91 reversing the judgment dated 30.9.1991 passed by Shri P.K.Das,Munsif, Puri in O.S. No.161/402 of 1990/1986. 93
- Page 1 and 2:
2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 271 I.M.QUDDUSI
- Page 3 and 4:
SK.IBRAHIM -V- STATE OF ORISSA [B.K
- Page 5 and 6:
2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 275 I.M.QUDDUSI
- Page 7 and 8:
MIRJA SIDDIK -V- STATE OF ORISSA ju
- Page 9 and 10:
23 DILIP KUMAR RAY -V- STATE OF ORI
- Page 11 and 12:
25 DILIP KUMAR RAY -V- STATE OF ORI
- Page 13 and 14:
27 DILIP KUMAR RAY -V- STATE OF ORI
- Page 15 and 16:
2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 285 B.P.DAS,J &
- Page 17 and 18:
NITYANANDA BEHERA -V- STATE [S.C.PA
- Page 19 and 20:
2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 289 B.P.DAS,J &
- Page 21 and 22:
ANUPAMA BEHERA -V- D.M., LIC OF IND
- Page 23 and 24:
ANUPAMA BEHERA -V- D.M., LIC OF IND
- Page 25 and 26:
39 13. In the case of P. J. Chacko
- Page 27 and 28: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 297 L.MOHAPATRA
- Page 29 and 30: 43 Court in the case of M/s. Thunga
- Page 31 and 32: 45 and (c) on account of some mista
- Page 33 and 34: “ The High Court held that the re
- Page 35 and 36: 49 Deputy Superintendent of Police.
- Page 37 and 38: The copy of the Station Diary dt.24
- Page 39 and 40: 53 accordingly, investigation was t
- Page 41 and 42: 55 lying dead with ligature mark on
- Page 43 and 44: 11.40(1974) CLT.977 : (Sahadeb Patn
- Page 45 and 46: comparative statement showing perfo
- Page 47 and 48: 61 construed according to the plain
- Page 49 and 50: 63 11. This Court in Sahadeb Pattna
- Page 51 and 52: ules and regulations h) Ability to
- Page 53 and 54: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 55 and 56: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 57 and 58: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 59 and 60: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 328 A.S.NAIDU,J
- Page 61 and 62: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 63 and 64: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 332 PRADIP MOHA
- Page 65 and 66: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 67 and 68: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 69 and 70: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 71 and 72: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 73 and 74: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 75 and 76: INDIAN LAW REPORTS, CUTTACK SERIES
- Page 77: 91 impression of bias and favourtis
- Page 81 and 82: 95 hearing the appeal set aside the
- Page 83 and 84: 97 and the parties to the lease are
- Page 85 and 86: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 354 R.N.BISWAL,
- Page 87 and 88: 101 cargo, which was unfit for ship
- Page 89 and 90: 103 This Section stipulates that ap
- Page 91 and 92: 105 Sub-section (2) of Section 7 of
- Page 93 and 94: 107 further, in the meantime also t
- Page 95 and 96: 109 “…… The High Court was of
- Page 97 and 98: 111 learned Subordinate Judge on th
- Page 99 and 100: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 368 SANJU PANDA
- Page 101 and 102: 115 OLR 791 (Sk. Mustafa and anothe
- Page 103 and 104: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 372 SANJU PANDA
- Page 105 and 106: 119 Rs. 71,74,451/- for repair of t
- Page 107 and 108: 121 reported in AIR 1989 SC 1239 (A
- Page 109 and 110: 123 already quoted and the aforesai
- Page 111 and 112: 125 offending truck. The further ca
- Page 113 and 114: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 382 B.P.RAY,J.
- Page 115 and 116: 129 to any person, or to consent th
- Page 117 and 118: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 386 B.P.RAY, J.
- Page 119 and 120: 133 testimony of the victim in a ca
- Page 121 and 122: 135 relationship of the appellant w
- Page 123 and 124: 137 Officer,Bangalore). 3.AIR 1996
- Page 125 and 126: 139 restored, only to avoid the ord
- Page 127 and 128: 2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 396 141 B.K.PAT
- Page 129 and 130:
143 4.12.1997. The vehicle was insu
- Page 131 and 132:
145 vehicle and insurance policy tr
- Page 133 and 134:
147 place from the date of sale whe
- Page 135 and 136:
149 deemed to have issued to the in
- Page 137 and 138:
151 6. On an analysis of Sections 9
- Page 139 and 140:
153 the policy purports to cover in
- Page 141 and 142:
2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 410 B.K.NAYAK,
- Page 143 and 144:
157 “….. The decision in the ca
- Page 145 and 146:
2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 414 S.K.MISHRA,
- Page 147 and 148:
161 the imposition of fine of Rs.50
- Page 149 and 150:
163 overtuous regarding sex. Theref
- Page 151 and 152:
165 6. The learned trial court, aft
- Page 153 and 154:
167 The Opposite parties 2 to 11 ar
- Page 155 and 156:
169 3. It is undisputed at this sta
- Page 157:
shall dispose of the application on