ORIGINAL JURISDICTION - Orissa High Court
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION - Orissa High Court
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION - Orissa High Court
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2010 ( I ) ILR-CUT- 332<br />
PRADIP MOHANTY,J.<br />
MD.NOORULLAH SHAREEF -V- SENIOR POST<br />
MASTER,GPO,BUXIBAZAR,CTC-1*<br />
OCTOBER 29,2009.<br />
LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (ACT NO. 36 0F 1963)-SEC.5<br />
Law is well settled that while considering the application of<br />
condonation of delay the <strong>Court</strong> should not take a pedantic approach<br />
but should take a pragmatic view and it is not necessary for the party<br />
seeking condonation of delay to explain each day of delay.<br />
In the present case, due to official process and for tracing out the<br />
file, the delay had occasioned – Held, the appellate <strong>Court</strong> has not<br />
committed any illegality or material irregularity in allowing the<br />
application – However the cost imposed by the appellate <strong>Court</strong> is<br />
modified from Rs.5000/- to Rs.20,000/-. (Para 5)<br />
Case laws Referred to:-<br />
1. 2003(I) OLR (SC) 673 : (Shiv Shakti Coop.Housing Society, Nagpur -V-<br />
M/s. Swaraj Developers & Ors.)<br />
2. 2008(I) OLR 235 : (Golam Mohammad & Anr.-V- Sk.Fakir & Ors.).<br />
3. 2003(II) OLR 409 : (Sitaram @ Mahendra Ghosh -V-Sri Antaryami<br />
Mohapatra &18 Ors. etc.)<br />
4. (2006)7 SCC.452 : (Vidyodaya Trust & Ors.-V-mohan Prasadr & Ors.).<br />
5.2003 (Supp.)OLR 703 : (Narayan Dash -V- Gouranga Charan Dash & Ors,<br />
etc.).<br />
For Petitioner – M/s. P.K.Rath (I), S.Barik, S.M.Ali, D.Jena, M.Tola,<br />
R.Mahapatra & D.Maharana.<br />
For Opp.Party – Mr.S.K.Das, Central Government Counsel.<br />
*CRP NO.4 OF 2005. From the judgment dated 17.12.2004 passed by Sri<br />
C.R.Dash, Ad hoc Addl.District Judge (FTC-I), Cuttack in Misc. Appeal<br />
No.119 of 2002 reversing the order dated 02.09.2002 passed by Sri G.Pati,<br />
Civil Judge (Jr.Division), Ist <strong>Court</strong>, Cuttack in Misc.Case No.152 of 2000.<br />
PRADIP MOHANTY,J. In this Civil Revision, the petitioner challenges<br />
the judgment dated 17.12.2004 of the Ad hoc Addl. District Judge (FTC-I),<br />
Cuttack in Misc. Appeal No. 119 of 2002 reversing the order dated<br />
02.09.2002 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Ist <strong>Court</strong>, Cuttack<br />
rejecting an application filed under Order 9, Rule-13 C.P.C. registered as<br />
Misc. Case No.152 of 2000.<br />
2. The brief fact of the case is that one Ashrafun Nisha Begum and her<br />
husband Md. Abdullah Sharif on 17.12.1984 had purchased jointly 16<br />
numbers of National Savings Certificates amounting to Rs.80,000/- from the<br />
opposite party. They had made their sons, namely, Md. Nurullah Shariff and<br />
Md. Rahimtullah Shariff as nominees. After the death of Md. Abdullah<br />
77
Change language