10.04.2013 Views

History of civilizations of Central Asia, v. 6 ... - unesdoc - Unesco

History of civilizations of Central Asia, v. 6 ... - unesdoc - Unesco

History of civilizations of Central Asia, v. 6 ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ISBN 92-3-103985-7 The surrender <strong>of</strong> Merv and the Afghan question<br />

patchwork <strong>of</strong> semi-independent principalities which constituted Afghan Turkistan and had<br />

some 950,000 inhabitants at the end <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century. 42 From east to west, there<br />

was Wakhan, located at the eastern end <strong>of</strong> the Amu Darya basin; Badakhshan, 20,000 km 2<br />

on either side <strong>of</strong> the Panj; Kunduz, <strong>of</strong> about 30,000 km 2 ; Khulm, which was the centre <strong>of</strong><br />

ancient Bactria; and Maimaneh. These principalities, peopled mostly by Uzbeks and Tajiks<br />

(except for Wakhan), returned to Afghan domination in the third quarter <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth<br />

century. Only the principality <strong>of</strong> Andkhoy (with about 60,000 inhabitants) remained semi-<br />

independent in the 1880s.<br />

The Russian Pamirs expedition ended with the signing <strong>of</strong> the Russo-British Pamirs bor-<br />

der agreement <strong>of</strong> 27 February 1895, which stipulated that the territories on the left bank <strong>of</strong><br />

the Panj (part <strong>of</strong> Darwaz) belonged to Afghanistan and those on the right bank ( Roshan,<br />

Shughnan and part <strong>of</strong> Wakhan) to the protectorate <strong>of</strong> Bukhara. The other part <strong>of</strong> Wakhan<br />

was a narrow corridor attributed to Afghanistan in order to separate the Russian empire<br />

from British India. On 18 August 1907 Russia recognized Afghanistan as being outside its<br />

sphere <strong>of</strong> influence and, for many decades, desisted from a continuation <strong>of</strong> its expansionist<br />

policy in <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Asia</strong>.<br />

RUSSIAN EXPANSION IN XINJIANG<br />

From the middle <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century, Chinese policy was defensive, given the need to<br />

counter the growing influence <strong>of</strong> Russia and Britain. Relations between the local authorities<br />

in Xinjiang and Beijing were politicized and violent uprisings broke out, <strong>of</strong>ten backed by<br />

the powers active in the region.<br />

In the early 1860s Xinjiang was the scene <strong>of</strong> major rebellions. The Hui, also known as<br />

the Dungans (Chinese Muslims), and the Taranchis rebelled against the Chinese authori-<br />

ties, whom they expelled from Kuldja with the assistance <strong>of</strong> other indigenous peoples, the<br />

Kyrgyz and the Sarts. An independent entity was formed under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the Khoja<br />

dynasty. The Taranchis initially enjoyed a certain prosperity before becoming the target <strong>of</strong><br />

increasingly frequent military requisitions by the Manchus which kept pace with Muslim<br />

insurrections in Xinjiang. These requisitions peaked in 1863, bringing them into conflict<br />

not only with the Chinese authorities (in particular, General Tso Tsungtang, 1812–85) but<br />

also with their Dungan neighbours. The political fortunes <strong>of</strong> the Taranchis crystallized for<br />

a brief period in parallel with the venture <strong>of</strong> the Kokandi Yakub Beg in Kashghar. 43 Under<br />

42 Badakhshan: 158,000 inhabitants; Wakhan: 3,000; Kunduz: 400,000; Andhkoy: 60,000; Balkh: 64,000;<br />

Maimaneh: 270,000; Darzab: 5,000. Total: 960,000 inhabitants according to the Voenniy Sbornik (Military<br />

Handbook) cited by Reclus, 1881, p. 490. See also Luzhetskaya, 1986.<br />

43 Boulger, 1879.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!