10.04.2013 Views

Water and Energy - Draft Report of the GWRC Research ... - IWA

Water and Energy - Draft Report of the GWRC Research ... - IWA

Water and Energy - Draft Report of the GWRC Research ... - IWA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>GWRC</strong> <strong>Water</strong> & <strong>Energy</strong> - <strong>Draft</strong> report<br />

scrutiny (i.e., a given water treatment or wastewater treatment or<br />

storm water management alternative) define <strong>the</strong> global<br />

inventory.<br />

• Performance evaluation: Best practices, metrics, <strong>and</strong> indices<br />

have been developed to help utilities evaluate ongoing<br />

performance, through comparisons with <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

utilities.<br />

• Impact assessment: Impact assessment methods are used to<br />

convert <strong>the</strong> inventory inputs/outputs into environmental (i.e.,<br />

GHG emissions), social (i.e., damages to human health) or<br />

economic impacts. Some methods or tools used for impact<br />

assessment include: life cycle assessment, least cost planning,<br />

embodied energy assessment, ecological footprint identification,<br />

conjoint analysis, social modelling, net present value analysis,<br />

least cost planning, life cycle costing, externalities valuation, etc.<br />

The attached figure, “Convention for integrated performance<br />

evaluation” helps to illustrate this.<br />

There is a need to identify <strong>and</strong> evaluate <strong>the</strong> models <strong>and</strong> methods<br />

used by urban water utilities to inventory process inputs <strong>and</strong> outputs,<br />

to evaluate performance, <strong>and</strong> to assess economic, environmental <strong>and</strong><br />

social impacts <strong>and</strong> risks <strong>of</strong> urban water energy management<br />

decisions. The models <strong>and</strong> methods help utilities define <strong>the</strong><br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> discharge <strong>of</strong> contaminants relative<br />

to urban water management, <strong>and</strong> to evaluate <strong>the</strong> impacts. There is a<br />

need to compare <strong>and</strong> contrast <strong>the</strong> models <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> identify<br />

<strong>the</strong> gaps for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> refining, syn<strong>the</strong>sizing, harmonizing, or<br />

developing new models <strong>and</strong> methods.<br />

Objectives Review <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> science <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> urban water utilities (drinking<br />

water, wastewater, reuse, <strong>and</strong> storm water) to manage energy<br />

consumption <strong>and</strong> greenhouse gas emissions. This will include a<br />

review <strong>of</strong> process-specific models, performance indicators, <strong>and</strong><br />

impact <strong>and</strong> risk assessment methods; syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> methods <strong>and</strong><br />

models generally used <strong>and</strong> accepted for evaluation <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

consumption <strong>and</strong> greenhouse gas emissions; description <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong><br />

methods <strong>and</strong> models are used for decision making <strong>and</strong> risk<br />

evaluation; identification <strong>of</strong> gaps <strong>and</strong> research needs for refinement<br />

<strong>and</strong> harmonization, or development <strong>of</strong> more robust models <strong>and</strong><br />

methods; provision <strong>of</strong> a framework for proceeding with research<br />

Deliverables<br />

projects to meet <strong>the</strong> research needs.<br />

Provide a final report that summarizes existing process models,<br />

performance indicators, metrics, <strong>and</strong> indices, <strong>and</strong> impact assessment<br />

methods <strong>and</strong> tools, including a comparison <strong>and</strong> analysis. Summarize<br />

how <strong>the</strong> tools are currently used for energy management decision<br />

support <strong>and</strong> risk assessment. Develop a framework for harmonizing<br />

existing models, indicators, methods, <strong>and</strong> tools leading to a<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!