2003 - usaid/ofda

More documents

Recommendations

Info

of the CM.A repom. the judges worked mostly on newer, less complicaled cases. The ClIA has suiiessfull~ drabril the coun's anention lo the backlog ofolder cases that needs to be addressed. Case Processing Time from Filing to Disposition for 2003 Fig.1 0 200 100 600 SO0 1000 1200 Number of Days
Result Kumber C.1.1: Improved Adn~inistration of the Two Court Systems Indicator: Red~tction it1 time consumed by varioirs ndntittisrrarir.e procedures Unit of \leasure 1 : Days consumcd from beginning of filing proccss to first hcaring Baseline for 1998 (NB): 45.4 days I Number planned for 2003: 40 days 1 Number achieved in 2003: ;.I days I Discussion of result: The number achieved in 100; marks a decrease of 1% in the number of days consumed from case filing to first hearing in comparison with thc basclinc as ntcasurrd in 1999. This result also represents a 9 K improvement on the targcvd number ofdays by the end ofthe Project. The law requires a first hcaring to bc held between IS and 60 days ancr thc case is filed. Thcreforc. thc average numbcr of days between filing and first hearing should be in the range of 40 days. Thc implementation of the Case Initiation and Receipting Network (CIRN). the automated systcm introduced by the Project to handle case Cilin~. distribute filed cases nndonily over circuils and asripn a first harinz. ensures that all first hearings continue to be scheduled within this 40-day nn2c. This rcflects positivcl? on thc impact ofautomatcd procedures introduced by the Project on rcducing processing tintc. In 2002. the Project had anticipated that this numbcr would decrese funhcr ifthc uliliation ofautomated systems and procedures was sustained. a projection which was corroborated by the dlrrcsc ahiered in 1003. Unit of Xleasurc 2: Days consunicd in the scrvice proccss from filin: to ackno\vlcd~cnicnt of service I Baseline for 1998 (NB): 15.7 days ~ - -- - ~~ Number planned for 2003: IS days Numbcr achicvcd in 2003- 18.7 d+s Discussion of rcsult: The number of days consun~cd by the scrvicc process fcll 6m1 15.7 da?s in 1995 to 17.5 in 1999. representing an overall decrease 016.49:. This decrcasc coincided uith the XIOJ's Dccrcc in 1999, in response to the Project's rccomntcndations. allowin$ liti~ants to k xmcd by rc:istcred mail instcad of process servers. Howvcvcr. this downward trend \%as rcvcrsed. \r-ith tintc consumcd in the service process increasing progressively until it reached 17 days in 2002. This rcprcscnlrd an iniiesc of 44 40.6 in proccssinz time in comparison with the brselinc for 199s~
Page 2 and 3: Section Executive Suniniar?. I. Inr
Page 4 and 5: months. If this wend continues bqon
Page 6 and 7: NCJS on various institutional devel
Page 8 and 9: A complete Model Pilot Coun Procedu
Page 10 and 11: AOJS was designed to advocate posit
Page 12 and 13: 3. OVERVIEWOFIV~INISTRYOFJUSTICEAND
Page 14 and 15: NCJS's organizational structure inc
Page 16 and 17: 4. OVERALL PROJECT RESULTS: ANAL YS
Page 18 and 19: Final Performance Data Table Source
Page 20 and 21: Final Performance Data Table Source
Page 22 and 23: Final Performance Data Table - Unit
Page 24 and 25: Final Performance Data Table .-*' :
Page 26 and 27: Final Performance Data Table Result
Page 28 and 29: Final Performance Data Table Unit b
Page 30 and 31: Final Performance Data Table Unit o
Page 32 and 33: 4.2 Findings and Conclusions: 1.2.1
Page 34 and 35: Adminirmcion riJustict Support Proj
Page 38 and 39: The reason for the observed increas
Page 40 and 41: A funher factor that may have cause
Page 42 and 43: -- - I Unit of.\leasure 6: Kumber o
Page 44 and 45: -~ -~ Unit of hlcasure 2: Number of
Page 46 and 47: - Sole: The increase noredjor 2001
Page 48 and 49: Unit of hleasure 1 : Number o fwmin
Page 50 and 51: 4.1.1.2 Result Number C.1.2: Increa
Page 52 and 53: 1.2.2.1 Result Xurnber C.2.1 Enhanc
Page 54 and 55: Unit of hleasurc 3: Number of newju
Page 56 and 57: a L Y 1 L Unit of Zlcnsure 4: Numbe
Page 58 and 59: 5. OVERVIEW OF LA IVYERS' SUR VEE K
Page 60 and 61: 5.3 Discussion of Key Findings 5.3.
Page 62 and 63: A review of the data also reveals a
Page 64 and 65: Respecring cortrrsrorr rime: In spi
Page 67 and 68: 6.1.1 Key Activities Undertaken and
Page 69 and 70: An additional challenge encountered
Page 71 and 72: Conference panicipation provided a
Page 73 and 74: Year ZOO0 ZOO l Key Activities Comu
Page 75: 6.3 TASK 3: STRENGTHEMKG NCJS RESEA
Page 78 and 79: Year 6 of the AOJS Project sat\- th
Page 80 and 81: design and implementation of variou
Page 82 and 83: Year 200; Key Activities Complctrd
Page 85 and 86: 6.1.1 Key Activities Undertaken and
Page 87 and 88:
expected to perform using the C.\IA
Page 89 and 90:
Reduction \\'orkshop lo present les
Page 91 and 92:
Ycar 100 I 1009 zoo; C.\IA mm~gernc
Page 95 and 96:
Adminilrneon of Jur6cr hpporr Proje
Page 97 and 98:
Administration of Jurcirc Support P
Page 99 and 100:
Adninislrrlion orJustict Support Pr
Page 101 and 102:
ZOO l 2002 l licy Actiritics Complc
Page 103 and 104:
Ycar loo; Key Activities Completed
Page 105 and 106:
Ieners, recognition cenificates, et
Page 107 and 108:
6.6.3 Challenges Encountered One of
Page 109 and 110:
Y ' SUMMARY m SUMMARY COSTS (I) OVE
Page 111:
I1 is important to desip, inrplmcnt
Page 114 and 115:
I ANNEX A I 1 PROJECT PRESS PROFILE
Page 116 and 117:
New juridical project to solve 12 m
Page 118:
Egyptian judges see fruits, frustra
Page 121 and 122:
Judicial Studies: . .. Counselor .M
Page 123 and 124:
Introdcctow 3nd AOJS related Sectio
Page 125 and 126:
A Article 6 5
Page 127 and 128:
Article # 6
Page 130 and 131:
The General Assembly for Eorth Cair
Page 132 and 133:
AWES B: POOLED LIST OF REESCISEERED
Page 134 and 135:
Unit Mensrrre 4: Number of procehrn
Page 136 and 137:
I Unit meastcre6: number of the pro
Page 138:
I m ANNEX C 1 IN-COUNTRY TRAINING R
Page 145:
erg b r: - * z a C < < - % % % * o
Page 151:
n n n n 0 . C Z S $ u I- C C
Page 158 and 159:
u Y 3 z u x n i - niYi-#F-r, n n n
Page 160:
~~~~ -_I ; r l - n n = a X X X = -
Page 163 and 164:
a a a a : zzzz ' I ---- zzzz
Page 168 and 169:
31 - e m - ' X X - ? ? = - - -
Page 172:
mi- < .. a .+ T vl - -
Page 178 and 179:
ANNEX E I EXAMPLE AND DETAILED VIEW
Page 180:
--,-~.-- ~- - - , - .-.- 8 . i. Cas
Page 184 and 185:
4INISTRY OF JUSTICE :OURT AUTOMATIO
Page 189:
COURT AUTOMATION SYSTEMS: FLOW CHAI
Page 193 and 194:
C0UII:'AU'SOMA'I'ION SYSTEMS: FLOW
Page 196 and 197:
li I ANNEX H 1 PROJECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
Page 208:
114 ihr:~ Collcclion Sllccls l'or Y
Page 223 and 224:
~ ~ ~ - - -- .-. - I I1ost 'Travel
Page 225 and 226:
. Olli~.c ~V~~II~~I~UIIICIII B COII
Page 227 and 228:
:o~~inlcrcinl Law Dcvclopmc~it Prog
Page 229 and 230:
htlook Tr;iilii~~y for NCJS Judicia
Page 231 and 232:
File Nnmc T~.slitrg Grottp Trcritti
Page 233 and 234:
.... .- .... - - .. .... Filc Ni~ri
Page 235 and 236:
8 1.1 1.2 3.3 CMA V.3.U Tr~ri~ri~rg
Page 237:
I - -- - -- Legal Tcrlilinology Glo
show all

2003 - usaid/ofda

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?