Titel Kino 2-2000 - German Films
Titel Kino 2-2000 - German Films
Titel Kino 2-2000 - German Films
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Portrait of Ulrike Ottinger<br />
Ottinger’s films explore a<br />
world of difference defined<br />
by the tension and transfer<br />
between settled and nomadic<br />
cultures. Ottinger’s sense of<br />
this cultural transfer informs<br />
her documentary and her<br />
feature films. It is what marks<br />
the stations of her encounter<br />
with the other, whether recognizably<br />
exotic or simply<br />
but subtly unpredictable.<br />
Nomadic cultures – archaic or<br />
modern – occupy a margin<br />
where reality, the future, or<br />
the other uncontrollably<br />
begins. Metamorphosis and<br />
allegory are, accordingly,<br />
hallmarks of Ottinger’s<br />
visual language.<br />
From her prehistory as visual<br />
artist Ottinger brought to her<br />
take on film the principle<br />
of collage and an eye trained for<br />
composition. But what in turn<br />
drew her to film is that<br />
it is constitutively a medium<br />
of juxtaposition which can<br />
thus best convey the present<br />
tensions, for example, between<br />
parameters of the historical and of the modern, between<br />
stationary and moving perspectives, between global<br />
panoramas and the miniature. Reflecting the status of<br />
the medium as the high or late point of developments<br />
Starting her visual arts career in Munich and Paris (painting, works on paper, photography, performance),<br />
Ulrike Ottinger’s commitment to film took off with her move to Berlin, that archaeological site of<br />
political and psychic projections which served her through the 80s as a major source of inspiration for<br />
her exploration of the cinematic medium. The deconstructive momentum of Berlin is reflected in the<br />
difference Ottinger’s films make. In her films difference does not stop short between units or unities<br />
(those of cultural, national, or sexual identity, for example). In the encounter with the other, which these<br />
films explore, self finds itself, beside itself, crossed with and crossing through the other. And that’s the<br />
difference that sets Ottinger’s cinema apart.<br />
Her film credits are: Laokoon und Söhne (short, 1972/73), Berlin Fieber – Wolf Vostell<br />
(short, 1973), Die Betörung der blauen Matrosen (short, 1975), Madame X – Eine<br />
absolute Herrscherin (1977), Bildnis einer Trinkerin – Aller jamais retour (1979),<br />
Freak Orlando (1981), Dorian Gray im Spiegel der Boulevardpresse (1984), China.<br />
Die Künste – Der Alltag (1985), Superbia – Der Stolz (short, 1986), Usinimage<br />
(short, 1987), Johanna d’Arc of Mongolia (1988), Countdown (1990), Taiga (1992), Exil<br />
Shanghai (1997).<br />
STATIONS OF<br />
THE CROSSING<br />
Ulrike Ottinger<br />
beginning with the printing<br />
press, Ottinger makes her<br />
movies at the stations of the<br />
crossing of the legible with the<br />
irreducibly visual, of narrative<br />
with tableau.<br />
Her first feature, Madame<br />
X – Eine absolute<br />
Herrscherin, prefigures all<br />
her subsequent movies. It<br />
made Ottinger a sensational<br />
figure of controversy. This<br />
ostensible „lesbian-feminist<br />
pirate film“ in turn challenged<br />
certain assumptions of feminist<br />
politics by keeping its focus<br />
fixed on the troubling doubling<br />
of gender. Her next feature,<br />
Bildnis einer Trinkerin,<br />
which Jonathan Rosenbaum<br />
judged in 1983<br />
to be “an uncategorizable<br />
masterpiece so sui generis<br />
that influences seem hardly<br />
relevant at all to the synthesis<br />
achieved“, established her<br />
reputation as one of the<br />
leading European art<br />
cinema directors.<br />
Bildnis einer Trinkerin is the first part of Ottinger’s 1980s<br />
trilogy, which continued with Freak Orlando and concluded<br />
with Dorian Gray im Spiegel der Boulevardpresse. The<br />
Berlin setting holds these films together. In Ottinger’s allegorical<br />
11