23.04.2013 Views

Blackwell Readings in Medieval Philosophy - Fordham University ...

Blackwell Readings in Medieval Philosophy - Fordham University ...

Blackwell Readings in Medieval Philosophy - Fordham University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MP_A02.qxd 11/17/06 5:26 PM Page 1<br />

General Introduction<br />

<strong>Medieval</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>in</strong> Perspective<br />

In the modern m<strong>in</strong>d, the adjective “medieval” has often been associated with ideas of<br />

darkness, dogmatism, oppression, and barbarity. This should not be surpris<strong>in</strong>g, if we consider<br />

how modernity came to def<strong>in</strong>e itself, precisely <strong>in</strong> opposition to the medieval tradition,<br />

as the Renaissance, the re-birth of ancient learn<strong>in</strong>g, the Reformation of a corrupt church, the<br />

Enlightenment after an age of darkness, an Age of Reason after an age of ignorance and bl<strong>in</strong>d<br />

faith. Even today, this mentality has its visible effects. To the <strong>in</strong>tellectual reflexes of “the<br />

modern m<strong>in</strong>d” referred to above, the very phrase “medieval philosophy” until fairly recently<br />

sounded almost like an oxymoron, <strong>in</strong>deed, so much so that <strong>in</strong> modern curricula of the history<br />

of philosophy the medieval period was barely mentioned, and even nowadays it is skipped<br />

by some philosophy departments, boldly leap<strong>in</strong>g from ancient philosophy directly to the study<br />

of Descartes (ignor<strong>in</strong>g about two thousand years of Western <strong>in</strong>tellectual history).<br />

To be sure, this situation is happily chang<strong>in</strong>g. In the larger scheme of th<strong>in</strong>gs this is probably<br />

due to the fact that we live <strong>in</strong> a postmodern period, <strong>in</strong> which the grand, def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ideas<br />

of modernity itself have become at least questionable, if not discredited, as a result of modern<br />

historical experience (th<strong>in</strong>k world wars, <strong>in</strong>dustrialized genocides, global exploitation of<br />

people and nature, the manipulative uses of “values,” ideologies and religions, etc.). This<br />

postmodern perspective, by reveal<strong>in</strong>g the various limitations of the “grand ideas” of modernity,<br />

naturally prompts historical and philosophical reflection on their validity <strong>in</strong> history,<br />

and thus on their emergence from developments <strong>in</strong> the medieval period.<br />

But, on a smaller scale, recent developments <strong>in</strong> philosophy as a profession also promoted<br />

the grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> medieval philosophy. Perhaps the most important of these recent<br />

changes is the transformation of ma<strong>in</strong>stream analytic philosophy. Be<strong>in</strong>g the descendant<br />

of early twentieth-century logical positivism, analytic philosophy used to be strongly<br />

anti-metaphysical, secularist, and ahistorical (<strong>in</strong>deed, sometimes anti-historical: it was not<br />

uncommon among analytic philosophers to sneer at the work of their historian colleagues<br />

as consist<strong>in</strong>g of book reports, as opposed to serious philosophy). By the 1980s (if not<br />

earlier), however, analytic metaphysics emerged as a legitimate philosophical discipl<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

followed by analytic philosophy of religion and a new <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> analytic historical studies,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!