THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEANDERTHALOID AUSTRA-
THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEANDERTHALOID AUSTRA-
THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEANDERTHALOID AUSTRA-
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Description of a Neanderthaloid Australian Skull<br />
between 35 and 40 mm. Several skulls of the Roth collection were found by<br />
Klaatsch in which the distance was between 45 and 50 mm. (R. 24, R. 28,<br />
R. 57, R. 62). All these examples contrast with the European where the<br />
depression is usually placed closer to the glabella (Schwalbe, quoted by<br />
Klaatsch). Klaatsch measured the greatest supraorbital breadth, i.e., the<br />
distance between the ectorbital prominences which overhang the frontozygomatic<br />
suture. The degree of development of the external angular process<br />
is then given by comparing this measurement with the post-orbital diameter.<br />
The smaller the index the larger and more prominent is the external angular<br />
process and we may note that the index in No. 792 is slightly below that of<br />
Pithecanthropus and the Spy skulls.<br />
(b) The Cranial Vault. In No. 792 the distance of the inferior temporal<br />
lines from the sagittal suture in a projection is 45 mm. in the frontal region<br />
(fig. 1); in the anterior parietal region it is approximately the same (45.5 mm.).<br />
The two temporal lines are separated from one another by a distance of 5 mm.<br />
even when only a short distance above the fronto-zygomatic suture. They<br />
diverge somewhat from one another and at the' coronal suture are separated<br />
by an interval of 15 mm. On crossing this they both deviate upwards and<br />
skirt the upper margin of the parietal eminence.<br />
The interval between the temporal lines is occupied by a well-marked<br />
bregmatic eminence forming a diamond-shaped area somewhat spread out<br />
both from side to side and from before backwards, approximating to the<br />
condition found in the W.A. B. 10283 (Australian Museum) skull. The<br />
anterior angle of this eminence which can be traced forwards to the supraorbital<br />
depression forms a torus frontalis medianus.<br />
Posteriorly the bregmatic eminence continues to the vertex (fig. 7); the<br />
highest point of the eminence is situated behind the bregma. The general<br />
form of the eminence in No. 792 is intermediate between the broad, flat<br />
elevation seen in the female Tasmanian in the Australian Museum and the<br />
more sharply defined eminence of Pithecanthropus. E. 11348 and S. 1158<br />
(Australian Museum) have a similar eminence to No. 792, but it is separated<br />
posteriorly by a distinct depression from the vertex as in Pithecanthropus<br />
and R. 60. The receding forehead presents on either side of the torus frontalis<br />
medianus practically no signs of tubera frontalis.<br />
In No. 792 the parietal eminences although present, are ill-developed, the<br />
interparietal diameter (117 mm.) being 15 mm. less than the greatest width<br />
(132 mm.) which coincides with the supramastoid breadth.<br />
Turner (21), referring to the parietal bone in the Tasmanian aboriginal,<br />
states that "in the postero-parietal region a broad, shallow, median depressed<br />
area exists, bounded laterally by a low ridge on the parietal bone and along<br />
the middle of this depression the sagittal suture lies below the general plane<br />
of the vault." This condition is also to be observed in the skull of the Australian<br />
aboriginal, e.g., in No. 791, No. 618, R. 78, R. 45, R. 17, R. 14. R. 8 and R. 12,<br />
but is absent in No. 792.<br />
45