Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage
Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage
Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
OVERVIEW<br />
10<br />
15 Changes which would harm the heritage values of a significant place should<br />
be unacceptable unless:<br />
a. the changes are demonstrably necessary either to make the place<br />
sustainable, or to meet an overriding public policy objective or need;<br />
b. there is no reasonably practicable alternative means of doing so without<br />
harm;<br />
c. that harm has been reduced to the minimum consistent with achieving<br />
the objective;<br />
d. it has been demonstrated that the predicted public benefit decisively<br />
outweighs the harm to the values of the place, considering:<br />
• its comparative significance,<br />
• the impact on that significance, <strong>and</strong><br />
• the benefits to the place itself <strong>and</strong>/or the wider community or society<br />
as a whole.<br />
16 Enabling development to secure the future of a significant place should be<br />
unacceptable unless:<br />
a. it will not materially harm the heritage values of the place or its setting<br />
b. it avoids detrimental fragmentation of management of the place;<br />
c. it will secure the long term future of the place <strong>and</strong>, where applicable,<br />
its continued use for a sympathetic purpose;<br />
d. it is necessary to resolve problems arising from the inherent needs of<br />
the place, rather than the circumstances of the present owner, or the<br />
purchase price paid;<br />
e. sufficient subsidy is not available from any other source;<br />
f. it is demonstrated that the amount of enabling development is the<br />
minimum necessary to secure the future of the place, <strong>and</strong> that its form<br />
minimises harm to other public interests;<br />
g. the public benefit of securing the future of the heritage asset through<br />
such enabling development decisively outweighs the disbenefits of<br />
breaching other public policies.<br />
17 We conclude with a general statement about Applying the <strong>Principles</strong> (page 67),<br />
acknowledging that the cultural <strong>and</strong> natural heritage values of significant places,<br />
including those reflected in l<strong>and</strong>scape designations, should be managed in<br />
parallel, fostering close working relationships between cultural <strong>and</strong> natural<br />
heritage interests. Finally, we provide a set of key Definitions (pages 71-72).