29.04.2013 Views

Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage

Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage

Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OVERVIEW<br />

10<br />

15 Changes which would harm the heritage values of a significant place should<br />

be unacceptable unless:<br />

a. the changes are demonstrably necessary either to make the place<br />

sustainable, or to meet an overriding public policy objective or need;<br />

b. there is no reasonably practicable alternative means of doing so without<br />

harm;<br />

c. that harm has been reduced to the minimum consistent with achieving<br />

the objective;<br />

d. it has been demonstrated that the predicted public benefit decisively<br />

outweighs the harm to the values of the place, considering:<br />

• its comparative significance,<br />

• the impact on that significance, <strong>and</strong><br />

• the benefits to the place itself <strong>and</strong>/or the wider community or society<br />

as a whole.<br />

16 Enabling development to secure the future of a significant place should be<br />

unacceptable unless:<br />

a. it will not materially harm the heritage values of the place or its setting<br />

b. it avoids detrimental fragmentation of management of the place;<br />

c. it will secure the long term future of the place <strong>and</strong>, where applicable,<br />

its continued use for a sympathetic purpose;<br />

d. it is necessary to resolve problems arising from the inherent needs of<br />

the place, rather than the circumstances of the present owner, or the<br />

purchase price paid;<br />

e. sufficient subsidy is not available from any other source;<br />

f. it is demonstrated that the amount of enabling development is the<br />

minimum necessary to secure the future of the place, <strong>and</strong> that its form<br />

minimises harm to other public interests;<br />

g. the public benefit of securing the future of the heritage asset through<br />

such enabling development decisively outweighs the disbenefits of<br />

breaching other public policies.<br />

17 We conclude with a general statement about Applying the <strong>Principles</strong> (page 67),<br />

acknowledging that the cultural <strong>and</strong> natural heritage values of significant places,<br />

including those reflected in l<strong>and</strong>scape designations, should be managed in<br />

parallel, fostering close working relationships between cultural <strong>and</strong> natural<br />

heritage interests. Finally, we provide a set of key Definitions (pages 71-72).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!