Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage
Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage
Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance - English Heritage
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ENGLISH HERITAGE CONSERVATION POLICIES AND GUIDANCE<br />
125 Intervention must be justified primarily by considering the potential gain in<br />
knowledge in relation to the impact on the archaeological resource, <strong>and</strong><br />
specifically on the place or type of site in question. Established, relevant<br />
research framework priorities should be taken into account. Intervention<br />
should always be the minimum necessary to achieve the research objectives,<br />
fully utilising the potential of non-destructive techniques; but also extensive<br />
enough to ensure that the full research potential of what is necessarily to be<br />
destroyed in the process can be realised.<br />
Restoration<br />
126 Restoration to a significant place should normally be acceptable if:<br />
a. the heritage values of the elements that would be restored decisively<br />
outweigh the values of those that would be lost;<br />
b. the work proposed is justified by compelling evidence of the evolution<br />
of the place, <strong>and</strong> is executed in accordance with that evidence;<br />
c. the form in which the place currently exists is not the result of an<br />
historically-significant event;<br />
d. the work proposed respects previous forms of the place;<br />
e. the maintenance implications of the proposed restoration are considered<br />
to be sustainable.<br />
127 Restoration is intervention made with the deliberate intention of revealing<br />
or recovering a known element of heritage value that has been eroded,<br />
obscured or previously removed, rather than simply maintaining the status quo.<br />
It may also achieve other conservation benefits, for example restoring a roof<br />
on a roofless building may make it both physically <strong>and</strong> economically sustainable<br />
in the long term. Restoration of some elements of a place may be a desirable<br />
precursor to the introduction of new work (paragraph 138), which will<br />
necessarily take over where the evidence for restoration ends.<br />
128 The concept of authenticity (paragraph 91) dem<strong>and</strong>s that proposals for<br />
restoration always require particularly careful justification. Reinstating damaged<br />
elements of work directly created by the h<strong>and</strong> of an artist normally runs<br />
counter to the idea of authenticity <strong>and</strong> integrity. However, the reinstatement<br />
of damaged architectural or l<strong>and</strong>scape features in accordance with an historic<br />
design evidenced by the fabric of a place may not do so, if the design itself was<br />
the artistic creation, intended to be constructed by others, <strong>and</strong> the necessary<br />
materials <strong>and</strong> skills are available.<br />
129 Mitigation through recording (paragraph 104) is particularly important in<br />
restoration work. The results should be integrated with <strong>and</strong> used to update<br />
the initial analysis of the evidence for restoration (which will often be<br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> modified in detail during the early stages of work), <strong>and</strong><br />
the result deposited in the appropriate Historic Environment Record.<br />
55