29.04.2013 Views

irradiation of dissolving pulp by electron beams - Lenzing

irradiation of dissolving pulp by electron beams - Lenzing

irradiation of dissolving pulp by electron beams - Lenzing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In a wide range <strong>of</strong> CS2 input (36% to 26%<br />

calculated on a-cellulose) and AR from 0.60<br />

down to 0.47 no significant differente in viscose<br />

quality between the irradiated samples and the<br />

conventionally pre-aged <strong>pulp</strong> was observed.<br />

Upon increase <strong>of</strong> the cellulose content up to<br />

115.7% <strong>of</strong> Standard, no benefit was observed <strong>by</strong><br />

using irradiated <strong>pulp</strong>. Only in case <strong>of</strong> a drastic<br />

reduct-ion <strong>of</strong> the input chemicals down to 22%<br />

CS; and AR 0.5 the irradiated <strong>pulp</strong> gave a better<br />

viscose quality than the reference <strong>pulp</strong> under the<br />

same conditions (Figures 5 and 6). The same<br />

trials iperformed at the 2kg Pilot plant did not<br />

show any statistical differente between irradiated<br />

and conventionally pre-aged <strong>pulp</strong> (Table 2).<br />

B~JW&KLS. There seems to be a slight tendency<br />

to lower trithiocarbonate formation in the viscose<br />

made from the irradiated <strong>pulp</strong>.<br />

Fibre properties. Viscose <strong>of</strong> reduced CS2 content<br />

showed good spinning properties, the spinning<br />

conditions were not optimized. Tenacity and<br />

elonga.tion were not significantly influenced <strong>by</strong><br />

the use <strong>of</strong> irradiated <strong>pulp</strong>, the tendency is slightly<br />

better for aged <strong>pulp</strong>.<br />

Tenacity and elongation were significantly<br />

impaired <strong>by</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> CS2 Charge using<br />

Standard spinning conditions (Figure 7).<br />

69<br />

Brightness and yellowing <strong>of</strong> fibres were<br />

nega.tively influenced <strong>by</strong> both the use <strong>of</strong><br />

irrad.iated <strong>pulp</strong> and the reduction <strong>of</strong> CS2 Charge<br />

(Figure 8).<br />

Table 2. Results <strong>of</strong> trials at a Pilot plant [averagehange].<br />

conventional irradiated<br />

CS2 l%l Std. 22 Std. 22<br />

Alkali ratio Std. 0.5 Std. 0.5<br />

unfiltered viscose<br />

Filter value, PVC 452 252 393 1156 335 /IO3<br />

125 1167<br />

Filter value, 77 144 230 117169 123 139<br />

KWP 1230<br />

Total particle 12.4 28.3 18.6/17.1 22.1 /3.2<br />

volume [ppm] 17.8 140.0<br />

Time for 43 78 60 70<br />

filtration, min.<br />

viscose spinning dope<br />

Filter value, PVC 528 233 528 134 439 132<br />

/186 /121<br />

Filter value, 26112 47116 40115 43 145<br />

KWP<br />

Total particle 1.2 2.5 1.4 IO.5 1.3 IO.3<br />

volume [ppm] IO.6 11.8<br />

Ball fall [sec] 49 83 60 93<br />

Ripening ind., “H 14.7 6.5 15.9 7.8<br />

aged Standard irradiated aged 22% CS2; AR irradiated 22%<br />

Standard 0.5 CS2; AR 0.5<br />

Figure 7. Tenacity and elongation <strong>of</strong> fibers at standarcl spinning conditions (Pilot plant trials).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!