- Page 1 and 2: A CONTINGENT VALUATION OF RIVER WAT
- Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My sincere gratitu
- Page 5 and 6: Four estuaries, the Swartkops, Kari
- Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS Abbreviations…………
- Page 9 and 10: 2.3.3 Step 3: Calculating average b
- Page 11 and 12: 5.6 Identifying the target populati
- Page 13 and 14: 9.3 Conclusion on the appropriatene
- Page 15 and 16: 7.1 Number of questionnaires comple
- Page 17 and 18: 7.12 Relative importance attached t
- Page 20 and 21: CHAPTER 1: SOUTH AFRICAN ESTUARIES
- Page 22 and 23: for the estuaries. The study builds
- Page 24 and 25: 1.3.3 Estuarine bays/lagoons Estuar
- Page 26 and 27: 1.4.2 Sedimentation River mouth clo
- Page 28 and 29: The biggest estuary in SA is St Luc
- Page 30 and 31: 1.6.6 Mangroves Mangroves are trees
- Page 32 and 33: SA. Often, estuaries have unique bi
- Page 34 and 35: it can result in increases in the a
- Page 36 and 37: freshwater to estuaries. Recently e
- Page 38 and 39: 2.1 The market for estuary services
- Page 40 and 41: However, the value thereby lost is
- Page 44 and 45: 2.3.1.3 The payment vehicle The pay
- Page 46 and 47: left to state a figure based on the
- Page 48 and 49: to the estuary. For this reason, st
- Page 50 and 51: The approach assumes that sample si
- Page 52 and 53: 2.3.5.1 Incentives to misrepresent
- Page 54 and 55: wrong answers and responses that ar
- Page 56 and 57: plausibility of the questions and h
- Page 58 and 59: CHAPTER 3: THE SWARTKOPS ESTUARY In
- Page 60 and 61: egion and supplies water to the tow
- Page 62 and 63: Swartkops estuary is incised chiefl
- Page 64 and 65: visitors and the public in general
- Page 66 and 67: 3.3.3 Uses of the Swartkops estuary
- Page 68 and 69: Table 3.4: Once-a-month count of bo
- Page 70 and 71: 3.3.3.2 Subsistence uses Bait colle
- Page 72 and 73: complain that competition with ille
- Page 74 and 75: 3.4 Identifying the target populati
- Page 76 and 77: Table 3.8: Monthly flow volumes of
- Page 78 and 79: CHAPTER 4: THE KARIEGA ESTUARY Chap
- Page 80 and 81: length. The system has a low turbid
- Page 82 and 83: Figure 4.2: Street Map of Kenton-on
- Page 84 and 85: municipality have been investigated
- Page 86 and 87: 4.5.1 Recreational uses Boating: Th
- Page 88 and 89: 4.5.3 Commercial and industrial use
- Page 90 and 91: swimming and other activities commo
- Page 92 and 93:
Table 4.5: Monthly flow volumes of
- Page 94 and 95:
5.1 Physical description of the Mng
- Page 96 and 97:
5.3 Water demand in the OR Tambo di
- Page 98 and 99:
Figure 5.3: The Port St Johns Water
- Page 100 and 101:
The Post Office said fishing permit
- Page 102 and 103:
5.5.2 Subsistence uses Villagers re
- Page 104 and 105:
harvesting permits (KZN subsistence
- Page 106 and 107:
5.6 Identifying the target populati
- Page 108 and 109:
Table 5.3: Mngazi River Bungalows v
- Page 110 and 111:
winter. After this water levels bui
- Page 112 and 113:
Mngazana River itself is approximat
- Page 114 and 115:
Avicennia and usually in or near wa
- Page 116 and 117:
6.5 Water demand around the Mngazan
- Page 118 and 119:
Picnicking: The banks of the Mngaza
- Page 120 and 121:
main type of farm activity in the a
- Page 122 and 123:
An account of field experiences dur
- Page 124 and 125:
questions were unanswered (except f
- Page 126 and 127:
and Mngazana estuaries (Table 7.3).
- Page 128 and 129:
good understanding of the functions
- Page 130 and 131:
7.7), indicating that a significant
- Page 132 and 133:
No. of people 250 200 150 100 50 0
- Page 134 and 135:
No of respondents 140 120 100 80 60
- Page 136 and 137:
and Mngazana) travelled shorter dis
- Page 138 and 139:
In the light of these statistical f
- Page 140 and 141:
Due to the respondents refusing to
- Page 142 and 143:
8.3.2 Results and interpretation Re
- Page 144 and 145:
8.4.2 Results and interpretation Th
- Page 146 and 147:
8.5.2 Results and interpretation Fo
- Page 148 and 149:
In the predictive model the adjuste
- Page 150 and 151:
• The model is well fitted based
- Page 152 and 153:
• For the Swartkops and Mngazana
- Page 154 and 155:
Table 9.1: TWTP - selected estuarie
- Page 156 and 157:
9.1.3 Size of user population By de
- Page 158 and 159:
139 particular turned out to be too
- Page 160 and 161:
Table 9.4: The Kariega estuary user
- Page 162 and 163:
Table 9.6: The Mngazana estuary use
- Page 164 and 165:
BAIRD, D., MARAIS, J.F.K. AND BATE,
- Page 166 and 167:
BREEN, C. AND MCKENZIE, M. (2001).
- Page 168 and 169:
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
- Page 170 and 171:
HANLEY, N. AND SPASH, C.L. (1993).
- Page 172 and 173:
LOFGREN, K-G. (1995). Market and ex
- Page 174 and 175:
NELSON MANDELA METROPOLITAN MUNICIP
- Page 176 and 177:
SCHALACHER, T.A. AND WOOLDRIDGE, T.
- Page 178 and 179:
WHITFIELD, A.K. (2000). Available S
- Page 180 and 181:
Region ¹ Mouth type ¹ Scientific
- Page 182 and 183:
Region ¹ M outh ty pe ¹ S c ienti
- Page 184 and 185:
Region ¹ Mouth type ¹ Scientific
- Page 186 and 187:
FILL IN THE GAPS IN THE PERSON’S
- Page 188 and 189:
12. WHAT LEVY PER YEAR ARE YOU WILL
- Page 190 and 191:
171 19. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER COMME
- Page 192 and 193:
high security, including patrols by
- Page 194 and 195:
APPENDIX 5: Some common fish found
- Page 196 and 197:
APPENDIX 7: Some common birds found
- Page 198 and 199:
APPENDIX 9: Field experiences - Mng
- Page 200 and 201:
APPENDIX 10: Some common fish found
- Page 202 and 203:
owned by white people from all arou
- Page 204 and 205:
APPENDIX 13:Trees of the Mngazi and
- Page 206 and 207:
APPENDIX 15: Example of monthly fis
- Page 208 and 209:
APPENDIX 16: Example of annual fish
- Page 210 and 211:
APPENDIX 17: Information brochure h
- Page 212 and 213:
“The entire issue as far as the u
- Page 214:
WHITFIELD, A.K. (2000). Available S