15.05.2013 Views

DANGEROUS CROSSING: - International Campaign for Tibet

DANGEROUS CROSSING: - International Campaign for Tibet

DANGEROUS CROSSING: - International Campaign for Tibet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>DANGEROUS</strong> <strong>CROSSING</strong>S: CONDITIONS IMPACTING THE FLIGHT OF TIBETAN REFUGEES, 2011<br />

60<br />

can lead to arrests, detentions and, most commonly, the extraction of<br />

bribes. In order to avoid the danger of this, explained an ICT source,<br />

undocumented <strong>Tibet</strong>ans employ strategies such as self-imposed curfews<br />

to reduce the likelihood of being stopped by police in the evening.<br />

Likewise, the head of a <strong>Tibet</strong>an NGO in the Boudha area of Kathmandu<br />

said: “I keep my <strong>Tibet</strong>an staff who don’t have RCs behind the scenes so<br />

that if any Nepali authorities visit and questions us, I don’t put my staff<br />

in danger.” 153<br />

In 2002, the <strong>Tibet</strong> Justice Center, an American NGO, speculated that<br />

the stalled issuing and renewal of refugee cards was due to “bureaucratic<br />

inefficiencies, rather than any desire [on the Nepal government’s<br />

side] to withhold status from <strong>Tibet</strong>ans legally residing in Nepal.” 154 Ten<br />

years on, with no change, it seems clear that political decisions underpin<br />

this bureaucratic stalemate. This is backed by the fact that in 1998,<br />

the Nepal government proved it was capable of producing RCs when<br />

it suddenly began processing RCs to <strong>Tibet</strong>ans in the Kathmandu valley,<br />

although the process was just as suddenly suspended.<br />

<strong>Tibet</strong>ans interviewed <strong>for</strong> this report raised the issue of refugee documentation<br />

as a matter of significant concern in their lives. Lack of documentation<br />

is at the root of many of the socio-economic challenges they<br />

face, and leaves them vulnerable to human rights violations. At a practical<br />

level, such documentation should be in the Nepal government’s interests,<br />

as it would enable them to keep track of refugee numbers. On<br />

a political level, keeping <strong>Tibet</strong>ans in a grey zone facilitates deniability of<br />

their status as “refugees,” which curries favor with China, and keeps<br />

them separated from civil society and its legitimate expectations from<br />

the Nepal government.<br />

2) Citizenship<br />

Although rare, there are some <strong>Tibet</strong>ans living in Nepal who have one<br />

of two <strong>for</strong>ms of Nepali citizenship known as nagrikta and angrikta.<br />

Angrikta is a <strong>for</strong>m of citizenship that was handed out to the <strong>Tibet</strong>an<br />

guerilla fighters after they were <strong>for</strong>ced to lay down their arms in Nepal<br />

in 1974. In a gesture after the conflict, King Mahendra decided to <strong>for</strong>malize<br />

the status of <strong>Tibet</strong>an guerilla fighters who settled in Nepal, and<br />

some 1,500 <strong>Tibet</strong>ans were given citizenship. Thereafter, their offspring<br />

would be born as Nepali citizens. In the late 1970s, the Nepal government<br />

rolled out a program to give citizenship (Nepali: nagrikta) to hundreds<br />

of thousands of inhabitants of the Himalayan region – including

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!