Prospectus - SBM Offshore
Prospectus - SBM Offshore
Prospectus - SBM Offshore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(y) Employee, agent or partner misconduct or failure to comply with anti-corruption and other<br />
government laws and regulations could harm the Group's reputation, reduce its revenue and profit,<br />
and subject it to administrative, criminal and civil enforcement actions.<br />
Misconduct, fraud or non-compliance with applicable government laws and regulations, or other improper<br />
activities by any of the Group's employees, agents or partners could have an adverse effect on its business and<br />
reputation. Such misconduct could include the failure to comply with government procurement regulations,<br />
competition laws and regulations, regulations regarding the protection of classified information, regulations<br />
prohibiting bribery and other foreign corrupt practices, regulations regarding the pricing of labour and other<br />
costs in government contracts, regulations on lobbying or similar activities, regulations pertaining to the<br />
internal controls over financial reporting, environmental laws and any other applicable laws or regulations.<br />
The policies within the Group enforce compliance with these regulations and laws and the Group takes<br />
precautions intended to prevent and detect misconduct. However, since the Group's internal controls are<br />
subject to inherent limitations, including human error, it is possible that these controls could be intentionally<br />
circumvented or become inadequate because of changed conditions. As a result, the Group cannot ensure that<br />
its controls will protect it from reckless or criminal acts committed by its employees, agents, partners and<br />
others. Failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or acts of misconduct could subject the Group to<br />
fines and penalties and suspension or debarment from contracting, any or all of which could harm the Group's<br />
business and reputation, subject the Group to administrative, criminal and civil enforcement actions and<br />
adversely affect its business, results and financial condition.<br />
(z) The Company may have violated anti-corruption laws, which, if true, could harm the Company's<br />
reputation, reduce its revenue and profit, and result in monetary penalties, criminal and civil<br />
sanctions and other remedies.<br />
An investigation was commenced in 2012 at the request of the Company into allegations that certain payments<br />
involving sales intermediaries in certain African countries in the period 2007 through 2011 violated anticorruption<br />
laws. These allegations came to the attention of the Management Board in February 2012, after a<br />
review of the Company's compliance procedures in late 2011. The investigation is being carried out by outside<br />
legal counsel and forensic accountants, with the support of the Company's Chief Governance and Compliance<br />
Officer and under the oversight of the Audit Committee. The investigation is expected to be completed in<br />
2013, although the timing of completion depends in part on further discussions with authorities.<br />
As the investigation is not yet concluded, the Company cannot make any conclusive statements regarding the<br />
findings of the investigation. However, indications have surfaced that the Company has paid substantial sums,<br />
mostly through intermediaries, which appear to have been intended for governmental officials. The<br />
Management Board, which was appointed in the course of 2012, has found it necessary and appropriate to<br />
increase awareness of proper compliance throughout the Company up to the highest management levels. In the<br />
course of the investigation allegations were made that improper payments were also made in countries outside<br />
Africa, but to date no conclusive proof of those allegations has been established.<br />
The Company voluntarily disclosed the investigation to the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (Openbaar<br />
Ministerie) (OM) and the United States Department of Justice (DoJ) in 2012. The Company agreed to<br />
periodically update the OM and the DoJ regarding the investigation.<br />
The Company is unable to estimate the ultimate consequences, financial and otherwise, if any, of the payments<br />
which led to this investigation at this time. Further, violations of law or compliance procedures may have<br />
occurred in the same or other jurisdictions, in which the Company's management may have been involved.<br />
Failure to comply with anti-corruption laws could give rise to criminal prosecution by the OM, the DoJ or any<br />
local authorities, civil claims or administrative proceedings against the Company. This could result in the<br />
Company paying damages or significant fines or penalties imposed by the OM, the DoJ or any local<br />
authorities, as well as disgorgements, debarment or other remedies. Under US anti-corruption laws, the<br />
maximum fine is calculated under a multi-step process set out in the advisory "Federal Sentencing Guidelines"<br />
and could have a material financial impact on the Company. The Company may also have to divert significant<br />
0105735-0000002 AMCO:5624830.1 36