20.05.2013 Views

Optimal transport, Euler equations, Mather and DiPerna-Lions theories

Optimal transport, Euler equations, Mather and DiPerna-Lions theories

Optimal transport, Euler equations, Mather and DiPerna-Lions theories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.3. SUB-RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS 15<br />

Theorem 1.3.1 Let µ <strong>and</strong> ν be (compactly supported) probability measures, with µ absolutely<br />

continuous with respect to vol. Assume that there exists an open set Ω ⊂ M × M such that<br />

supp(µ × ν) ⊂ Ω, <strong>and</strong> d2 SR is locally semiconcave (resp. locally Lipschitz) on Ω \ D. Then there<br />

exists a function φ : M → R, <strong>and</strong> an open set A ⊂ M, such that φ is locally semiconcave inside<br />

A, <strong>and</strong> the unique optimal <strong>transport</strong> map is given by<br />

T (x) :=<br />

expx(− dφ(x)) if x ∈ A,<br />

x if x ∈ M \ A.<br />

We see that we can recover more or less the st<strong>and</strong>ard Riemannian result, simply splitting<br />

the <strong>transport</strong> map in two sets suitably chosen. The key points with respect to previous results<br />

in the sub-Riemannian setting are:<br />

1) We do not make any assumption of regularity on the sub-Riemannian distance on the<br />

diagonal (all previous results assumed at least the function d2 SR to be Lipschitz on the<br />

diagonal, like in the Heisenberg group).<br />

2) We can prove a “second order regularity” of the function φ appearing in the formula for<br />

the <strong>transport</strong> map (recall indeed that semiconcave function are twice differentiable a.e.)<br />

In particular, thanks to 2), we can prove a weak regularity property of the optimal <strong>transport</strong><br />

map, as in the Riemannian case. This allows for instance to write (for the first time, to our<br />

knowledge) a weak formulation of Monge-Ampère equation in a sub-Riemannian setting:<br />

Theorem 1.3.2 With the same assumption of Theorem 1.3.1, the optimal <strong>transport</strong> map is<br />

differentiable µ-a.e. inside A, it is approximately differentiable at µ-a.e. x. Moreover<br />

Y (x) := d(exp x) −dφ(x) <strong>and</strong> H(x) := 1<br />

2 Hess dSR(·, T (x)) 2 |z=x<br />

exists for µ-a.e. x ∈ A, <strong>and</strong> the approximate differential of T is given by the formula<br />

<br />

˜dxT<br />

Y (x) H(x) − Hess φ(x) if x ∈ A,<br />

=<br />

Id if x ∈ M \ A,<br />

where Id : TxM → TxM denotes the identity map.<br />

Finally, assuming both µ <strong>and</strong> ν absolutely continuous with respect to the volume measure,<br />

<strong>and</strong> denoting by f <strong>and</strong> g their respective density, the following Jacobian identity holds:<br />

<br />

det ˜dxT <br />

f(x)<br />

= = 0 µ-a.e. (1.3.3)<br />

g(T (x))<br />

In particular φ satisfies in a weak sense the Monge-Ampère type equation<br />

det H(x) − Hess φ(x) =<br />

f(x)<br />

| det(Y (x))|g(T (x))<br />

for µ-a.e. x ∈ A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!