Optimal transport, Euler equations, Mather and DiPerna-Lions theories
Optimal transport, Euler equations, Mather and DiPerna-Lions theories
Optimal transport, Euler equations, Mather and DiPerna-Lions theories
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.5. THE (ANISOTROPIC) ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY 23<br />
An application to Cheeger sets<br />
A Cheeger set E for an open subset Ω ⊂ Rn , n ≥ 2, is any minimizer of the variational problem<br />
<br />
P (E)<br />
cm(Ω) := inf | E ⊂ Ω, 0 < |E| < ∞ .<br />
|E| m<br />
In order to avoid trivial situations, it is assumed that Ω has finite measure <strong>and</strong> that the parameter<br />
m satisfies the constraint<br />
n − 1<br />
m > . (1.5.9)<br />
n<br />
An interesting question is how to provide lower bounds on cm(Ω) in terms of geometric properties<br />
of Ω. The basic estimate in this direction is the Cheeger inequality,<br />
|Ω| m−(n−1)/n cm(Ω) ≥ |B| m−(n−1)/n cm(B) , (1.5.10)<br />
where B is the Euclidean unit ball. The bound is sharp, in the sense that equality holds in<br />
(1.5.10) if <strong>and</strong> only if Ω = x0 + rB for some x0 ∈ R n <strong>and</strong> r > 0. In [20] we strengthen this lower<br />
bound in terms of the Fraenkel asymmetry of Ω<br />
A(Ω) := inf<br />
x∈Rn <br />
|Ω∆Br(x)|<br />
|E|<br />
<br />
: |Br| = |E| ,<br />
Theorem 1.5.3 Let Ω be an open set in Rn , n ≥ 2, with |Ω| < ∞, <strong>and</strong> let m satisfy (1.5.9).<br />
Then<br />
|Ω| m−(n−1)/n cm(Ω) ≥ |B| m−(n−1)/n <br />
2<br />
A(Ω)<br />
cm(B) 1 +<br />
,<br />
C(n, m)<br />
where C(n, m) is a constant depending only on n <strong>and</strong> m. A possible value for C(m, n) is given<br />
by<br />
2<br />
C(n, m) =<br />
+ C0(n),<br />
m − (n − 1)/n<br />
where C0(n) is the constant defined in Theorem 1.5.1.<br />
1.5.2 An isoperimetric-type inequality on constant curvature manifolds<br />
In the case of a Riemannian manifold (M, g), one can try to mimic Gromov’s proof to obtain an<br />
isoperimetric type inequality. However in this case things become extremely more complicated,<br />
since many computations which are trivial on R n involves second derivatives of the distance, <strong>and</strong><br />
so in particular Jacobi fields. In [16], in collaboration with Yuxin Ge, we succeeded in adapting<br />
Gromov’s argument to the case of the sphere <strong>and</strong> the hyperbolic space.<br />
More precisely, let M n (K) denote the n-dimensional simply connected Riemannian manifold<br />
with constant sectional curvature K ∈ R. Set c(x, y) := 1<br />
2 dg(x, y) 2 , where dg(x, y) is the geodesic<br />
distance between x <strong>and</strong> y on M, <strong>and</strong> for K ∈ R define<br />
⎧<br />
<br />
⎪⎨<br />
GK(r) :=<br />
⎪⎩<br />
( √ Kr) cos( √ Kr)<br />
sin( √ Kr)<br />
if K > 0,<br />
1<br />
<br />
if K = 0,<br />
if K < 0,<br />
( √ |K|r) cosh( √ |K|r)<br />
sinh( √ |K|r)