03.06.2013 Views

Agenda Item 9 - 12-0288 - Land off Edmondstown Road ...

Agenda Item 9 - 12-0288 - Land off Edmondstown Road ...

Agenda Item 9 - 12-0288 - Land off Edmondstown Road ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RHONDDA CYNON TAF COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL<br />

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL<br />

COMMITTEE<br />

1 NOVEMBER 20<strong>12</strong><br />

REPORT OF: SERVICE<br />

DIRECTOR PLANNING<br />

1. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT<br />

MUNICIPAL YEAR 20<strong>12</strong>-2013<br />

<strong>Agenda</strong> <strong>Item</strong> No. 9<br />

APPLICATION N0: <strong>12</strong>/<strong>0288</strong> -<br />

FARMHOUSE AND AGRICULTURAL<br />

SHED WITH ACCESS TO<br />

EDMONDSTOWN ROAD<br />

LAND OFF EDMONDSTOWN ROAD,<br />

EDMONDSTOWN<br />

Members are asked to determine the above planning application.<br />

2. RECOMMENDATION<br />

That Members consider the proposals and my report thereon and<br />

determine the application having regard to the advice given.<br />

3. BACKGROUND<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

The application was originally reported to the meeting of the<br />

Development Control Committee on 6 September 20<strong>12</strong>. A copy of the<br />

report is attached at APPENDIX A. At this meeting Members resolved<br />

to defer determination for a site visit.<br />

The site inspection took place on 25 September 20<strong>12</strong> (APPENDIX B)<br />

and following this, the application was reported back to the<br />

Development Control Committee on 04 October 20<strong>12</strong>. At that meeting<br />

Members were minded to approve the application as it was considered<br />

the proposed development would not be visually intrusive within the<br />

rural setting nor does it represent an inappropriate development in the<br />

Green Wedge.<br />

Members conclusion that the proposed development would not be<br />

visually intrusive within the rural setting is fully appreciated. There is<br />

no objection to the principle of erecting an agricultural building at this<br />

location, however, there is concern with regards to the scale (that is,<br />

21.4m length by 13.7m wide by 5.4m high to its apex) and external<br />

appearance of the proposed agricultural shed. The shed would be<br />

clearly visible along the Public Right of Way that runs adjacent to and<br />

across the fields to the south and concern is raised that a building of<br />

the size proposed would appear unduly intrusive at this location.<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

1<br />

133


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

There is also some concern that the need for such a large building,<br />

which would lie wholly within a green wedge, has not been justified.<br />

Especially having regard to the size and use of the agricultural land<br />

which the applicants farm and a large area of this land being a Site of<br />

Special Scientific Interest and under land management agreements.<br />

Notwithstanding the above if Members are still minded to approve the<br />

application; then it is suggested that the following conditions are<br />

attached to the planning permission:<br />

1. The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the<br />

expiration of five years from the date of this permission.<br />

Reason: To comply with Sections 91 and 93 of the Town and<br />

Country Planning Act 1990.<br />

2. Building operations shall not be commenced until samples of the<br />

external materials of the dwelling and agricultural shed have<br />

been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning<br />

Authority and all materials used shall conform to the samples so<br />

approved.<br />

Reason: To ensure that the external appearance of the<br />

proposed development will be in keeping with the character of<br />

the area and adjoining buildings in the interests of visual<br />

amenity in accordance with Policies AW5 and AW6 of the<br />

Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development Plan.<br />

3. No development shall take place until there has been submitted<br />

to and approved by the Local Planning Authority a<br />

comprehensive scheme of landscaping for the dwelling and<br />

agricultural shed, which shall include indications of all existing<br />

trees (including spread and species) and hedgerows on the land<br />

and details of any to be retained together with measures for their<br />

protection during the course of development.<br />

Reason: To ensure that the new development will be visually<br />

attractive in the interests of amenity in accordance with Policies<br />

AW5 and AW6 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development<br />

Plan.<br />

4. All planting, seeding or turfing in the approved details of<br />

landscaping shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding<br />

season following the occupation of the building(s) or completion<br />

of the development, whichever is the sooner, and any trees or<br />

plants which within a period of five years from the completion of<br />

the development die, are removed or become seriously<br />

damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

2<br />

134


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

season with others of similar size and species, unless the Local<br />

Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation.<br />

Reason: To ensure that the new development will be visually<br />

attractive in the interests of amenity in accordance with Policies<br />

AW5 and AW6 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development<br />

Plan.<br />

5. No development shall take place until there has been submitted<br />

to approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority a plan<br />

indicating the positions, design, materials and type of boundary<br />

treatment to be erected. The boundary treatment shall be<br />

completed in accordance with the approved details before the<br />

development is brought into beneficial use and retained as such<br />

thereafter unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local<br />

Planning Authority.<br />

Reason: To ensure that the new development will be in keeping<br />

with the surrounding area and to protect residential amenity in<br />

accordance with Policies AW5 and AW6 of the Rhondda Cynon<br />

Taf Local Development Plan.<br />

6. Construction works on the development shall not take place<br />

other than during the following times:<br />

• Monday to Friday 0800 to 1800 hours<br />

• Saturday 0800 to 1300 hours<br />

• Not at any time on Sundays, Bank or Public holidays,<br />

unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning<br />

Authority.<br />

Reason: To ensure that the noise emitted from this<br />

development is not a source of nuisance to occupants of nearby<br />

residential properties in accordance with Policy AW5 of the<br />

Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development Plan.<br />

7. No development shall take place until drainage arrangements<br />

have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local<br />

Planning Authority, which shall include a Hydrological Impact<br />

Assessment including proposed mitigation, design details and a<br />

development program with respect to:<br />

a) protection of open and culverted sections of the existing<br />

watercourse during and after construction<br />

b) protection of properties downstream of the development<br />

from increased flood risk during and after construction<br />

owing to the development; and<br />

c) protection of properties within the development from flood<br />

risk<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

3<br />

135


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Reason: To ensure adequate disposal of foul and surface water<br />

drainage in accordance with Policy AW10 of the Rhondda<br />

Cynon Taf Local Development Plan.<br />

8. The development shall not be occupied until the drainage works<br />

have been completed in accordance with the approved plans.<br />

Reason: To ensure adequate disposal of foul and surface water<br />

drainage in accordance with Policy AW10 of the Rhondda<br />

Cynon Taf Local Development Plan.<br />

9. The dwelling hereby permitted shall be constructed to achieve a<br />

minimum Code for Sustainable Homes Level 3 and achieve a<br />

minimum of 1 credit under category ‘Ene1- Dwelling Emission<br />

Rate’ in accordance with the requirements of Version 3 of the<br />

Code for Sustainable Homes. The development shall be carried<br />

out entirely in accordance with the approved assessment and<br />

certification.<br />

Reason: To ensure the development constructed is in<br />

accordance with policy guidance in relation to providing<br />

sustainable buildings, outlined in paragraph 4.11.4 of Planning<br />

Policy Wales.<br />

10. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning<br />

Authority, construction of the dwelling hereby permitted shall not<br />

begin until an ‘Interim Certificate’ has been submitted to and<br />

approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, certifying<br />

that a minimum Code for Sustainable Homes Level 3 and a<br />

minimum of 1 credit under ‘Ene1 - Dwelling Emission Rate’, has<br />

been achieved for the dwelling or house type in accordance with<br />

the requirements of Version 3 of the Code for Sustainable<br />

Homes.<br />

Reason: To ensure the development constructed is in<br />

accordance with policy guidance in relation to providing<br />

sustainable buildings, outlined in paragraph 4.11.4 of Planning<br />

Policy Wales.<br />

11. Prior to the occupation of the dwelling hereby permitted, a Code<br />

for Sustainable Homes ‘Final Certificate’’ shall be submitted to<br />

and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority,<br />

certifying that a minimum Code for Sustainable Homes Level 3<br />

and a minimum of 1 credit under ‘Ene1 - Dwelling Emission<br />

Rate’, has been achieved for the dwelling in accordance with the<br />

requirements of the Version 3 of the Code for Sustainable<br />

Homes.<br />

Reason: To ensure the development constructed is in<br />

accordance with policy guidance in relation to providing<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

4<br />

136


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

sustainable buildings, outlined in paragraph 4.11.4 of Planning<br />

Policy Wales.<br />

<strong>12</strong>. Prior to the commencement of development, details of traffic<br />

management and wheel washing facilities shall be provided on<br />

site in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved<br />

in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details<br />

shall be implemented and maintained throughout the<br />

construction period unless otherwise agreed in writing by the<br />

Local Planning Authority.<br />

Reason: To ensure that mud and debris are not deposited from<br />

the construction site onto the public highway, in the interests of<br />

highway safety in accordance with Policy AW5 of the Rhondda<br />

Cynon Taf Local Development Plan.<br />

13. Notwithstanding the submitted plans, development shall not<br />

commence until full engineering and design details of the<br />

improved access <strong>off</strong> <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong> including<br />

improvements to the agricultural shed access road (PROW)<br />

have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local<br />

Planning Authority. The approved details shall be fully<br />

implemented prior to the development being brought into<br />

beneficial use.<br />

Reason: To ensure the adequacy of the proposed development<br />

in the interests of highway and pedestrian safety. In accordance<br />

with policy AW5 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development<br />

Plan.<br />

14. Prior to commencement of works on site a method statement to<br />

protect/keep available the Public Right of Way during<br />

construction work shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by<br />

the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be<br />

implemented and maintained throughout the construction period<br />

unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning<br />

Authority.<br />

Reason: To ensure that the PROW is protected and available<br />

during construction work, in the interests of pedestrian safety in<br />

accordance with Policy AW5 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local<br />

Development Plan.<br />

15. No outside storage shall take place within the curtilage of the<br />

agricultural shed, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the<br />

Local Planning Authority.<br />

Reason: To protect the visual amenity of the surrounding area<br />

and green wedge in accordance with policies SS22.1, AW5 and<br />

AW6 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development Plan.<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

5<br />

137


NOTES<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

1. The applicant/developer is advised that construction workers<br />

should be made aware of the line of the PROW as it forms part<br />

of the application site and therefore they will encounter<br />

pedestrian traffic. Construction workers must therefore be<br />

vigilant of the PROW and furthermore it should not be blocked<br />

by construction traffic at any time.<br />

2. The applicants’ attention is drawn to the attached letter from<br />

Countryside Council for Wales dated 20 Jun 20<strong>12</strong>.<br />

3. The applicants’ attention is drawn to the attached letter from Dwr<br />

Cymru/Welsh Ware dated 3 July 20<strong>12</strong>.<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

6<br />

138


O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

7<br />

APPENDIX A<br />

APPLICATION NO: <strong>12</strong>/<strong>0288</strong>/10 (JAW)<br />

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs A West<br />

DEVELOPMENT: Farmhouse and agricultural shed with access to<br />

<strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong><br />

LOCATION: LAND OFF EDMONDSTOWN ROAD,<br />

EDMONDSTOWN CF40 1NP<br />

DATE REGISTERED: 11/04/20<strong>12</strong><br />

ELECTORAL DIVISION: Tonyrefail West<br />

APPLICATION DETAILS<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Full planning permission is sought to erect a farmhouse (dwelling) and<br />

agricultural building with access on land <strong>off</strong> <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong>,<br />

<strong>Edmondstown</strong>. The dwelling would be set-back in the site curtilage and<br />

measure <strong>12</strong>.5m wide by 8.5m deep and would be 8.8m high to its ridge. It<br />

would have an attached garage (with storage space above) measuring 4.6m<br />

wide by 8m deep by 6m high to ridge level. The garage/store would be set<br />

back 2m from the front elevation of the dwelling. The dwelling would have a<br />

front porch and a 1.5m deep two-storey rear projection. The external walls of<br />

the dwelling would be reclaimed dress stone and the roof covering would be<br />

slate. The external walls of the garage/store would be roughcast render. The<br />

dwelling would accommodate an entrance hall, kitchen/dining room, utility<br />

room, living room, kids playroom and toilet on the ground floor and three<br />

bedrooms (one en-suite), a bathroom and <strong>off</strong>ice on the first floor.<br />

The agricultural building would be located to the east of the dwelling and<br />

would measure 21.4m in length by 13.7m wide. It would be 3.6m high to<br />

eaves level and 5.4m to its apex. The external materials would comprise<br />

concrete panels to the lower walls and green profile sheets to the upper walls<br />

and roof.<br />

The applicants’ have advised that the agricultural building would be required<br />

to store, approximately 132 round hay bales, a tractor and loader, a trailer<br />

(with hay bob and mower stored in the trailer), a further tractor, topper, baler,<br />

stock box, link box, fertilizer spreader, approximately <strong>12</strong> fertilizer bags, logs,<br />

and straw (with storage room below for fence post, wire and animal feed).<br />

Access to the site would be via the unnamed track, which is part of a Public<br />

Right of Way (ANT/59), that links <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong> with Rees Street.<br />

The applicants’ currently farm approximately 28 hectares of land at Dinas Isaf,<br />

of which 10.6 hectares is a SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest) and under<br />

land management agreements. The remainder are hay fields. Approximately<br />

20 cattle and 80 sheep are farmed. The applicant’s have also advised that<br />

they will shortly farm a further 11 hectares as part of Graig Ddu Farm. The<br />

farm machinery and hay is currently stored at Graig Ddu Farm approximately<br />

three miles away.<br />

139


SITE APPRAISAL<br />

The western part of the application site (where the dwelling is proposed) is<br />

enclosed by a stonewall, which is collapsed in places. This area is heavily<br />

overgrown and contains redundant single storey block and corrugated iron<br />

roofed sheds.<br />

The site is located on the eastern edge of <strong>Edmondstown</strong>, which is mainly<br />

characterised by terraced dwellings. The area surrounding the application<br />

site comprises open countryside to the south and east (part of which is the<br />

Rhos Tonyrefail SSSI). The Graig Ddu mountainside lies on the opposite side<br />

of <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong> (to the north). To the south-west is a playing field and<br />

to the west is an unmade access that provides secondary access to a number<br />

of side roads. To the north-west is a children’s playground, a community hall<br />

and the rear of a public house.<br />

A Public Right of Way (PROW), runs across the front of the site and through<br />

the south-east of the site (between where the proposed dwelling and<br />

agricultural building would be located). The PROW appears to be well used<br />

by the local community (including children using the playground) and provides<br />

a link to/through the open countryside.<br />

PLANNING HISTORY<br />

08/1448 Application to determine whether Permission Required<br />

planning permission is required 14/10/08<br />

for infilling part of a field with<br />

imported hardcore/building rubble<br />

PUBLICITY<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

A press notice, site notices and direct neighbour notification letters have<br />

advertised the application. 24 letters and a petition have been received which<br />

are summarised as follows:<br />

Petition signed by 61 signatories objecting to the proposal, however, no<br />

reasons are provided.<br />

10 letters objecting to proposal (5 with no reason provided) concerns raised<br />

include:<br />

• Oppose application if it affects the PROW and/or road to houses.<br />

Everyday traffic has become dependant on this overflow route to<br />

houses, it also serves a community hall, the football clubhouse, a<br />

children’s playground and a Public House.<br />

• Noise and health and safety issues associated with a working farm so<br />

close to residential properties, a children’s playground and general<br />

playing field.<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

8<br />

140


• Loss of view of surrounding mountains and valley from <strong>Edmondstown</strong><br />

<strong>Road</strong>.<br />

• Scale of proposal is out of keeping with local area.<br />

• The applicant states that proposal would ease congestion of having<br />

farm building closer to fields; however, we have never experienced<br />

traffic problems caused by the applicant’s agricultural vehicles.<br />

14 letters in support of the application, which are summarised as follows:<br />

• Will greatly improve appearance of village and materials would reflect<br />

local character.<br />

• Will reduce carbon footprint and improve safety and congestion on<br />

roads between site and Graig Ddu farm.<br />

• Only concern proposal may block the PROW and/or road, which we<br />

have been assured is not the case.<br />

• Regularly use PROW to walk dog and admire wildlife, the environment<br />

and animals. Proposal would benefit the area.<br />

• Williamstown Primary School comments that to have a resource within<br />

walking distance of the school becomes an extension of the classroom<br />

and provides outdoor learning for all the children.<br />

CONSULTATION<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Transportation Section – no objection subject to conditions.<br />

<strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Engineering – advises that there is an existing<br />

culverted watercourse passing through/adjacent to the site. No objection<br />

subject to suitable drainage conditions including the submission of a<br />

Hydrological Impact Assessment.<br />

Public Health and Protection – no objection.<br />

Environmental Services (Leisure) – no adverse comments received.<br />

Countryside Council for Wales (CCW) – advises that the Rhos Tonyrefail<br />

SSSI is located within 50m of the site. The application has the potential to<br />

affect the SSSI with the identified risks being i)potential pollution incidents<br />

during construction and ii) the disposal of foul water from the house and<br />

surface water arising from the agricultural building and house. Appropriate<br />

controls and construction methods are required to be in place, to control these<br />

risks to the SSSI.<br />

The continued sustainability and viability of the applicant’s agricultural<br />

business and therefore management, in particular stock grazing, is vital to the<br />

long-term maintenance of the nationally important habitats on the land within<br />

the SSSI.<br />

Dwr Cymru/Welsh Water – no objection.<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

9<br />

141


Countryside Section – advises that there is an objection to the proposed size<br />

and impact of the proposed agricultural building on the landscape. Also,<br />

advises that the Rhos Tonyrefail SSSI is located close to the site and a<br />

PROW runs to the front of the site and between the proposed location of the<br />

dwelling and agricultural building. The proposal would increase the risk of<br />

conflict between pedestrian users who have the right to walk the footpath and<br />

vehicles. There would appear to be adequate width to allow the footpath to<br />

be accommodated to the side of the access track, which would allow the<br />

traffic to be segregated, it would also be beneficial if this section of path could<br />

be brought up to the same standard as the remaining section of the footpath<br />

through the fields.<br />

Spatial Planning – no policy objection subject to the requirements of the<br />

relevant polices being met.<br />

SEWBREC – there are no records of any statutory protected species within<br />

the immediate vicinity of the site.<br />

Tonyrefail and District Community Council – although do not object to the<br />

proposal would comment that there is a footpath running through this area.<br />

What steps are being made to maintain access to these footpaths during<br />

construction works?<br />

POLICY CONTEXT<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development Plan<br />

The proposed farmhouse lies within the defined settlement boundary. The<br />

agricultural building lies completely within a green wedge and partially within a<br />

minerals safeguarding zone within the Southern Strategy Area.<br />

Policy CS2 of the LDP – is concerned with creating sustainable growth within<br />

the Southern Strategy Area, particularly by protecting the culture and identity<br />

of communities by focusing development within defined settlement boundaries<br />

and by protecting the built and natural environment.<br />

Policy AW1 – identifies the housing land requirement figure and how this will<br />

be achieved. This includes the development of unallocated land within the<br />

settlement boundary.<br />

Policy AW2 – requires new development to be in a sustainable location<br />

Policy AW5 – specifies criteria for new development. It requires new<br />

development to have an acceptable impact on the character and appearance<br />

of the site and surrounding area and no significant impact on the amenities of<br />

neighbouring occupiers. It also requires development to be of sustainable<br />

design with good accessibility.<br />

Policy AW6 – outlines types of development criteria that will be supported,<br />

including the following:<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

10<br />

142


• A high standard of design;<br />

• Design appropriate to the local context;<br />

• An integrated mixture of uses appropriate to the scale of the development;<br />

and<br />

• An efficient use of land.<br />

Policy AW14.2 – the resources of sandstone will be safeguarded from<br />

development.<br />

Policy SSA11 – Net density is sought at a minimum of 35 dwellings per<br />

hectare.<br />

Policy SSA13 – stipulates that development should occur within the defined<br />

settlement boundary.<br />

Policy SS22.1 – identifies a green wedge at land north of Tonyrefail (Trane<br />

Farm, Cae’r Farm) and Penrhiwfer (Mynydd y Gilfach) (part). Development<br />

that would prejudice the open nature of the land will not be permitted.<br />

•<br />

National Guidance<br />

Planning Policy Wales<br />

Paragraph 4.7.16 – the construction of new buildings in a green belt or a<br />

locally designated green wedge is inappropriate development unless it is for<br />

the purpose:<br />

• Justified agricultural and forestry needs.<br />

Paragraph 9.3.3 - states that new housing development should not damage<br />

an area’s character or amenity.<br />

Planning Policy Wales Technical Advice Note <strong>12</strong> (Design) advises that the<br />

Welsh Government is strongly committed to achieving the delivery of good<br />

design in the built and natural environment, which is fit for purpose and<br />

delivers environmental sustainability, economic development, and social<br />

inclusion at every scale throughout Wales.<br />

PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

As detailed previously, planning permission is sought for the erection of a<br />

farmhouse (dwelling) and an agricultural building. The two elements of the<br />

proposed development will be considered separately.<br />

1. The Proposed Farmhouse (dwelling)<br />

The description of the dwelling is a farmhouse, however, it would be located<br />

on an unallocated area of land within the settlement boundary of<br />

<strong>Edmondstown</strong>. The principle of erecting a dwelling at this location would<br />

therefore be acceptable. Therefore, the proposal is being considered as the<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

11<br />

143


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

erection of a dwelling within settlement limits, and as such, if permitted there<br />

would be no need for a condition tying the dwelling to an agricultural/rural<br />

enterprise use. Indeed, Members should note that no justification has been<br />

put forward for an agricultural workers dwelling. Therefore, the main issues to<br />

be considered are:-<br />

• The impact on the character and appearance of the area<br />

• The impact on highway safety, parking and the PROW<br />

• The impact on nearby residential properties<br />

• The impact on the SSSI<br />

The impact on the character and appearance of the area<br />

The dwelling would be set down from <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong> and set apart from<br />

the existing residential properties in the area. The concern that the proposed<br />

dwelling would be out of keeping with the area is noted. It is considered that<br />

the siting, scale, design and external materials of the proposed detached<br />

dwelling would provide an appropriate development on the edge of the<br />

settlement, that is, it would be a visually appropriate building when viewed<br />

from both the built-up area and the surrounding countryside. The proposal<br />

would also include the retention and rebuilding of the existing stone boundary<br />

wall on the western side of the dwelling and a new stone boundary/retaining<br />

wall on the eastern side. The concern with regard to the loss of general views<br />

of the countryside from <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong> is noted. It is not considered that<br />

the siting, scale and design of the proposed dwelling would be harmful to the<br />

general views of the countryside from <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong>.<br />

The impact on highway safety, parking and the PROW<br />

The access to the proposed dwelling would be from <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong>,<br />

which provides a highway link with Rees Street. A PROW also runs along the<br />

access to the front of the site and continues to the east of the proposed<br />

dwelling. Concerns from local residents with regards to continued access to<br />

the existing PROW and access track are noted. The Council’s Transportation<br />

Section has acknowledged that the existing access/PROW is sub-standard in<br />

terms of structural integrity, gradient and radius kerbing. A condition is<br />

therefore recommended to improve the access track/PROW to the proposed<br />

dwelling (which is within the applicant’s ownership). The aboverecommended<br />

condition would improve the access track/junction from<br />

<strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong> for all highway users. A condition is also recommended<br />

to ensure that the PROW is available throughout the construction phase of the<br />

development. A garage and driveway would provide adequate <strong>off</strong>-street<br />

parking to serve the proposed dwelling. A turning area would be provided to<br />

the front of the dwelling to enable cars to access/egress the site in a forward<br />

gear, which would assist in mitigating any conflict between pedestrian and<br />

vehicular traffic.<br />

In terms of neighbouring residential amenity<br />

The dwelling would be located to the east of existing dwellings and set down<br />

from <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong>, It is considered that the dwelling would have no<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

<strong>12</strong><br />

144


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

adverse impact on the existing amenities of nearby residential properties in<br />

terms of loss of privacy, loss of light or overbearing impact.<br />

The impact on the SSSI<br />

CCW has advised that the drainage from the proposed dwelling has the<br />

potential to impact on the SSSI, which is located within 50m of the site. The<br />

proposal is to discharge surface water from the proposed dwelling to a<br />

rainwater harvesting tank. Foul water is proposed to be connected to the<br />

public sewerage system (using pumps if necessary), unless this proves<br />

unviable. It is noted that drawing no. BD1651/PL02 Rev. E incorrectly shows<br />

a water treatment plant within the curtilage of the proposed dwelling. A<br />

condition of permission would be recommended to require the submission of a<br />

comprehensive drainage scheme prior to commencement of work on site.<br />

Such a condition would enable full consideration of the proposed site drainage<br />

in relation to the SSSI.<br />

It is therefore considered that the proposed dwelling is acceptable and in<br />

keeping with the relevant policies of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local<br />

Development Plan.<br />

2. Proposed agricultural building<br />

The main issues in the consideration of the proposed agricultural building are:<br />

• Planning policy context of the development and the impact on a Green<br />

Wedge.<br />

• The impact on the character and appearance of the area.<br />

• The impact on highway safety, parking and the PROW.<br />

• The impact on nearby residential properties.<br />

• The impact on the SSSI.<br />

Policy context and impact on the Green Wedge<br />

The agricultural building lies partially within a sandstone minerals<br />

safeguarding zone. Although the agricultural building falls within a minerals<br />

safeguarding zone, the minerals have already been sterilised due to the<br />

proximity of the residential areas and are thus unsuitable for extraction.<br />

The agricultural building lies wholly within a green wedge. (Policy SS 22.1 -<br />

Green Wedges of the Local Development Plans). The proposed agricultural<br />

building would measure 21.4m in length by 13.7m wide by 5.4m high to its<br />

apex and would accommodate, such items as, machinery (for the hay fields,<br />

for transporting hay as feed for the animals, transporting animals when they<br />

get sick) and approximately 132 hay bales. Concern is raised whether such a<br />

large building is required within the Green Wedge. The Design and Access<br />

Statement (DAS) submitted as part of the application states that the<br />

applicants currently farm approximately 28 hectares of land at Dinas Isaf, 10.6<br />

hectares of which is under land management agreements with Butterfly<br />

Conservation and the Countryside Council for Wales. The DAS also states<br />

that they will shortly farm a further 11 hectares at Graig Ddu Farm. The<br />

applicants have advised that they ‘cut hay once a year’. The need to bring the<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

13<br />

145


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

machinery to site from Graig Ddu Farm, which is located approximately 3<br />

miles away is acknowledged. However, this is the current situation and as the<br />

hay is cut only once a year (and having regard to the size of the site excluding<br />

the SSSI), it is questioned why so much machinery is required to be stored in<br />

the proposed building. It is noted that a local resident has advised that they<br />

have never experienced traffic problems caused by the agricultural vehicles<br />

travelling between the two farms.<br />

The applicants have advised that there is need to store the hay bales inside,<br />

because if the wrapping is torn then the contents will rot. Criminal damage<br />

and birds pecking holes cause such problems. Concern is raised whether<br />

there is a need to store the bales/all the bales in the building. The proposed<br />

dwelling would be erected on the site and therefore the bales could be stored<br />

close to the dwelling for security reasons, with the potential of mesh or other<br />

suitable covering of the bales to prevent birds harming the covering.<br />

Having regard to the above although there is no objection to the principle of a<br />

agricultural building at this location, concern is raised with regards to the need<br />

for such a large building. Paragraph 4.7.16 of Planning Policy Wales advises<br />

that the construction of a new building in a green wedge is inappropriate<br />

development unless it is for justified agricultural need. In this case it is<br />

considered that the scale and size of the building has not been adequately<br />

justified for the agricultural use of the land (having regard to its size and use)<br />

and would therefore result in inappropriate development in the green wedge.<br />

The impact on the character and appearance of the area<br />

The site of the proposed agricultural building would be set down from<br />

<strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong> and would be located close to the proposed dwelling. It<br />

is appreciated that the applicants wish to site the building close to the dwelling<br />

for security purposes. However, concern is raised that the scale and external<br />

appearance of the proposed building, the appearance of which is more akin to<br />

an industrial unit, would have a significant adverse impact when viewed from<br />

the PROW that runs adjacent to the site and crosses the fields to the south.<br />

Concern is also raised with regards to the scale and appearance of the<br />

building when viewed from <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong>. It is therefore considered<br />

that the agricultural building, due to its scale and external appearance would<br />

appear unduly intrusive within this rural location.<br />

The impact on highway safety and the PROW<br />

As discussed earlier in the report, the Transportation Section has requested a<br />

condition to improve the access track/PROW from <strong>Edmondstown</strong> <strong>Road</strong> and a<br />

condition is recommended to ensure that the PROW is available throughout<br />

the construction phase of the dwelling. The Transportation Section has also<br />

advised that the length of access track to the proposed barn, which is part of<br />

the PROW would require upgrading and widening to facilitate both vehicular<br />

and pedestrian traffic. The requirement to widen/upgrade the access<br />

track/PROW could be provided by condition if planning permission were to be<br />

granted for the agricultural building<br />

The impact on nearby residential properties<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

14<br />

146


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Noise and health and safety concerns associated with a working farm so<br />

close to residential properties and children’s play area are acknowledged<br />

The land is currently in agricultural use and the machinery used is currently<br />

brought to site, when required. It is not considered that the erection of a<br />

building to house hay bales, tractors etc. would cause an unacceptable<br />

degree of noise and disturbance to the nearest residential properties.<br />

The impact on the SSSI<br />

As discussed earlier in the report CCW has advised that surface water<br />

drainage from the proposed agricultural building has the potential to impact on<br />

the SSSI, which is located within 50m of the site. These details could be<br />

provided via a condition(s) if planning permission were to be granted for the<br />

agricultural building.<br />

Having regard to the above it is considered that the size and scale of the<br />

proposed agricultural building would result in inappropriate development in the<br />

green wedge and would appear unduly intrusive at this countryside location.<br />

The proposed agricultural building would be contrary to Policies AW5, AW6<br />

and SS22.1 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development Plan and<br />

Paragraph 4.7.16 of Planning Policy Wales.<br />

RECOMMENDATION: Refuse<br />

1. The proposal represents inappropriate development in the Green Wedge in<br />

that the building, due to it size, is not justified for agricultural needs. As<br />

such, the proposed agricultural building conflicts with paragraph 4.7.16 of<br />

Planning Policy Wales and Policy SS22.1 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local<br />

Development Plan.<br />

2. The proposed agricultural building, due to its size, siting and external<br />

appearance would be visually intrusive and detrimental to the rural<br />

character and appearance of the area. The proposed agricultural building<br />

would be contrary to Policies AW5 and AW6 of the Rhondda Cynon Taf<br />

Local Development Plan.<br />

======================================================================<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

15<br />

147


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

This page intentionally blank<br />

148


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 4 October 20<strong>12</strong><br />

'>) prENDlx G<br />

RHONDDA CYNON TAF COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL<br />

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL<br />

COMMITTEE<br />

4 ocToBER 20<strong>12</strong><br />

REPORT OF THE<br />

DIRECTOR LEGAL AND<br />

DEMOCRATIC SERVICES<br />

MU N ICI PAL YEAR 20<strong>12</strong>.2013<br />

Author: Mrs.Z.Maisey, Principal Officer, Committee Services<br />

1.<br />

3.<br />

3.2<br />

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT<br />

To consider the outcome of the site inspection in respect of the abovementioned<br />

proposal and to determine the application, as outlined in the<br />

report of the Service Director, Planning, attached at Appendix 1.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

To refuse the application in accordance with the recommendation of the<br />

Service Director, Planning.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Agenda</strong> ltem No.4<br />

SITE MEETING<br />

APPLTCATION NO.l 21<strong>0288</strong> -<br />

FARMHOUSE AN D AGRICULTURAL<br />

SHED WITH ACCESS TO<br />

EDMONDSTOWN ROAD - LAND OFF<br />

EDMONDSTOWN ROAD,<br />

EDMONDSTOWN<br />

3.1 In accordance with Minute No.82 (Development Control Committee, 6<br />

September 20<strong>12</strong>), a site inspection was undertaken on 25 September<br />

20<strong>12</strong>, to consider the impact of the proposal on the surrounding area and<br />

highways issues.<br />

3.3<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

The meeting was attended by the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the<br />

Development Control Committee (County Borough Councillors<br />

R.B.McDonald and M.J.Watts) and County Borough Councillor E.Webster<br />

in consultation with Local Member for Tonyrefail West (County Borough<br />

Councillor (Mrs) E. Hanagan).<br />

The Planning Officer outlined the application which sought full planning<br />

permission to erect a farmhouse (dwelling) and agricultural building with<br />

access. The Planning Officer informed Members that the erection of a<br />

149


3.4<br />

3.5<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 4 October 20<strong>12</strong><br />

dwelling at this location was acceptable and in keeping with the relevant<br />

policies of the Rhondda Cynon Taf Local Development Plan. However,<br />

although there was no objection to the principle of an agricultural building<br />

at this location, there was concern with regards to the need for such a<br />

large building. lt was considered that the scale and size of the building<br />

had not been adequately justified for the agricultural use of the land and<br />

would, therefore, result in inappropriate development in the green wedge.<br />

The Planning Officer informed Members that the size and appearance of<br />

the agricultural building, particularly when viewed from the Public Right of<br />

Way would be visually intrusive within this rural location.<br />

Members viewed the location of the proposed agricultural building to be<br />

accessed via the unnamed track which formed part of a Public Right of<br />

Way. The building would be erected wholly within the green wedge and<br />

would measure 21.4m in length by 13.7m wide. lt would be 3.6m high to<br />

eaves level and 5.4m to its apex.<br />

The Transportation Officer confirmed no objection to the proposed<br />

development subject to conditions which would include the improvement<br />

of the access track/public right of way which was currently in a substandard<br />

condition.<br />

150


LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972<br />

as amended by<br />

LOCAL GOVERNMENT (ACCESS TO INFORMATION) ACT 1985<br />

RHONDDA CYNON TAF COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL<br />

LIST OF BACKGROUND PAPERS<br />

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE<br />

1 NOVEMBER 20<strong>12</strong><br />

REPORT OF: SERVICE DIRECTOR PLANNING<br />

REPORT OFFICER TO CONTACT<br />

APPLICATION N0: <strong>12</strong>/<strong>0288</strong> -<br />

FARMHOUSE AND<br />

AGRICULTURAL SHED WITH<br />

ACCESS TO EDMONDSTOWN<br />

ROAD, LAND OFF<br />

EDMONDSTOWN ROAD,<br />

EDMONDSTOWN<br />

See Relevant Application File<br />

Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

MRS J WAKEFORD<br />

(Tel. No. 01443 494761)<br />

O:\Legal Offices\CMTEES\Development Control\Dev Control Cttee 20<strong>12</strong>-<br />

2013\0111<strong>12</strong>\2. <strong>12</strong> <strong>0288</strong> JAW.doc<br />

16<br />

151


Development Control Committee <strong>Agenda</strong> - 1 November 20<strong>12</strong><br />

This page intentionally blank<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!