04.06.2013 Views

Saving Mothers' Lives: - Public Health Agency for Northern Ireland

Saving Mothers' Lives: - Public Health Agency for Northern Ireland

Saving Mothers' Lives: - Public Health Agency for Northern Ireland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252<br />

20 Severe maternal morbidity - the Scottish experience 2003 to 2005<br />

Discussion<br />

The Scottish Confi dential Audit of Severe Maternal Morbidity has collected data prospectively using 14 welldefi<br />

ned, consistent categories of morbidity <strong>for</strong> the triennium (2003-2005), contemporaneous with this maternal<br />

death enquiry. The audit is funded by NHS Quality Improvement Scotland. Continuous data collection under<br />

the auspices of a national agency, has two principal advantages. Firstly, aggregation of data over several<br />

years means that meaningful national rates of rare outcomes such as eclampsia can be calculated. Secondly,<br />

consistent methods mean that trends over time in overall rates of severe morbidity can be examined.<br />

The causes of severe maternal morbidity found in our study differ from the causes of maternal death found<br />

in the Confi dential Enquiries. Major haemorrhage accounted <strong>for</strong> 69% of our cases of severe morbidity<br />

but <strong>for</strong> only 11% of Direct maternal deaths in the UK in the 2003 to 2005 triennium. In contrast, venous<br />

thromboembolism was the principal cause of maternal death (28% of cases), but accounted <strong>for</strong> under<br />

2% of our cases of severe morbidity. Thus, the pattern of morbidity and mortality appears to differ from<br />

the continuum described by Pattinson 5 , with some clinical insults (e.g. major haemorrhage) being more<br />

amenable to alteration by prompt and appropriate treatment than others.<br />

The approach used by the Scottish Confi dential Audit relies on accurate and complete case identifi cation<br />

at local hospital level. There have always been concerns that incident reporting systems under-estimate<br />

the true level of reportable events. In order to improve reproducibility, we have a designated member of<br />

staff within each unit with responsibility <strong>for</strong> reporting and we regularly update these participants. We would<br />

anticipate that with increasing familiarity with the study, case ascertainment would improve. Improved<br />

ascertainment may explain the apparent rise in the rate of severe morbidity.<br />

Another explanation is that a rise in major obstetric haemorrhage has resulted from changes in the obstetric<br />

population: increasing numbers of mothers with complex medical conditions, increasing age at childbirth,<br />

increasing number of multiple pregnancies following assisted reproduction, and increasing number of<br />

caesarean sections with subsequent placenta praevia and accreta. Data from In<strong>for</strong>mation Services of NHS<br />

Scotland 10 show that the national rate of emergency caesarean section remained constant at 15.4% over<br />

the three years of this study but the rate of elective Caesarean section rose year on year, from 8.8% in 2003<br />

to 9.5% in 2005 (Chi-squared test <strong>for</strong> trend, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!