09.06.2013 Views

Red_Book_2005

Red_Book_2005

Red_Book_2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IR-1.6<br />

the rule stated above, these are now fluorido, chlorido, bromido, iodido, hydroxido, hydrido,<br />

cyanido, oxido, etc. In particular, thio is now reserved for functional replacement<br />

nomenclature (see Section IR-8.6), and the ligand S 2 is named sulfido.<br />

In anumber of cases the names of (formally) anionic ligands have changed asaresult of<br />

modifications to the nomenclature of the anions themselves (see Section IR-1.6.2). For<br />

example, the ligand HNNH is now named hydrazine-1,2-diido (Example 3in Section<br />

IR-1.6.2), and HNCO * was (hydridonitrido)oxidocarbonate( * 1 )inRef. 22 but is now<br />

named (hydridonitrato)oxidocarbonate( * 1 ).<br />

Particular attention has been given to providing the correct names and endings for<br />

organic ligands. Thus, with reference to Examples 4 and 5 in Section IR-1.6.2,<br />

methanaminido is now used rather than methaminato, and aporphyrin ligand is named<br />

porphyrin-21,23-diido rather than the name porphyrinato(2)(which is used in Ref. 11).<br />

The systematic organic ligand names given inTable VII are now in accord with anion<br />

names derived by the rules of Ref. 21. In anumber of casesthey differ from the names given<br />

as systematic in Ref. 11.<br />

IR-1.6.5 Formulae for (formal) coordination entities<br />

In the formulae for coordination entities, ligands are now ordered alphabetically according<br />

to the abbreviation or formula used for the ligand, irrespective of charge (Sections IR-4.4.3.2<br />

and IR-9.2.3.1).<br />

In Ref. 11, charged ligands were cited before neutral ligands. Thus, two ordering<br />

principles were in use for no obvious reason other than tradition, and the person devising the<br />

formula needed todecide whether aparticular ligand was charged. Such adecision is not<br />

always straightforward.<br />

Thus, for example, the recommended formula for the anion of Zeise’s salt is now [Pt(Z 2 -<br />

C 2 H 4 )Cl3 ] whereas in Ref. 11 it was [PtCl3 ( Z 2 -C2 H 4 )] because chloride is anionic.<br />

IR-1.6.6 Additive names of polynuclear entities<br />

The system developed in Ref. 11 for additive names of dinuclear and polynuclear entities<br />

has been clarified and to some extent changed for reasons of consistency: the order of<br />

citation ofcentral atoms in names is now always the order in which they appear in Table VI,<br />

the element occurring later being cited first (see Sections IR-7.3.2 and IR-9.2.5.6).<br />

The system can be used for polynuclear entities with any central atoms. In this system,<br />

the order of the central atoms in the name reflects the order in which they are assigned<br />

locants to be used in the kappa convention (Section IR-9.2.4.2) for specifying which ligator<br />

atoms coordinate to which central atoms. The atom symbols used at the end of the name to<br />

indicate metal-metal bonding are similarly ordered. Thus, for example, [(CO) 5 ReCo(CO) 4 ]<br />

is now named nonacarbonyl-1k 5 C ,2k 4 C -rheniumcobalt(Re—Co) rather than nonacarbonyl-<br />

1 k 5 C ,2k 4 C -cobaltrhenium(Co—Re) (as in Ref. 11).<br />

IR-1.6.7 Names of inorganic acids<br />

GENERALAIMS,FUNCTIONS ANDMETHODS<br />

The names of inorganic acids are dealt with separately in Chapter IR-8.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!