13.06.2013 Views

BCOA Bulletin January-February-March 2007 - the Basenji Club of ...

BCOA Bulletin January-February-March 2007 - the Basenji Club of ...

BCOA Bulletin January-February-March 2007 - the Basenji Club of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONDITIONAL REGISTRY<br />

The AKC’s DNA programs have resulted in an unprecedented approximately <strong>the</strong> same for breeders who register one or two litters<br />

level <strong>of</strong> accuracy to <strong>the</strong> AKC registry by evaluating <strong>the</strong> a year as it is for those who register 8 or 9 litters a year. (10+ are<br />

parentage <strong>of</strong> many AKC dogs and litters. However, for that<br />

slightly higher). So dogs, breeders, and puppy owners all<br />

very small percentage <strong>of</strong> registered dogs that are found,<br />

across our spectrum <strong>of</strong> customers are affected.<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten years after birth, to have an unknown ancestor,<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r potential twist is <strong>the</strong> Pennsylvania style<br />

<strong>the</strong> AKC has canceled <strong>the</strong> registration. To maintain<br />

"Lemon Laws" that could require a breeder to refund<br />

genetic diversity, improve customer relations, and<br />

up to 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> purchase price if a registration<br />

still maintain <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> registry, <strong>the</strong> Board<br />

is cancelled. There are and will be many people,<br />

<strong>of</strong> Directors approved <strong>the</strong> concept to allow <strong>the</strong> issuing<br />

including innocent third parties, who will be most upset<br />

<strong>of</strong> Conditional registration certifi cates and pedigrees,<br />

with AKC, threatening to destroy all <strong>of</strong> our advances in<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than canceling <strong>the</strong> registrations <strong>of</strong> a dog, all <strong>of</strong> its<br />

littermates and all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir progeny in <strong>the</strong>se cases. This concept<br />

credibility, image, and reputation.<br />

was discussed at <strong>the</strong> September 2005 Delegate Meeting where Potential Solutions: AKC staff has determined eight different<br />

AKC’s Consultant on DNA Science and Technology Dr. Elaine possible solutions to this dilemma, though all have some drawbacks.<br />

Ostrander recommended its implementation.<br />

They range from maintaining <strong>the</strong> status quo, which would continue<br />

<strong>the</strong> ever-increasing number <strong>of</strong> cancelled registrations, unhappy<br />

The Problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pyramid Effect<br />

customers and decreased revenue, to ending <strong>the</strong> DNA programs all<br />

The AKC staff has identifi ed and informed <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> a toge<strong>the</strong>r, which would be a disaster for our message to <strong>the</strong> public<br />

growing problem related to <strong>the</strong> efforts to maintain <strong>the</strong> integrity and would seriously weaken <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studbook.<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AKC registration database and studbook. The situation is • One proposal for making better use <strong>of</strong> DNA suggests<br />

especially challenging because all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solutions proposed so far collecting samples from all breeding stock, archiving <strong>the</strong>m (such as<br />

have signifi cant drawbacks or side effects.<br />

with FTA paper), and processing <strong>the</strong> samples only when a question<br />

arises. This would also facilitate a random audit and processing<br />

The Problem: Current AKC policy is that whenever DNA to prove whatever level <strong>of</strong> studbook accuracy we desire. While<br />

testing indicates incorrect parentage <strong>of</strong> a purebred litter, all efforts a valuable <strong>the</strong>ory, it does not solve <strong>the</strong> pyramid problem, as an<br />

are made to cooperate with <strong>the</strong> breeders to establish <strong>the</strong> correct incorrect registration could go undiscovered until a question had<br />

parentage, which is successful about 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time. If <strong>the</strong> arisen, potentially many generations later.<br />

information needed to make <strong>the</strong> corrections is not available, <strong>the</strong> • Ano<strong>the</strong>r proposal suggests <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a "qualifi ed"<br />

litter registration will be cancelled. This applies to litters whelped pedigree, using an identifying marker on <strong>the</strong> pedigree or registration<br />

after <strong>January</strong> 1, 2000.<br />

number that would indicate that <strong>the</strong> parentage, at a certain point in<br />

This policy, along with o<strong>the</strong>r DNA identifi cation programs, has <strong>the</strong> pedigree, is uncertain or unverifi able. Potentially, after several<br />

led to a substantial improvement in <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studbook. subsequent generations <strong>of</strong> DNA proved registrations, or discovery<br />

However, much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> compliance audit testing, and all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r confi rmatory information, <strong>the</strong> marker could be removed<br />

Frequently Used Sires testing, is done on dogs who have already from fur<strong>the</strong>r generations. While this would pose a different public<br />

produced litters, and whose progeny may have multiplied. Thus, relations challenge, admitting that <strong>the</strong>re are some things that we do<br />

when that dog is excluded from <strong>the</strong> registry, ALL <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> progeny not know actually streng<strong>the</strong>ns <strong>the</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> information,<br />

are also excluded. While this works to ensure <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> our which we do know.<br />

database, it also works to make a large number <strong>of</strong> people very • A potentially effective solution would be to have a truly<br />

unhappy with AKC, and drives <strong>the</strong>m away from us permanently. random audit <strong>of</strong> a certain number <strong>of</strong> sets <strong>of</strong> parents and <strong>of</strong>fspring,<br />

Imagine that you get a letter from AKC informing you that with <strong>the</strong> DNA collected and processed at AKC expense. This is<br />

<strong>the</strong> grandsire <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stud dog you used last year has been found similar to <strong>the</strong> method <strong>the</strong> IRS uses with great success in keeping <strong>the</strong><br />

to have incorrect parentage, and all <strong>of</strong> his progeny now have <strong>the</strong>ir "error rate" for income tax returns very low. This could eliminate<br />

registration permanently cancelled - including <strong>the</strong> young puppy <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>the</strong> Frequently Used Sires program, which would<br />

you kept out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> litter and have already shown successfully! substantially reduce <strong>the</strong> costs to high volume breeders, and show<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> dogs excluded is still relatively that all breeders are treated equally. Those factors might bring<br />

small, it is growing at an exponential rate. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, those dogs some responsible high volume breeders back to AKC. The down<br />

will continue to reproduce, creating more and more dogs that are side is that <strong>the</strong>re would be substantial costs for data collection and<br />

ineligible for AKC registration, and more and more people turned DNA processing (one estimate was more than $1 million dollars<br />

away from AKC.<br />

per yearly audit), and a certain percentage <strong>of</strong> registration errors<br />

While we believe we have a very high standard <strong>of</strong> integrity, we would still go through undetected.<br />

also know that <strong>the</strong>re have always been some errors in our records, • Many people have urged AKC to move towards requiring<br />

caused by accident, inattention, carelessness, and occasionally by DNA collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> all breeding stock at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong><br />

outright fraud. The data indicates that <strong>the</strong>re is no single group <strong>of</strong> litter registration. This has <strong>the</strong> advantage <strong>of</strong> proving absolute<br />

breeders that cause all <strong>the</strong> problems - <strong>the</strong> litter exclusion rate is integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> registry, and eliminates <strong>the</strong> pyramid effect, as any<br />

The <strong>Basenji</strong> <strong>Club</strong> <strong>of</strong> America, Inc. BULLETIN - 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!