15.06.2013 Views

Full article - Magnolia Press

Full article - Magnolia Press

Full article - Magnolia Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elegans Cantraine, 1835, the latter preoccupied by Doris elegans Quoy & Gaimard, 1832. Placed as Chromodoris<br />

cantraini [sic] Bergh, 1879 in synonymy of Hypselodoris picta (Schultz in Philippi, 1836) by Ortea et al. (1996: 43).<br />

Chromodoris? citrina Bergh, 1874, as “n. sp.”; JMG 3(6) 1874c: 113, pl. 1, figs. 14–17. JMG 3(8) 1875b: 210<br />

[78]. A species different from Notodoris citrina Bergh, 1875 according to footnote in Bergh (1875b), JMG 3(8):<br />

196 [64]. Only known from original illustration. Rudman (1986c: 384) compared to Noumea crocea Rudman,<br />

1986, from which it differs in coloration. McDonald (2009: 151) placed in Glossodoris.<br />

Chromodoris dalli Bergh, 1879, as “n. sp.”; JMG, 5(14) 1879a: 3; nomen nudum. Footnote on p. 3 states that this<br />

species will be published in Bergh’s “nudibranchiate Gastraeopoda [sic] of the North Pacific”, as part of Dall’s<br />

Exploration of Alaska. Described as Chromodoris dalli Bergh, 1879 (1879c: 109–112, pl. 13 [5] (1880a), figs. 1–7<br />

[8–14]; pl. 14 (1880a), figs. 1–4; apparently simultaneously with an identical description in Bergh (1879d). Placed<br />

in Glossodoris by Rudman (1984: 156; 1986c: 180).<br />

Chromodoris elisabethina Bergh, 1875, as “n. sp.”; JMG 3(8): 205 [73]; nomen nudum. With footnote in Bergh<br />

(1875: 205 [73]) stating that new species not formally described in the remainder of the <strong>article</strong> will be introduced in<br />

a later part of the Journal or in Heft 10 of Bergh’s Malacologische Untersuchungen in Semper’s ‘Reisen’.<br />

Described as Chromodoris elisabethina Bergh, 1877 (1877c: 466–473, pl. 51, figs. 6–15; pl. 53, fig. 28). Bergh<br />

(1877a: 75) stated “D[oris] sponsa E[hrenberg, 1831] = Chromodoris elisabethina, Bgh.” Accepted as valid<br />

species by Rudman (1982: 205).<br />

Chromodoris gloriosa Bergh, 1874, as “n. sp.”; JMG 3(6) 1874c: 113, pl. 1, figs. 6–9.—JMG 3(8) 1875b: 205<br />

[73], 211–213 [79–81], 229 [97], 230 [98], pl. 9, figs. 19–31. Tahiti (Garrett, coll.). Synonymized under Noumea<br />

varians (Pease, 1871) by Rudman (1986b: 316).<br />

Chromodoris godeffroyana “Garrett“ Bergh, 1877 (1877c: 485, 493, with “Goniobranchus godeffroyana, Garr.<br />

Journ. D. Mus. Godeffroy. Heft XIV, 1877 [error for 1879] Taf. 1, Fig. 1–4“ in synonymy, the latter a MS name<br />

supplied by Garrett together with notes and field illustrations. <strong>Full</strong> description, as “n. sp.“ by Bergh (1879a), JMG<br />

5(14): 12–14, 46, 49, pl. 1, figs. 1–4; pl. 4, figs. 2–11, Huahine, Society Islands (Garrett, coll.). Placed as Risbecia<br />

godeffroyana ([Garrett MS] Bergh, 1877) by Rudman (1987: 373).<br />

Chromodoris histrio Bergh, 1875, as “n. sp.”; JMG 3(8) 1875b: 205 [73]; nomen nudum. With footnote by Bergh<br />

(1875b: 205 [73]) stating that new species not formally described in the remainder of the <strong>article</strong> will be introduced<br />

in a later part of the Journal or in Heft 10 of Bergh’s Malacologische Untersuchungen in Semper’s ‘Reisen’.<br />

Described as Chromodoris histrio Bergh, 1877 (1877c: 493). <strong>Full</strong> description in Bergh (1879a), JMG, 5(14): 8, 9,<br />

46, 48, pl. 1, figs. 9–12; pl. 3, figs. 10–14. Tahiti (Garrett, coll.). Placed in synonymy of Chromodoris rufomaculata<br />

Pease, 1871 by Rudman (1987: 352).<br />

Chromodoris lapinigensis Bergh, 1879, as “n. sp.”; JMG 5(14) 1879a: 3, 18, 19, 49, pl. 4, figs. 30–34. Lapinig,<br />

Philippines (Semper, coll.). Treated as Glossodoris by McDonald (2009: 160).<br />

Chromodoris luxuriosa Bergh, 1875, as “n. sp.”; JMG 3(8): 205 [73], 227 [95], pl. 7, fig. 2.—JMG 5(14) 1879a:<br />

7, 8, 48, pl. 3, figs. 2–9. Tahiti; Gilbert Islands (Garrett, coll.). Synonymized under Durvilledoris lemniscata (Quoy<br />

& Gaimard, 1832) by Rudman (1984: 292).<br />

Chromodoris moerchii Bergh, 1877 (1877a): 56. Nomen novum for Goniodoris picturata Mörch, 1863, non<br />

Pterodoris picturata Ehrenberg, 1831, which Bergh both considered to be species of Chromodoris.—JMG 5(14)<br />

1879a: 1, 3, 4.—JMG 5(14) 1879a: 47, 48 (as mörchii). Note: Bergh (1877a: 56) referred to JMG Heft 12 of 1877<br />

as containing the introduction of the new name. Publication of that part was delayed until Heft 14 in 1879. Treated<br />

as member of Glossodoris and misspelled as “moerchi” or “morchii” in subsequent literature.<br />

60 · Zootaxa 3511 © 2012 <strong>Magnolia</strong> <strong>Press</strong><br />

BIELER & PETIT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!