15.06.2013 Views

Full article - Magnolia Press

Full article - Magnolia Press

Full article - Magnolia Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Doriopsis spiculata Bergh, 1876. The full description, as “n. sp.”, appeared in JMG 5(14) 1879a: 37, 38, 47, pl. 2,<br />

figs. 13–15. However, Bergh (1876: 387) had listed the name and given a minimal description by mentioning that<br />

the taxon differs in “its richness of the dorsal skin on the spicules” [our translation], which qualifies under ICZN<br />

rules as meeting requirements of a description.<br />

Doriopsis tristis Bergh, 1874. Shown as “n. sp.” with full description in Bergh (1875b), JMG 3(8): 216 [84],<br />

223–225 [91–93], 231 [99], 232 [100], pl. 11, figs. 3–7; but previously introduced by Bergh (1874b: pl. 33, fig. 9<br />

and caption). Camigiun, Philippines; Palau (Semper, coll.).—JMG, 5(14) 1879a: 47, pl. 2, fig. 17.<br />

Doridopsis vidua Bergh, 1879, as “n. sp.”; JMG 5(14) 1879a: 35, 36, 46, 47, pl. 1, figs. 17–20; pl. 2, fig. 16. Tahiti<br />

(Garrett, coll.).<br />

Doris “(Gen.?)” punctulifera Bergh, 1874, as “n. sp.”; JMG 3(6) 1874c: 113, pl. 1, figs. 19–20.—Chromodoris?<br />

punctulifera—JMG 3(8) 1875b: 209 [77]. Considered a probable synonym of Chromodoris aspersa (Gould, 1852)<br />

by Rudman (1983: 145).<br />

Doris schmeltziana “Garrett” Bergh, 1875; JMG 3(8) 1875b: 228 [96], pl. 8, figs. 34–37. Bergh (1877a: 61)<br />

listed it as “Discodoris (Dendrodoris) schmeltziana (Garr.) n. sp.” and Bergh (1877d: 519) as “Discodoris<br />

schmeltziana (Garr.) n. sp.”, the latter with a footnote that the actual description would follow in a future number of<br />

JMG, where Bergh published it as Discodoris schmeltziana “(Garrett)”; JMG 5(14) 1879a: 50, pl. 5, figs. 9–15. The<br />

1875 introduction seems to have been overlooked. Rudman (2005: 1) stated: “Although published as a name in a<br />

list in Bergh, 1877, Discodoris schmeltziana was not properly described until 1880.” Listed as of Garrett by Bergh,<br />

this name must be attributed to Bergh (1875).<br />

Doris “(N. g.?)” tessellata Bergh, 1879; JMG 5(14) 1879a: 50, pl. 5, figs, 16–18. A more detailed description, as<br />

Dictyodoris tessallata Bergh “n. sp.“, was provided by Bergh (1880b: 75–78, pl. C, figs. 11, 12; pl. F, figs. 22, 23).<br />

Echinodoris Bergh, 1874, as “n. gen.”; JMG 3(6) 1874c: 109. Type species by monotypy, Doris eolida Quoy &<br />

Gaimard, 1832. Rudman (1985: 9) pointed out that Bergh misidentified the type species and refers most probably<br />

to Cadlinella hirsuta Rudman, 1995. Rudman stated that he was submitting to the I.C.Z.N. a proposal “that<br />

Echinodoris should be treated as a junior objective synonym of Ceratodoris [Gray, 1850; also with Doris eolida as<br />

its type], and in the interests of nomenclatural stability not be considered available to replace Cadlinella”. He also<br />

planned to request “that both Echinodoris and Ceratodoris … be suppressed” in favor of another name (1985: 9).”<br />

We have not located such an I.C.Z.N. proposal or resulting decisions. This matter could also be resolved by<br />

specialists by applying options in I.C.Z.N. (1999) Art. 70.3.1.<br />

Miamira Bergh, 1874. Shown as “Nov. Gen.” in JMG 3(6) 1874c: 113; but previously introduced by Bergh<br />

(1874b: caption to pl. 33). Type species by monotypy, Miamira nobilis Bergh, 1874.—JMG, 3(8) 1875b: 185 [53].<br />

Valdés & Gosliner (1999) synonymized under Ceratosoma Gray, 1850.<br />

Miamira nobilis Bergh, 1874. Shown as “Nov. Sp.” in JMG 3(6) 1874c: 113, 116, pl. 1, fig. 5; pl. 4, figs. 29–33;<br />

but previously introduced by Bergh (1874b: pl. 33, fig. 2 and caption).—JMG 3(8) 1875b: 185–195 [53–63],<br />

227–229 [95–97], pl. 8, figs. 1–30, pl. 9, figs. 1–4. Masinloc, Philippines (Semper, coll.), Albay, Philippines (Jagor,<br />

coll.), Upolo, Samoa (Graeffe, coll.). Valdés & Gosliner (1999: 34) synonymized Miamira nobilis Bergh, 1875<br />

under Ceratosoma sinuata (van Hasselt, 1824).<br />

Notodoris Bergh, 1875, as “Nov. Gen.”; JMG 3(8) 1875b: 196 [64]. Type species by monotypy, Notodoris citrina<br />

Bergh, 1875. Synonymized under Aegires Lovén, 1844 by Fahey & Gosliner (2004: 618).<br />

Notodoris citrina Bergh, 1875, as “n. sp.”; JMG 3(8) 1875b: 196–199 [64–67], 230 [98], pl. 9, figs. 32–45, pl. 10,<br />

figs. 1–8. Type species of Notodoris. A species different from Chromodoris citrina Bergh, 1874 according to<br />

footnote on p. 196. Accepted as Aegiris citrinus (Bergh, 1875) by Fahey & Gosliner (2004: 663).<br />

MOLLUSCAN TAXA OF THE MUSEUM GODEFFROY OF HAMBURG<br />

Zootaxa 3511 © 2012 <strong>Magnolia</strong> <strong>Press</strong> · 63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!