Belém VIRUS Laboratory

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Page 1 .:., ... Revo Insto Medo trapo .\'ão Paulo 36 (2); 171-174 ...$

, poo1 40 PARASITOLOGY Incidental to the rodent and bird recapture programmes, blood smears were made at the time of bleeding for virus and serology, and a number of paras i tes ~Jere found in these (Table 39)0 !~o~p~~ Vírus stocks for yellow fever (H 111 MOUSENEUTRA LIZAT ION TESTING Ilheus (H 7445), SLE (AR 23379) and Bussuquara (AN 4116) were obtained by the ic inocu1ation of 3-day-o1d mice with 10% suspensions of mouse brain in bovalbumin, and the collection of the serum or brain at 96 hours after infection for H 111, or 72 hours for the other viroses. In an effort to interpret the specificity and sensitivity or ti".e N test using serum vírus íc, and brain vírus íp, wíth the 4 group B agents known in Erazil, the follO\fing 13 seTa were selected for testing in tl1e 1:8 dilution: seTa 1 tm-ough 4 are hyperimmune mouse ascitic fluids for yellow fever, Ilheus, SLE, and Bussuquaraj sera 5 through 1 are believed to be yellow rever immune either by history or HI pattern, including a human with a reliablc history af previaus 17-D vaccinatian, a oi sera of monkeys PR 319 and PR 322 shot during Janua~ in Utinga forest, and monkey PR 316 from the same forest; sera 8 and 9 fram humans of Gameta believed to be Ilheus imzmme by the HI pattem; plasma and senlJll 10 and 11 believed to be SLE ilnmune repres en ting pooled Q~ragypa (black vul ture ) plasmas AV 6306 and AV 6310, and a serum fram a human resident af Cameta with SLE RI patternj and sera 12 and 13 fram fFae~himya
0 ination, RO 5209 (several bleedings pooled 41 and RO 5157, be1ieved to be Bussuquara immune by considerabJ.e experience indicating that Bussuquara commonly infects these rodents. Table 40 lists the results af yellaw rever, Ilheus, Bussuquara, and SLE N tests (Strains used given on Table)o Serum 7 , a monkey from Utinga, and s erum 8, a human , from Cameta, would appear to have had previous experience with both yellow rever and Ilheus viroses o The yellow rever brain ip test lacks specifici ty in group B unless ~ ~~I of ~ 2.5 is considered as the criterion for positivity instead af tr_e classic figure af ~ 1.7. Fbur non-group B mouse hyperimmune sera were included with LNIls .of 0.2, 0.4, and 1.3 indicating that the ye11ow rever ip test group B resu1ts are group specific, and that reactions represent heterologous antibody. This test should be excellent for measuring group B antibody. The brain ip tests with Ilheus, SLE, and Bussuquara viruses retain their specificity to a remarkable degree and are as sensitive or more sensitive than the serum ic teste It would seem advisable to adopt the ip test routinely when dealing with SLE, Ilheus, and Bussuquara, yellow fever Yellow rever strain H 20228 from a febrilc human from Vigia, taken 2 days after was used to test for post-vaccination antibody. This strain; after the 5th passage, produced a viraemia in mice of 305, but when used as a haemagg1utinin showed no advantage over strain H 111 in a comparative test on human sera from Amapa.: 1:20 HI titre 1 :40 1 :80 H 111 60 § 152 45 H 20228 61 155 49 4 § NQ af sera pasitive at this titre.
Page 1 and 2: Belém VIRUS Laboratory Belém, Par
Page 3 and 4: This report is reproduced as receiv
Page 5 and 6: 49 ENTOMOLOGY HumaJl bait catches .
Page 7 and 8: vector, DITRODUCTION With the depar
Page 9 and 10: -3 - Several strains oí íoot-and-
Page 11 and 12: R!oech~ antibody. nheus, 'UF 5 Ilhe
Page 13 and 14: y I. enezuelensis er ever, was 7 A
Page 15 and 16: wever, o follows: 114 "9- B. ~ghnet
Page 17 and 18: EAN cessory -48 th25th RI posi tive
Page 19 and 20: cerine. aboration, th), 13 FIELD ST
Page 21 and 22: suquar~. quitoes. oa from blood of
Page 23 and 24: these (2:160 219 of ~~: others. 4 p
Page 25 and 26: g r, TISSUE CULTURE STUDIBS ON .A.R
Page 27 and 28: lln The following Y1rusea only prod
Page 29 and 30: c lruses peclt'lc. ver, ver. gcs bo
Page 31 and 32: \dse, 25 dilution gave 19-59 plaque
Page 33 and 34: ined: al 27 ENTOM:>lOGY This year t
Page 35 and 36: to 29 - Tables 24 and 25 give the r
Page 37 and 38: -31 (Table 26), so it seems that a
Page 39 and 40: it oes -blower trap catc?es, -33 It
Page 41 and 42: er: on chicken bait, and ~~ B 9 and
Page 43 and 44: ork. ar, -37 from an early biteo Th
Page 45: h. , .39 suction trap took more mal
Page 49 and 50: -43 When the test was repeated by p
Page 51 and 52: iolof:;f 45 CATTIE DISEASE In Ju1y
Page 53 and 54: l e, 47 The histopathology in these
Page 55 and 56: io. d 49 litter (another possible
Page 57 and 58: Remary.s .. - 51 supply and other i
Page 59 and 60: is: sis: from these cattle died 1'd
Page 61 and 62: Animal --- attendants and cage wash
Page 63 and 64: 57 Name Institution Date JóC.King
Page 65 and 66: Table 1 (continued) Group or comple
Page 67 and 68: Table 2 (continued) Year 54 55 56 5
Page 69 and 70: - 63 - Table 4 Viruses from Sentine
Page 71 and 72: - 65 - Table 4 - cont. Date Virus S
Page 73 and 74: - 67 - Table 4a Viruses from Sentin
Page 75 and 76: - 69 - Table 5 - cont. Date Virus S
Page 77 and 78: - 71 - Table 6 - cont. Date Pool N
Page 79 and 80: Mosquito - 73 - Table 8 Species of
Page 81 and 82: - 75 - Table 10 Vertebrate specimen
Page 83 and 84: - 77 - Table 11 Changes in HI antib
Page 85 and 86: Table 13 Ectoparasites inoculated f
Page 87 and 88: . ..:t\i\'O . J:3 1I .I . I. ~t:8Â
Page 89 and 90: Tabl. 14 ~rtc Platon Sagu1nU8 Proe~
Page 91 and 92: Table 19 Results of CF tests using
Page 93 and 94: Table 27 Ground level mosquito capt
Page 95 and 96: Table 22 Ground level mosquito capt
Page 97 and 98:
Table 23 Ground level mosquito capt
Page 99 and 100:
Table 24 Daytime catches on human b
Page 101 and 102:
-95- Table 5 Daytime catches on hum
Page 103 and 104:
Table 27 Mosquitoes and Phlebotomus
Page 105 and 106:
Table 28 Mosquitoes & Phlebotomus t
Page 107 and 108:
Table 29 Mosquitoes by kind and mon
Page 109 and 110:
o C"'\ C1> ri ~ E-i * I-i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Page 111 and 112:
Table 30 (continued) 31 28 31 30 31
Page 113 and 114:
Table 31 (continued) Total Feb Mar
Page 115 and 116:
~ C"'\ C"'\ r-I 'fJ E-t G) S ! .s
Page 117 and 118:
- ~~§() '-" -:t (""\ Q) .-I .o ~ -
Page 119 and 120:
.. 'S .~ ~ ~o() '-" \J\ I"'") Q) .-
Page 121 and 122:
115 - Table 37 *1e l11lebotOllUB ca
Page 123 and 124:
, Jan.22 26 28 7 7 20 22 23 23 Jul,
Page 125 and 126:
:r :r" :B, -119- Table lu V1Z'a8..
Page 127 and 128:
-121 V1IuIea 18 ola ted. trCII1 -te
Page 130 and 131:
124 ~ () .- '-- ~I() .~ w (X)~ ~ -~
Page 132 and 133:
Fig. 5. 126 The new meteorological
Page 134 and 135:
Fig. cages, intervals. 128 - 7. The
Page 136 and 137:
APPENDIX I TRE SEROLOGICAL RESPONSE
Page 138 and 139:
al. I -133 - These results offer a
Page 140 and 141:
5 Appendix I Bleeding Date Table 2
Page 142 and 143:
[ Appendix I U) w U) :) ~ .5 fi O-
Page 144 and 145:
Appendix I IC') ~ o: ::> (.!) ~ tI>
Page 146 and 147:
Appendix II p60ple, bIlt tilere 18
Page 148 and 149:
Appendi:x: II -144 where, 1n 1932,
Page 150 and 151:
o. v.2-'1 Appendix II Op}X)r'bm1tie
Page 152 and 153:
-148-
Page 154 and 155:
Appendix II -150 - otJ1er cases bac
Page 156 and 157:
Appendix II \m1.torm1:3' L negat.1v
Page 158 and 159:
Appendi:z: 11 -154- case *ria Ria (
Page 160 and 161:
Appendix II -156 - v1rQlence on tll
Page 162 and 163:
Beni, Brazil. Highways, Appendix II
Page 164 and 165:
Appendix III Influenza -160 - MYXOV
Page 166 and 167:
odents, Lingual 1956, Appendix III
Page 168 and 169:
us31, hibition, ver, ucambo. n, App
Page 170 and 171:
oasta1 aboratory p1dem1cs, . mazoni
Page 172 and 173:
Appendix III -168 - (Bradypus) from
Page 174 and 175:
fter t. Appendix III -170 - mosquit
Page 176 and 177:
itoes, rker, es. Appendix rn -172 T
Page 178 and 179:
Appendi:x III -174 - Tab1e 12 summa
Page 180 and 181:
Appendix liI Kairi vírus has been
Page 182 and 183:
Appendix ll! 178 13/53 peop1e at La
Page 184 and 185:
Appendix III -180 - Ungrouped Arbov
Page 186 and 187:
~ppendix li! and the vírus can pro
Page 188 and 189:
Appendix III -184 Several mosquito
Page 190 and 191:
1. 3. figs. Hyg. ~:372-96, li:620-6
Page 192 and 193:
Appendix III -188 CAUSEY O. R., CAU
Page 194 and 195:
31. ~3. 15. ~4 . ~ppendix -190 5ROP
Page 196 and 197:
50. Panamer. Para, Trap. mosquitoes
Page 198 and 199:
Appendix III CAUSEY O. R., SHOPE R.
Page 200 and 201:
Appendix III -196 - JOHNSON K. M.,
Page 202 and 203:
Appendix III
Page 204 and 205:
Appendix III 200 - Table 3 Arboviru
Page 206 and 207:
LI"\ QJ ~ .c tU E-4 Appendi:x ~ ti)
Page 208 and 209:
Appendi:x: III V i r u s Aedes spp.
Page 210 and 211:
0\ 41 .-I ~ ~ JJ ~ Appendix III a r
Page 212 and 213:
Tab1e Isolates Sentinel 141 14 13%c
show all

Belém VIRUS Laboratory

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?