19.06.2013 Views

[en] Landscape Ecological Survey of the Bipindi-Akom II ... - ITTO

[en] Landscape Ecological Survey of the Bipindi-Akom II ... - ITTO

[en] Landscape Ecological Survey of the Bipindi-Akom II ... - ITTO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5.3 Soil physical physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nyangong, Nyangong, Ebom and Ebimimbang soils<br />

Soil type type Depth Texture Texture Texture Texture Bulk Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity AWe<br />

(clay%) (silt%) (silt%) (sand%) (g/cm3) (%)<br />

Nyangong I 35-70 10-20 10-40 1.03 10<br />

2 50-80 50-80 5-15 10-40 1.21 12<br />

3 1.26 7<br />

Ebom I 20-50 5-20 40-60 1.22 17<br />

2 35-60 35-60 5-15 30-50 1.37 16<br />

3 1.4 1.4 12<br />

Ebimimbang I 0-25 5-15 60-90 1.3 11<br />

2 20-45 5-15 40-80 1.55 15 15<br />

3 1.63 n.a.<br />

Soil depth classes: I = 0-20cm; 2 = 20-60 cm; 3 = 60-90cm. Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity values are <strong>the</strong> average <strong>of</strong> at least 4<br />

observations. A AWC= WC= Available Water Cont<strong>en</strong>t (one or two observations per soil depth class).<br />

The Valley Bottom soils are dominated by a sandy texture, but in fact all all texture texture classes classes may may<br />

occur in in all possible possible sequ<strong>en</strong>ces. Stratification is characteristic for <strong>the</strong>se soils. In g<strong>en</strong>eral, g<strong>en</strong>eral, <strong>the</strong><br />

Valley Valley Bottom soils have have 5-30% clay and 40-90% sand sand in <strong>the</strong> topsoil. The subsurface horizons<br />

g<strong>en</strong>erally are more sandy.<br />

5.3.2 Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity<br />

The ranges ranges in bulk bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> soils soils in <strong>the</strong> TCP research research area area are 0.8 to lA g/cm3 in in <strong>the</strong><br />

topsoils topsoils (0-10 cm) and 1.0 to 1.7 g/cm g/cm 3 in <strong>the</strong> subsoils (20-90 cm) (Table 5.3). The bulk<br />

d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> all three three main soil soil types increase strongly with depth, depth, as as effects effects <strong>of</strong> cultivation cultivation and and<br />

organic matter matter cont<strong>en</strong>t decrease. decrease. The The increase <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities with depth take place 'within<br />

25 25 cm from from <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface. The The bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nyangong/Ebom soils and <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang<br />

soils are within <strong>the</strong> normal range <strong>of</strong> 1.0 to 1.6 g/cm g/cm3 3 and 1.2 to 1.8 g/cm g/cm 3 as giv<strong>en</strong> by Landon<br />

(1991) for clayey and sandy soils, respectively.<br />

3 as giv<strong>en</strong> by Landon<br />

(1991) for clayey and sandy soils, respectively.<br />

Average values <strong>of</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities for <strong>the</strong> Nyangong, Ebom and Ebimimbang soils at three depths<br />

(0-20 cm, 20-60 cm and 60-90cm) are giv<strong>en</strong> in Table 5.3. The Nyangong topsoils have bulk<br />

d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> around 1.0 g/cm3, and below 20 cm <strong>the</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities increase to values <strong>of</strong> 1.2 to<br />

1.3 g/cm3. The topsoils and subsurface horizons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebom soils have bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities around<br />

1.2 and lA g/cm3 Average values <strong>of</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities for <strong>the</strong> Nyangong, Ebom and Ebimimbang soils at three depths<br />

(0-20 cm, 20-60 cm and 60-90cm) are giv<strong>en</strong> in Table 5.3. The Nyangong topsoils have bulk<br />

d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> around 1.0 g/cm3, and below 20 cm <strong>the</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities increase to values <strong>of</strong> 1.2 to<br />

1.3 g/cm<br />

, respectively. Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang soils are <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

TCP research area, i.e. 1.3 g/cm 3 for <strong>the</strong> topsoils and 1.5 to 1.7 g/cm 3 for <strong>the</strong> subsoils. There is<br />

thus an increasing bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity with a decreasing clay cont<strong>en</strong>t.<br />

3 • The topsoils and subsurface horizons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebom soils have bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities around<br />

1.2 and 1.4 g/cm3 , respectively. Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang soils are <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

TCP research area, i.e. 1.3 g/cm3 for <strong>the</strong> topsoils and 1.5 to 1.7 g/cm3 for <strong>the</strong> subsoils. There is<br />

thus an increasing bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity with a decreasing clay cont<strong>en</strong>t.<br />

The Ebimimbang soils have less stable aggregates than <strong>the</strong> Ebom and Nyangong soils (Waterloo<br />

et al., 1997), resulting in vertical clay movem<strong>en</strong>t and lower permeability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang<br />

soils. The higher bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang Ebimimbang soils are explained by <strong>the</strong> lower aggregate<br />

stability and higher sand sand cont<strong>en</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se soils.<br />

Topsoils under agriculture have decreased organic matter cont<strong>en</strong>ts and less roots resulting in<br />

higher bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities d<strong>en</strong>sities compared to id<strong>en</strong>tical soils soils under forest (pers. comm. comm. Yemefack, 1996). 1996).<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!