Antiamoebic drugs for treating amoebic colitis - The Cochrane Library
Antiamoebic drugs for treating amoebic colitis - The Cochrane Library
Antiamoebic drugs for treating amoebic colitis - The Cochrane Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S<br />
HEADER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<br />
ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<br />
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2<br />
BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2<br />
OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />
METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />
RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8<br />
Figure 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />
Figure 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13<br />
Figure 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15<br />
Figure 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17<br />
DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17<br />
AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20<br />
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32<br />
DATA AND ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67<br />
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 1 Clinical failure: 1 to 14 days after end of<br />
treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72<br />
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 2 Clinical failure: 15 to 60 days after end of<br />
treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73<br />
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 3 Parasitological failure: 1 to 14 days after end of<br />
treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75<br />
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 4 Parasitological failure: 15 to 60 days after end<br />
of treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76<br />
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 5 Relapse (ornidazole). . . . . . . . 77<br />
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 6 Adverse events. . . . . . . . . . 78<br />
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Any anti<strong>amoebic</strong> drug vs placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical failure: 1 to 14 days after end of<br />
treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79<br />
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Any anti<strong>amoebic</strong> drug vs placebo, Outcome 2 Parasitological failure: 1 to 14 days after end of<br />
treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80<br />
Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Any anti<strong>amoebic</strong> drug vs placebo, Outcome 3 Other adverse events. . . . . . . . 81<br />
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Combination regimen vs monotherapy, Outcome 1 Clinical failure: 1 to 14 days after end of<br />
treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81<br />
Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 Combination regimen vs monotherapy, Outcome 2 Parasitological failure: 1 to 14 days after<br />
end of treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82<br />
Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 Single dose regimen vs longer regimen, Outcome 1 Clinical failure: 1 to 14 or 15 to 60 days<br />
after end of treatment, combined. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83<br />
Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4 Single dose regimen vs longer regimen, Outcome 2 Parasitological failure: 1 to 14 days after<br />
end of treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83<br />
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Other anti<strong>amoebic</strong> drug comparisons, Outcome 1 Clinical failure: 1 to 14 days after end of<br />
treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84<br />
Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 Other anti<strong>amoebic</strong> drug comparisons, Outcome 2 Parasitological failure: 1 to 14 days after end<br />
of treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85<br />
Analysis 6.1. Comparison 6 Subgroup analyses: alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 1 Parasitological failure 15 to<br />
60 days after end of treatment, by clinical category. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86<br />
Analysis 6.2. Comparison 6 Subgroup analyses: alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 2 Parasitological failure 15 to<br />
60 days after end of treatment, by age group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87<br />
Analysis 6.3. Comparison 6 Subgroup analyses: alternative drug vs metronidazole, Outcome 3 Parasitological failure 15 to<br />
60 days after end of treatment, single or mixed intestinal infection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88<br />
<strong>Anti<strong>amoebic</strong></strong> <strong>drugs</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>treating</strong> <strong>amoebic</strong> <strong>colitis</strong> (Review)<br />
Copyright © 2009 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cochrane</strong> Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
i