teamsters united parcel service national grievance committee

CASES CARRIED OVER:
9.5
N-09-263: Local 70 v. UPS, Oakland, CA
On behalf of all affected employees within NorCal,
Union alleges a violation of Article 37, claiming that
the Company failed to post the Opt-In/Opt-Out list as
required by the contract.
N-09-367: Local 70 v. UPS, Oakland, CA
On behalf of Ignacio Munoz, Union alleges a violation
of Articles 37 and 22. UPS is violating contractual
rights by not following what was negotiated for 9.5
violations (UPR-5-09-57H).
N-09-368: Local 70 v. UPS, Oakland, CA
On behalf of Ignacio Munoz, Union alleges a violation
of Articles 37 and 22. UPS is violating contractual
rights by not following what was negotiated for 9.5
violations (UPR-5-09-58H).
N-09-369: Local 70 v. UPS, Oakland, CA
On behalf of Ignacio Munoz, Union alleges a violation
of Articles 37 and 22. UPS is violating contractual
rights by not following what was negotiated for 9.5
violations (UPR-5-09-89F).
N-09-398: Local 70 v. UPS, Oakland, CA
On behalf of Ignacio Munoz, Union alleges that the
Company violated Article 37 and all others that apply,
claiming ongoing 9.5 violations (7/2/09).
N-10-168: Local 177 v. UPS, Hillside, NJ
On behalf of Aurelio Bernales, Union alleges a
violation of Article 37, Section 1, claiming the
Company violated the CBA.
N-10-171: Local 533 v. UPS, Reno, NV
On behalf of Scott Bryant, Union alleges a violation
of Article 37, Section 1, claiming that management has
failed to post 9.5 list after being asked repeatedly
(7/13/09, 7/14/09, 7/15/09 and 7/16/09).
-44-