25.06.2013 Views

The Top 100 NGOs 2013. - Akshaya Patra

The Top 100 NGOs 2013. - Akshaya Patra

The Top 100 NGOs 2013. - Akshaya Patra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

interests outside Belarus. As a<br />

result, the EU sanctions have hardly<br />

harmed them.<br />

<strong>The</strong> EU could, however, have a<br />

significant impact on other European-<br />

Belarus businesses. Moshensky,<br />

Shakutin and <strong>Top</strong>uzidis all have<br />

EU-based holdings, as do many other<br />

individuals who prefer to invest in<br />

Belarus from a safe external vantage<br />

point – a practice that is spreading<br />

within the domestic community as it<br />

helps to substantially lower dependence<br />

on Lukashenko. Consequently, through<br />

an ironic political twist, reinforcing<br />

sanctions on Belarusian businesses<br />

mainly hurts those – such as the<br />

promising young Aleksei Zhukov<br />

heading the Alyuteh Company –<br />

who are trying to escape the reaches<br />

of the President’s control. <strong>The</strong><br />

resultant impact when it comes to<br />

foreign investor confidence means<br />

that developing interests in the EU<br />

has become increasingly difficult<br />

for such enterprises. Potential local<br />

partners in external markets have<br />

no guarantee that, sooner or later,<br />

these good willed and more or less<br />

independent figures will not be<br />

hit adversely by further<br />

European restrictions.<br />

At the same time, alternative policies<br />

are difficult to identify. Betting on<br />

strengthening the political opposition<br />

and democratic breakthroughs is not<br />

a realistic option from a European<br />

perspective. Liberal and opposition<br />

movements are deeply divided between<br />

several leaders, none of whom stand out<br />

as obvious challengers to Lukashenko.<br />

Too ideological and radicalized, most<br />

also act, in part, from outside the<br />

country – predominantly, from Poland.<br />

This split geographical base is likely<br />

to lead to a kind of muted competition<br />

between externally based groups –<br />

especially media actors – and domestic<br />

activists. Because the latter take most<br />

of the risks in a climate of strong<br />

repression, they typically also claim<br />

the most legitimacy. Meanwhile, the<br />

external groups, with greater control<br />

over communications, try to exert some<br />

influence by favoring one faction over<br />

another. Moreover, when the wives or<br />

sisters of former presidential candidates<br />

speak as if they were representing a<br />

particular group, further confusion is<br />

added to an already blurred picture.<br />

FeaTure<br />

So far, none of these movements has<br />

been able to propose a clear, effective<br />

and realistic strategy. Arguably, it<br />

is because it would be futile to call<br />

for regime change in the current<br />

Belarusian context. As long as Russia<br />

agrees to subsidize its small neighbor,<br />

Lukashenko and his entourage will be<br />

able to resist any European pressure or<br />

public demonstrations of discontent.<br />

Minsk currently receives several billion<br />

dollars from Moscow each year to<br />

buy social peace, as well as to provide<br />

minimal economic stability.<br />

<strong>The</strong> President is therefore under no<br />

pressure to sit at a negotiating table<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> groups<br />

aligned against<br />

Lukashenko<br />

cannot count<br />

their forces, assess<br />

their audience<br />

or set achievable<br />

targets, so instead<br />

are condemned to<br />

agitate in almost<br />

empty spaces.’<br />

with what he and others would suggest<br />

are barely legitimate opposition<br />

leaders. Wishful thinking and lobbying<br />

for strengthened actions based on<br />

promoting European values can lead<br />

nowhere, at least in the immediate<br />

future. Even more so as the EU has<br />

never previously shown an inclination to<br />

enforce such a moral policy elsewhere.<br />

Although the new European Dialogue<br />

for Modernization, launched last April,<br />

includes a number of very pragmatic<br />

goals, it has not, to date, proven to be<br />

well managed or coordinated. Perhaps<br />

inevitably, it has also failed to deliver<br />

any firm results.<br />

Oddly, the demands of the Belarusian<br />

opposition do not match economic<br />

and political reality. This apparent<br />

incongruity constitutes one of<br />

Lukashenko’s major achievements.<br />

Clearly, deprived of any public platform<br />

<strong>The</strong> gloBal Journal + January & FeBruary 2013<br />

108<br />

to convey their message – whether<br />

via the media, or in an open and free<br />

political or parliamentary context –<br />

the opposition cannot be held totally<br />

responsible for its failure to appear<br />

relevant, credible and legitimate.<br />

Without the means to organize<br />

and communicate, any opposition<br />

movement would find it difficult to<br />

unify potential members and exercise<br />

a political role. <strong>The</strong> groups aligned<br />

against Lukashenko cannot count<br />

their forces, assess their audience or<br />

set achievable targets, so instead are<br />

condemned to agitate in almost empty<br />

spaces. Recent parliamentary electoral<br />

campaigns in Belarus illustrate this<br />

point. <strong>The</strong> major opposition groups –<br />

dismissed as “nobodies” by<br />

Lukashenko – boycotted last<br />

September’s elections to protest the<br />

detention of political prisoners and<br />

alleged opportunities for electoral fraud.<br />

Focused on the boycott issue, those<br />

opposition parties that did participate<br />

said nothing about economic issues,<br />

and hardly mentioned the traumatic<br />

currency crisis of 2011, much less<br />

propose any solutions. Unless Russia<br />

performs a U-turn, provoking a serious<br />

financial crash in Belarus, Lukashenko<br />

has ensured his political position for the<br />

next three years, while the opposition<br />

remains frozen. Well-informed<br />

independent experts in Minsk confirm<br />

that, “there is nothing more to do now<br />

than to wait for the next presidential<br />

election in 2015.”<br />

In Sabali, meanwhile, people tend to<br />

think that even if there were no more<br />

elections, life would not change. With<br />

a pension of around $200 dollars per<br />

month, the elderly can meet all their<br />

basic needs and live quite well.<br />

Well, that is, if one discounts traveling<br />

beyond the village or eating out at<br />

nearby restaurants. Ivan, who supervises<br />

Sabali’s first small ethno-museum<br />

set up by his son in an old house<br />

nearby, was in no hurry to vote. When<br />

the ballot box arrived he inserted his<br />

ballot paper in front of the two<br />

mandated officials, whom he knew very<br />

well. Voting itself meant nothing. He<br />

and his wife will be happy either way,<br />

watching their son help local boy made<br />

good Chizh to accomplish his dream<br />

of turning Sabali into a large touristcultural-ethnographic<br />

complex. If<br />

nothing else, their house will<br />

be repainted.<br />

CERAH, a Joint Centre of<br />

HUMANITARIAN ACTION<br />

Advanced Training for Professionals<br />

in Geneva<br />

Master’s programme and short specialised courses<br />

www.cerahgeneve.ch<br />

Mathare, Kenya © Julius Mwelu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!