OW 73 - Outweek.net
OW 73 - Outweek.net
OW 73 - Outweek.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
,<br />
••<br />
.<br />
meSsase is cloaked in music so adored by the establishment<br />
th!lt nobody could say no. But AIDS-phobia, it seems,<br />
proved much stronger than they anticipated and not so<br />
easily veiled.<br />
~ ,.. .' ... . .<br />
.<br />
. For starters, despite many months of m~g'with CEOs<br />
of over 75 majOr international corporations, Red Hot and<br />
Blue .never found a sPollJiOf to help them defray the costs of<br />
p.toduction. Even after Chrysalis signed 011 as the record<br />
~y batidling the project, not a single corporation cJare9<br />
, .to breiak with the pack by lending even token support to the<br />
· , .fight against AIDS. Only Entertainment Weekly stepped for-<br />
\Vard, sponsoring a dinner party for Red Hot and Bi~ in Los<br />
· . . ~geIes that garnered a 19t of press. It was an exercise that<br />
..' left; Blake quite astounded.<br />
:..... ," "~" ~ ' .<br />
. '.<br />
.'· . '.<br />
:, '~e were turned down for<br />
. ~..<br />
'.' ..~ ., .<br />
sponsorship by everyone you<br />
. :.".<br />
;:;,<br />
." cO,illd ilJ)agine;<br />
.""want ~oget ~to<br />
I don't really<br />
nameS at .this<br />
.: poiDt--l'dJike to get into names<br />
• •<br />
, on Dec, " though-because,<br />
,<br />
who knows? I've still got this<br />
. , ,<br />
op~mism that maybe· someone<br />
Will come. out of the woodwork,<br />
what with all thepress.B~t<br />
.' essentially we were turned<br />
,:;,;:,'" . !iown py eyeryone: sneaker<br />
'. , companies, Soft drink comiYanies<br />
and eV~r:Yone for whom t4ese<br />
artists' . images were images<br />
yOu!d assume' that they'd want<br />
•,<br />
~ , "<br />
:, .. ;',<br />
to i~tifywith. '<br />
.,". .<br />
."I.saJd to them, 'You ,know, .<br />
, . .<br />
'; . ,~peopl~ wit? HIV and AIDS<br />
.'<br />
,<br />
-l"" - k f' ',-'. • ,<br />
,<br />
•<br />
•<br />
••<br />
,'.<br />
.' ,<br />
wear jeans; They wear sneakerli.<br />
They:, do e:verythingthat<br />
evetfbOdy else does~No't:ruinks<br />
to you, though.' Their excuses<br />
were things like, ':That's not our<br />
prime focus for 1990:' Well,<br />
their prime focus is bullshit,<br />
quite honestly.",' .<br />
At ABC-TV, which had<br />
. bou8ht the rights to air the video,<br />
program in America, <strong>net</strong>work<br />
execs were saying no to a number<br />
9,f'the more provocative .<br />
. (and effective) videos, cutting,<br />
large portions of the original<br />
~ and niIiog in the gaps,<br />
with their.oWn script. As we go<br />
to press, nobody working on the<br />
project seems able or willing<br />
.....to'say just how similar·<br />
ASC's shoW will be to the original<br />
[~estory .·on page 4i], but<br />
riobody'isharboring any illusions.<br />
Nor have BritiSh music crit-<br />
, ics helped matters any, accOrding,to<br />
Wainer. Much In'keeplng<br />
with the tradition' of macho<br />
•<br />
•<br />
38 OUTWII.K Dao..... _r" f_<br />
,<br />
•<br />
Above: Era......<br />
Video, directed<br />
by Adelle Lutz<br />
and Sandy McLeod,<br />
may)_t·<br />
prove to be<br />
"'1'00 Darn Hot."<br />
Optioalte, left: David .<br />
Byrne. directed hi.<br />
,<br />
own video of "Don't<br />
•<br />
Fence Me In.''<br />
Right: .gD Pop<br />
and DebbleHany<br />
.pelr off In<br />
... e •••Did You .vahl"<br />
• •<br />
..rock criticism, British Pop journalists sOund jaded at best and<br />
doWnright spiteful at worst. ,. , ,<br />
"Here in England, a lot of music journalists .nave<br />
attacked the actual record, saying that Cole P9rter would<br />
tum in his grave," explains Watney. "How th!'! hell do they<br />
know what Cole Porter would think? I, think Cole 'Porter<br />
•<br />
would cheer. As a man (acing an epidemiC and thinking that<br />
,<br />
his music could help raise some money and win'over some<br />
minds, I think he'd. be absolutely cheering. How can they<br />
say that you can't tamper with something a$ sacred as Cole<br />
Porter? It's like saying that you can't paint a picture [a certain]<br />
way because the Sistine Chapel will decompOse. That's<br />
so absurd., It's just lightly veiled homophobia, spoken by<br />
male' rock critics who are just Jbcious little &hits, really.<br />
They're only revealing th~ depthS of their own ignorance,<br />
and they contribute to the' ignorance, sadly, because they<br />
are the gate-k~ to mass culture."<br />
. Overall, the album is a wonderful presentation of Cole<br />
Porter" with styles ranging from Sinead O'Coniler's spine-tin-<br />
81ing rendition of "You Do Something to Me" to the apocalyptic<br />
spoof of "Well Did You Evah!" interpreted by Debbie<br />
Harry and Iggy Pop. The videos are breathtakingly beautiful, .... :"<br />
with Jean-Baptiste Mondino's ~on of Neneh Cherry in. :"j<br />
"I've Got You Under My,Skin" settlDg new standards. On the .• ,.:<br />
otµer hand, while it is unrealistic to expect that'all of the<br />
Songs in this package could be' manipulated to give a blata.(ltly·AIDS-related<br />
message, the:videos offered a perfect<br />
oppo~unity to contextualize the music with thoughtful<br />
imagery that would have carried .the 'theme·a little further.<br />
S?ffie of the artists jumped at the opportunity by Including<br />
sex-positive imagery, documenta'ly footage or Simple sloga~