28.06.2013 Views

Alternation article template - Alternation Journal - University of ...

Alternation article template - Alternation Journal - University of ...

Alternation article template - Alternation Journal - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Johannes A. Smit<br />

Firstly, we may acknowledge that apartheid’s Ideological State<br />

Apparatuses (ISAs) were indeed disparate – those chosen by the state could<br />

have been different. Yet, as a brief overview <strong>of</strong> the state’s legal framework<br />

shows, the racist state’s ISAs as founded in state laws, formed a firm grid in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> which the ruling racist elite and its Repressive State Apparatuses<br />

(RSAs) could function 11 . Drawing on an earlier paper (cf. Smit 2002), they<br />

can be briefly outlined in terms <strong>of</strong> 1) the legislation prior to 1948 which<br />

cultivated certain racial practices and social formations in society broadly<br />

speaking; and 2) the actual legal framework the racist state put in place – i.e.<br />

as it was supposed to not only structure society ideologically, but also use<br />

these systems and structures to enforce and inculcate racial superiority and<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> existence under the racist ideology by both oppressor and<br />

oppressed. The legal framework mainly focused on the governance <strong>of</strong> sex,<br />

suppressing and prevention <strong>of</strong> political resistance and opposition, the<br />

governing <strong>of</strong> relations in local communities (‘little apartheid’), as well as in<br />

education, the economy, and the establishment <strong>of</strong> the black homelands 12<br />

.<br />

Against the background <strong>of</strong> the fully operationalising <strong>of</strong> the systems and<br />

institutions that inculcated the ideology, direct governance – akin to<br />

Althusser’s RSAs (1971:138) – provided a unified coordinating and<br />

11 In order to make a distinction between direct state governance <strong>of</strong> the ruling<br />

elite via its direct repressive systems and its indirect governance via its coopting<br />

<strong>of</strong> systems and institutions in the sate, Althusser’s (1971) distinction<br />

between the RSAs and ISAs is helpful. In his context <strong>of</strong> 1950s France, the<br />

ISA’s comprised <strong>of</strong>: 1) the religious ISA (the system <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

churches/ [religions]); 2) the educational ISA (the system <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

public and private ‘schools’); 3) the family ISA; 4) the legal ISA; 5) the<br />

political ISA (the political system, including the different parties); 6) the<br />

trade-union ISA; 7) the communications ISA (press, radio and television,<br />

etc.); 8) the cultural ISA (literature, the arts, sports, etc.).<br />

12 I only provide a sample <strong>of</strong> these laws. For a full break-down with<br />

discussions <strong>of</strong> the different Acts impacting on or contributing to the<br />

establishing <strong>of</strong> apartheid South Africa, consult, http://www.sahistory.<br />

org.za/pages/chronology/special - chrono/governance/apartheid - legislation.<br />

html. The different timeframes this website treats are: 1856 – 1913; 1920s;<br />

1930s; 1940s; 1950s; 1960s; 1970s.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!