28.06.2013 Views

Alternation article template - Alternation Journal - University of ...

Alternation article template - Alternation Journal - University of ...

Alternation article template - Alternation Journal - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Johannes A. Smit<br />

… To allow a black man in to play, and perhaps beat, a white man<br />

would have been a contradiction <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> white supremacy.<br />

In fact, merely for a black man to play in terms <strong>of</strong> equality with a<br />

white man, whether he won or lost, is still not permissible because<br />

this too would undermine the doctrine <strong>of</strong> racial supremacy—white<br />

supremacy.<br />

… South Africa wishes to be a part <strong>of</strong> the international<br />

family <strong>of</strong> nations, at least as far as sports are concerned, while at the<br />

same time violating the international code <strong>of</strong> sports which says ‘there<br />

will be no racial discrimination in sports’. They have this peculiar<br />

dilemma: on the one hand they wish to have racial discrimination<br />

and they enshrine it in their constitution, and, on the other hand, they<br />

wish to participate with the rest <strong>of</strong> the world on the basis <strong>of</strong> equality<br />

while they declare that they are committed to a policy <strong>of</strong> inequality<br />

(Brutus [1970] 2006:147; e.a.).<br />

Having established this argument he then addresses the Western<br />

nations, especially the United States, Britain, France and Australia who<br />

continue to have sporting relations with apartheid South Africa. On the one<br />

hand, they continue these relations, he argues, for economic and political<br />

reasons. However, if they do continue these relations, they in fact function as<br />

‘protectors’ <strong>of</strong> South Africa which is unacceptable. If they do not break<br />

sporting relations ‘then we will know that their concern for civil rights, for<br />

equality <strong>of</strong> citizens as far as sport are concerned, is hypocrisy’ (Brutus<br />

[1970] 2006:148). What is needed is international ‘unity’ in the total<br />

exclusion <strong>of</strong> South Africa from international participation in sports. And for<br />

this, the main argument derives from human rights.<br />

I believe that the countries that have taken a stand against South<br />

Africa in sports must now go further, and they must make it clear<br />

that not only will they break <strong>of</strong>f relations with South Africa but they<br />

will break <strong>of</strong>f relations with the countries which continue to<br />

strengthen and support the South African racists. If this means no<br />

longer participating at White City, London, or at Madison Square<br />

Garden, New York, I believe that countries have to go to that point<br />

<strong>of</strong> saying, “If you will support racism, then we are no longer<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!