29.06.2013 Views

Saxon Southampton; a New Review - Archaeology Data Service

Saxon Southampton; a New Review - Archaeology Data Service

Saxon Southampton; a New Review - Archaeology Data Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PHILIP HOLDSWORTH<br />

A number of other features are to be associated with the building. Of these,<br />

a cross wall is indicated by a line of post-holes at right angles to the western<br />

doorpost.<br />

DISCUSSION OF THE BUILDINGS<br />

With the exception of Buildings 7 and 8, the structures are of types well<br />

described from Anglo-<strong>Saxon</strong> studies and add little to existing knowledge. Only<br />

Building 4, with its use of two different constructional techniques, is of particular<br />

interest, inasmuch as it confirms the hypothesis that buildings of ground-sill<br />

construction tend to be later than those with their wall posts set in trenches.l"<br />

However, Buildings 7 and 8 are worthy of detailed consideration. Both were<br />

buildings of paired post-hole construction; Building 7 was certainly bow-sided and<br />

Building 8 probably so. The pottery suggests that the destruction of Building 8<br />

took place early in the 9th century.<br />

Although only a portion of the middle of each building was excavated, the<br />

overall dimensions of both can be estimated by comparing their mid-widths with<br />

the ratios of length to mid-width and of mid-width to end-width of other bowsided<br />

buildings (TABLE I). Both continental and British exarriples have been used,<br />

although the numbers are limited as preliminary reports and summaries rarely<br />

give measurements.<br />

TABLE I<br />

DIMENSIONS OF HAMWIH BUILDINGS 7 AND 8 COMPARED<br />

WITH OTHER BOW-SIDED BUILDINGS<br />

Dorestad"<br />

Buckdcn"<br />

Chaltonl"<br />

Cheddar!"<br />

Average ratio<br />

Building 7<br />

Building 8<br />

Length: mid-width<br />

4.1 : I<br />

2.7 : I<br />

2.2 : I<br />

3.9: I<br />

3.22 : I<br />

Mid-width<br />

5·70 m.<br />

6.80m.<br />

Estimated<br />

length<br />

18.35 m.<br />

21.89 m.<br />

Mid-width: end-width<br />

1.25 : I<br />

I. I 3 : I<br />

I. I 8 : I<br />

1.33 : I<br />

1.22 : I<br />

Estimated<br />

end-width<br />

{.67 m.<br />

5.57 m.<br />

Assuming that between a third and a half of the length of each building was<br />

excavated, it is probable that these estimated dimensions are correct to within a<br />

5% error.<br />

i s P. V. Addyman, 'The Anglo-<strong>Saxon</strong> house: a new review', Anglo-<strong>Saxon</strong> England, I (1972),306.<br />

17 W. A. van Es, 'Excavations at Dorestad: a pre-preliminary report', Berichten Rijkdienst v.h. Oudheidkundig<br />

Bodemonderzoek, XIX (1969), 183-207.<br />

18 C. F. Tebbutt, 'An r rth century "boat-shaped" building at Buckden, Huntingdonshire', Proc, Camb.<br />

Antiq. Soc., LV (1962), 13-15.<br />

1. P. V. Addyman and D. Leigh, 'The Anglo-<strong>Saxon</strong> village at Chalton, Hampshire: a second interim<br />

report', Medieval Archaeol., XVII (1973), fig. 6.<br />

'0 P. Rahtz, 'The <strong>Saxon</strong> and medieval palaces at Cheddar, Somerset: an interim report of excavations<br />

in 1960-62', Medieval Archaeol., VI-VII (1962-3), 3-66.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!