13.10.2012 Views

Monarch-mind-control

Monarch-mind-control

Monarch-mind-control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

chapter_5<br />

In court, the written records can be introduced along with the<br />

person who recorded them. In other words, the personal witness is<br />

still important even with written documents. The testimony of our<br />

eyewitnesses expose Billy Graham's <strong>mind</strong>-<strong>control</strong> activities. Still,<br />

we want to bear in <strong>mind</strong> that witnesses have varying degrees of<br />

credibility and knowledge. The qualifications of witness in relation<br />

to what they are testifying is important. But to simply dismiss all<br />

these witnesses because they are not paper is simply to cut<br />

ourselves off from many valuable sources of information.<br />

In accumulating evidence, the researcher will come upon two types<br />

of information. One is prearranged evidence and the other is called<br />

casual evidence. Casual evidence is evidence that has just happened<br />

to appear by accident. An actual example is when friends of mine<br />

met a total stranger who happens to be a Mason and he offhandedly<br />

talks about Billy Graham being a Freemason. Casual evidence is<br />

simply evidence that happens without the interested party having<br />

anything to do with it surfacing. Finding casual evidence is<br />

generally "luck".<br />

In this case, Fritz has bumped into a great deal of casual evidence,<br />

simply because he had his eyes open and has been investigating this<br />

area for several years. Because of the situation today in this nation,<br />

there is little chance to get a proper hearing of this information. In<br />

terms of the future, indeed, the backlash from this book may silence<br />

us. The truth will still remain, even if we and the other witnesses<br />

don't.<br />

We can draw conclusions about ducks from studying various types<br />

of ducks. I can not draw conclusions about radios from studying<br />

ducks, I can generalize about American made cars, but I can't<br />

include in my generalization about American cars an ox-cart in<br />

India. This may sound basic, and it is, yet people try to generalize<br />

by lumping the generational Satanists in with everybody else, and it<br />

just doesn't work. They also try to draw conclusions about the<br />

Freemasons on the basis of what the Rotary Club they belong to is<br />

like and it just doesn't work.<br />

http://mercury.spaceports.com/~persewen/fritz/fritz-ch5-3.html (15 of 30) [7/15/2000 7:59:28 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!