07.07.2013 Views

the case of the 'urban villas'

the case of the 'urban villas'

the case of the 'urban villas'

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dr. Anne Hrychuk Kontokosta<br />

Visiting Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Pratt Institute<br />

Research Associate, Institute for <strong>the</strong> Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ancient World, NYU<br />

Making <strong>the</strong> private public: from elite horti to imperial <strong>the</strong>rmae<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Middle Republic, <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> over sixty horti (elaborate garden estates) by <strong>the</strong><br />

city’s elite signaled a new trend in urban domestic living with long‐lasting impacts on <strong>the</strong> art,<br />

architecture, and city‐plan <strong>of</strong> Rome. An alternative to <strong>the</strong> traditional domus, opulent horti,<br />

which may have been inspired by Hellenistic royal palaces, were constructed on <strong>the</strong> outskirts<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city ‐ distant and private enough to be unconstrained by traditional social codes, while<br />

close enough for <strong>the</strong>ir owners to stay involved in public life and advertise <strong>the</strong>ir immense<br />

personal wealth. The ambiguous nature <strong>of</strong> horti (suburban/urban; public/private;<br />

Roman/Hellenistic) was reflected by its nomenclature (“vegetable garden”), which <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

positive, traditional connotations for a provocative, new architectural type.<br />

Not until <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Republic can literary sources and archaeological evidence<br />

fully attest to <strong>the</strong> function <strong>of</strong> horti as private enclaves for Rome’s most influential public<br />

residents (Caesar, Pompey, Lucullus, Maecenas, Sallust). This paper proposes that while<br />

private horti continued to act as retreats for <strong>the</strong> city’s elite, in <strong>the</strong> imperial period <strong>the</strong>y also<br />

became architectural, decorative, and ‐ in some ways ‐ even functional models for <strong>the</strong> city’s<br />

new public <strong>the</strong>rmae. Imperial <strong>the</strong>rmae <strong>of</strong>fered Romans new types <strong>of</strong> urban experiences<br />

(luxurious gardens, foreign art, libraries, etc.) previously associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

socially‐restricted spaces <strong>of</strong> Roman horti. To <strong>the</strong> ancient viewer, <strong>the</strong> connection would have<br />

been visually explicit when M. Agrippa built <strong>the</strong> first imperial bath (25BCE) directly adjacent<br />

his own private hortus. By <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> revolutionary Baths <strong>of</strong> Nero in 60 CE<br />

(famous for <strong>the</strong>ir axial plan and elaborate decoration) many features <strong>of</strong> horti were<br />

permanently established in imperial <strong>the</strong>rmae. Using a variety <strong>of</strong> archaeological and textual<br />

evidence, this paper traces evidence for <strong>the</strong> unusual influence <strong>of</strong> private residences on one <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> most public institutions <strong>of</strong> Imperial Rome.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!