12.07.2013 Views

Untitled - Memorial University's Digital Archives - Memorial ...

Untitled - Memorial University's Digital Archives - Memorial ...

Untitled - Memorial University's Digital Archives - Memorial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

0 ,1':'311


SARS and Illness Narratives: An Examination of an Epidemic<br />

by<br />

© Jon D. Lee<br />

A thesis submitted to the<br />

School of Graduate Studies<br />

in partial fulfillment of the<br />

requirements for the degree of<br />

Doctor of Philosophy<br />

Department of Folklore<br />

<strong>Memorial</strong> University of Newfound land<br />

August 2008<br />

St. John' s Newfoundland


Abstract<br />

One of the largest recent disease outbreaks began in November of 2002. .....hen the<br />

first cases of a disease that wou ld soon be know n as SARS began spreading in Ch ina.<br />

Since then. the SA RS coro navirus has achieved infamy seldom seen among diseases.<br />

s.....eeping through medi a and Internet sources to create a panic that left thousands of<br />

people halfway around the .....orld wearing surgical masks in attempts to protect<br />

them selves from perceived harm.<br />

The goal of this dissertation is to examine and understa nd the narratives that<br />

people told about the SA RS outbreak- the rumors. gossip. legends. jo kes. and other<br />

forms of oral communication. Examining these narratives will provide insights into why<br />

peop le believe the things they do about disea..es, and why narratives both shape and are<br />

shaped hy disease.<br />

A key concept included in this examination involves the reasons behind the<br />

exaggerated. and in many cases disproportionate reactions exhibited by the puhlic. Tied<br />

lip in these reaction.. were issues of race and cthnicity. personal and familial protection.<br />

and fear. all of which were directly influenced by oral narratives. as well as by<br />

information gathered from media sources. Ultimately. sources such as newspapers and<br />

news broad casts can be blamed for the larger part of the hysteria that surrounded the<br />

outbreak. But oral narratives were also culpable. and so a second thrust of this work will<br />

be to examine what steps can be taken to coun teract. or po..sibly preempt these ...ources of<br />

information.


Ultimately. it is the goa l of this work to demonstrate that the types of narratives<br />

that circulated during the SARS outbreak closely resem bled narratives associated with<br />

other diseases. thereby estab li..hing a template or typology of di..ea..e narratives. The<br />

existence of such a typology would mean that medica l and health personnel. respon ding<br />

to future d isease out brea ks, would be able to bette r predict the fonns of narrative that<br />

wou ld arise . and would thus be better able to respond to the panic and xenophobi a that so<br />

often accompany epidemics.<br />

iii


Writing any list such as this is stressfu l. to say the least. I began researc hing this<br />

project almost exactly five years before completing my first draft . and in that lime I no<br />

doubt discussed my various and ever-changing ideas with hundred s of people. Dozens<br />

more helped me in subtler ways. It lakes a village 10 raise a child . as the saying goes. and<br />

it took the support and encouragement of everyone around me 10 help me create this<br />

work . The impulse to therefore include in this section anyone and ever yone I' ve talked to<br />

since March of 2003 is strong.<br />

More stressfu l still. after narrowing down this list of contribu tors, is the task of<br />

plac ing them into some sort of order. Whose name should be first? Will i offen d anyo ne<br />

by placing the ir name last? By leaving them out altoge ther. even if by accident? To this<br />

last question I can only say, I tried my best to include everyo ne, and if a name is nOI on<br />

this list il is only due to my idiocy. and not because I did ne t appreciate what thai person<br />

did for mc.<br />

As for ranking names by importance, I have concluded that any such feat would<br />

he self-defea ting. I cannot say. for the most part. that nne person helped me more than<br />

another. Like the butterfly in Ray Bradbury' s "A Sound of Thunder: ' the removal of any<br />

one perso n from the histor y of this project could result in catastro phe. The lists of peop le<br />

that make up the rest of this section will therefore berandom. written down as they<br />

occurred 10 me. with no differentiations made as to importance or usefulness .<br />

iv


Save one. I mel my wife. Lynncttc. only a few months before beginning this<br />

projec t. She has, in faith and love beyond my com prehension. remained beside me<br />

throughout my strugg le to bring this work to light. offering condolences where necessary<br />

and. as was more often the case. Drill-Sergeant-like encou ragement during my periods of<br />

sloth and torpor . For putting up with me (and putting me up. given my graduate student's<br />

salary) . I will never adequate ly be able to express my gratitude . Thank you. my love.<br />

In random order . then. I also wish to thank the following people .<br />

None of this could have been possible-quite literally- without the time and<br />

space volunteered me by my interviewees: Jennifer Lim. Angel and Rosita Lim. Luis<br />

Tan. Mike Larse n. Jonathan Gou ld. Annie Ferraro . Mayee Ramrattan. Ju..tin Aitcbeson.<br />

Ann Mora n. Seny Zamora. Benjamin Sandler. and Heather Read. For answering my<br />

quest ions. providing me with data and new avenues of research . and for making me<br />

realize import ant aspects of my research that even I wasn' t aware of. 1am foreve r<br />

indebted.<br />

My former roommat e Robert "Robbie D" Dennis was instrumenta l in not only<br />

helping me procure a place to stay while I conducted my research in Toronto . Canada.<br />

but for introducing me to one of my informant s. and for providing me with bibliographic<br />

resources. Robert' s sister. Hollie, and her husband. Michael Peter Carte r, were kind<br />

enough to o ffer me a bed and an Internet connect ion in Toronto, and more importantly.<br />

free use of their coffee maker.<br />

My friends and fellow graduate students in the Folklore Departme nt at <strong>Memorial</strong><br />

University of Newfo undland also deserve to be mentioned . and none more so than Lynne


McNeill and Andrea Kina. Together. the three of us suffered the long road East. and<br />

logged hundreds of hours of encouragement. diversion. ideational dissection, and support.<br />

Without Lynne. I could not have written sections of chapter six; without Andrea, I would<br />

not have survived chapter two.<br />

Many of the professors in the Folklore Department buttressed me at one time or<br />

another, and none so much as Diane Goldstein. dissertation advisor extraordinaire. who<br />

challenged me at every tum and forced me to greatly hone my mental skewers.<br />

Committee members Paul Smith and Cory Thome provided additional assistance.<br />

slipping important mailings and printouts into my mailbox and otherwise providing new<br />

ideas and sources of material. Martin Lovelace, who served as Department Head for most<br />

of the years I was physically present at MUN, offered constant encourag ement. and more<br />

importantly. bel ieved in me enough as an educator to consistently offer me course s to<br />

teach. In addition. Dr. Lovelace was generous enough to step in last-minute as a<br />

committee member when circumstances left Dr. Smith unable to continue. Philip Hiscock<br />

performed brilliantly in his role as teaching mentor, and offered better bibliographic<br />

ndvice than even my Chicago Style Manual. Peter Narvaez's CD Some Good Blues<br />

played constantly in the background. as did his theory lectures from Folk 6030. Diane<br />

Tye' s clarifications of proper dissertation format and length kept me buoyant during<br />

mental storms. And the patience and grace of departmental secretaries Sharon Cochrane<br />

and Cindy Turpin cannot be underestimated for keeping me out of trouble. for helping me<br />

organize my academic life. and for providing me with the resources I needed to make it<br />

from one class to the next.<br />

vi


MUN was not the only univers ity to provide me with useful folklor istic mentors.<br />

Jeannie Thom as. Sieve Siporin. and Barre Toelken of Utah Slate University are<br />

singu larly respons ible for not only gelling me intereste d in this disci pline in the first<br />

place . but for writing me the leiters thai gOIme accep ted into MUN. and for con tinuing to<br />

sho w their loyalty by writing me the dozens of letters of recommendation that I have<br />

thrown their way in my search for gainful employment. Mikel Koven and Elliott Oring<br />

have given me helpful feedba ck on conference papers. sometimes providing jaw­<br />

dropping alternate views of key elements that have forced me 10 reconsider large parts of<br />

theories. And I can only send out a broad "than ks't to the dozens of folk lorists-both<br />

professionals and students-who have come up to me at conferences and offered<br />

positive. unso licited reviews of my papers.<br />

Outside of the acade mic world . no two peo ple have been more influentia l and<br />

supportive than my parents. David and Jan. Together with my grandmot hcrs-c-Ruth and<br />

Will a-c-they have provided shou lders strong enough on which to suppo rt the worl d. For<br />

assistance both financial and emotional. I offer the followin g prayer: May your beer be<br />

forever cold and never fiat. Gracias.<br />

I also wish to extend my appreciation 10 every one who has eve r enco uraged me to<br />

write. regardless of ge nre. Special mention must be given here to Sam Green. Micha el<br />

Donovan. Bill Holm. Bill Kloefkorn . Robert Hodgson Van Wagoner. Primus St. John .<br />

1.V. Brumm els and Eddie Elfers at Logan House Press. Charles Cuthbertso n. Robin<br />

Parent. Micah Schicker . Chris Okelberry, Ian Brod ie. and Jodi McDavid .<br />

vii


Finally. a note for the fallen. Ellen Meloy. Lcslic Norris. and Ken Brewer-c-all<br />

wonderfu l people. all brilliant writers. all fast fricnds-did not make it to see the<br />

completion of this work. I know they would have been proud to see me succeed. From<br />

whatever vantage point they're watching me. I hope they're smiling.<br />

viii


Abstract<br />

Ac knowledgmen ts<br />

Chapter<br />

I. The Yellow Brick Road<br />

Tab le of Contents<br />

2. Folklore. Media. and Medicine 25<br />

Folklore and Folkloristic Materials 29<br />

iv<br />

Contemporary Legends 32<br />

Health Panics 39<br />

Race and Racialization oW<br />

Risk and Risk Assessment 47<br />

Media Theory 53<br />

SARS and Official Medicine 61<br />

3. Chronicle of a Health Panic 73<br />

4. SARS and AIDS: A Comparison of Etiological Legends 145<br />

5. We Gather Together: SARS and Public Space 167<br />

6. Private Actions in Public Spaces; SARS and Paradigm Violations 193<br />

7. "Please Receive Communion Through Your Hands": Personal and<br />

Communal Mediation of Stigma in the 2003 SARS Epidemic 214<br />

8. The Cause and the Cure; Folk Medicine and SARS 243<br />

9. Full Circle: The Recycling of Disease Narratives 275<br />

10. Epilogue: ...And the World Moved On 293<br />

ix


References Cited<br />

Appendix<br />

1. A Contribution Towarda Typology of Disease Narratives<br />

297<br />

334


What has been will be again.<br />

what has been done will be done again;<br />

there is nothing new under the sun.<br />

- Ecclesiastes 1:9<br />

Chapter 1: The Yellow Brick Road<br />

In 2003. for a frantic few months. a virus spread across the world with a fury that<br />

seemed apocalyptic. This novel disease came from China. but quickly slipped that<br />

country's boundaries to bound halfway across the world in a matter of only a few hours.<br />

Its speed left doctors and researchers gasping in the wake. struggling to throw up walls<br />

hath physical and intellectual against the assault. But these reactions were as nothing<br />

compared to the fear that gripped the nations of the world. who were suddenly confronted<br />

with a strange. invisible. and unexplained foe that killed one out of every five people it<br />

touched.<br />

Panic ensued. Thousands of people were involuntarily quarantined. Thousands more<br />

simply chose to stay home. rather than risk catching the new virus from a coworker or<br />

stranger. The tourism industry ground to a near-halt. Airlines. theaters. restaurants.<br />

hotels. and other businesses shew'ed record profit losses. Chinatow ns all over North<br />

America were virtually empty. And people were dying: not only laypersons. but doctors<br />

and nurses too. cut down by the very disease they were strugg ling to understand.


For a frantic few months, the virus was everyw here. Even when not physicall y<br />

present, its name was everyday writ large on television screens and the covers of<br />

newspapers: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, known fur better by its acrony m.<br />

SARS. Headlines screamed the death tolls. The 9 o'clock news mopped out the new<br />

geographica l mens where the virus had spread overn ight. Radio announce rs warned<br />

people to wear their protective masks and avoid public places at all costs. The messages<br />

were impossible to avoid. SARS equaled fear. SARS equaled the unknown. SARS<br />

equaled the uncontroll able. SARS equaled death.<br />

And then, almost as suddenly as it had arrived , the virus disappeared. No cure or<br />

vaccine prompted its departure; no great medical breakthrough hastened the world<br />

towards a SARS·free future. Instead, in the end, the simple measures were what proved<br />

most effective: isolating the contaminated, regular temperature checks. public<br />

announcements on proper hygiene measures. vigilance. There were those who predicted<br />

that the virus would return, but their warnings have so far proved ground less. As of early<br />

2008, a full four years after the last cases of SARS whimpered out of exis tence, there<br />

have been no relapses, no new outbreaks . The virus ex ists now only in test tubes in<br />

highly-guarded facilities, and in the memories of those who surv ived.<br />

There are thousands of questions that could be asked about an epidemic such as<br />

this. Where did it come from? Why did it appear? Why didn't it prove more lethal'? Is<br />

there a cure? Will it ever return? Medicine has answered many of these questions, as will<br />

be revealed in these pages. However, there are many more questions that lie beyond the<br />

normal interests of virologists , and many perspectives that do not appear in the pages of


such prestigious publications as the British Medical Ioumal and the l ournat ofthe<br />

American Medical Assoc iation. For instance. what is the storymaking process that<br />

underlies the disease narratives that circulated among laypersons? Why was SARS so<br />

prone to these kinds of narrative constructions? What do these stories reveal about<br />

popular conceptions of disease?<br />

Questions such as these deserve answers as dee ply investigated as the conclusions<br />

that appear in medical journals. precisel y because the kinds of questions that the<br />

layperson asks about a novel disease are the same questions that a virologist asks about it.<br />

That is. am I vulnerable. who is infected. and how can I assure my safety'?The answers<br />

that come from such questions may ultimately be different. and even highly<br />

contradictory. This. however. does not lessen the importance of the questions. The act of<br />

understanding anythin g that is new is accomplished initially by creating for that novel<br />

item a story. and that story is created by taking what is already known about a similar<br />

item and laying that knowledge over the rough form of the unfamil iar. All of our<br />

beginnin gs arc the same; there is nothing new under the sun.<br />

The juxtapos ition of medicine and folklore that drives the study of these questions<br />

is initially problematic and confusing. Medicine is. after all. the rationalized. highly<br />

scientific study of the body and of those objects that attack it. Medicine is seen as austere.<br />

detached. objective. Its practitione rs are regularly accused of dehum anizing their<br />

subjects. of treating living. breathing human beings as little more than broken vessels<br />

whose wants and needs. opinions and cultural mores arc irrelevant and unwelcome .<br />

Medicine is good at treat ing diseases. shoddy at treating people. What could this


disciplin e possibly have to offer in the way of understanding how humans think and act.<br />

behave and react? Folklore. on the other hand. is the study of culture . a discipline<br />

dedicated to understanding the reasons behind many aspects of human thought and<br />

action. behavior and reaction. Folklore is grounded in the human condition. and its<br />

practitioners highly value the wants and needs. opinions and cultural mores of the people<br />

they study. And any folklorist who attempts to make a medical diagnosis is obv iously<br />

overstepping the bounds of her training.<br />

Rather than being oppos ing constructs . these theoret ical stances can in fact<br />

function well together . dovetailing into a mechanism that can-at least in certain areas­<br />

provide answers that either discipline by itself could not. Medicine can tell us how to<br />

transplant an organ: folklore can tell us why some ethnic groups refuse such lifesaving<br />

procedures. viewing the organs as the seat of the soul. and what may be done to deal with<br />

such situations. In contrast. folklore can tell us that people have used the foxglove plant<br />

since the middle ages to treat various maladies: medicine can tell us the name of the<br />

plant's relevant medicina l compounds, and provide standardized. safe preparations of<br />

them to treat individuals with atrial fibrillation. In the arcus where these disciplines meet,<br />

it is safe for both practitioners to wander. and to point out questions and answers the<br />

other side may not have considered.<br />

It was in this spirit that I began my study of SARS, I became aware of the<br />

outbreak at roughly the same time and in the same manner as most everyone else in<br />

Canada: I heard about it on the news. Stationed safely as I was at the time on the isolated<br />

island uf Newfoundland. I wasn't particularly conce rned about the outbrea k, and


experienced only a slight bout of concern when the virus crossed the Atlantic and<br />

surfaced in Toronto. Far more important to me at the lime were the aftereffects of the<br />

destruction of the Twin Towers on 9111, which had happened only a few months before.<br />

and the beginn ings of the war in Iraq on the 19lh of March. 2003. Com pared to the War<br />

on Terrorism. a smal l virus seemed rather an odd thing on which to place so much<br />

attention.<br />

It therefore caught my eye when this smal l virus qu ickly overtook headlines<br />

everywhere. and the word "SARS" became at least as common in news reports as<br />

ment ions of Saddam Hussein. Comb ined with this was work I wa.. do ing as a Research<br />

Assistant at <strong>Memorial</strong> University of Newfou ndland (MUN). where my adviso r, Dr. Diane<br />

Go ld..rein. had recen tly finished revisions on hcr then-unpublished book. OIlCf!UpOIlA<br />

V;nu (Utah State University Press. 20(4). I was privileged to read galley drafts of this<br />

hook. and as..istcd Dr. Gold..rein in rhe constructio n of its index. The combination of<br />

the..e events was fonuit cu s. and soon led to my wondering whether SARS would make<br />

for as good of a ..ubject for study as A IDS had been for Dr. Gold..tein. I discussed the<br />

..ubjcct with her. and. encouraged to pursue it. began my research.<br />

I pause here to explain the presence of the following. largely per..onal and<br />

..ubjccuv c narrative in what is otherwise a ..cholarly work. Bruce Jackson. in Fieldwork.<br />

criticizes schol ars for their fieldwork effort s. He docs so not only bccau ..e he finds their<br />

methods flawed . hut their academic reports devoid of emotions and scrubbe d free of any<br />

mentio n of failure. Jack..on writes. "Thousands of folklore studies are based on<br />

fieldwork; only a few of those studies include commentaries on how and why the


fieldwor k was done or tell us much about moments the writers found interesting or<br />

memorab le.... Folklorists report their successes. net their failures" (1987, 13· 14).<br />

Jackson says that the absence of this informationin scholarly articles is potentially<br />

hannfu l to students . who receive from such studies the impression that any failure in<br />

fieldwork means that the fieldwo rker herself is a failure . The absence of this information<br />

is al..o deleterious to the project as a whole becau..e pure objectivity is impossible. as is<br />

ensuring that every relevant question has been a..ked. every pertinent re..earch path<br />

followed to its furthest ends.<br />

In other words. there is no such thing as flawless fieldwork . There will always be<br />

questions that went unasked. or informants who went un-contacted(or even unnoticed) .<br />

Additionally, the metaphorical "lenses" through which any fieldworker views a topic­<br />

lenses based on cultural and familial morals. personal likes and dislikes. and even what<br />

mood the fieldworker happens to he in at that moment-s-color and shape the questions the<br />

ficldworkcr asks, and thus the responses that the informants give. Looking at this from a<br />

different angle. when I ask an informant if they have heard any jokes about SARS. I am<br />

telling thai informa nt that I) I am only interested in hearing about SARS. and not any<br />

other disease. and 2) I am only interested in hearing jo kes, and not any other oral form.<br />

Even simple questions thus drastically limit the answers a researcher is likely to receive.<br />

So, recognizing my own flaws and fallibilities. and in the interests of as best a full<br />

disclosure as I can manage (changing only a few names to protect certain ident ities), I<br />

present the following, being a description of my fieldwo rk. I hope this account will not<br />

only provide readers with a glimpse of the problems that I encountered (and my solutions


to them). hut will offer to the newer students of the discipline a document which proves<br />

that even worst-case scenarios can result in good data. There is nothing wrong with<br />

making mistakes; the only failure lies in failing to learn from them.<br />

My initial efforts in studying SARS-detailed in sharper relief in chapter three­<br />

were to log on daily to severa l websites (principally CNN.com, Yahoo.co rn. and<br />

MSN.com). beginning in April of 2003. and print off any news article that mentioned<br />

SARS. Isolated as Newfoundland is, this seemed to me the best method for procuring<br />

news of the world. and I kept up the task for almost two years. Other forms of research<br />

during this time were limited, and mainly relegated to reading various and sundry<br />

acade mic texts. Coursework and other requirements of the Ph.D. resulted in a significant<br />

gap between the outbreak and most of the interviews.<br />

Thus, my search for interviewees in the Toron to area actually began sometime in<br />

January or February of 2005. though I was not scheduled to travel to the area until the<br />

summer of the same year. I thought it prudent to begin early. The fieldwork that I was to<br />

conduct over the summer would be the largest project of its kind that I had ever<br />

undertaken. and I did not take the task lightly. I began my search for interviewees as<br />

many students often do: by asking everyone I knew if they had any contacts who would<br />

be willing to talk to me. Severa l did. and passed along the pertinent contact information.<br />

I spent the next few months slowly making my way through the list that my initial<br />

efforts had generated. weeding out those potential informants who had no wish to speak<br />

to me. profusely professed their ignorance of anything relating to SARS. or otherwise<br />

made it clear that they would not be comfortable being interviewed. Where possible. I


asked these people if they had an y co ntacts they wou ld be willing 10 share with me before<br />

we co ncluded our discus sions. and a small handfu l did . I also ruled out interviewin g<br />

an yone not in the immediate Toron to area. as my budget was 100 small to afford<br />

extensive travel. or eve n the renting of a car. Wher e I thought relevant . I placed the<br />

names of these non-Toronto residents on a "potential telephon e intervie ws't Iist.<br />

Though it seems incredible to me now. the medi um-sized li",t of potential<br />

inform ants that I had gathered through friends and colleag ues was , by May of 2005.<br />

pared down 10 only seven confirmed interviewees. By this time I had also established that<br />

my fieldwork dale s in Toronto would be July 8 10 1·1.. so I set about workin g on a suitable<br />

series of questio ns thai I could ask my interviewees. as well as procuring the appro priate<br />

recording equ ipment. A Irip to Wal-Mart so lved the latter prob lem . resulting in a Son y<br />

Walkm an cass ette player/re corder with a rather ineffect ive bui lt-in microphone. but an<br />

exte rnal. plug-in mic that proved 10 be of exce llent quality in my run-throu ghs.<br />

Th e summer months passe d quickly. and all too soon J uly loom ed. I made one lust<br />

round of co nfirmation emails and phone ca lls in lute Jun e. and was pleased to note that all<br />

seven informants we re sti ll plann ing on meet ing with me. I was particu larly excited about<br />

three of them : Anne. Bob. and Caro l (whose names have all been cha nged to protect the ir<br />

identities). Anne was a nurse in the Toronto urea during the SARS outbreak. and though<br />

she was nOIemployed at any of the hospita ls that were the most heavily affected . she had<br />

ment ioned in ou r earlier con versations that she had a few good stories to tell me. Bob was<br />

a student ar a Toron to-ar ea University. and the friend of Bob ' s who had given me his<br />

email address had as..ured me thai Bob had at least one incred ible story to tell about life


in Toronto dur ing the SARS scare. Finally. Caro l was the director of an International<br />

Students program at a major Toronto university. and had teased me on the phone with<br />

promises of the horror stories that she and the university' s Asian students had faced<br />

during the crisis.<br />

So. eagerly anticipat ing the stories these people were to tell me. I hoarded a plane<br />

on Jul y 8 m and arrived in Toronto in the late evening of the same day. For residence I had<br />

secured a spare room in the apartment of the sister of a former roommate of mine. and<br />

after settling in. walked around the neighborhood to acquaint myself with the landscape<br />

(it being too late in the night by this point to bother people with phone calls). The next<br />

mornin g-Saturday. Jul y 9 th _ I began to contact my informants to book my meetings.<br />

I do not profess belief in portents and omen s. Nevertheless, I was unsettled when<br />

the first phone number I dialed brought neither answer nor voice mail. and the person<br />

who answered at the second number had never heard of the informant I was seeking.<br />

Unbelievably. my day only cont inued to decline from there. Anne did answer the<br />

phone. but became instantly nervous and unwilling to talk. Whereas earlier she had<br />

remarked that she had several stories to relate. she now cla imed that she didn' t remember<br />

much about thc outbreak. and doubted that anything she could contribute to my study<br />

would be of much usc. I politely disagreed. remarki ng that any story about SARS was<br />

important. and that even the smallest mention of it would be worth my time. But Anne<br />

still hedged. and thus began ten minutes' worth of my attempt ing us courteously and<br />

professionall y as possible to get Anne to agree to meeting with me. All of my attempts<br />

were rebuffed. and it quickly became obvious that this interview was simply not going to


pan out. I thanked Anne for her time and gu..'e her my numb er in case she chan ged her<br />

mind. and moved on.<br />

My next ca ll went to Bob . who had already agreed to meet with me durin g the<br />

afternoo n of the followin g day-Sunday. J uly 10 th • Bob also answered the phone. but<br />

when I introd uced myself. he informed me that he had forgot ten that he was going to a<br />

rock n' roll co ncert on Sund ay afternoo n. I offe red to meet with him ear lier or later in the<br />

day. but he replied that he wouldn't be avai lable. Neither would he be available during<br />

the week. bec ause of classes and his even ing jo b. Neither. in respo nse to my last-ditch<br />

effort. would he be ava ilable if I immed iately took the subway to his bouse: he was go ing<br />

into the co untry for the da y. Feelin g increasingly sus picio us. I left Bob my number in<br />

case his schedule cleared. and dialed up the next person on my list.<br />

Anoth er no answer. Then an answering machine . Finally. I phoned Carol. The<br />

only numbe r I had for her was her office number at her university. but I had used it<br />

befo re. and knew it to be correct. The last time we had talked (which was only two weeks<br />

ea rlier) . I had informed Ca rol that I woul d be arriving on a wee kend, and we had agree d<br />

that I should leave my co ntact inform ation on her message manager . which she wou ld<br />

retrieve whe n she ca me to work on Monday morning. But when the message manage r<br />

picked lip. a recorded voice informed me that Carol was no longe r affiliated with that<br />

univer sit y: she had taken a job elsew here. No conta ct information was provided, nor was<br />

the location where she bad begun her alternate employment.<br />

There followed a franti c few hours in which I repea tedly ca lled back the pho ne<br />

number.. of the two people who hadn 't picked up, dialed se..'eral numbers at Carol' s<br />

10


university to try and find her forward ing information. and scoured my notes for<br />

interviewees that I might have missed. or phone numbers that I might have written down<br />

incorrectly. Eventua lly. I was simply forced to acknow ledge the reality of the situation:<br />

all seven of my confirmed interviews had fallen through .' It was now early eveni ng on<br />

the 9 th of July. and my plane left early the morning of the l.flh_ meaning I sudden ly had<br />

only four days to comp letely recon..truct my fieldwork efforts . find new interviewees. and<br />

conduct my interviews.<br />

So Jtoo k the onl y course of action that ..eemed reaso nable: I called the one person<br />

I knew who lived in Toronto and a..ked her if she'd be interested in meeting me at a bar<br />

for a drink or eigh t.<br />

The person I called was Jillian Gou ld. Jill ian had started the Ph.D. program at<br />

MUN at the same time I had. and had taken her Co mprehensive Exams at roughly the<br />

same time as well. She had moved to Toronto some months earlier in pursuit of a job and<br />

10 conduct her fieldwork-in addition to being closer to her family. who lived in the area.<br />

I reasoned that if anyone were capa ble of sympathizing. it would be Jillian. She was.<br />

luckily for my liver. unavailable that evening. but invited me over to her house for dinner<br />

Oil the night of Mond ay the eleventh. In response to my tales of fieldwork woes. she<br />

mentioned that her roomm ate. Jennifer. had lived in Toronto during the SARS outbreak.<br />

and might be able to give me a few stories. At the time. this information actually proved<br />

more discouraging than anything: somehow. Jillian had slipped my mind in my earlier<br />

, Though this was on ly a fatalistic reaction at this point. it ultimately proved to be true.<br />

Despite repeated calls over the next few days. I never did get anybody to pick up the<br />

phone at the two houses that lacked an..wering machines. and the informant who did have<br />

an an..wering machine never called me back.<br />

II


cas ings of friends and colleag ues with contacts. so when I hung up the phone I found<br />

myse lf curs ing my own idiocy at not calling the one person I knew who actually resided<br />

in the city in which I was doing my fieldwork.<br />

The next two days passed slowly. The people with whom I W:L\ staying had full­<br />

time jobs. so were rarely home. and Toronto was in the midd le of a summer heat wave<br />

that left me literally dren ched with sweat if I stayed outside for longer than ten minutes.<br />

Try as I might. I could not think of anothe r way to resurrect my fieldwork than hope<br />

l illian' s roommate wou ld be able to recommend a few people. I had by now thorough ly<br />

exhausted my Toronto-urea connections . and I was-and still am--entirely<br />

uncomfortable with the idea of engag ing random peop le on the street in conversation on<br />

the off chance that one of them might have a story to tell me. Yes, there were probably<br />

other avenues open. but none occu rred to me at the time. So for the first two days of my<br />

fieldwork trip, rather than conduct the interviews that I had planned for the previous four<br />

months. I sat in a non-air-conditioned apartment and slowly sweated through my clothes.<br />

Mond ay eventually meandered in. and late in the afternoon I packed my record ing<br />

equipment into a backpack and set off for lilli an's. Upon arrival. my host informed me<br />

that not only did Jenni fer have a few stories that she' d be willing to share, but that<br />

between the two ofthcm they' d thought up a few other people I could talk to. I was<br />

eluted. and for the first time since Satu rday felt like things might still have a chance of<br />

turning out all right. So immediately after dinner I hauled Jennifer into the living room.<br />

set up my equipment. and plunged in.<br />

12


--- .--- - - - - -_._- ------<br />

That first interv iew taught me two vcry important lessons. FiN. I learned that it' s<br />

a bad idea 10 set up an intervie w right next to the only phone in the house. Second. I<br />

learned that the list of Questions I'd prepared for these interviews was fur too long. I'd<br />

been working on this list for a few weeks. and by the lime I arrived in Toronto I'd<br />

managed to ro me up with three typed. single -spaced pages ' worth of Queries. I asked<br />

Jennifer every single one of them . thinking at the time that I was making sure that I<br />

gleaned every relevant piece of information possible. What ended up happening was that<br />

the interview took the better part of ninety minutes. and by the end Jennifer was visibly<br />

exhausted and beginni ng to beg off answeri ng the more difficu lt questions . I fell terrible<br />

abou t this. and when we were finished I apologized and told her that I'd no idea the<br />

process would be so lengthy and draining.<br />

Luckily. she was a good sport. I say this because she respond ed to my apologies<br />

by tellin g me that her parents were in Toron to during the outbreak, and were interested in<br />

talking to mo-e-she' d called them earlie r in the day. after Jill ian had told her what I was<br />

resea rching. Better still, I was then told that Jillion' s brother was also in Toronto in 200 3.<br />

and that he was available for an interview. Excited, I immediately rang both parties and<br />

secured interviews for the followi ng day.<br />

Jennifer' s parents-Angel (pronounced ON-hell, with a Spanish accent) and<br />

Rosita-c-were wonderful interviewees. Theirs was the first interview I had ever conducted<br />

w-ith two people at the same time, and despite their occasio nally talkin g ove r each other<br />

(which produ ced an almost untranscribable mess on audiocassette), they told wonderfu l<br />

13


stories. To my delight. halfway through our interview Angel excuse d himself to call Luis,<br />

a friend of his, as it had occu rred to him that Luis wou ld make a good interviewee.<br />

And so he did. Luis knew few spec ific narratives about SARS. but was very<br />

op iniona ted as to why ou tbreaks should be taken serious ly. When I asked him if he'd<br />

heard any SARS jokes , he told me that there was noth ing funny about people dying . My<br />

interviews with Luis, Angel and Rosita marked a significan t shift in my orientations to<br />

the kinds of quest ions I was asking. The list that I had created was almo ...t sterile in its<br />

exami nations of the out break. with most of the question" following the form of "d id you<br />

hear x?" and "what was your opi nion of yT Despite all the research that I had so far done<br />

on SA RS. the question of ethnici ty had never fully permeated my understanding of the<br />

material. That is to say. while I was aware that racism had been a part of the outb reak. it<br />

had blind ly never occurred to me that I might be interv iewing people of Asian desce nt<br />

(Jenn ifer. Ange l. Rosita. and Luis were all Chinese-F ilipino). The questions that I had<br />

prepar ed were in no way insensitive to race and ethnicity. hut they did fail to adequately<br />

address it. and so halfway through my chat with Angel and Rosita I began ad-fibbing<br />

questions to try and incorporate these deta ils. Talking with Luis forced me to further<br />

consider these facts, and as well, revealed to me that some of the questions I was asking<br />

(for instance. " Have you heard any jok es about SARS,?,,)could be interpreted as<br />

inscnsitlve-c-cspe cially if asked to someone who had lost a friend or family mem ber to<br />

the virus. J wus fortunate to catch this before I offended anyone, but the reali zation still<br />

came as a shock.<br />

14


When I returned to my apartment later that afternoon. another pleasa nt surprise<br />

awaited me. Robb ie. the former roomm ate of mine whose sister's spare room I was<br />

currently ..lcepin g in. had tracked down a budd y of his named Mike, who was an El\1T in<br />

Toronto durin g the SARS crisis. Mike wou ld be shewi ng up for dinner in an hour. and I<br />

cou ld interview him afterwards. That intervie w turned out to be one of the most<br />

informative of my entire fieldwork process. at least in terms of what was going on in the<br />

city from a medica l perspecti ve. But Mike was not ju ..t a member of the med ical<br />

communi ty-he had also been a patient, as he was one of the first peop le quarantined for<br />

SARS in Canada (though he had never actua lly cont racted the virus] . My interview with<br />

Mike was ..o engros..ing that I completely forgot abo ut the li..t of questions lying nex t to<br />

my elbo w, and instead spent our entire talk merely urging him to tell more stories.<br />

The next morning. I hopped on the subway and rode to Brown' s College . where<br />

Jilli an' s brother Jonathan worked. My interview with him focused mostly on his<br />

percept ions of life in Toro nto dur ing the crisis. and resulted in a few good sound bites.<br />

Then. as I was packing my cassette recorder into my hackpack. Jonathan mentioned that<br />

his department's secretaries. Annie and Mayce. might he good to talk to. li e walked me<br />

out and introduced me, and I spent the next hour weav ing and bobbing my way from one<br />

secretary to the other. trying desperately to capture their stories through the stream of<br />

students that kept running through the office. Finally. ju st before I left the building.<br />

Jonat han re-emerged from his office and hauled me to the rear of the room. where he<br />

introduced me to Justin. Unfortunately. I had only brought a single tape to the meeting in<br />

my hurry to leave the apartment that morning. and as I had already filled almos t the entire<br />

15


tape between Jonathan and his secretaries. I only had enough space for Justin to relate a<br />

single narrative. Still. I was satisfied: in three days I had conducted nine interviews.<br />

which was a far cry from the utterly blank and useless tapes I had been dreaming of since<br />

Saturday.<br />

In my heart, however, I suspecte d that nine interviews would not provide enough<br />

material for an entire dissertation. So after I returned to Newfoundland. I went back<br />

through the notes that I had made while in Toronto and discovered three potential<br />

contacts who had escaped my notice during my three-day interviewing whirlwind. The<br />

first was Ann, who was Jillian' s aunt. I sent Jillion an email to see if it would be<br />

accep table for me to give Ann a call. and made that call on the 2i h of July. Ann's<br />

connection to the SARS crisis was that her husband had been hospitalized for a possible<br />

case of pneumo nia during the beginning weeks of the outbreak. It turned out that her<br />

husband was fine. and had not contracted the corcnavirus. but Ann's stories of what it<br />

was like visiting her husband in the hospital showed the strain that medical staff and<br />

hosp ital visitors were under.<br />

My second contact was Sony. who had been referred to me by Angel and Rosita.<br />

as well as Luis. Seny was Filipino. and worked for a major corpo ration in the Toronto<br />

area. I was initially planning on Seny's interview to also be by telephone. but late in the<br />

month realized that a wedding I was going to in Ontario might coincide with Seny's<br />

being able to be interviewed in person. I would have to squeeze the interview in during<br />

the short time I would be in Toronto proper (roughly the few hours on either end of the<br />

trip when I would be arriving at or departing from the airport). but the quality of the<br />

16


interview would make the trip worth my time. As easy us it W:lS to conduct the telephone<br />

interview with Ann (and similar long-distance interviews that I'd done for other projects).<br />

the results were never of the same value as the face-to-face meetings . So I called up Seny.<br />

and we agreed to meet at her office in the early afternoon of the 3 nJ of August. Seny<br />

proved to be an exce llent interviewee. whose reco llections of the SARS outbreak were<br />

vivid. Her stories were engrossi ng and detai led. and I left her intervie w wishing that more<br />

informa nts were as intelligent and well-spoken.<br />

I still at this point wasn't quite satisfied with the number of interview s I had<br />

conducted, so upo n returning to Newfoundland I got hack in touch with Jennifer. my first<br />

interviewee. who had mentioned that her boyfriend would be an ideal perso n to talk to.<br />

Benjami n W :l S the third of the potential contacts that I had noticed in my notes. and<br />

Jenn ifer was happy to provide me with his phone number. Benjamin' s life is more<br />

heavily detailed in chapter five of this work, but it should he noted here that at the time I<br />

interviewed him. he W:l S working as a bartender in San Francisco. Thus, the only<br />

interview ing method available to me was the telephone. After severa l false starts, I<br />

eventually managed to get in touch with Benjam in. and interviewed him on August 17 111 •<br />

As has already been made evident. virtually my entire fieldwork process ended up<br />

hcin g a series of serendipitous moments. But Benjamin' s interview stood out even among<br />

those, for he had spent 2003 in Ch ina, traveling and filming sections of the Yangtze River<br />

for an independent, self-financed docum entary. Benjamin's descriptions of the lives of<br />

the villagers who resided on the banks of the Yangtze ended up being critical for the<br />

17


creation of large parts of chapters five and six of this work, and gave me valuable insights<br />

into the roles of race and ethnicity in a disease outbreak.<br />

I did have one further lucky break that merits mention. When the school semester<br />

at MUN started in early September of 2005, our departmen t held its annua l "meet and<br />

greet" orienta tion, in which all faculty and student members introduced themse lves and<br />

gave brief biographies. Having spent August transcribing my interviews-a process that<br />

would take me until December to completc-c- I took the opportunity to announce during<br />

this orientation session the topic and nature of my research, and asked that anyone who<br />

had any SARS-related stories please contact me. At the sess ion's end, a new graduate<br />

student named Heather Read approache d me and noted that she had lived jus t outside of<br />

Toronto in 2003, and that her mother was a nurse in Ontario during the outbreak. Heather<br />

expressed interest in being interviewed, and I ju mped at the chance, sitting down with her<br />

on the 9 th of September for the better part of an hour. Heather' s recollections, especially<br />

those involving her Asian roommates. helped to further my theories on the nature of race<br />

and cthnicity in outbreaks. evidencing as they did the blatant racism present in Toronto<br />

dur ing the SARS crisis.<br />

And thus ended my series of interviews. I did announce in all of my classes for<br />

the next two years that I would be interested in talking to anyone who had any SARS­<br />

related narratives, but only one student ever expressed interest. Unfortunately, that<br />

..student had to drop out of school altogether some weeks later due to a medica l<br />

emergency, and I never saw him again. Still, my efforts in the summer of 2005 netted me<br />

thirteen interviews, totaling some 300+ pages of transcrip tions. I had at one point<br />

18


cons idered revisiting Toronto in 2006 for additional interv iews. but decided against such<br />

an excursion. partially becau se of budge tary restrictio ns. and partially because it seemed<br />

to me after transcribing my interviews that I already had enough information to write<br />

about for quite some time. Indeed . my transcriptions exceed the length of this<br />

dissertation.<br />

Creat ing those transcriptions also revea led to me the importance of the directions<br />

I was forced to take. and the questions I was compe lled to consider. following my initial<br />

fieldwork meltdown. Though it was neither plan nor intent-nor even noticed at the<br />

time-the li..t of interviewees I brought with me to Toronto consisted entirely of<br />

Caucas ians. While I no do ubt would have gathered considerable and importan t<br />

information from such a group. my data would have been largely homoge nous. reflect ing<br />

the attitudes and perce ptions of people who in many ways stood on the outside of the<br />

outbreak. being rarely-if ever-forced 10 confront the realities of being jud ged for the<br />

co lor of their skin or the shape of their heritage. But as the first four peop le I intervie wed<br />

belon ged to a community and ethnicity that had been heavily stigmatized. I was forced to<br />

change Illy horse midstream. as it were. and reflect upo n their experiences.<br />

Look ing back. this shift in approach sent shockwaves through what I had assumed<br />

w'ere carefully constructed ideas. and affected virtually every aspect of this project.<br />

Because of those first four interviews. there is not a single chapter in this dissertation that<br />

docs not. in some way. consider the effects of xenophobia and racism during the<br />

epidemic . In many ways. my being confronted with the narratives of peop le from<br />

stigmatized comm unities and ethnic ities was the single most important factor in the<br />

19


shaping of everything that was to come from my efforts. II wou ld not he unreasonab le to<br />

declare that th is dissertation would have been poorer without such refoc using.<br />

Other aspects of my fieldwo rk also forced me to change my ideas . As I have<br />

already mentioned. my interview with Luis made me realize the dangers inherent in<br />

asking for jokes about SARS from people who may have had friends and relatives perish<br />

from the di...ease . Mike proved an excellent and willing source of information in this<br />

aspect. and also gave me insights into the medical community that I might not have<br />

gotten otherwise . And my phone conversation with Benjamin gave me a glimpse into the<br />

very heart of the count ry that was blamed for the outbreak. provid ing me with data that<br />

allowed me to make a ca...e for the existence of para llel reactions to the virus, regardles...<br />

of place . cthnicny, and status. So while my interviews with J CIl . Angel. Rosita. Luis. and<br />

Scny were perhaps the most important in terms of red irecting my thoughts. they we re not<br />

the only factors that prove d critical.<br />

The work that hJS resulted from my researc h effo rts has taken some three yea rs 10<br />

wr ite, and will, I hope, shed light on an area of folklore that has so far gone unnoticed . I<br />

also trust that the theori es and ideas I put forward here are useful to other scholars, as<br />

wel l as 10 stude nts of both folkloristics and medicine .<br />

This wor k is organized JS a series of studies, introd uced hy a large amo unt of<br />

background material to familiarize the reader with the subject and perti nent scho larly<br />

ideas . Chapter two begins this theore tical orientat ion with an overv iew of three key areas<br />

that are especially rele vant in the examination of SA RS. These areas are those of folklore.<br />

the media. and SARS. Taking these topics one at a time. chapte r two first examines the<br />

20


theoretical standpoi nts in the field of folklore that dea l with folk medicine. health pa nics.<br />

and legends. and the intersections bet ween the se areas. The chapt er then mo ves to the<br />

field of media theo ry. not ing key works that describe the relat ion ship bet ween media<br />

presentation of topi cs and public react ion to those topi cs. where in many cases the<br />

med ia' s slant on the report co lor!' and shapes publi c react ion. Finall y. the narrati ve moves<br />

to the world of SARS. and provide s a glimpse at the writin gs of people who wor k within<br />

the field of medi cine and science, and wha t the ir react ions were to the out break.<br />

C hap ter three provides a chro nicle of publ ic inform ation for the SARS crisis. The<br />

focus of this chapt er is twofold . simul taneously presenting the outbrea k as it was revea led<br />

to the publi c through vario us media sources. and as well. sho wing the medic al versio n of<br />

the epidemic as revealed through vari ous academic journ als. The ultim ate goal of this<br />

chapter is to demo nstrate that there were key dif ferences in wh at the publ ic was rec eiving<br />

VeNlS what the med ica l world was discove ring and anno unci ng. Espe cially in the areas<br />

of published rumor and legend. the story of SARS tha t the pu blic rece ived from the<br />

media in 2003 was not the story that the medical establi shme nt was telli ng, This chapter<br />

will set the stage for the exa minatio ns thai will occupy the cen tral studies of this boo k.<br />

Cha pter four begins this series of studies. and focuses Oil etiologicallegends .<br />

Dozens of narrative s dea lt with the origin of SARS, including why it arrived and where it<br />

cam e from . Providing glimpses at legends as wide ly varied as gov ernment con spi rac y<br />

theories and animal origin stories. this chapter will demo nstrate that the narratives that<br />

aros e du ring the SARS outbreak clo sel y resemb led the narra tives that arose durin g the<br />

init ial years of the AIDS epidemic. In doin g so. this chapter attem pts to esta blis h the firs t<br />

! I


in a series of arguments that ultim ately demo nstrate that disease narrat ives do not spring<br />

out of nowh ere. hut are in..teed recycled from prev ious outbreaks.<br />

Chapte r five moves the examin ing lens from the field of etiological legends to<br />

narratives that deal with gathering places. Beginning with an hi..torica l ove rview of<br />

narratives concern ing the negative consequences of eating in Chine ..e restaurants. the<br />

chapter then moves to the world of SA RS. where the modem and historica l narratives are<br />

once again found to he similar in tone and plot. These modem narratives are then<br />

exami ned as they appeared in media sources. and a.. well. a.. they appeared in their oral<br />

form... as related to me by my interviewees. Beginning a theme that will thread<br />

throughou t the rema inder of the book. this chap ter then addrcs ses the racial and eth nic<br />

fears that such narratives caused. and their consequences.<br />

Chapter six continues the investigations into the xenophobic nature of SA RS<br />

narratives by examining those legends and rumors that involved individuals conducting<br />

private actions in public spaces. Many of the narrat ives that circulated during the<br />

outbr eak had at their roots incomprehension as to the different meanings that cultures<br />

place Oil act ions. These misunderstandings and miscommu nications led to scenarios in<br />

which Asians were wrongly blamed for misconduct. when in fact the conduct was<br />

co mplete ly appropriate according to Asian standards. Such blame was not j ust the<br />

province of the public: medi a sources assisted in the spread of negative rumors by not<br />

only publishing those rumors. but by continually printing stories that fome nted anti­<br />

globalis t sentiments.<br />

22


Chap ter seve n uses the lens of stig ma theory to further examine the racis m and<br />

xenophob ia that came packa ged with the coro navirus. Espec ially useful in this chapter is<br />

the work of Ervin g Goffmun. whose studies of stigma brought the subject to the academic<br />

com munity as a whole. However, Goffman's theo ries of stigma are found to he lacking in<br />

key areas when held up to the types of stigma expe rienced by my interv iewees during the<br />

SARS outbreak. This cha pter therefore highlights these underdeveloped areas , pointing<br />

out avenues for furthe r class ification rubrics, and suggesting new crite ria for the types of<br />

stigma that cou ld he studied.<br />

Cha pter eigh t exam ines the state of folk med icine during the outb reak. Seve ral<br />

SA RS cures are noted and discussed, and the types of these cures arc com pared to the<br />

preventat ive and cu rative measures employed by laype rsons during other epide mics, such<br />

as AIDS . In addition, this chapter looks at the longstanding battle betwee n folk and<br />

"o ffic ial:' "Western:' or "hospital " medicine, and the interconnection !'> and fragmented<br />

pathways that lie between these realms. More specifical ly. this section addresses the<br />

reasons why folk medicine has rema ined a vibrant. and even growing presence in the<br />

modem wor ld, suggesting that the medical establishment may be doing itself and its<br />

patients a great disservice by attem pting to quash the publ ic' s interest in it.<br />

Chapter nine is the last study, invol ving an in-de pth scrutiny of the nature and<br />

probl em of rumor and legend in d isease outbrea ks. These form s of narratives have by this<br />

point been proven to he deleterious and damaging, and this deman ds the question of what<br />

can be done to prevent or stymie their spread. Unfortunate ly, the answer to th is question<br />

i.. difficult , for rumors and lege nds have proven to be noto riously difficu lt to erad icate.


However. there have been some recent studies that may have shed new light on possible<br />

solutions to these problems.<br />

SARS is, by all appearances, a dead disease. It existed during a specific period of<br />

time. then vanished. Like the Latin language. it provides scholars with a perfect specimen<br />

to examine. an ideal. non-evolving thing-in-a-boule that can be placed under a<br />

metaphorical microscope and seen from end to end. all of its connections fixed and<br />

unchanging. even if yet undiscover ed. The following series of examina tions arc by no<br />

means exhaustive in scope. but will hopefully provide at least a ray of light in a<br />

previo usly dark chambe r. and give voice to people whose stories would have otherwise<br />

been forgotten.


Cha pter 2: Folklore. Medi a, a nd Medi cin e<br />

One of the largest recent disease outhreaks hega n in Nove mber of 2002. when the<br />

first cases of a disease that would soon he known as SARS began spreading in China.<br />

Since then. the SARS coronuvtrus has achieved infamy seldom seen among diseases.<br />

swee ping through media and Intem et sources to create a pan ic that left thousands of<br />

people halfway around the world wearing surgica l masks in attempts to protect<br />

themselves from perceived harm. Extrao rdinarily. the virus's non-age-adju sted mortality<br />

rate was. overa ll. only one in five ("Researc h puts Sars [sic ]..... 20(3 )-a significant risk.<br />

but noth ing compared to the 90% rate of the Ebola virus. or even the 22% rate (in<br />

Canada) of common pneumococcal pneumonia. neither of which have a media frenzy to<br />

parallel that of the SA RS virus.<br />

The ultimat e goa l of this dissertation is to exa mine and understand the narra tives<br />

that people told about the SA RS outbreak-the rumors. gossip . legends. jokes. and other<br />

form s of oral communication. Exam ining these narratives will provide insights into why<br />

peop le believe the things they do about diseases. and why narratives both shape and are<br />

shaped by disease. But in order to begin such an examina tion. we must first contcx tua lize<br />

the study of diseases and medicine as a whole within the fields of folklore. media studies.<br />

and medicine. Examining existing literature on healt h models. belief systems. disease<br />

panic. and other areas will provide us with a background appropriate to the study of a<br />

nove l disease by providing common theoretical ground and language.<br />

25


Any theore tical orientalion regarding SARS must by necessity be<br />

multidi sciplinary, for the greate r portion of spec ific information about SARS exists<br />

outside the acade mic field of folklore. Within the field, Diane Golds tein' s recent boo k<br />

Once UPOII1I vtms: AIDS Legends and Yema cular Risk Perception (2()()4)contains one<br />

paragrap h thai briefly discusses the simi larity between SA RS and A IDS narrative s.<br />

Norine Dresser' s websi te I" F OCI H contains a one -page section under its "Online<br />

Multicultural Manners" on SARS rumors (Dresser :!()()4). Monica Kropej listed a few<br />

Slovenian SAR S rumors in her 2003 ISCLR paper (Kropcj 2003) . and both<br />

urbanlcgcnds.com and snope s.com. if they can be cons idered authoritative. contain<br />

article s debunk ing some of the current SAR S legends. Beyond that, not much is<br />

avai lable. As of laic 200 7. no majo r book by a folklorist has dealt exclus ively with the<br />

subject. and an MLA International Bibliography searc h for articles on "SA RS" returned<br />

only three relevant hils: IwOfrom the field of linguistics. and one from sociology. written<br />

in a dialect of Chincsc.? none of which were relevant to my focus. There arc a few<br />

sources other than these within the field- sources thai somehow escaped the eyes of the<br />

MLA-hut they are few and far between.<br />

This is not 10say that the field of folklore cannot offer anything toward the study<br />

of SARS. In fact. there are many sources that offer widely varied theoretical standpoints<br />

that can ultimately be applied to this topic-the work simply involves looking at those<br />

theor ies in new lights. demonstrating how the ir tenets arc also applicable to areas outside<br />

those initially determined by their creators. What needs to be made clear, however, is that<br />

::!The MLA citat ion provided an English summary for the Ch inese article.<br />

26


a study of any disease such as SARS-which ex isted not on ly in the vernac ular health<br />

percep tions of the layperson. but in severa l other real ms. such as science and medicine­<br />

must take into accoun t those other areas. As such. the focuses of this chapter will be<br />

threefo ld. eac h sectio n being particularly relevant to the arguments that will occupy this<br />

thesis. First. I will exa mine the work within the field of folklore (or work that is regularly<br />

used by folk lorists). especially as these top ics relate to rumor. legend . and health panics.<br />

Second. I will look at work that attempts to analyze and construct theor ies involving the<br />

med ia. including newspapers . magazines. and televised news broadcasts. Finally. I will<br />

investigate the medica l and health-related rea lm. delving into work written by doctors.<br />

nurses. scientists. and other profess ionals who work primarily within the realm of<br />

medicine.<br />

These are not the on ly three realms of importa nce in the study of SARS. but it<br />

docs seem to me that they are of prim ary co ncern in the matter. since many of the<br />

probl ems with and confusions about the disease that resulted in panic and xenophobia<br />

cam e from the co mmunications (or lack thereof) that took place betw een these area s. For<br />

exa mple. it took the scientific com munit y some lime to iso late the SARS coronavirus and<br />

[ocate its source in the Chine se civet cat. During that time muny hypotheses were<br />

adva nced within the scientific co mmunity conce rning such details , and. as is the natur e of<br />

scientific work. some of those hypotheses were ultimat ely proven incorrec t. Regardless<br />

of their potential for being co rrect. however. media sources reporte d every piece of news<br />

they cou ld glean from the scientific com munity. their quest for deta ils driven by an<br />

informat ion-hungry pub lic that purchased in mass quant ities any newspaper with the


word "SARS" in its headli ne. And the infor mation-hungry publi c abso rbed those facts,<br />

leading to lay people discussin g the problems amongst themselves.<br />

Several areas of concern crop up in this scen ario. as brietl y (and therefore<br />

inaccurately) as it has been stated here. For one. there are distinct levels of vocabulary in<br />

all three layers of this pictu re. from the highly technical medica l ja rgo n of the sc ientific<br />

community. to the simplistic vocabulary employed by most newspapers. to the wide ly<br />

varied communication styles used by laypeople. Th e problem is that the med ia- which<br />

has arguably the si mplest language of the three-is the main source of communication<br />

betwee n the sc ientific and lay co mmun ities. Any inform ation that co mes from the<br />

scie ntific community must therefore be pared down to its bare bones and rephrased in<br />

such a fashion as to make it "understandable" to the ge neral public. Co nsiderab le loss of<br />

nuance and meaning is the result of such paring, a co nsequence that ca n res ult in<br />

miscommunicat ion and misunderstanding.<br />

A second area of conce rn in this scena rio is the accuracy and co mpleteness of<br />

information as it flows from one source to anot her. In addition to the problems mentioned<br />

in the previous paragraph. the med ia is a problematic source of information precisely<br />

beca use it is a business, and therefore has as a primary interest the crea tion of prof it.<br />

News stories that will sell newspapers will get published as a result. while news stor ies<br />

that are of lesser interest (or impact) will be put as ide. pushed to later pages of the paper ,<br />

or left uncovered altoge ther. So while the announce ment of. say , lemmings having bee n<br />

discovered as the carr iers of SARS wou ld rank high on the list of "publishable material."<br />

the retraction of th is information at a later date might or might not be co nsidered as<br />

28


--- - - - - - - - - --- -----.--,-----<br />

cultural belief systems and how they lead people 10perceived differences in risk-related<br />

activities when it comes to contrac ting the virus (Flaskerud and Calvillo 1991: Flaskerud<br />

nod Rush 1989; Harwood 1981: Trotter and Chavira 1981. ctc.). Even the subject of<br />

AIDS as a punishment from God has not gone unnoticed (Flaskerud and Rush 1989:<br />

Mays and Cochran 1987). And while SARS stilllacks folklorist ic works on these topics,<br />

vernacular discourse. legend. and communication are overflowing with untapped.<br />

unrecorded exa mples.<br />

Because of the wide-ranging natures of these texts. illness-narra tivity research<br />

also provides a wealth of indirect information on SARS . The recent movement in this<br />

crea. for instance. towards viewing health narratives as models for illness and health<br />

action (Good 1994: Mattingly 1998 ) is especially relevant. as it provides a means to look<br />

at SARS narratives as keys to complex cultural belief systems. Lauric Stanley-<br />

Blackwell's 1993 article on Acadian good-Sa maritan legends and the New Brunswick<br />

lepro..yJ epidemic of the 1840s is an excellent work detailing the link between health and<br />

legend, demonstrat ing how the narrativ es used by communitie.. were "therapeutic... they<br />

dcmysrificd the disease. mitigated its harshness, and combated the pervas ive notion that<br />

the disease was an hereditary scourge among the Acadian population" (33). And Gillian<br />

Bennett' s article "Bosom Serpents and Alimentary Amphibians: A Language for<br />

Sickness" demon strates how legends serve as mediators of health crises, allowing those<br />

.1 The Icons "le pro..y" and "leper " are widely considered offensive and politically<br />

incorrect. The preferred term is "Han..en's di..case:' which will be u..ed hereafter, exce pt<br />

when directly quoting a source.<br />

30


affl icted a means of understanding their diseases -c-how they came to he ill and how they<br />

can recover ( 1997).<br />

Another theoretical approac h that will prove crucia l in exami ning SARS<br />

narratives is that espoused by David J. Hufford in T1,,: Terror That Comes in the Nighl:<br />

A" Experience-Centered Study of SlIpen wIlIraf Assault Traditions . In examining the<br />

cxi..renee of "Old Hag" narratives.' Hufford found that. contrary to what had been<br />

previously written . the "Old Hag tradition contains elements of experience that are<br />

independent of culture" ( 1982a. 15). In further examining previous literature on the<br />

subject. and on other supernatural phenomena . Hufford found that research into folk<br />

belief contained a disturbing set of assumption s. three of which he found most pernicious :<br />

( I) That stateme nts which do not appear to allow for materialistic interpretation<br />

may be rejected out of hand; (2) that "the folk" arc always poor obse rvers and<br />

consi..tently confuse subjective with objective reality-a confusion which the<br />

scholar can unravel rather easily at second hand; and (3) that informants therefore<br />

cannot maintain mcmorates separate from legends. (1976. 73)<br />

Because of assumptions such as this. Hufford created a new hypothesis. the "exper ience-<br />

centered approach," which he explains as essentially following the rule that. when<br />

collecting data. "we should suspend our disbelief and not start wondering immediately<br />

what really happened- that is. what would he an explanation we could accept" (Hufford<br />

1976. 73· 4). Instead. we should begin our fieldwork from the stance that the material we<br />

are abo ut to receive is coming from "accurate observations interpreted rationally" (l 982a.<br />

.. The "Old Hag" is the name given in Newfoundland. Canada. to a phenomenon that<br />

typically cons ists of an individual waking sometime during the night. but finding him or<br />

herself to be temporarily paralyzed. This is often ucccmpunied by the sen..arion of<br />

pressure on the chest (often leading to feelings of suffocation). as well a" hallucinat ions<br />

of supernatural beings entering the room.<br />

31


xviii), and as such. "When an informant relates a bizarre but believed experience. we<br />

should try to ask some of the questions that his friends and neighbor s might. as well as<br />

those that occur to a university professor" ( 1976. 74). Th is valuing of informant belief<br />

systems and narratives is as critical in dealing with disease narratives as it is in<br />

researching supernatural phenomena.<br />

Contemporary Legends<br />

Beyond these genera l orientation... any approach to the exami nation of the<br />

narratives surrounding SARS must begin with the legend genre. Contemporary legends.<br />

as defined by Patricia Turner. are "unsubstantiated narratives with traditional themes and<br />

modem motifs that circulate in multiple versions and are told 4lS if they are true or at least<br />

plausible" ( 1993. 5). and are characterized by "pe rsistence. pervasiveness and<br />

persuasiveness" (Kapferer 1996. 246). The oral passage of a legend is "often<br />

fundamentally a political act" (Ellis 200 1, xiv). a fact that is closely tied in with Ronald<br />

L. Baker' s assertion that "mass culture nourishes legendry-providing it with fresh<br />

subject matter and spreading its dissemination" ( 1976. 367). According to Jan Brunvand.<br />

the maintenance of legends is based on three criteria: "Strong basic story appeal. a<br />

foundation in actual beliefs. and a meaningful message or moral" ( 1981. 10 ). and as<br />

Tamotsu Shihutani has stated. the genre advises. cautions. and informs with speed and<br />

authority ( 1966).<br />

Much of the field of legend research is. in fact. directly relevant to the study of<br />

SARS, since my examinations of the coronavirus largely entail dissections of the<br />

narratives that surrounded it. such as legends, rumors. jo kes. gossi p. etc. Legend theory<br />

32


that specifical ly deals with disease and illness is particularly relevant. providing a<br />

background for subsequent discussions about novel illnesses. In this sense. a relevant<br />

starting point lies in a small work by Frances Cattermole-Tally that originally appeared in<br />

the "Topics. Notes and Comments" section of the journal Folklore in 1995. In this.<br />

Cauermole-Tally discusses the Fantasies and realities surround ing the intrusion of non­<br />

human organisms into the body. Beliefs in the possibility of such intrusions go "far back<br />

in history and [are] almost world wide" (89). and transcriptions (or at least descrip tions)<br />

of the stories that accompany them have appeared in folkloric texts for decades. For<br />

instance. Thomas R. Brendle and Claude W. Unger's Folk stedicine ofthe Pennsylvania<br />

Germans: 71,e NOII-OccIIlt Cures, published in 1935. mentions the Pennsylvania<br />

Germans' usc of the word "wo rm" to describe intestina l parasites such as the tapewo rm<br />

(qtd. in Catterr nole-Tally 1995. 89-90). What is critical about Cuttermole-Tally's article.<br />

however, is not its descriptions of historical beliefs in animal intrusions. hut its discussion<br />

of the problems inherent in many folkloristic works concerning those beliefs. "Fears of<br />

worms or reptilian forms existing in one' s body are not without basis," Cuttcrmole-Tally<br />

warns: "Just as many physicians often ignore or dismiss belief ...· about diseases. so most<br />

folklorists overlook or ignore the reality that diseases might be caused by animals<br />

residing in the human body" (Cattcrmolc-T ally 1995, 90, emphasis in original).<br />

This call for what is essen tially academic belief. or at least willing suspension of<br />

disbelief. in the beliefs of others is well-evidenced in Adrienne Mayor's "The Nessus<br />

Shirt in the New World: Smallpox Blankets in History and Legend: ' Mayor ' s article<br />

starts off by recognizing that smallpox blanket stories "may be based on historical fact"<br />

33


( 1995.55). and moves from there into an exa mination of the historical consequences of<br />

these stories. Echoing v eronique Cumpion- Vincenr's earl ier observations thai<br />

contamin ation fears often involve elements of xenophobia (qtd. in Mayor 1995. 67).<br />

Mayor notes that "in poiso n-garme nt legends of Europe . India. South Ame rica. the<br />

Unitcd Slates. and elsewhere. those who are Others in terms of race. culture . nat ionality.<br />

ethnic group . religion. gender. status. class. eth ics. and "0 on. are held responsible for<br />

contaminating clo thing' (Mayor 1995 . 67). These examination" of the racial stereotypes<br />

presen t in smallpox blan ket stories are furthermore extended to other illness narratives.<br />

Mayor not ing especially the similarities between legends surrounding "ma llpox and<br />

AIDS . Both narrat ives. for exa mple. ex hibit themes of "moral responsibility. blaming<br />

victims ... • [undl tfatal gift ' motifs" (1995. 56). as well as "morally ambiguous situations"<br />

( 1995. 68 ) that blur the boundaries of acco untab ility. It is. however . the theme of "Others<br />

as contaminating strangers" ( 1995. 72) to which Mayor kee p" returning- a theme that<br />

will appea r aga in and again in the discussions of SA RS that will appea r in subseque nt<br />

chapters.<br />

Xenophobia such as that which app ears in Mayoc' s work may in part come from<br />

what Bill Ellis has noted of legend-telling: that it can bc seen as the "communal<br />

exp loration of socia l boundaries" (l990b . 3 1). where members of a gro up define and<br />

demarcate their borders. A consequence of such demarcation can be the exclus ion of<br />

those mem bers who are deemed not to fit communal norm " and expectations. In "Organ<br />

The ft Narra tives." Veroniqu e Camp ion-Vincent ap plies the exa mina tion of xeno phobic<br />

responses to narratives conce rning the theft of body parts. especially in relation to baby


parts and stolen corneas (both of which come from Sout h America). and kidneys (in<br />

Europe and North America). " Legends and rumors:' she says. "thrive on the degree and<br />

intensity of belief" ( 1997.7). and narratives that involve outsiders stealing body parts<br />

from children provide an opportune medium for the nourishing of intense beliefs. In a<br />

separate essay . Campio n-Vincent expands on these points to bring out the nature of these<br />

fears of outsiders, saying. " In a state of crisis in which the established value system of a<br />

group or society seems at stake . it is easier to cope with anxiety if it becomes fear of<br />

someone who can be held responsible' (2005 . 105). noting at the same time that the<br />

belief in stories such as these is in part explainable by their not relying on "fact or<br />

reason:' and therefore being unaffec ted by them (2005 . 106 ). The full extent of<br />

xeno phobic sentiments is usually downplayed in reports by popular media. but oral<br />

narratives are not so tame. and make apparent the full spectrum of sent iments.<br />

Cumpion-Yinccnt's articles are important for more than just their discussions of<br />

xenophobia. Along the way. the articles also touch on reasons beh ind the ex istence of<br />

rumor and legend. creating a theoretical framework for the understandin g of the basic<br />

human needs that drive the creation and promul gation of such narratives. Quoting Neil<br />

Aschcrson. Campion-Vincent slates that "rumor exists because it fills a need. 'The need<br />

for an interpretati on which suddenly and magically strings toget her disconnected fears<br />

and hopes. nostalgia and hatreds and displays them in a single significa nce' .. ..· ( 1997.<br />

32). Narrat ives such as these provide a means of expressing deep-seated emot ions that<br />

may not be socially accep table in other forms of communication. Simon Bronner<br />

discusses one exampl e of this in his exam ination of children 's contagion folklore. wherein<br />

35


he finds that the "coo lies complex" came out of associat ions with polio, but ex isted<br />

among children as a means of "playfully dramatiz]ing] the dread of the disease," while<br />

simultaneously examining the modem logics of appearance and clean liness in associatio n<br />

with health (1990. 107).<br />

Laurie Stanley-Blackwell's aforementioned work on New Bnmswick narratives<br />

concerning Hansen's disease shows a different purpose for legends. In her work, the<br />

stories are not told by one set of people about another. but by one set of peop le about<br />

themselves. In this case, the legends mitigate the fears associated with the disease. and<br />

attempt to explain its prescnce in a way that removes the focus of blame from the local<br />

population. specifically by claiming that the disease came from elsewhere as a result of<br />

travelers. In making such narrative claims, the local people create "a humanized and<br />

indigenous aetiology for leprosy" ( 1993. 39). Diane Goldstein presents yet another view<br />

of this. noting that the AIDS legend tradition "betrays our obsession with origins,"<br />

where in the underlying themes of popular legends all revolve around a single concern:<br />

"establishing a first-a source for this thing that made our world change so irreversi bly"<br />

(2004.77).<br />

Another way legend theory can be used to exa mine health-related concepts is by<br />

utilizing its ability to discuss rationally and logically the vernacular theories that surround<br />

disease and cure. These vernacular theories are often scorned by the "officia l" medical<br />

community. but this does not necessarily result in their being abandoned by the<br />

layperson. Gillian Bennett gives an excel lent example of this in relation to bosom<br />

36


serpents and other animal s bel ieved to be able to reside inside the human bod y. Bennett<br />

claim s that these narratives form<br />

... a complete language for talking about sickness . They are a metaphor-come- true<br />

which allows a rational aetiology to be deduced from the centra l image and a<br />

logical cure devised. But they are also a means whereby lay persons may talk<br />

informedly to each other and to the ir therapists about the nature and course of the<br />

sufferings. Best of all. they are a means thro ugh which the efficacy of the various<br />

medica l alternatives may be debated. The doctor need never have the last word<br />

(though he often does even here). The stories are there to be told. to demonst rate<br />

that no mailer how many times patients arc told that their sufferings are<br />

imagi nary. in the end the scoffers will be confou nded and the patient will be<br />

dramatically vindicated. ( 1997.239)<br />

Regardless of the purpose beh ind the legend. the narrative itself continues to be<br />

spread because it "resonate ls ] with the life circums tances" of the narrator and audienc e<br />

(Bennett and Smith 1996. xxii). Elissa R. Henken exemplifies these themes in her article<br />

"Escalating Danger in Contemporary Legends: ' especially as the narratives she choos es<br />

10 study exhibit fears of Others. Her main purpose is to demonstrate that legends scem to<br />

be changing in two ways in the modern world: first. the amount of danger a victim faces<br />

in a legend seems to be larger and more life-threateni ng now (as compar ed to. say.<br />

legends in the 1970s); and seco nd. that there appears to be a moveme nt away from<br />

justifiable or merited punishment in these narrativ es. This second topic is well-<br />

demonstrated in the "welcome to the wonderful world of AIDS" legends. where Henken<br />

suys that. in contrast to previous narratives where A IDS victims could be blamed for<br />

promiscuity in having contr acted the disease. "that legend has been largely superseded by<br />

legend s in which the victim. unwillingly pricked by an Hl v -infccted needle. has simply<br />

gone to the movies or used a payph one or soda machine or gas pump" (200 2. 26 1). No<br />

longer is it necessary in legends to justi fy a victim's plight by having them take a course<br />

37


of action deemed immoral or inappropriate by community standards. Instead. we now<br />

have narratives where even those who are innoce nt of any crime are potential victims.<br />

Such "changes in punishable behavior appear clearly linked to changes in a group's<br />

morals" (2002 . 259). possibly e,..idencing a shift caused by the nature of modem society.<br />

where "shame appears to be losing its strength a, a social control and peop le are<br />

rewarded for publicly humiliating themselves on television" (2002. 27 1-2). As such.<br />

legend, emp loy increasingly harsher punishments for violators of social and communa l<br />

noons in order to remain relevant. and furthermore need to empha..ize the negative<br />

consequence, of inappropriate acts by demonstrating that even innocent people are not<br />

safe. In legends. it is no longer accep table for the public to assume themse lves protected<br />

from harm by their po..itive actions.<br />

Paula Treichler' s 110"' to Have 111eor)';11 t/ll Epidemic provides an exce llent<br />

summarization of many of the points that have so far been addressed. Concerning the<br />

origins of AIDS narratives. she states that, given the uncertainties that revolved around<br />

the disease' s origins. transmission vectors. curability, and other unknowns. "it docs not<br />

seem unreasonable thut... people' s imaginations give hirth 10 many different conceptions"<br />

( 199lJ. 16), Reactions to these stories vary widely. depending on multiple factors. hut the<br />

narratives arc important as a whole because they are evidence of a cultural " St' IIW " of<br />

truthfulness (1999, 1(4 ). For instance. Treichler slates that "so me of the idiosyncrat ic.<br />

unreasonable. apparently demented meanings annburedto AIDS provide important<br />

insights into how people make sense of the world. collectively and individually. and how<br />

language works in culture. They reveal sources of mistrust. resistance . fear. and<br />

38


discmpc wermcnt" ( 1999. 222). Such narratives. especially as they exist in the fonn of<br />

conspiracy theories, offer empowermen t to their narrators in knowing secre t and<br />

dangerous information. which helps exp lain why these narratives "of blame and causation<br />

circu late geographically with astonishing case" (1999 .220). Bordia and DiFonzo provide<br />

additiona l reasons for this transmis sibility in the ir discussions of rumor . wherein they<br />

note that uncertainty and anxiety are key 10 the spread of rumo r. especially as that rumo r<br />

applies to topics of perso nal relevance. and that there seem to he three motivations to the<br />

spread of rumors : "fact-finding, relationship-building. and self-enhancement" (2005. 88).<br />

Considering these factors. it should come as no surpri se that rumors have been close ly<br />

linked to the spread of "violence. prejudice. and discrimination" (Knopf. qrd. in Fine<br />

2005 .2).<br />

Health Pan ics<br />

A spec ific subset of legend-related material that is directly related to the<br />

investigation of SARS narratives includes theories about panics. such us health. moral.<br />

and Satanic panics. Panic was omn ipresent in the SA RS outbreak. and the theories that<br />

arise in ucudcmic literature about other areas will prove helpful in examining the 2003<br />

epidemic. Jeffery Victor defined a "rumor panic" as "a collect ive stress reaction in<br />

response to a belief in stories about immediate ly threatening circumstances." and said<br />

abou t them. "a rumor pan ic in a community can be identified by the ex istence of widely<br />

occurring fear-provo king behavior" (1993.59). Moral panics appea r frequent ly in<br />

soc iety. and may be novel. but have also been seen to appear. then submerge into an<br />

39


almost-unnoticed state before reemerging decades later. sometimes with such force that<br />

they enact legal and socia l changes in response (Cohen. Stanley 2002).<br />

Bill Ellis has written widely about Satanic panics and devil-worshippers. His 1990<br />

article "The Devil-Worsh ippers at the Prom: Rumor-Panic as Therapeutic Magic" restates<br />

his theory that "one function of legend i.. to 'name' previously undefined threats and by<br />

so doing gain psychological control over them" (3 1), which is a variation on his<br />

"communal exploration of social boundaries" theory stated earlier in this chapte r. Ellis'<br />

most relevant point in this article is his summarizat ion and extension of work done by<br />

Joel Best. Best. Ellis explains , in studying the exaggerations of the numbers of abducted<br />

children reported by organizations and individuals. finds that the problems behind these<br />

inflated numbers lie not in the facts that a claim exists. but in the reasons "people find for<br />

justifying draw ing certain conclusions from the facts" ( 1990.29). People' s percept ions of<br />

a problem. then. arc more influential in their summariza tions of the problem than are the<br />

actual facts. Accordingly. these perceptions should be the main focusof study for<br />

problems involving especially panic-related narratives, for as Ellis points out. when<br />

closely examined. many of these perceptions ami claims tum out to not be " irrational,"<br />

but evidential of deep-seated fears and anxieties. And as devil-worshippers are often<br />

synonymous with "cults" in the public consciousness, then David Frankfurter's<br />

paraphrasing of Claude Levi-Strauss provides an excellent parallel commentary:<br />

"Cults... are 'good to think with' when people arc anxious about cultural decl ine.<br />

subversion. and evil" (2003 . Ill ).<br />

40


peop le character ized the act of mast urbat ion as derogatory, dangerous, and in severe<br />

cases , deadly. Men in partic ular were pain ted as be ing highly suscept ible to the act. their<br />

sex ual drives "hard to control" and "fragile , read ily damaged by a moment's<br />

carelessness" ( 1992.387). These works succeeded in being popular for two rea...ons. First.<br />

the tracts that attempted to discount them were filled with what flail calls "ambiguities"<br />

(1992. 386). where authors seemed unsure of their claims. undermined their own<br />

arguments. or otherwise stymied discussions. Second. the works that did succeed d id so<br />

largely because they built on already-existing belief systems about the negative potential s<br />

of masturbation. As Hall says. "So loaded was the subject with negative connotations that<br />

any reassurances seem to have been far less audible than the slightest hint of potential<br />

harm" (1992.387).<br />

Kathleen Wood ward provides an exce llent addition to the examination of pan ic in<br />

"Stat istical Panic," wherein she exa mines the role statist ics play in creat ing fea r and<br />

anxiety. Statistics are pointed out as being equi table to risk, especially when it comes to<br />

health . In our modem socie ty we are surrou nded by figures and facts that tell us. for<br />

exa mple. the likelihood that we will contract breast cancer, or fait down a ni ght of stairs,<br />

or be eate n by sharks. Statistics is. in fact. "a discour se of risk. We are at risk. it seems, of<br />

anything and everyt hing" ( 1999, J79). One of the many problems Wood ward points out<br />

co ncerni ng statist ics is that they are too eas ily read in a nega tive sense. and often pro mote<br />

"a sense of forebod ing and insecurity" ( 1999. 180 ). So. for exam ple. if someone is told<br />

that they only have a one in ten million cha nce of being eaten by a shar k. the message<br />

that can end up being made clea r is not that it is ext raordinarily unlikely for such an event


to occur. bUI simply that such an event ClI1l possihlv occur. Given this fact. and the<br />

statistic-rich nature of the modem world. Woodw ard claims that. in some ways. our lives<br />

are essentially a series of statistical panics. one occu pying our minds for a fleeting<br />

mom ent until another moves in and shoves out the first one. and so on. The panic that can<br />

be caused by statistics is especia lly acute. largely because of the uncerta inty intrinsic to<br />

the statement : "What in fact panics us. howeve r. is that we cannot be certain of our own<br />

future . howe ver much (it has been ) quanti fied ... for us" (1999 . 187). In the end.<br />

Woodw ard claims that. follo wing the work of Ulrich Beck. industria l society has been<br />

replaced hy the risk society. where "What we fear is risk itself' (1999 . 180).<br />

The last few articles have moved towards panic spec ifically associa ted with health<br />

issues. Margaret Humphreys' "No Safe Place: Disease and Panic in Amer ican History"<br />

brings this transition to its fullest. shedding light on modem instances of fear and anxiety<br />

related 10 such epid emics and health scares as cholera. malaria. heart di..ease. and the<br />

200 1 mailing of anthrax-laden letters. among other s. II i.. Humphr eys' contention thai<br />

modem Americans have largely forgotten what it means to "feel that our place is<br />

contaminated. diseased. and unsafe" (2002. 845). and so scares such as the anthrax ­<br />

mailings often resu lt in panics disproportionate to their actual morbidit y. Such react ions<br />

are not solely limited to North America. nor to novel anxiety' inducing health situations.<br />

In fact. Humphreys states that. in general. "diseases do not cause panic in direct<br />

proportion to their morb idity and mortality. a fact that seems counterintuitive" (2002.<br />

846). and illu..trates this by not ing that women are far more afraid of breast cancer than<br />

heart disease. despite the latter being far more prevalent and deadly.<br />

43


Humph reys also notes that the "crossing of boundar ies" (200 2. 847) as it relates to<br />

diseases passin g both real and artificia l borders is ce ntral to panic . She co mments. "The<br />

scariest d iseases are traveling diseases. Strange plagues that threate n the place of<br />

sanctuary arouse the most fear. Th is is particularly true when the disease can be tracke d"<br />

(200 2.850) . and adds that there is a direct correlation between the speed of morta lity and<br />

the esca lation of panic. Th e spread of panic . however . is directl y dependent upo n the<br />

spread of informa tion (or disinform ation) surrounding the disease. and the media plays a<br />

role in this circulation. Humphr eys even goes so far as to claim that "disease panic and<br />

the news media forrn their own generative circle" (2002 . 846). where the panicked public<br />

demands more informa tion from the media. and upon its presentation. such information<br />

begets more panic. which creates a call for more information . etc.<br />

Race an d Racializal ion<br />

Humphreys' art icle is important in anoth er aspect: its discussion of racial themes .<br />

Panic. she says , begets racism and xenop hobia . particularly because of the "cro ssing of<br />

boun da ries" mentioned ea rlier. Diseases that come from else w'here arc blamed upo n the<br />

peop le who inhabit the coun try of the disease' s or igin. Erecting bound aries arou nd our<br />

own homes is an "inev itable response to a travel ing. panic disease" (2002 . 850) . but also<br />

res ults in the format ion of psycholo gical boundari es between "us" and "them" and the<br />

creation of the "Others" category noted in Mayor' s discussion of the Nessus shin. The<br />

quaranti ning and avo idance of these Others is the co nsequence of such bound aries, and<br />

has numerou s historica l examples. including the quarant ining of San Franci sco' s<br />

Chinatown during the bubonic plague epidemic of ) 9tJ.t , and various fears assoc iated


with imm igrating Jewish people in 1892 (who were tied to typhus). and Italians in 19 16<br />

(who were blamed for polio) (2002. 852).<br />

The racia l comments present in Humph reys' work correspond with what Charles<br />

L. Briggs has noted: that "narratives about ep idemics make racia l and ...exual inequalities<br />

seem natural-c-as if bacte ria and viruses gravitate toward populations and respect social<br />

bou ndaries" (2005 . 272). This "racialization." defined by Om i and Winant as "the<br />

extension of racial mean ing to a previously racia lly unclassified relationship. social<br />

practice. or group" ( 1986. 6-t). can be seen as a consequence of living in the modem<br />

world as dc...cribed by Marrin-Barbe ro. where we do not have socie tie...with media . bUI<br />

media constructs that shape society ( 1987). In this sense. the narratives thai appear in the<br />

media influenc e the way professionals and laypersons perceive the health system. both in<br />

terms of its practit ioners and how it relates to the non -medical sectio ns of the population.<br />

The same could be said of how the population perceive s disease. Any new virus or<br />

bacterium that has its origins in a foreig n country is immediately. irrevocably tied to that<br />

place and the people who live there. and thus AIDS becom es synonymous with Africa,<br />

SA RS with China. etc. At the same time thai these diseases become synonymous with<br />

race. they can also reshape racial boundaries. changing the way laypersons and<br />

profe ssionals perceive others (or Others. after Mayor). Such changes arc not necessarily<br />

irrcvocable-c-few peop le today would still assoc iate Jewish people with typhus- but they<br />

can provide ruts in the road. as it were. into which future discussions of the connections<br />

between disease and race can slip. As Briggs says . "Producing narratives of race. disease.<br />

and ...pace involves the collaboration of biomedical profe...sionals, publ ic health officia ls.<br />

45


politicians. reporters. and. often . anth ropologists. Such narratives can he firml y in place<br />

before an epidemic has begun . there by shaping epidemiological investiga tions.<br />

preventinn and treatment regimes. and long-term effects" (2005. 277).<br />

Alan Kraut' s Silent Travelers: Gem's. Gelles. and 'ht' "lmmignm r ,\tellace"<br />

provides a secon d look at issues of race and disease. strong ly demonstrating the<br />

histo rically assumed Jinks between immigrants and ep idemics . especially regardi ng<br />

tube rculosis . cholera. and the bubonic plague. The reality of the situatio n. Kraut argues. is<br />

not that the immigrants were nece....arily carriers of diseases. but that the condit ions they<br />

were forced to live in (many of them being explo ited for cheap labor) were of such poor<br />

quality and sanitation that disease often resulted. American citizens. then. were largely to<br />

blame for the outbreaks for the ir negli gence in creating decent living situations for these<br />

immi grants. Despite this (or rather. because of a lack of understandin g of this). the<br />

immigrants continued to be blamed as carriers and spreaders of diseuse- a stigma that<br />

has carried forward ever since. as evidenced by Haitian peoples being accused of<br />

propagat ing the AIDS virus in the 1980s (Kraut 1995. but see also Fairchild 200 3;<br />

Markcll999; and Marks and Worboys 1997). Raciulizut ion such as this finds an easy<br />

scapegoat in the form of people who arc alread y stigmatized in some way or another.<br />

whether as pros titute. criminal. foreigner. or some other illegal and/or immor al label: "in<br />

many of the del iberate-infector narrat ives. the aggressor is portrayed as a member of a<br />

threatening ethnicity or social group-e-a group already thought to have eroded morals"<br />

(Go ldstein 2004. -18).<br />

46


Risk and Risk Assess ment<br />

The panic and racia lizat ion that is often present in legends can be seen as part and<br />

parcel of risk-determining decisions made by the lay public. Defined by Mary Douglas.<br />

"risk" is "the probab ility of an even! combined with the magnitude of the losses and gains<br />

that it will entail" ( 1992.40). The determination of risk inherentl y involves the creation<br />

of "boundaries" between one group and another . or more prec isely in relation to SA RS.<br />

between oneself (or an extended peer group) and a group of people seen to be more at<br />

risk of contracting the disease (Gilman 1988)"Ri..k is a key concept in the ..tudy of not<br />

only legends, but health beliefs as expre ssed in legend ... as the narrativ es that come from<br />

situations deemed pote ntially harmful by the lay public offer direct in..ights into the<br />

co llective psychological frameworks present during periods of stre..s and anxiety . Risk<br />

c..timation is a natural response to tension. indeed a crit ical facili ty required to functio n<br />

properly. However, it is also an act that has proven prob lematic for authorit ies ..ccking to<br />

quell panic. Not only does risk estimation lend to panic and racialism, but identifying and<br />

understanding the underlying causes of such actions can he difficult, and "official"<br />

communication designed to suppress and subduc those act ions can have the oppos ite<br />

effect. Many academic models of risk-related behavior fail to take into acco unt cultural<br />

and personal meanings of "ris k," "s usce ptibility," and "risk reducing behavior," instead<br />

attempting to assign generic mode ls and definitions 10 individuals- an act that can result<br />

in the same sentence having different meaning s for researcher and rescarc hce (Go ldstein<br />

2004 , 163). William Leiss and Douglas Powell have further noted that:<br />

Research has suggested that effort s to con vince the public abou t the safety and<br />

benefits of new or existing techno logies... rather than enhan cing public<br />

47


confide nce. may actually amplify anxieties and mistrust by denying the<br />

legitimacy of fundamenta l social concerns. The public carries a much broader<br />

notion of risk. one incorporating. among other things. account ability. economic s.<br />

values. and trust, (2()()4. I I )<br />

Leiss and Powell point directly to the confusion of basic definitions


curious to note the disdain some branches of official medicine have towards folk<br />

medicine. as the logics that have created these two strands of thought. while different in<br />

their conclusions. arc similar in their approaches and even methods. Ultimately. all<br />

epidemiology starts as folk epidemiology: the constructio n of stories about novel<br />

diseases. Some of these stories end up as beneficial and others arc ultimately proven<br />

incorrect. but as has already been stated. the story-making PIlX'eSS is the same for both<br />

groups of people: am I vulnerable. who has the disease . and how can I not get it'!<br />

Despite such similarities. the historica l debasement of folk medicine by officia l<br />

medicine is well documented. On a larger scale. folk belief as a whole has been<br />

frequently deemed as little more than supersti tion and belief in magic and the<br />

superna tural (Honko 1964: Mullen 1969). Folk medicine. however. seems to attract<br />

specia l attention when it comes to official scorn. David Hufford has succinctly<br />

summarized the academic disparagement of folk beliefs with the phrase "w hat I know. I<br />

know: what you know. you only believe" ( 1982b, 47), a stance that varies in its public<br />

expressions from outright contempt to sincere. but misguided attempts to "reeducate" the<br />

public. Efforts in this latter area often assume patients to be "empty vessels:' who. as<br />

described by Bonnie Blair O' Connor •<br />

.. .in the absence of medically accepted knowledge about health and illness. are<br />

assumed to have I/ O knowledge about them as a basis for making choices or taking<br />

action.... The conception of patient education thus frequently operates on the<br />

basis of an extremely simplistic view of its mission: "co mmunicate success fully<br />

with people so they will understand their health problems (usually as we. not they.<br />

define them) and they will want to change their behavior".. .. When the proposed<br />

changes do not occur. or when they come about very slowly, the cause is<br />

generally interpreted as "resistance to change" and defined as a "prob lem" which<br />

is located in the "target population: ' ( 1995. 177)<br />

49


heavily refined over the course of time to acco mmodate new ideas and fine-tune current<br />

ones-including abandon ing altogether ideas that have been found to be injurious or<br />

ineffective. Systems such as these are in fact " logical" and "rational: ' in that they have<br />

been created ba..ed on evidence gathered from long-term observat ion and experience<br />

(Hufford 1984). Lay health systems arc indeed greatly different from the modem Western<br />

models. but these differences, while recognized , have been largely ignored or overlooked<br />

in their importance and rationale. For instance , while Western models place almost all of<br />

their value on objective experience-to wit, the absence of disease and the proper<br />

functioning of bodily processes-lay health models place their emphasis on subjec tive<br />

experience : that the subject has feelings of good health, such as being energetic, pain­<br />

free, and able to perform daily routines (Calnan 1987). Such concepts arc part of a<br />

group's "cullural constructions of reality: ' where the worldvicws of a people define and<br />

..hapc how they react to themselves and others


Many theories and models have been created in attempts to help Western doctors<br />

better understand their patient s. none perhaps more effect ive than the Health Belief<br />

Model. This mode l. developed by sociologists. "holds that the factors affecting health­<br />

relate d beha..-ior (on the part of laypersonsI are perceive d ...u...cept ibilny to and serious ness<br />

of a given health threat. percei ved benefits and barriers to a given course of health­<br />

promot ing or remedia l action and (interna l and exte rnal! cues impe lling action "<br />

(O'Connor 1995. 19 ). Decisions. then. are being made on an internally logical and<br />

rational system. In the prese nce of an injury . several factors are considered. and a<br />

decision made based on what the patient (and perhaps his/her family) fee ls is the most<br />

appropriate course of action. If a particular course of treatment. whether it be traditiona l<br />

or hospital-be...ed. is deemed overly stressful or potentially more inju riou s than the injury<br />

itself. then that course of treatment is removed from the list of opt ions. This manner of<br />

thinking is not that different from what takes place in a doctor' s office: if a patient has an<br />

infection. the doctor considers a possible range of treatments. concludes that an antibiotic<br />

regimen is idea l. but upon finding out that the patient is allergic to penicillin. opts for a<br />

drug free of that compound. The logic in hoth systems is clear. Lay health systems<br />

merely rely partially on traditional remedies-remedies that arc considered superstitious<br />

or magico -rcligious by doctors. and so are disparaged. The arguments that arise becau se<br />

of this disparagement would be minimalized if doctors were able to incorporate lay health<br />

belief systems into their practice. recognizing not only their permane nce in worldw ide<br />

cultures. but their cultural importance. When these belief systems are not only perma nent.<br />

52


ut indica tive of the choi ces peop le may he likely to make given a health problem. it only<br />

makes sense for w estern medicine to attem pt to understand them .<br />

MEIIIA T HE ORY<br />

More cou ld be said conce rning the relevance of folkloristics to the study of<br />

SARS. but in the interests of space we move from here into an examination of theor ies<br />

surrou nding the media. focusing especia lly on newspapers and televisio n. An<br />

understa nding of theoretical works in this area is especially important in the case of the<br />

SARS outbreak. as many people relied heavily on media sources for informatio n. and<br />

thus the biases and quirks that are an inhere nt pan of a news source are often passed on to<br />

the public. sometimes with less-than-desirable consequences. Leiss and Powell have<br />

noted the vacuum-ab horring nature of the public when it comes to informat ion. and have<br />

identified media sources as a component in the filling of such vacuums. In this sense.<br />

event s that arc reponed by media sources "become the sub..tantial basis of the publi c<br />

framing of. .. risks" (2004. 3 1). including both inflammatory comments from doo msayers<br />

and the soothing tones of politicians who assure that there is nothing to worry about.<br />

Specifically in reference to the SARS crisis. J. Kurlbcrg, writing in the<br />

Correspondence Section of the jou rnal A('ta Pediatr. noted that public response in<br />

Sweden to the outbreak had been so widely affected by media reports that even<br />

healthcare wor kers' reactions had been compromised. Karlhcrg gave as evide nce the case<br />

of a lIong Kong mother and child who arrived in Sweden in April of 2003 for a vacation.<br />

Soon after land ing. the ten-month-old son developed a high fever. and the mother<br />

attempted to have him exam ined at a hospita l in Stoc kholm. She was forced to wait<br />

53


out side (in 3 0 C tempe ratures) for twen ty minutes, then told to take the boy to a different<br />

hospital. Upon arriva l there. the woman was told to wait in her car, where she was met by<br />

a doctor dressed in protec tive clothing. who looked


inflamma tory articles in the press. From a folkloristic perspect ive. the role of mass media<br />

in di....eminating legends has long been recognized. Degh and Vazson yi noted in 1973<br />

that med ia is perha ps the "greater part" of the transm ission of ...uch narratives . after they<br />

...pend the initial and ...mallc r part of their ex istence being pa...sed oral ly (37) . Only a few<br />

years later Robert Mitchell noted the majo r role that media played in<br />

"compounding ... rumors that served a...a ...ub ...titute for informa tion through 'formal news<br />

channels" ( 1979. 40 ). and both Bengt af Klintberg and Jan Brunvand have remarked on<br />

the rapidity in which legends are spread by media sources , the report s adding to the<br />

entertainment value of the narratives. as well as their plau ... ibility (Brunvand 198 1;<br />

Klintberg 1981). Perhaps all of this is best summarized by Elliott Dring. who said. "At<br />

the bou ndary of the legend is not the myth or Marchcn with which it is forever being<br />

compared ... At the boundary of legend is news...that is. the reports. acco unts.<br />

...tatements. and ...torie...that we read daily in our newspapers" ( 1996.337).<br />

Moving specifically into the realm of media coverage of ep idem ics. we find that<br />

the literature still has much to say about the influence of news reports on the public.<br />

Steven Epstein has noted that the media' s continual usc of a spec ific ...ct of reporters and<br />

"experts" to discuss a situation not onl y mirrors "the internal ...tratiflcation of a social<br />

movement or a scientific community. but can even constr uct such hierarchies" (1996.<br />

335). In this sense, media reports cannot be seen as simply a record of the events in an<br />

epide mic. but mu ...t be con ... idered a funct ional part of those events, both ...haping them<br />

and be ing shaped by them. If a media source desig nates Doctor X as an "expert" on the<br />

topic and continually u...es his sound bites (pcrhap...bccau ...e he i......imply mo re photogenic<br />

55


or better at paring down complex jargon into easily-understandable speech than his<br />

peers). then Doctor X literally become s the "expert" on the subject in the eyes of the<br />

public-s-despite the fact that he might not know as much as Doctor Y......ho is simply not<br />

as effective at communicating with media sources.<br />

Seen in this light. the role of the media in outbreaks is far more complex than<br />

might be assumed. This is compounded by the ba..ic nature of ncws sources- specifically<br />

newspapers- which is that they are businesses attempting to sell their product (though<br />

even televised news reports compete with the reports being delivered on other channels<br />

for viewers). As such. the coverage of the thousands of ncwswonhy events that take place<br />

around thc world on a daily basis is not only curtailed by access to information<br />

concerning those events. but economic jud gments about which of those events will be<br />

seen as the more interesting by the public. and will thus sell more product. Elizabeth Bird<br />

has commented 011 the nature of this relationship at length. stating specifically that:<br />

News reflects and reinforces particula r cultural anxietie s and concerns. It goes in<br />

waves: many scholars have demonstrated. for exa mple. that waves of reponing<br />

about teenage suicide or child abuse do not necessarily reflect actual change s in<br />

the rates of these problems. Rather. they reflect waves of interest. and in tum feed<br />

the anxieties that have produced the interest in the first place. ( 1996.47)<br />

What appears in the pages of newspapers and thc special reports on the evening news<br />

cannot thus be assumed to be an unbiased and accurate reflection of daily events. Instead.<br />

it must be thought of as a subjective representation of them. sifted through numerou s<br />

political. economic. social. and cultural filters.<br />

The effect that the media ultimatel y has on the public is contentious. There are<br />

some who argue that the narratives dispersed by media sources are ultimatel y helpful-<br />

56


after all. the media docs disseminate useful. correct information on a regular basis.<br />

including articles that debunk popular misconceptions. or warn of the negative<br />

consequences of certain actions. The title of Marshall Goldberg 's 1987 article epitomizes<br />

this stance : ''T V Has Done More to Contain AIDS than Any Other Sing le Factor:'<br />

Goldberg 's piece is a defense of television-based AIDS report ing. arguing that. despite<br />

the problems to the contrary (inaccuracy . sen..ationali..m. etc.). television has ultimately<br />

done the world a service in pre..enting information about the di..ease. having taught the<br />

basics of transmission. susceptibility. and prevention . This article is admitted ly not<br />

scholarly. appearing a.. it did in the pages of TIl Guide, but as it was written by a<br />

physician and appeared in the pages of a magazine with a purported circulation of 16.3<br />

million in 1989 (Jones 1989). it was no doubt considered authoritative by many of its<br />

readers.<br />

On the other side of the argument lie these who claim that the narratives<br />

circulated hy the media have done varying degrees of harm. largely due to their<br />

inaccuracy. misunderstanding of key concepts. or misrepresentation. Benjamin Radford<br />

provides an exa mple of the sometimes-inaccurate nature of news reports in his article<br />

"Ringing False Alarms; Skepticism and Media Scares," Radford only briefly mentions<br />

SARS in his work (as an exa mple of a disease that is regularly given "ala rmist<br />

headlines"). However. he does present four major stories that appeared in newspapers<br />

between 1990 and 200 1. including missing/exploited children. racist church fires. the<br />

dangerous nature of bounty hunters. and the 200 1 ca..e of a Nigerian "slave ship". In all<br />

four cases. the nature of the threats and the numbers assoc iated with them were gross ly<br />

57


ove r-exaggerate d by the media-e-especially in the case of the slave ship. which turned out<br />

10 be an innocuous ferry transpo rting job-hunting (and free-living) teenagers to Co tonou.<br />

The most exagge rated fact. however. was the prese nce of mis...ing or lost children. a<br />

number estimated by the U.S. Department of Justice to read 400.000 eac h year.<br />

However. a study by the Crimes Against Children Research Center found that 73% of<br />

those children were home within twenty- four hours. and the larger numbe r of the<br />

remaining ch ildren were abscon ded with by a parent . usua lly the result of a divorce. In<br />

fact. betwee n 1990 and 1995. the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children<br />

hand led only 5 15 cases of children abducted by strangers (Radford 2005). Thus. the<br />

media cannot be assu med to consistently provide accurate repo rts.<br />

A seco nd. and perha ps mo re serio us take on the negative aspects of media is<br />

given by Paula Treichler. who states:<br />

We can point out that docum enting a scenario in print does not make it so. But<br />

who arc the "we:' and to whom are we po inting this out? And what do we expect<br />

10 accomplish? A scenario that cas ts "the media" or "the gove rnment" as<br />

complicit in duping the public about AIDS will nOI be dislodged by network news<br />

reporting or a lectu re from the U.S. surgeon general. Evidence. facts. the asse rtion<br />

of authority: none of these will function to discredit


The first is Peter Washer' s "Representations of SARS in the British Newspapers:' which<br />

appeared in 2()()4.w asher's study entailed a close examination of news articles appearing<br />

in all major Sunday national newspapers in the UK for a four-week period following the<br />

16 th of March. 2003. Any article that mentioned SARS was noted. coded for any of<br />

twenty -four key themes. and entered into a qualitative software database. Washer' s first<br />

observation upon examining his result.. was that:<br />

In the very first reports of SARS on 16 March, all the articles referred to the new<br />

illness as a "killer bug" or to a "myste rious" "lethal" "deadly pneumonia virus" .<br />

Th is new "threat" was de scribed as "moving at the ..peed of a jet" and people<br />

affected were not respondin g to traditional treat ments. Combined with adjectives<br />

like "un treatable" were some graphic descriptions of how the "victims' lungs<br />

..well and they suffocate". (2()()4,2565)<br />

For the first two weeks of the period Washer studied . new..paper articles revolved arou nd<br />

..cvc ral thcmes. including the origin of the disease, the attempts by Western doctors to<br />

com hat it. the search for a "pati ent zero: ' and the idea that SA RS could he the next<br />

plague. By the third week. however. only three types of story domina ted the papers : I)<br />

Chinese corruption and inefficiency; 2) the death of a major researcher, Dr. Carlo Urbani.<br />

w-hocontracted SARS while in Thailand; and 3) the negative effects of SARS on the<br />

econom y. By the fourth week the onl y major thread left was the discussion of global<br />

economies in light of the epidemic. Constantly mixed in with these threads over the four-<br />

week period , however. were comparisons of SARS to other diseases. such us A IDS.<br />

Ebola, and Spanish Flu. These comparisons are important because all of those diseuses<br />

came from somewhere other than the UK-in other words, the newspapers were<br />

constantly pointing out how recent outbreaks all came from elsewhere. This reporting<br />

contributed to the UK's xenophobic reaction: "the social repre..entation of SARS<br />

59


esonates with represe ntations of infectious diseases throughout histor y: we lay the blame<br />

for the new threat on those outside one's own com munity. the 'o thcr' " (2QO...1. 2570 ).<br />

Stephe n L. Muzzaui's " Bits of Falling Sky and Global Pandemics: Moral Panic<br />

and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome." gives an even harshe r criticism of the media's<br />

hand ling of the ep idemic . espec ially in regards to foreign peoples . Muzzuui states :<br />

The media 's construction of Asian communities as breed ing grounds of contagion<br />

was not focused exc lusive ly on Canada. Rather. news coverage in the United<br />

States saturated viewers with images of East and Southeast Asians wearing masks<br />

and creati vely-fra med camera angles provided footage of deserted Chinatowns in<br />

American urban centers. further fueling the stigma . (2005. 123)<br />

Muzzaui unequivocally blames the media for cove rage that was "lillie more than<br />

sensationalis m and xenophobic fear-mongering" (2005 . 12..n.and that con tributed to the<br />

"victimization of already disenfranchised groups" (2005 . 125).<br />

By far. then. the majority of voices cited here agree that the med ia. while<br />

valuable. arc ofte n guilty of inflammato ry exaggerations. inaccurate statements. and in<br />

regards 10 disease outbreaks. fear-mon gering. This last detail should be kept in mind as<br />

we move into the final section of this chapter: a review of the theories and articles<br />

specifically surrounding SA RS. The articles that fill the final section of this chapter are<br />

almost exclusively written by doctors. nurses. and medical researchers. and have<br />

appeared in the pages of scientific and medicinal journals. whether as articles or<br />

commentaries. As a whole these articles represe nt the ovcra rching thoughts and ideas of<br />

the men and women on the "fro nt lines" of the battle aga inst SARS. including not on ly<br />

scientific op inio n. but also personal concern. As such. these articles may be considere d a<br />

litmus test for the psychologica l profi le of the scie ntific and hcalthcare com munities. in<br />

60


In Canada. a study conducted out of the Univers ity of Toronto's Departm ent of<br />

Psychiatry on the psychological impact of SARS on hospital workers also found that<br />

nurses were more likely to report having felt stress . Furthermore. heah hcare workers who<br />

dealt with pat ients who had (or were suspec ted of having) contracted SARS reported<br />

greater amounts of stress than their peers. The study con nects these responses to not only<br />

the fear of contracting SARS. but also to social isolation and job stress. and recommends<br />

that interven tion attempts in times of future outbreaks should focus on all three of these<br />

orcas. rather than just on the fear of the disease itself (Maunder et al. 2QO...l). Another<br />

study of the reactions of heahhcare workers to the crisis examined the react ions said<br />

workers had to having been quarant ined. Unsurprisingly. fin ny of these healt hcare<br />

workers expe rienced feelings of fear. loss. and frustration. hut some were also equally<br />

conc erned about their forced inability to do their job-i.e. to help others in a bcalthcare<br />

capacity. The study concludes by again reco mmendin g changes he made to pol icies in<br />

case of future outb reaks. specifical ly noting that better literature 0 11dealing with<br />

infectious diseases. as well as stress management. be made available (Rob ertson et nl.<br />

20(4). Many of the conclusions of this study were echoed in an ex.amination of the<br />

psychological and occupational impact of SAR S at a teaching hospital (Mount Sinai) in<br />

Toron to. During the first four weeks of the Canadian outb reak (the span of time<br />

investigated in this study). eleven healthcare workers at the hospital contracted SAR S.<br />

and the hospital did set up seve ral health support interventions for these employees.<br />

However. the infected workers still reported feelings of loneliness. anger. and fear. as<br />

well as conce rn about the effects of their being quarantined on family members and other<br />

62


hospital staff In contrast . healthcare workers who were not infected with SARS reported<br />

heigh tened stress responses when it came to treating those workers who were infected (as<br />

opposed 10 regular patients). and increased apprehension over spreading the virus to<br />

family members (Maunder et al. 2(03).<br />

A different set of studies examined the reactions of non-healthcare workers {i.e.<br />

the pub lic) to the outbreak. specifically regarding their opinions about interacting with<br />

the hcahbc are community. A study in Taiwan found that the public' s utilization of<br />

medical services as a whole decreased drastically during the outbreak. with inpatient care<br />

droppin g by 35.2%. and ambulator y care by 23.9%. Even the field of dentistry was<br />

affected. experienci ng a 16.7% reduction in the number of patients. Given these numbers .<br />

the authors of the study warned that the healthcarc commu nity should not overlook the<br />

possibility of collateral. unreported health issues during times of crisis (Chang et al.<br />

2(04). A similar study of a major teaching hospital (Prince of Wales Hospital ) in Hong<br />

Kong reached comparable conclusio ns. in that almost all areas of the hospital' s<br />

emergency department expe rienced significant decreases in the number of patients<br />

reporting health concerns. The authors noted that trauma cases. minor cases , and the<br />

mean daily attendance all decreased by up 10 fifty percent. The only areas not affected by<br />

the outbreak were I) patients requiring immediate care. and 2) the number of patients<br />

disc harged against medical advice. In the former area. the number remained the same, bUI<br />

in the latter. the numbers actually decreased. meaning that fewer patients were leaving<br />

without first securing the doctor 's permission. Fear was noted as the driving force beh ind<br />

these changes. as well as possible changes in commu nity behavior. where membe rs of the<br />

63


public took better care of themselves so a.sto preclude any necessity of entering a<br />

hospital (Man et al. 2003).<br />

One editorial. written in Canada in the summer of 2003. shortly after Toronto had<br />

been removed from the World Health Organization's travel advisory list. also mentioned<br />

the widespread fear. but firmly located the source of that fear in the media. This should<br />

come as no surprise. given this chapter ' s previous section on media theory. But this<br />

article in particular . which appeared in Ctinicul Nunillg Research, placed significant<br />

blame on news sources:<br />

The way in which the media report news about infectiou s diseases often tends to<br />

increase anxiety because the focus of certainty is frequent ly the number of deaths .<br />

There have even been suggestions that some of those issuing bulletins about<br />

SARS may want to increase press circu lation. boost ratings for particu lar TV<br />

news channels. highlight pressure for better access to health funding. or even<br />

make political headlines. Whatever the underlying reasons for generating<br />

publicity about SARS. there has been an immense response of fear in the genera l<br />

public and the panic that death is imminent for all who contract the disease.<br />

(Hayes 2003. 3(0 )<br />

Regardless of whether or not the claims made by Hayes were valid or truthful. their<br />

placement within this editorial demonstrates that even within the medical community. the<br />

media were being blamed for fear-mongering. Hayes. however. is not so polemic as to<br />

claim that the media is the only source of fear. noting that the medical community is also<br />

at fault. Among other details. Hayes notes that the masks that hcalthcare workers w'ere<br />

required to wear. while greatly decreasing their chances of contracting the virus. were<br />

seen by some nurses as a "barrier between individuals" (2003. 30 1). and a catalyst for<br />

negative reactions in nurse-patient interactions.


In fact. if one word were to be used to describe the reactions repo rted in almos t<br />

every piece of collected literatur e conce rning psychol ogical reac tions to the out break. it<br />

would he "fear." Most of the articles dealt with the negative effects of fear. such as<br />

heightened anxiety of infecti ons spread ing during commercial air travel . with a similar<br />

apprehens ion building over the possibility of using airlines 10 disperse bioterrorism<br />

age nts-s-a possib ility that was made clear as a resul t of SAR S (Alexander. D.r\. 2003:<br />

Karwa . Currie and Kvetan 2005: Mangili and Gen drea u 2005). Other articles detai led the<br />

public' s co nfusion and fear caused by the disrupt ive measures that Toronto had to<br />

enforce to dea l with the outbreak-s-measures that were made the more disruptive beca use<br />

oft hc city's lack of a plan for such an occurrence. meaning that the proces s was bumpy.<br />

sometimes contradicto ry. and bewilderingly altered from week 10 week (Lim et al. 2()()..t ).<br />

Yet other articles noted the stigmatizat ion of Asian-American co mmunities while other<br />

races rema ined untouched (stigmatically) by the publi c. a situation that resulted in the<br />

stigmatized communities avoid ing or dela ying seeking health care (Person et al. 20(4).<br />

Two twists on this recognition of almost-universal fear were. first. a co mmentary abou t<br />

undergraduate medical stude nts in Toronto. who were frustrated that the out break had<br />

resulted in their not being permi tted to enter teaching hospitals in late Mar ch and early<br />

April of 2003 . a situation that man y students felt ham pered their educa tion (Clark 2(03).<br />

Second. an articl e from the Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Schoo l of<br />

Publi c Health in Hong Kong pointed out that the panic caused by SARS result ed in a<br />

public far more concerned with their collective health. and thus more likely to follow the<br />

65


preve ntative measures recommended by healthcare worker s and govern ment officia ls<br />

(Lau et al. 2003).<br />

Not all articles dealt with fear. of course . and M. Oren's study of quaran tine<br />

measures provides a useful segue betwee n discussions of fear and matters of a more<br />

abstract nature. Oren 's article does acknow ledge the presence of fear in the public. but<br />

from a more quali tative perspect ive. noting that informing the public of medical matters<br />

crea tes a di lemma between warning of a potent ial threat-a significant source of stress<br />

creation in regards to the public-and ascertaining the likelihood of that threat actually<br />

occurring (i.e. waiting to sec if the outbreak actually occurs before sending out warnings).<br />

Wh ile this is a significant eth ical quandary . Oren points out that conta ining a potential<br />

outbrea k at the start is far more effective than react ing to it once it has spread throughout<br />

a community. and as such. weighs in favor of adva nce warnings (2()().t).Singer et al. also<br />

discuss some of the ethical situations that arose because of the outbreak. including the<br />

ethics of quarant ine (individual liberties versus protecting the public); the balance<br />

between protecting private informat ion and revealing necessary medical informati on;<br />

hcalthcurc workers' di lemma s over their duties to help the infected. which raises the<br />

chances of those workers' families contracting diseases that the workers may bring home;<br />

patients whose necessary surgeries were postponed because of restrictions that limited the<br />

number and type of people who could enter hospitals during the outbreak; and the<br />

quest ion of how to dea l with outbreaks in a global community, wh ich includes issues of<br />

travel. responsibility. transpare ncy. and honesty (2003 : sec also Bernstein 2003 and<br />

Smit h et al. 2()()..t). Singe r et al.'s paper makes no attempt to provide answers to these<br />

66


ques tions, instead merely attemp ting to present issues that must be dea lt with by the<br />

healthcarc community. However, the article docs poin t to the fact that man y researchers<br />

and medica l profes..ionals were conce rned with ethics , and eager to discuss them.<br />

Othe r researchers and doctors were more interested in discussing the physica l<br />

problems that occurred in attempting to treat patients and prevent the spread of the<br />

coronavirus. Oren's above-noted artic le was positive in its evaluation of quaramines as<br />

effective measures, but other healthcare professionals were not so optimistic. One of<br />

these was Richard Schabas, a former Chief Medical Officer of Health for Ontario, and<br />

Chief of Staff at Yor k Central Hospital during the SA RS outbreak. In a review pub lished<br />

in the Canadian Medical Association Journal . Schabas unflinchingly pointed out the<br />

posit ive and negat ive ways with which the out break had been dealt. delivering an<br />

especially deflat ing co mmentary on quarantines:<br />

Ontario's response to SAR S has been energ etic. Unfo rtunate ly, however. it<br />

appears to have been based on unachievable expec tations, specifically, that<br />

quarantine would eliminate the disease. Let's be realistic. Quaran tine plays an<br />

importa nt but limited role in the co mmunity con trol of respirator y infections. II<br />

ca n reduce the impact of an outbreak but, accordi ng to our ex perience with other<br />

respirator y diseases, it won' t sto p transmission entirely. (2003, 1432)<br />

Instead of massive quarantines. which Schabes says do little more than drain public<br />

hea lth resources, he recom mends a program of ge neral surveilla nce. accompanied by<br />

public and professional education. Quarantines do still playa role in this new rubric of<br />

disease contr ol, but a lesser one, implemented only when necessary.<br />

J. Levett took an even darker view of what co uld have been in the art icle "Severe<br />

Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS): Loud Clang of the Leper's Bell:' Leven stated that<br />

the case with which the coronavirus rapid ly ..pread between continents ..hould have been<br />

67


a wake -up call for hea lth professiona ls and organizations worldwide . The articl e. which<br />

appe ared in December of 2003 . foreca ..t two po....ible futures for the outbreak (which had<br />

gone into a recession by this time): a ..uccc....ful co ntainment. or a worst-case scenario<br />

invo lving massive outbre aks. The latter situat ion was es pec ially trou bling for Leven . who<br />

clai med that Euro pean health services would not be able to cope with the sudde n strain.<br />

The article ended with a ca ll for the establishment of a Europe an Union Ce nter for<br />

Disease Co ntrol (2003).<br />

Finally. for the bleake..t side of the outbrea k... orne resea rchers pointed out the<br />

po.....ibilitics of SARS being used as a model for bioterrorist act ivities. Th is scenario was<br />

glo..sOO over in a previous paragr aph in this chapter. but de..erves more examination here .<br />

A.C . Shurtle ff. writin g for the Investigational Drugs journal. reported on a "cries of<br />

forum .. in 2()()4designed to addre ss the possibilit ies that some recent emerging infective<br />

disca..es could be possible agen ts of biot errorism. and what ..tcps could he taken if such a<br />

sce nario occurred . Abo dis cussed in these forums were genetic engineering method.. to<br />

circumve nt or enhance the immun e system. the creation of vacci nes and immune<br />

therapie s. and the deart h of new antiviral drugs (2004). Th e seriousness of these forums is<br />

perhaps best demonstrat ed in a different article. wherein the discu ssions revolved around<br />

the possi bilit ies present in anthrax and smallpo x being used a" agent" of bioterro rism .<br />

Here. D.K. Bhalla and D.B. Warheit gave a history of the purpo seful misu se of biological<br />

agents. beginning with infect ed cadave rs bein g thrown into the water sources of oppo sing<br />

armies in medieva l tim es. and cont inuing until the present day. with the anthr ax-mailing<br />

"care" of 2001 . Bha lla and Warheit noted that both anthrax and smal lpox are classi fied a"<br />

68


category A agents by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. a spot reserved for<br />

those agen ts that could cause the most hann after deliberate introduct ion into society . The<br />

great danger of living in the modem age. they note, is the relative ease with which<br />

orga nizations can sometimes acquire such agents. the cheapness of their manufacturing.<br />

and the ease of thei r delivery . International treaties limiting the availability of such agents<br />

arc helpfu l. and more are created ever y year. However. Bhalla and Warheit concluded<br />

that the on ly logical (and necessary) tack is to develop new strategies for the earl y<br />

detection of harmful -agent dispersal. and new treatment strategies for the long -term<br />

survival of the infected (20Q...t). Given the nature of this messa ge. it is eas y to see why<br />

Shurtleff' s article carries such weight: relea sed into society on a massive scale. SA RS<br />

could be devastating. and easily overwhe lm the available medical services. as Levett<br />

warned earlier in this sect ion.<br />

Ending this rather morb id section on a lighter note, nne notes that not all<br />

researchers lambasted gove rnments and hcalthcare communities for failing to take 3 more<br />

expedited or effectivc approach in dealing with the out break. C. Liu . while admitting the<br />

Chinese govcmrncnt' « initial failure to report SARS. pointed out that China was<br />

ultimately successful in containing the epidemic. and praised his Chinese colleagues for<br />

their efforts (200) . And two Hong Kong dentists pointed outlate in 2004. in the Journal<br />

of the American Dental Assoc iation. that despite up to one-third of health care workers in<br />

some cou mrics con tracting SARS from their patients . not one dental healt h care worker<br />

ever beca me infected through a dental setting. The authors gave as reaso ns for this<br />

curiosity the universal health control measures standard in the dental community. as well<br />

69


as the relative non-infectiou s nature of the coro navirus in the early stages of individual<br />

infections. and recomm end that the dental co mmunity maintain its curre nt b ..eI of<br />

infection control measures (Sa maranayake and Pciris 2()()..l).<br />

A final ..cct ion in this chapter di..cu....e....rudies of discase rumors. and the theo ries<br />

that have been forwarded to discuss the propagation of viru..es in an epidemic.<br />

Interestingly. and bring ing us back to the more folklore-oriented sect ion that began this<br />

cha pter. many of these scient ific theories attempt to solve the complex mathematical<br />

equations involved in virus propagation by treating the virus as a rumor that exists in<br />

small- world networks. Mathematically. it seems. the two fonn .. spread in similar fashion.<br />

and one can thus be used to discuss the other. Historically. researchers investigated this<br />

relationship using zero dimensional mode ls. where d ifferent "subpopulations" are mixed<br />

equally. interacting with other subpopulations in proport ion to their size. However. as<br />

Kupcnn an and Abramson pointed out in 200 1 (building on the work of OJ . Watts and<br />

S.II. Strogatz). such models do not accurately reflect the dispersal of real-wo rld<br />

subpopulations. and as such. they propose adopting "s mall-world" models. which are<br />

neither dependent on the subpopulations being well-mixed. nor on lattices of groups.<br />

Such reorganization produced a clear difference in tenus of epidemiology: the small­<br />

world model s produced results evidencing a much faster epidemic propagation than<br />

earlier models- resuhs that better resembled what occurs in the real world (200 1). Using<br />

these small-world models. and building on work that Kuperman and Abramson began in<br />

the above essay. D.H. Zanette pointed out that "en epidemic like model. which can be<br />

interpreted as the propaga tion of a rumor. exhibits critical behavio r at a finite randomne..s<br />

70


of the underl ying small-world network" (2001. n.p.). In other words. that there exists a<br />

critical point in the existence of a "rumor" where. if it docs not die out in the<br />

neighborhood of its origin. but spreads over a finite fraction of the population. its ability<br />

to propagate further grows geometrically and dynamically. Such conclusions bring 10<br />

mind Oren' s statements (given earlier in this chapter) that it is far more effect ive to<br />

contain an outbreak earlier. rather than later.<br />

A different model for calculating socia l and biological contagion arrived in 2004.<br />

proposed by P.S. Dodds and OJ. Watts. This modclused most of the work from ex isting<br />

frames. but included the memory of individuals as part of its calculations. Novel in its<br />

approach. for this marked the first time that human memory of exposure was explicitly<br />

made part of contagion studies. the work of Dodds and Walts showed that there is a<br />

strong correlation between the contagion models used in the social sciences (i.c. rumors)<br />

and in epidemiology (i.e. disease). whereas they had previously been thought to be<br />

largely incompatible:<br />

Our model suggests. however. that in reality these IwOkinds of contagion models<br />

may not be entirely distinct. We venture the possibility that some infectious<br />

diseases may spread in a fashion similar to social contagion processes. For<br />

example. two exposures to an agent sufficiently close in time may infect an<br />

individual with higher probability than would be expected if the expos ures acted<br />

as independent events. (2005. 598)<br />

A second point of theoretical importance in this discovery lies not at the beginni ng of the<br />

contagion process. but at the end. In addition to studying individuals who contract<br />

diseases. Dodds and Watts also studied people who recovere d and became permanently<br />

immune afterwards. and found "that epidemics inevitably die out but may be surprisingly<br />

persistent when individuals possess memory" (2005. 587; hut sec also Dodds and Walts<br />

7 1


20(4). NOIcd mainly in relation to biological models. this statement has great relevancy<br />

when combined with the social science world. where "epidemic' refers to "rumor:' the<br />

result being that the model s used in this article de monstrate some of the reasons why<br />

narratives abo ut a disease continue to exist long afte r the disease has vanished.<br />

This brings to a clo se our discussions of theories. Realistically. the hundred-some­<br />

odd sources that were used to construct this chap ter represent only the tip of a vast<br />

iceberg . Each section-folklore. media. and SARS--could be expa nded to hundreds of<br />

sources by itself. and there are arguabl y more sections that could he added to provid e this<br />

work with a better grounding. But as stated at the beg inning of this chapter. the sections I<br />

have chose n to use here represe nt what I see as the three main areas of discussion that<br />

will occupy the remainder of this volume. Incomplete as these sections may be. they still<br />

represent a large cross-sectio n of the work that has been done. and will prov ide an<br />

understanding of the areas from \\..hich the rest of this work will launch forth.<br />

72


Chapter 3: Chronicle of a Health l'unic<br />

The origins of the SARS virus can be traced to China's Guangdong province.<br />

though it was some months after the disease's initial outbreak in the Western world that a<br />

full timelin e could be constructed. Secrecy on the pan of the Chinese government is the<br />

main reason for this. followed closely by the difficulties of reverse-trac ing public disease<br />

pathways. But even after locating the earliest-known exam ples of human-related SARS.<br />

investigators were still left questioning where the virus had come from before entering<br />

the human population: viruses aren' t created ex nihito. so the disease had to haw its<br />

origins elsewhere. But where? An anima l'? Which anima!'? And how did the virus manage<br />

to cross thousands of miles of land and open water to almost simultaneously spring up in<br />

Hong Kong. Hanoi. and Toronto . but miss the places in between?<br />

This chapter will he a discussion-albeit brief-ofthese issues. A full-scale<br />

timelinc is not necessary for the purposes of this dissertatio n, but more to the point.<br />

would add potentially several hundred pages of largely irrelevant information. It is.<br />

however, necessary to cover the basics: to skip a rock over the pond and point out how<br />

the brief ripples this causes intertwine. The materials I usc to create this cha pter largely<br />

consist of newspaper clippings, and the methods 1used for gathering them can be seen in<br />

some ways as evidence of public concern about the disease at various points in time.<br />

For the better part of two years-c-April 20:.>3 to summer 2005-1checked various<br />

online newspapers and news sources such as CNN.com. f\lSN .com, and Yahoo.com on<br />

an almost-daily basis, printing every article that contained in any way the word "SARS."<br />

73


The results of this effort have produced a stack of paper some seven inche...high,<br />

containing literally hundreds of journalistic contributions. The bulk of these articles ,<br />

however. were printed betwe en April 2...... 2003 (the first day I began this task) and Jul y<br />

2...... 2003 ; these three months together compromise over half of the pile. The decrease in<br />

ava ilable articles after this point in time can be seen as evidence of the wane in public<br />

interes t in the disease in concordance with the virus' s declining worldw ide presence . July<br />

2 nd , 2003, for example, is the day the World Health Orga nization removed Toronto from<br />

its list of infected cities. Not coinci dentally , North American news sources began<br />

focusing their attentions elsewhere afterward . By 2QO..t it was difficult to co llect more<br />

than two or three articles a week, and the last of the series of regularly published<br />

stories-at least on the website s I chec ked-sputtered out in July of that same year.<br />

Subsequent journ alistic contributions do exist. of COU f'>e, but dwindle to sporadic<br />

thrashings, barely managing one or two contributions a month .<br />

What results from these efforts-the bulk of this chaptcr-c-can therefore be ...een<br />

as a chronicle of publ ic. media -based information concerni ng the outbreak: that is, the<br />

select ive progression of events based on journalistic wonts and biases, which arc<br />

themselves largely based on considerations of assu med public interest. In other word s.<br />

and as has already been discussed, newspapers print stories that sell. The narratives that<br />

construct the media' s version of events are therefore extremely suspec t. for though this<br />

version does contain much that is true and factual. it also bends at times towards the<br />

sensat ional at the cost of object ivity.<br />

74


Peter washe r. in his article "Representations of SARS in the British<br />

Newspapers," adds another facet to the suspect nature of the media 's version when he<br />

says:<br />

But beyond the realist global epidemic of (the disea ..e) SARS lies the<br />

globalizatio n of the phenomenon of the SAR S panic, where the saturation and<br />

..peed of the world news media' .. coverage leads to the (suppos ed) r iskposed by<br />

SARS being socially constructed on a globa l scale. And yet despite the moderni ty<br />

of the med ium, the message is almost comfo rtingly familiar: The social<br />

representat ion of SARS resonates with representations of infecuous di..ea..es<br />

throughout histor y: we lay the blame for the new threat on tho..e outside one ' ..<br />

own community. the 'ot her ' . (2004 , 2570)<br />

Though Washer' s exami nation of SARS -re1ated newspaper articles COWrhows particular ..ubjectivity in continually<br />

presenting SARS as a threat to the publ ic, but simultaneously assuaging that public<br />

through the process of "ot hering" with reass urances that the average reader was in no<br />

danger.<br />

Why then include (he following timeline, a.. rife as it is with biases'! Because the<br />

media was in many cases the primary di....cminutor of data for much of the public. and<br />

large scctors of the population can he said to have been direc tly influenced by what (hey<br />

heard on the evening news or read in the morni ng paper... Many of my informants said<br />

that their tclcvi..ions wwe turned on constantly throughout the SA RS epidemi c, and<br />

always tuned to a local news channel. And if the news reported rumors, then it seems<br />

only log ical that those rumor " became part of public consciousness.<br />

At the same time, it is important to remember that the ver..ion of SARS as<br />

represented through media cove rage is not the only way to organize the data. In fact.<br />

75


there may he dozen s of potential versio ns-personal. cult ural. etc.-ull filled with biases<br />

and excl usio ns bused on what was and what was not seen us impo rtant. For the purposes<br />

of thi s chapter. two of these vers ions stand out: not only that represented in the media. but<br />

abo that represen ted in medici ne. Media sou rces may have bee n the primary source of<br />

inform ation for the public. but journalists were not. for the most part. the people on the<br />

front lines of the outb reak figh ting to understand the disease. treat its victims. and prevent<br />

its further sprea d. This honor goes (0 the doctors. scienti ..ts. and hcalthcarc workers who<br />

spen t tho..e few months risk ing their own lives- and sometimes dying- to save the rest<br />

of us. So thro ughout this chapter. the media's version of SARS will be periodica lly<br />

interrup ted by a side discussion of the medic al versio n. as represented thro ugh the articles<br />

that were being pub lished in the British Medical Journal and Tile Lancet, Thi s<br />

co nstructio n will allow for a glimpse at the differences in focus between these two<br />

sou rces of information. show ing that what one source co nsiders important is not<br />

necessaril y seen as such by another.<br />

Epidemics fade. This is the natural progression of such things. Equally true is that<br />

epidemics rise. and when this happen s. rumors begin: where the disease came from ; who<br />

is respo nsible for it: how long it will take to find a cure; how virulent it is. But in order to<br />

sec the co nnect ions between rumor and fact. it is first necessary 10 lay dow n said facts.<br />

that we may have a co rkboa rd on which we can later pin our analyses. Lei the following<br />

timclinc . then. be ou r board.<br />

In mid -Febru ary of 2003. China's governmen t repo rted 305 cases of atypica l<br />

pneumonia in the Guangdong prov ince . Five of these cases resu lted in deat h. hut the<br />

76


Chinese government refused to say much more about them . Despite this secrecy. the<br />

World Health Organization (WHO) learned on Febru ary 10 th that such cases had been<br />

occu rring with so me regularity in Chin a since at least Nove mber of 2002. China 's<br />

gove rnment reassured them that these were not significant. and on Februa ry lotU, issued a<br />

statement claiming that the disease was unde r contro l (''Timcline for SAR S" 2003).<br />

On February 21.t. 200 3. an elderly professor from Chi na's Guangdong province<br />

checked into the Metropole Hotel in Hong Kong. having traveled there to attend a<br />

wedd ing. The professortook a room on the ninth floor of the hotel. l ie had a rough and<br />

fever. and soon infected twe lve other guests at the hotel. possibly by sharing elevators<br />

with them. These guests then left the hotel. trawling to Vietnam. Ca nada. the United<br />

Slates . and Singapo re. Th ey carried the virus with them. infecting people in these new<br />

co untries. and thus spread the disease much more rapidly and efficie ntly than virtually<br />

any other illness in human history (Gouds mit 2()().t. lotO-lotl ).<br />

Within days these travelers and their infected victims began arri ving in hosp itals.<br />

complaining of sym ptoms such as fever. coughing. and shortness of breath, Puzzled<br />

med ical staff attempted to interpret these symptoms.nv they seemed in some ways 10<br />

indicate flu. but also pneumoni a. It took only five days for docto rs in Hong Kong to<br />

realize thi s was a separate disease altogether. and 10 give this set of symptoms its ow n<br />

name : on February 26 111 the world was introduced to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.<br />

or SARS. Other cases soo n followed. and only two da ys later the first reports of this new<br />

disease emerge d fro m Vietnam . Less than two weeks later-on March It h -the WH O<br />

issued a global health ale rt to health-care workers. stat ing that a new flu-like disease was<br />

77


spreading and seemed to he highly contagio u... Two days later the disease was reported in<br />

Toronto, and the day after that the WHO issued an emergency travel advisory. warning<br />

that the new disease was spreading worldw ide. At this point such guidelines did not<br />

restrict travel to any specific part of the world. but merely advised travelers to be wary of<br />

SARS sym ptoms and to report to airport personnel if any fellow pa.ssengers showed signs<br />

of ..uch symptoms r-Tlmetine for SARS" 2003).<br />

On March 18 th • German doctors made the first step in identifying the physical<br />

structure of this new vims, claim ing to have found evidence of a param yxovirus in blood<br />

samples taken from a patient who had SARS. Scientist!"in 1I0ng Kong. who found<br />

evidence of the virus in two other patients. confirmed this. The paramyxoviru s belonged<br />

to a family of viruses that can cause. among other diseases, measles. The findings<br />

reported in Germany and Hong Kong were immediately noticeable to medical staff<br />

worldwide. as pneumonia can be a comp lication of the measle.. ("Timeline for SARS"<br />

2IX))).<br />

On March zo", Hong Kong officials hypothcsized that the global spread of SARS<br />

might have had its origins in a guest at a local hotel. Using this , epidemiolog ists were<br />

uhle to truce the illness back to the old professor from Guungdong, and thence to China.<br />

An entirely new avenue of study opened. and the search for the origins of SARS moved<br />

to this new country. The Chinese government made the investigation official on March<br />

21" by formally asking for help from the WHO in investigating the outbreak in the<br />

Guangdong province (v'Timeline for SARS" 2003). A team of WHO experts traveled to<br />

the region on April 7 th • bUI was hampered significantly by the secretive nature of the<br />

78


clinical presentatio n of the virus was noted to "suggest an illness of variable severity<br />

ranging from mild illness to death. The speculation is that the most severe illnesses occur<br />

among first level contacts of an index case" (Zambon and Nicholson 2(03). However. the<br />

article stopped short of attempting to locate an origin for the breakout. noting only that it<br />

appeared to be linked to the aforementioned cases in Guangdong province. Rather than<br />

providing a hopef ul ending, or even a guess. the article ended with a sobering description<br />

of the state of affairs:<br />

The techniques of tracking a new disease parallel those of tracking a war and<br />

involve documenting death and detritus. progressing up blind alleys. reporting<br />

spectacular highlights. and asking unanswerable questions. emphasizi ng that<br />

emerging infectious diseases and mortal combat may still have much in common.<br />

Our mastery of the microbial world is less complete than we might imagine and<br />

more subject to chance interactions in the environment than we might care to admit.<br />

(Zambon and Nicholson 2003. 678)<br />

It was at roughly this point that I began to take notice of this outbreak as a possible<br />

area of study and commenced my daily gathering of news articles. The chronicle of<br />

public information that follows from here is my own. though the skeleton behind it comes<br />

from official sources. It should be noted that, because the news agencies and websites I<br />

checked were North American in origin. most of the articles I gathered either concerned<br />

themselves exclusively with North American issues about SARS. or if they considered<br />

foreign countries. were written by North Amcrican journalists or the Associated Press.<br />

Bias is thus very possible. but I will endeavor to cover the story from nil fronts.<br />

We begin, somewhat naturally. with more examples of quarantine. On the first of<br />

April. American Airlines Flight 128 from Tokyo was quarantined briefly on the tarmac at<br />

San Jose International Airport in California after five passengers reported SARS·l ike<br />

81


sym ptoms (Sloan 1(03). On the same day. the first suspec ted SARS case wax repon ed in<br />

Australia. the first three cases were reponed in Indonesia. a Malaysian hospital said it had<br />

quarantined seve ral suspected patients for a number of days. and Singapore reponed three<br />

new cases after scree ning processes at airports led nurse!'.10 send seve n people to<br />

hospitals . At this point in time some 1770 peoplein five countries had been diagnosed<br />

with SARS. and sixty-fou r had died ("US holds plane .. ." 2003) .<br />

The WHO declared a travel advisory on Apri l 2 nd • asking potentia l passengers to<br />

"consider postponing all but essential trave r' to Hong Kong and Guangdong Province .<br />

China . The U.S. Center for Disease Control echoed these concerns , adding Singapore and<br />

Hanoi 10 its list. Canada managed to avoid the list. having convinced the CDC that the<br />

spread of the disease in Toron to had been checked (Cohe n, Jon 2003) . A day later, the<br />

reside nts of the quarantined apart ment block in Hong Kong were relocated to isolation<br />

camps after the initial quarantine proved ineffective . U.S. President George Bush echoed<br />

concern over infectious spreaders. issuing an exec utive order on April 4 lh that permitted<br />

the quarantining of healthy people suspected of having SAR S, but not yet displaying<br />

symptoms ("T imeline for SARS" 2003).<br />

The British Medical Journal was curious ly devoid of SARS-related articles on the<br />

5 1h of April, as was The Lancet. It was, admittedly, too early in the epidemic fur scie ntists<br />

to have begun publishing papers descr ibing the ir work with the disease, but in BM]'s first<br />

April ed ition. the only mention of the disease came via a report in the journal's "News"<br />

section . For the most pan, this ankle reviewed the death tolls and gave a brief histor y o f<br />

the WHO 's actions in respond ing to the crisis. But there were two important pieces of<br />

82


information revealed: first. that microbiologists at the University of Hong Kong believed<br />

that they had isolated the virus involved in the outbreak as a corcnavirus (a finding which<br />

agreed with similar studies at the U.S. Cente rs for Disease Contro l): and second. that the<br />

same Hong Kong team had alread y provided hospitals in the 1I0ng Kong area w ith a<br />

simple test for the virus. based on polymerase chain reactions (though the test was noted<br />

by the team' s spokesperson as being in its initial stages. and therefore still in need of<br />

fine-tuning). The article was very clin ical in its presentation of this information. and all of<br />

its sources were medical: there was no mention of rumor or goss ip. only data and<br />

argument s about that data (Parry 2003a).<br />

As mentioned above. April 7 lh was when a team of WIIO investigators traveled to<br />

Guangdong province to ascertain the origin of SARS . On AprilS 1h • Chinese doctors made<br />

a statement to the effect that there were more SARS cases in China than the government<br />

was reportin g. As if proving the logic behind this statement. Hong Kong reported forty<br />

new SARS cases a day for the next three days in a row. The WHO investigators made an<br />

initial report on April 9 11 \ declaring that China might be withholding informa tion about<br />

SARS ("TimcJine for SARS" 2(03). Initial forays into discovering the disease vectors<br />

responsible for the mass contamination occurring in Hong Kong led health officials to<br />

state that cockroaches might be responsible for carrying the disease from one residence to<br />

another. as reported by Yahoo ! News (Lyn 2003a). Worldwide. the effects of public<br />

concern over travel were already being felt: Australia's Qantas airlines. for example. cut<br />

IJX)(}jobs-or 3% of its workforce-on Wedncsay. April 9 Lh • and carriers such as<br />

Finland's Finnair. Germany's Deutsche Lufthan..a. Japan Airline.. System Corporation.<br />

83


All Nippon Airways. Hong Kong' s Cathay Pacific Airways. Korean Air. and Garuda<br />

Indonesia reported financial losses and cuts in flights ("SA RS hits airlines ... .. 2(03 ).<br />

The April It h editions of the British Medical Journal and The Lancet were<br />

equa lly as lacking SARS-related information as the editions published the previous week.<br />

In The Lancet, on ly a single news article existed. The BMl had little more. consisting<br />

mostly of a news piece, penned by the same author as the April 5 th BMl news piece.<br />

which was once again clinical in its reporting. using official sources as its references and<br />

avoid ing discussion of rumor and hearsay. The article gave the death toll. and remarked<br />

that the argument over the cause of the disease had come down to isolating whether the<br />

coronavirus identified the previous week was the sale cause. or whether it was operating<br />

in conjunction with another factor to create the symptoms associated with SA RS. Also<br />

noted was the WHO' s declaration thai the disease did come from one of China's southern<br />

provinces. but that they could not yet confirm whether there was any link between<br />

animals and humans in the disease's transmission (Parry 2003 b). The onl y other ment ion<br />

of SARS in the April 12 th edition of BMl came in the obituary of Dr. Carlo Urbani, the<br />

WHO official who brought the disease to the world ' s attention. and who died from<br />

SA RS-related complications on the 29 1h of March ("Ca rlo Urbani" 2(03).<br />

Apri l 14 th marked a banner day in the scientific and medical study of this new<br />

disease, with Canadian scientists success fully sequencing the DNA of the coro navirus<br />

believed to be responsible for the outbreak. Scientists in the Netherlands confirmed a da y<br />

later that a coron avirus was indeed responsible for SARS. According to an MSNB C.com<br />

report, the It h of the month was another day of discovery, with Hong Kong officia ls<br />

84


eporti ng the infection vectors of the apartme nt complex where a quarter of the territory' s<br />

1.300 cases were identified (the same complex whose residents had earlier been relocated<br />

to isolation camps). SARS had. accordi ng to their investigations. spread thro ugh a leaky<br />

sewage system ("T imeline for SARS" 2(03).<br />

Closer to home. it was also on this day that Memor ial <strong>University's</strong> International<br />

Centre notified its students via email that the Canad ian Embassy in Beijing. China would<br />

be closing to the public for a full week: "No visa applications can be submitted; no<br />

interviews will be conducted; no documents can be picked up in person during this<br />

period. Service by mail will continue." Intemational students-especially those students<br />

from Vietnam, China, Hong Kong. Singa pore and Taiwan- were also advised to check<br />

the latest updates from Heahh Canada hefore traveling home (Intemat ional Student<br />

Advisor 2003). In a follow-up flyer distributed camp us-wide at <strong>Memorial</strong> University on<br />

April 22 od • all students arriving from Hanoi, China, Hong Kong. Singapore and Taiwan,<br />

and any students "who may have had d ose contact with a person with suspected or<br />

probable SARS" were encouraged to chec k their temperature daily for three weeks and<br />

self-monitor for cough, shortness of breath, or difficulty breath ing (Studen t Health<br />

Service 2003).<br />

On the mainland. worshippers in Toronto attending mass on Good Friday were<br />

either asked to or voluntarily changed their religious rituals. avoiding dipp ing their<br />

fingers in holy water, receiving bread in their hands instead of on their tongues. bowi ng<br />

to the cross instead of kissing it. and avoiding altogether the sharing of wine. Choir<br />

members with sore throats or coughs were even asked not to sing, as the act could spread<br />

85


expectorant-and thus disease-c-over the congregat ion. On Easter Sunday-e-cc nsidered<br />

by many the most import ant celebration of the church-Bishop John Boissormeau of the<br />

Catho lic Archd iocese of Toronto excuse d from attendi ng mass those who were sick or in<br />

quarantine because of SAR S (Brown. DcNecn L. 2003).<br />

The April 19 lh edition of the Briti.." Mediall Journal contained yet another news<br />

story. this one remarking on how the virus' spread was difficult to contro l (Parry 2oo3c).<br />

but it also marked the first time that month that the virus appeared in an article elsewhere<br />

than the "News" sect ion. In fact. the journal's first sect ion. "This week in the 8MJ: ' had<br />

as its opener a blurb titled "Seve re Acute Respiratory Syndrome Demands Strict<br />

Control:' The blurb itself was only a short summary o f the contents of the two pieces in<br />

the journal that did disc uss SARS . but it see ms indicative of the larger state of affairs that<br />

it opened the edition. Abo indica tive was that the first of these two pieces. a lengthy<br />

editorial. opened the "Editoria ls" sect ion. The editorial itself was written by the Deput y<br />

Director of the Enteric. Respirator y and Neurological Virus Laboratory at London ' s<br />

Health Protection Agency, and summarized the scie ntific advancements that had been<br />

made in the investigation s of the coronaviru s since it was broug ht to the atte ntion of the<br />

Western world. SARS was noted to almost certainly he caused hy a coronavirus. but that<br />

there see med 10 be some assoc iation between the disease' s symptoms and a human<br />

mctapncumovirus that was isolated in 200 1. with a note that laboratories aro und the<br />

world were racing to check these correlations (Zambon 2003).<br />

The second major piece in the April 19 th ed ition of the 8MJ was a profession al<br />

paper by two researchers at the University of Hong Kong, one a professor and the other a<br />

86


physician. The paper was short . but reviewed Hong Kong' s da ily-rising number of deaths<br />

from SARS. summarized laboratory and pathological findings. recommended courses of<br />

treatm ent. and provided a list of precautions for doctors to take when treating the SARS ­<br />

infected. Much of the paper was thus review. but the recommendations for treatment and<br />

preventi on did cover new ground . includin g the advocating of quarantine as the best<br />

method of inhibitin g the disease' s spread. and the note that public education of propcr<br />

hygiene measures would be critical in dealing with the outbreak (Chan-Yeung and Yu.<br />

2(0)).<br />

The April 19 lh edition of The Lancet was similarly focu sed on SA RS. but<br />

conta ined eve n more works relevant to the outb reak. In total. seven of the edit ion' s fifty­<br />

six articles were devo ted to the disease : one ed itorial . two commentaries. one article . one<br />

news piece. and two "Correspondence" letters. All of these pieces were clinical in nature<br />

and tone. discussing infection con trol measures and the identification of the coronavirus<br />

as the possi ble source of the infection.<br />

On the other side of the ocea n. China faced increasing pressure and cr iticis m over<br />

its lack of openness in d iscussing SARS and revea ling pertinent and timely information.<br />

In respon se. the Chinese gove rnment promised to be more open. and on Ap riI 20 ,h •<br />

reported the number of SA RS cases in China as rising from 1.512 to I.H07.and fired the<br />

Beijing health minister and mayor ("T imcline for SARS" 2(03). A report filed by<br />

journalist Dexter Roberts on April 2 1 st does not show evide nce of this new openne ss,<br />

however: in attempting to interview a Beijing doctor about SARS. Roberts was told. " I<br />

am not allowed to talk about my countr y' s public health ... . I' m sorry-c-but the ministry<br />

87


The Ia..t few days in April conti nued to bring bad new.. to re..idcnts of the Toro nto<br />

area. On the 22"". The Center s for Disea..e Contro l and Prevention sent specialists to the<br />

city to help contain the spread of SARS. Toronto having been deemed key in succe....ful<br />

North American containment. At this point in time ..orne sixty-six hospital workers had<br />

b en listed a.. probable or suspected SARS cases. their numbers comprising almost 25%<br />

of the 259 SARS cases in the province. 7.000 peoplein thc Toronto area had been<br />

quarantined. There were only fifty-seven ca-..es of SARS reported elsewhere in the<br />

country. and all fourteen SARS -related deaths had occurre d in Toronto ("CDC team<br />

arrive.....·· 2003 ). The very next day. the WHO extended their travel advisory to cover.<br />

among other place... Toronto. giving this Canadian city the dubiou.. honor of being the<br />

only location outside of Asia to have warranted ..uch a warning ("New SARS travel. ..·•<br />

2QO.t). Reaction to this new advi..ory wa....wift and. in some cases comful. Toron to<br />

Mayor Mel La..tman went on record as saying. "Let me be d ear; it' afe to live in<br />

Toro nto. and it' s safe to visit Toronto" ("City of Toronto .v." 2(03). Despite such<br />

rea....uranccs. major league baseball teams were advised against visiting ho..pitals. using<br />

public transportation. mingling with crowds. and signing autographs ("'MLB issues<br />

guidelines..... 2003). and high-profile players like Alex.Rodriguez of the Texas Rangers<br />

made public statements to the effect that they would confine thcmsclvcs to their rooms<br />

between games to avoid po..vible exposure (" Rodrigucz. Rangers..." 2(03).<br />

The effects of the WHO warning were seen almo..t immediately. the travel<br />

advisory being for many the final factor in canceling travel plans to the already-suspect<br />

city. Store owners reported busine..s falling by half literall y overnight. and traffic in<br />

89


shopp ing malls ground to a near-hall. Hotels, already under strain. found customers<br />

cance ling reservations: some hotels had their occ upancy rates drop to 20% or lower.<br />

Co nve ntions were ca nce lled en masse . Air Cana da was hit espec ially hard . the travel<br />

advisory coming only three wee ks after it had been forced to file for bankruptcy as a<br />

res ult of losses sustained due to the war in Iraq. Planes arriv ing in Toron to after April<br />

23 N were almo ..t empty. Most telling . however. were the words of J. J. Johnston. chief<br />

economist at the Royal Bank of Canada. who said. "Our feeling is that probably now<br />

ISA RSI is going to take about a half percent off of the national growth rate for the second<br />

quarter : ' Bad for bu..incss. indeed ('"Toronto' s eco nomy take s.. : ' 2(03).<br />

Other areas of the wor ld suffered similarly. On Apr il 23 N , Beij ing ordered 1.7<br />

million prima ry and seco ndary students to stay home until May thoOn April2-l lh • a<br />

major hospital in Beijin g was sea led off unde r gove rnmen t orders . the 2.300 peo ple<br />

inside forced into quarantine until furth er notice (''Timeline for SARS" 2(03). Th e<br />

International Air Transport Association. the govern ing body ove r intern ational flights.<br />

pred icted that SARS would cost the industry some $ 10 billion do llars. and would affect<br />

airlines on every major continent ("SARS hits A..ian... ·• 20(3). Officia ls overseeing the<br />

2004 Ol ymp ics in Athen s. Greece began question ing the process of admitting seve ral<br />

hundred thousand athletes and visitors into the cou ntry, anyone of whom co uld be<br />

infecte d. and d id not imm ediately rule out postponing the games (Bondy 2(XJ3).<br />

Even the United States-largely untouched by SARS . with only thi rty-nine<br />

proba ble cases and no dea ths- felt the effect s. Ch inatowns in every majo r U.S. city<br />

repo rted ..luggis h busines s. with restaurants and other Chine..c-run businesses saying<br />

90


which showe d that the death rate among those younge r than 55 was 3.6 perce nt. while<br />

18.9 percent of those aged 65-75, and 28.6 percent of those older than 75 succumbed<br />

(Vedantam and Stein 2(03 ). A CNN.co m survey conducted on April zs"showed that<br />

public perceptio n of the disease was also one of pessimism; in answer to the question.<br />

"Have we seen the worst of SARST' 30.858 of 39.544 voters. or 78%. answered "No",<br />

Yet at the same time. a small but grow ing numb er of report s detailed successes.<br />

On Tuesday. April 22 rnl , Hong Kong allowed 200.000 seco ndary stude nts to retu rn to<br />

schoo l after a three-week stale-enforce d absence. under co nditio n that they wear masks<br />

and lake their temp eratur es daily (primary students. however. were told to still remain at<br />

home). Thi s decision might have been made in light of reports from Hong Kong' s health<br />

officials that noted a decline in the numb ers of new SA RS cases for three days in a row<br />

("C DC team arrives ... " 2003). Later that month, Vietnam was given official recog nition<br />

by the WHO for being the first co untry to effectively co ntrol the disease, with no new<br />

cases appearing in two wee ks (" How Vietnam beat. ..' 2003). And in the most pro mising<br />

state ment yet, on April 28 th a WHO official stated that he believed the worst of SARS<br />

was ove r in Vietnam. Canada, Singapore and Hong Kong (though China still remained a<br />

large problem). Canada seemed espec ially promi sing, as no new cases had been reported<br />

out side of a hosp ital in twelve da ys ("W HO: Worst of ..." 2(03). As a direct res ult of this,<br />

the WHO lifted the travel ad visor y for Toron to on the last day of the month. Finally,<br />

banks around the worl d report ed that SARS had done something they'd strugg led to<br />

achieve for yea rs: it had led people to do their banking onl ine. Thi s allowed banks to save<br />

92


costs by "trimming branch networks and cutting payrolls." a."conducting business online<br />

was cheaper for banks than business done in person ("SARS drives online.. ... 2003).<br />

While April' s last issue of The Lancet had only two pieces on SARS-a news<br />

article and Dr. Carlo Urbani's obituary. the last issue of the British Medical Journal<br />

published in April had no fewer than seven pieces about the disease. None of these pieces<br />

were peer -reviewed papers-two were "News" pieces. three appeared in the "Personal<br />

Views" section. one was a "Le tter," and the la..t wa.. a review of the website.. that various<br />

officia l sources such as the WHO and the CDC had set up to discus.. SARS- but every<br />

section that had a piece on SARS opened with it. The news reports detailed that the<br />

corcnavirus had been definitively identified as the source of the outbreak (parry 2oo3d).<br />

and summarized the disease' s progression in Canada (Spurgeon 2oo3a)-neither of<br />

which offered any great insights into the medical community. However. it was notable<br />

that the three pieces in the "Personal Views" section constituted the entirety of that<br />

section. a clear signal that SARS was uniquel y aligning the medical communit y. One of<br />

these "Personal Views" deserves specia l consideration. for it marked the first time in the<br />

IJMJ thai the connection between racism and SARS as promulgated by media sources<br />

was openly discussed (Schram 2003). Additionally. the "Letter" that appeared in the<br />

same edition noted the problems that Chinese foreign exchange students were having<br />

when attempt ing to return to school after vacations (Wong, Ian 2003) . Thus. for the first<br />

time since SARS was given a name. the BMJ had begun to pay attention to the role of<br />

rumors in the progression and effects of the disease.<br />

93


Still. the disease had not yet been eradicated. and the worldw ide eco nomy was<br />

suffering as a result of global panic. A poll in early May revealed that almost half of<br />

Americans bel ieved an outbreak was likely in their country. though only 8% of<br />

respondents were serious ly concerned about it ("Poll : SARS epidemic ..... 2003). Reports<br />

from Hong Kong were mixed. some claiming that the outbreak had peaked. while others<br />

discussed concerns scientists had over mutations of the virus and relapses among<br />

patients. not 10 mention the five-fold increase in dea ths over the previous month r-SA RS<br />

relapses stump .. ." 2(03). In Beijing. the government ordered elementary and middle<br />

schools 10 remain closed for a further two weeks, issuing an additional threat of<br />

punishment to these home-quarantined in Taipei who had violated their sentences.<br />

Taiwanese hospitals groaned under the strain of SARS cases, which had tripled to 116 in<br />

the past ten days. On Sunday, May 4 111 alone. thirteen new deaths were reported in Asia:<br />

seven in China. five in Hong Kong. and one in Singapore (Foreman 2(Xl3a).<br />

On May 4 111 • WHO officials in Hong Kong reported a significant breakthrough in<br />

the tracing of disease vectors. as data from recent studies showed that the SARS virus<br />

could live for up to four days in human waste-s-four days for diarrhea and two days for<br />

urine or fecal matter. Hong Kong scientists had long suspected that the virus could live in<br />

sewage. and was at least partly responsible for the contamination of an entire apartment<br />

complex after sewage pipes leaked. but had no proof. The WHO' s findings confi rmed<br />

these suspicions, and necessitated entirel y new worldwide containment strategies.<br />

Japanese researchers made a similarly important report the same day. recording the<br />

presence of live viruses on a chilled plastic surface four days after their placement.


Again. this finding necessitated global changes, us health officials now understood that<br />

the virus could survive for dozens of hours on. say, a refrigerated bottle of soda. On a<br />

positive note. CNN .com reported that experiments with basic househo ld cleaners<br />

demonstrated the virus dying within five minutes of exposure to chlorine bleach. offering<br />

a sim ple household strategy to prevent infection ("WHO sheds new... .. 2003).<br />

The brightness of this message apparently failed to find purchase in China. as<br />

villagers protesting the local government's SARS policy in Zhejian g province stormed<br />

local offices. breaking windows and office furniture and assaulting officials. Beij ing<br />

officia ls. perhaps in fear of mass retribution . sent policemen to guard eighty reservoirs<br />

around the capital city to protect the drinking water supply from SARS contamination<br />

(Foreman 2003b). Hospitals in the capital also suffered from public fear as scores of<br />

support staff quit their jobs. Their timing couldn' t have been worse. as China reported<br />

160 new cases of SARS and nine new deaths at the same time. and there was no<br />

indication of a leveling-off of the infection rate. In fact. Chinese officials expressed<br />

public concern about rural health-care resources. especially as migrant workers fled the<br />

capital for their hometowns. increasing the possibility of new disease vectors (vlto spitals<br />

in China... " 20(3). Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao called the situation "grave" and warned<br />

that "arduous work" was ahead if China was to contain the epidemic. The same day, 138<br />

new cases and eight more deaths were reported in the Chinese media rChinc: SARS<br />

hattie..... 2(03). The following afternoon. f\lSNBC.com reported that Beij ing citizens.<br />

fearing that domestic animals such as dogs and cats might have been respons ible for<br />

spreading the virus. had killed or abandoned hundreds of pets in recent weeks: some<br />

95


communities had apparently begun demanding such action (though these rules were not<br />

authorized by local government) ("SARS drives Chinese... .. 2003).<br />

Hopeful Asian exchange students felt the repercussions ofChina's situation.<br />

learning on May 6 th that the University of California at Berkeley would not be accepting<br />

around 500 students from China (as well as Hong Kong. Taiwan. and Singapore) for the<br />

summer session (" Berkeley turns away.,.." 2003). Other U.S. educatio nal facilities soon<br />

followed 'mil. John Holden. president of the National Com mittee on United Stales-China<br />

Relations, said on May t h that he was "not aware of any (exchange I progra ms that are<br />

going forward at the moment. or plan 10 go forward over the summer," and some Asian<br />

exchange students already in the U.S. forfeited trips home over fears of not being allowed<br />

to return for school in the Fall C"SARS impacting higher.. ,'"2003).<br />

The first two editions of 17Il' Li mn " published in May had eleven SARS-rclated<br />

articles between them. including three fast-tracked and peer-reviewed "Research Lcucr s"<br />

that revealed the results of studies designed to investigate optimal diagnosing methods. as<br />

well as treatment and preventative measures. News articles made lip the bulk of the<br />

remaining pieces"as did editorials concerning China' s failure to deal adequately with the<br />

disease in late 2


tempera ture of all inco ming passengers (a high body temperature signaling possible<br />

infect ion). The system seemed to work. as thirty-seven passengers were ident ified in only<br />

a few days. The U.S.• however. relied mos tly on the abilities of agents 10 recognize<br />

telltale symp toms in passengers- high fever . dry cough. and breathing troub le r-Federcl<br />

age nts trained.,.." 2(03). On May 9 th • Italy becamethe first count ry in Europe to<br />

introduce ob ligatory checks on all incoming passengers from Ch ina. reserving the right to<br />

also check those arriv ing from European cou ntries "where they may have made<br />

connections from Asia" (vltaly to chec k.:" 2(03).<br />

Global efforts such as these were markedly fewer at this point . bUIseem ed even<br />

more necessa ry within a few days . On Monday. May I2 lh • the WH O adde d India 10 its list<br />

of cou ntries with !'.U!'.PCClOO cases of SA RS after a man arr ived at a ho..pital in Ca lcutta<br />

with a feve r and cough (this after declari ng the cou ntry free of the disease only a few<br />

days earlier) (" One 'probable' SARS ..... 2(03). In China. the number of d iagnosed cases<br />

passed SJX)Oon the same da y. with seventy-five new cases and twelve deaths added to<br />

the list. Ta iwan recorded a record number of new cases. confirming eig ht death s and<br />

twenty-three infect ions. "the highest one-day rise for the area since the outbreak two<br />

month s ago" ("China SA RS numb ers..... 2(X>3). Taiwan' s information came on the heels<br />

of a Taiwanese Interior Mini stry report detailing the diffi culties in fight ing the disease<br />

beca use local.. refused to cooperate: fort y-two percent of peop le who were suppose d to<br />

reg ister with local health offic ials after arriving at airports neglec ted such duties.<br />

Officials were also having troub le kee ping track of the 23.000 people in quarantine (most<br />

of whom were disease-free), and had so far "pent S350,(X)()on 2,(X)() video came ra!'.that<br />

97


were installed inside the homes of quarurnined residents. In Tai pei alone. some 200<br />

reside nts disappeared, breaking quarantine. after their housing projec t was closed<br />

follow ing the discover y of a body and two people suspected of having SARS. As Loh I·<br />

l•-bcng. a former dep uty ambassador to the U.S. said in regards to this , "E veryone in<br />

Taiwan thinks he', 'pedal and smart-why should he observe the rules'! He knows the<br />

police won't strike him or arrest him" (McNeil Jr. 2003).<br />

Again. however . there were a number of success stories . Though the rest of China<br />

was still strugg ling. Beij ing declared on May 9 1 1\that its efforts to contai n the outbreak<br />

appeare d 10 be successful: the number of new reported daily cases had decli ned from 70­<br />

80 per dny- a pre- May 2 nd plateau-e-tc 30-40 per day. Medical staff were also<br />

contracting the disease less frequent ly. drop ping from a daily average of 15.8 percent to<br />

6.3 in the same period ("'Beijing hopefu l of.. :· 2003). For the excha nge student' who had<br />

previously been told they would not be accepted into U.S. programs- slight relief carne<br />

when the University of California at Berkeley resc inded part of their ear lier ban and<br />

announced it would allow roughly eighty students from China. Hong Kong. and Taiwan<br />

to attend school over the summer (though the school still planned on harring ove r 500<br />

others) ("Berkeley eases SARS.. : ' 2003). China also announced that SARS would not<br />

delay the launch of its first manned space n ight later in the year (t'Chi na: SARS won 't..<br />

20( 3), and in a public statement cove red by Yahoo ! News, Russia' s Vitaly Zverev. head<br />

of Moscow' s Virus Research Institute. asserted that the SARS scare was overp layed. that<br />

Russia would not have an outbreak. and that " 100 grammes of vodka' was the best cure<br />

(" Russ ian experts downplay... ·· 2003).<br />

98


Good news also came from the medical front. as a laborator y study in Germany<br />

suggested that a modified vers ion of an experimental drug designed originally to treat the<br />

common cold might be useful in blocking the SARS virus from reprodu cing. A similarity<br />

in protease enz ymes betw een SARS and the rhinovirus the drug was intended to treat<br />

provid ed the link. though no studies had yet been conducted on the viability of such<br />

hypotheses (Recer 2(03). The origin of SARS. however. was still very much a puzz le for<br />

researchers worldwide. As cove red by MSN BC.com. a growing number of experts<br />

believed that it might have come from an animal. but had few leads on which animal<br />

might be to blame. Some said it might be a bird, draw ing such conclus ions from a 1997<br />

outbreak of the flu in Hong Kong that was spread by poultry and resulted in the<br />

slaughtering of 1.4 million chicken s in containment efforts. Other researchers eschewed<br />

the animal theo ry altogether and said that SARS might simply he a mutation of a<br />

previously-harmle ss human virus. Researchers had earlier hoped that the decodin g of<br />

SARS ' genetic makeup would help eliminate such concerns and point 10 a specific<br />

human or non-human origin, but the results proved inconclusive r-Origm of SA RS..."<br />

2IX))).<br />

For Toront onians. probahly the best news of all arri ved e n May 14 th • when the<br />

W}IO officia lly removed Onta rio' s capita l from its list of areas with "recent local<br />

transmission: ' as twenty day s had passed since the last reported case of SARS was<br />

isolated in Canada . According to the WHO, this meant that "the chain of transmission<br />

Iwas) considered broken." after 321 probable or suspected case!'.and twent y-four death s<br />

("Wil D: SARS no longer. .... 2(03). Onl y a score of people in the country remained<br />

99


active cascloads, and five of those were released from hospitals the day before this<br />

announce ment, leaving only sixteen active cases in Canada ("Canada 's active SARS.. "<br />

2003; "Update #57 - Severe..... 2003).<br />

In most of China, neither the news nor the mood seemed as optimistic. In Beijing,<br />

desp ite the successes reported earlier in containing SARS, MSNBC.com reported that the<br />

governmen t found it necessa ry to crack down on rumors about the disease that were<br />

being spread by mobile phone messages. A new tracking system helped officials locate<br />

those who sent over 100 such rumors an hour-rumors which included that Beijing<br />

officials were ready to instate martial law, that crop dusters were spraying the city with<br />

disinfectants at night, and that smoking and drinking helped ward off SARS. This new<br />

tracking system quickly resulted in the detaining of a dozen peop le by city police ("Ch ina<br />

checks SARS.. "· 2003). At the same time, Yahoo! News covered the government of<br />

China's increasing fight with the populace over widespread use of the occ ult to ward off<br />

the disease. The officially atheist commun ist government. which had attempted to rely<br />

heavily on science, found itself confronted with peop le who hired sorcerers, lit<br />

firecrackers, burned fake money, and practiced other such "magical" rituals to protect<br />

themselves. There were even rumors of a child born with the ability to speak who<br />

prophesied that "gree n bean soup" would prevent infection-a rumor that drove the sale<br />

of mung beans up sharply in large parts of the country (Ang 2003a).<br />

In the midst of this panic, China's Supreme Court, faced with the increas ing<br />

problem of enforc ing quarantines, threatened imprisonment for up to seven years for<br />

quarantine violators, and a possible death penalty for those who caused death or injury by<br />

100


deliberately spreading the virus. The first arrest under these new laws came the day of the<br />

annou ncement, when a doctor in the northern city of Linha was charged with having<br />

previously violated quaran tine. resulting in the infection of more than 100 people. The<br />

doctor's punishme nt was a maximum sentence of three years (Bcdee n 2003a). These<br />

drastic measures drew immedia te criticism from the U.S. and international human rights<br />

groups ("US criticise d China ... .. ::!(03). and China 's worldwide standing wasn't helped<br />

by a WHO declaration that China 's doctors were still under-reporting SARS infeetions­<br />

a criticism that had been plaguing the count ry since early April (Ansfleld and Peng<br />

2003). Perhaps because of this, President Hu Jintao of China said in an interview the<br />

following day that "We are ready to further strengthe n our cooperat ion with Russia and<br />

the whole international community in prevention and treatment of SARS,"<br />

acknowledging that more financing, better research, and coord inated efforts would help<br />

in stopping the epidemic (Chuang 2(03).<br />

At the same time, there were increasing numbers of reports detailing a lack of<br />

concern in other areas of the world, or at least a perception that the SARS epidemic had<br />

been overblown. While large numbers of Asian exchange students were being denied<br />

entrance into U.S. universit ies, there were American exchange students in China who<br />

chose 10 stay and study, ignoring the calls of parents and educators who urged them to<br />

return home. There were also U.S. educators who were frustrated that their universities<br />

had cance lled planned research trips to China ("S ARS impacting higher.,." 2(03). In<br />

mid-May, two U.S. doctors pointed out to a jou rnalist that the West Nile virus had been<br />

more deadly, killing 2lWpeople in the U.S. and Canada in 2002 (SA RS, at this point, had<br />

101


only claimed the lives of twenty-three people in Canada. and none in the U.S.). One of<br />

these doctors-c-Dr. Paul Epstein of the Harvard Medical School Center for Health and the<br />

Globa l Environme nt-s-sa id. "T he attention focused in recent weeks on SA RS is<br />

extraordinary and. it can be argue d. excessive" (Fox 2oo 3a).<br />

Reactions such as these may be. at least in the U.S.. somewhat understandable:<br />

the stales had managed to avoid contamination for the most part. and had not seen a<br />

sing le fatality resu lting from the epidemic. There was a seriou s concern among members<br />

of the Cen ters for Disease Cont rol and Prevention ove r the capacities of U.S. hosp itals to<br />

deal with a large -scale epidemic. should one occur . a.. ho..pitals lacked the neces..ary<br />

quantities of nega tive pre....ure rooms/infection contro l rooms to deal with widespread<br />

con tamination. but even CDC members adm itted that the current measures seemed to be<br />

working ("U .S. hospitals ready.. ." 2(03). Public reactions to the disco..e were influenced<br />

in large part by media reports. and many news articles had headlin es such as "So Far.<br />

U.S. Succeeds in Containing SARS" (Ycc 2003a). and "CDC Doctor Suspected of SARS<br />

Recovering" (Yce 2003b). all of which painted a po..itive picture. Jud ging by the news<br />

articles co llected during the last half of May. the United Stat es had things under control:<br />

there was no need to worry.<br />

Across the border. however. the virus once again reared its head. Canada 's recent<br />

thirty-day dearth of outbreaks. which had provided Ont ario' s cap ital city relative freedom<br />

from WHO and CDC scrutiny. proved an unreliable measure o f success : on May 2)rd.<br />

Toront o hea lth officia ls revealed that they were looking into twenty-five poss ible new<br />

ca..cs. Thi s new outbreak covered two ho..pitals-St. John' s and North York General -<br />

102


and prompted the CDC to reissue their Toronto travel alert three days after lifting it. Of<br />

those infected, two of the North York patients had already died, and three of the SI.<br />

John ' s patients were in critical condition. Microbiologists studying the new outbreak<br />

were not immediately clear how this new outbreak had spread, and assumed all vectors as<br />

potentially infectious: health care workers, family members, even other patients. Toron to<br />

officials issued a statement declaring that anyone who had passed through North York<br />

betwee n April 22 11d and May I3 lh , and SI. John' s Hospital since May l SI should<br />

commence self-monitoring and immediately call a Toronto Public Health hot line to<br />

identify themselves: it was expected that over 1.000 people met these criteria (v'Toron to<br />

reports 25..... 2(0).<br />

Three days later the source of this new outbreak was revealed. taking the form of<br />

a ninety-six-year-old man who died on May 1, 1 after two attacks of pneumonia. The man<br />

was not isolated from other patients at the time of his admittance because hospital staff<br />

did not associate his pneumonia with SARS; indeed, the assoc iation was made only after<br />

the second outbreak. At the same time, the WHO placed Toronto back on its list of SARS<br />

hotspots. having made the decis ion after eight more probable cases and three new deaths<br />

were revealed ("Toronto reveals SARS.. ... 2(0). Toronto officials. investigating the<br />

matter. acknowledged that there could have been some thirty to forty cases that had gone<br />

undetected during the "dry" period between outbreaks (Huang 2(0)a).<br />

The last week in May revealed a Toronto once aga in under worldwide scruti ny.<br />

Scarborough Hospital housed about twenty SARS patients. ten of whom were med ical<br />

staff. while other members were under home quarantine. Hundreds of staff were under<br />

103


workin g quarant ine, and spent their days wearing N-95 masks-s-under orders to change<br />

them every four hours-and taking the ir temper atures twice daily. all while interactin g<br />

with patients. Staff members were also advised not to sit close together in the nurses'<br />

loun ge. and to keep a scat between themselves in the cafeteria (Gardner 2003).<br />

At Toronto' s Rouge Valley Cent enary hospital. four patients died during the<br />

week , all suspected of being SARS -related (though autopsies hadn't yet revealed the<br />

cause ). No sign of infectio n had been seen in urban or suburban areas. hut many hospitals<br />

bore signs warnin g of SARS . and had the ir main doors taped shut. allowing entrance onl y<br />

through their emergency wards . The Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions moved its<br />

annual meeting to 51.John' s, Newfound land. in response (Wroughto n 2003) . Province­<br />

wide. the number of probable cases rose dramatic all y: from twelve on Wednesday the<br />

28 lh • to twenty-nine on Thursda y. to forty-three on Friday, and to forty-six on Saturday.<br />

Over 150 additional peop le were being monitored closely as possible victims. Canada 's<br />

thirtieth victim died on Thursday. and hy this time in Toronto . more than 7,000 peo ple<br />

had been qua rantined, including 440 health care worker s and 1.500 people assoc iated<br />

with a high school. Still, Canadian Health Min ister Ann Mcl.cllnn reassured the public<br />

that ..It is not getti ng worse ... This second cluster has probab ly peaked and we are on the<br />

way out of this" ("Ca nada fears new .: ' 2(0 3). Onl y June would tell whether her<br />

predicti ons were accurate .<br />

In most of Asia and the surrounding areas. the news was mixed. At roughly the<br />

same time the UK announced its first confirm ed SARS case ("'UK has first.. : · 2003).<br />

China reported that the disease had entered the countryside. where million s of people<br />

104


lived in towns that were almost entirely unprepared and unequip ped to fight an outbreak.<br />

The worst of it seemed to have been located "in Qingxu. 270 miles southwest of Beijing.<br />

where dozens have caught the disease and several have died ." Only twenty miles away in<br />

Taiyuan. there were an est imated 300 cases and fifteen deaths. though the provincial<br />

government only acknow ledged 162 of the cases and seven of the deaths . More telling<br />

was a report from a governmenta l spokesperson who said that Shanxi hospita ls needed<br />

453 more respirators-on top of the eighty already existent (Pomfret 2003).<br />

These reports came the day after the Chinese cabinet passed a 52.56 billion fund<br />

to help the impoverished pay for treatme nt. to help modernize impoverished hospitals.<br />

and to support research. However. many people in Qingxu (and. it can be assumed. in<br />

other parts of China) doubted they would ever have access to that money: one local<br />

interviewee told a reporter from the WlHh illglO11 Pos that "A peasa nt's life in China has<br />

never been worth anything:' and referred to a general belief that local officia ls had stolen<br />

funds intended to alleviate poverty. Officials were so worried about such reactions and<br />

the spread of SARS that they began to han migrant workers from return ing home. But<br />

with 1.3 billion people, enforcing such a han was almost impossible; there had already<br />

been reports of patients known to have SARS lleeing to their homes, preferring to die<br />

there than in the hospitals, which many believed were useless (Pomfret 2003).<br />

Also alarming were reports from jo urnalists that rural regions didn't seem to<br />

understand the danger of SARS. and were not following governmental notices to<br />

disinfect public buildings. Even in hospitals, those with SARS· like symptoms were kept<br />

in waiting rooms with SARS -free patien ts until doctors were free to sec them.<br />

105


Govern ment officers also seemed to misunderstand the importance of quarantine: in<br />

China, local officials ....'ere expecte d to visit party secreta ries in hospitals, a tradition that<br />

may have led to the initial outbreak in Qingxu. Communist Party secretary Yue Shoubin<br />

contracte d SA RS in Beijing, was hospita lized in Qingxu, and was visited in the hospital<br />

by severa l members of a de legation. at least two of whom subsequently tested positive for<br />

SARS, and one of whom died (Pomfret 2(03).<br />

Despite their earlier agreement to be more open, Ch ina censo red a CNN<br />

International report on May 15 th , refusing to allow it to air because it "pos itions a<br />

negative cove rage of China," accord ing to one official. The seven -minute segment<br />

criticized the govcmments handling of the SA RS crisis. pointed to inadequate health<br />

care systems, and accused the government of orderi ng docto rs to underreport the number<br />

of SARS cases (Florf.ruz 2003). Two days later, Beijing reporte d four new deaths and<br />

nineteen new cases. rais ing the nationwide total to 282 deaths and 5,2 19 cases. The<br />

WHO, however, warned that these numbers might be higher (" Key Developments<br />

With .:' 2(03).<br />

Less than a week later, the WHO lifted the travel advisory on Ch ina's Gua ngdo ng<br />

province. demonstrating that at least parts of China were making progress (though<br />

Beijing had reported twe nty new cases per day for four days straight). The WIIO's<br />

actions came on the heels of a possible breakthrough in determinin g the origin of SARS,<br />

as covere d by CNN.com: Hong Kong researc hers said the virus might have come from<br />

civet cats . considered a delicacy by some Chinese ("WHO lifts HK..... 2(03). By the end<br />

of the month. Yahoo! News was reporti ng that prov incial officials in Guangz hou.<br />

106


Guan gdong had orde red sellers at markets to remove civet cats from their cage d wares. as<br />

well as snakes. bats, badgers and pangoli ns, all of which had been identifi ed as possib le<br />

carriers of the SARS virus. Farm s that raised exo tic species were told 10 qua rantine their<br />

livestock. Viola tors were threate ned with fines of up to S J2.000 . Such measures seemed<br />

effective: Guangdong province had not reported a single new ca..e of SA RS in a week.<br />

China as a who le showed signs of improving as well: on the last day of the month . on ly a<br />

single new case was reported. along with four deat hs-all in Beij ing. The number of new<br />

ca..es had thus dropped by ove r 90% since the beginning of May. prompting Beijing to<br />

cut from its list ninc of the sixteen ho..pitals set aside exclusive ly to treat SARS. Though<br />

il was still too early to make defin ite conclusions. China appeared 10 be containing the<br />

outbrea k (Bodeen 2003 b).<br />

May in Hong Kong. although nowh ere ncar as worrisome as in China. still proved<br />

hectic. Five peo ple died of SARS on May It h • raising Hong Kong' s tota l number of<br />

deaths to 243 (" Key Developments With ..:· 2(03). The WHO lifted its travel advis ory<br />

over the region on May 3 1'I. though thirty more deaths had been registered since the Itho<br />

In an odd turn of events. the virus proved a boon for businesses here: managers at<br />

restau ran ts reported that open-air dining patios were at capacity. and some restaurants<br />

had to hire addit ional staff to keep up with demand. Accord ing 10 one news articl e. this<br />

cou ld he traced to locals seeking fresh air and open spaces , two co mmod ities seen as<br />

healthfu l and lack ing in the overcrowded cities. Loca ls seeking less crowded areas also<br />

mean that bike rental shops ofte n rented out their en tire stoc k. and park attenda nce surged<br />

107


y 75%. Atlea...t one business that rented ou t plots of land for peo ple to try their hands at<br />

organ ic fanning said business was up by 700 % (Wong. Margaret 2003 '1).<br />

At the end of May in Hong Kong. the government pa...sed laws designed ( 0<br />

promote hygienic pract ices (and thus ward off SARS) among public ho using tena nts by<br />

pu ni...hing them for failing to keep their resi dences clean . Under these laws . which wou ld<br />

come into effect in August of 2003 . tenants would face eviction if they recei ved sixteen<br />

penalty points in a two-year period. Point-induci ng viola tion s included drying clothes in<br />

public areas . ...pitti ng. littering. throwing objects out of window s. and keeping pets . The<br />

Hong Kong Soc iety for the Prevention of Cruelly to Anima ls viewed the latter of these<br />

offe nces as dangcrous-c-espccially since havi ng a pel warranted a live -po int pcnalty ­<br />

and warned that such laws might lead to a surge in an ima l aba ndo nment (""HK<br />

government defe nds ... ·· 2003).<br />

Singa pore appeare d (0 be on e of the bright spot s. largel y than ks to some of the<br />

str ictest anti-SARS measures in the world. At the end of Ap ril. Singapore had the wo rld's<br />

fourth-highest death rate, with twenty-eight co nfirmed mortalit ies. But by the middl e of<br />

May. the co untry had gone ov er two week s witho ut report ing a new case. and<br />

go vernment officials we re hop eful the city wo uld he decl ared SARS-f ree by the WHO.<br />

Such a turnaround came thank s to the quarant ining of over 3,(XX) peo ple, tem porary<br />

schoo l closures. barring visitors at hospitals. and checking people's temperatures at<br />

borde rs. Co mplications arose when twe nty-...eve n peo ple. including three nurscs, at the<br />

cou ntry's largest menta l hospital were isolate d wit h SARS-Iikc symptoms on May l-tth<br />

t-Pres b SA RS out brea ks ..:' 2003). Three days later. however. there were still no<br />

108


co nfirmed cases; the outbreak seeme d to have been a false posit ive (" Key Developm ent s<br />

With ..... 2003). Then, one day shy of the "twenty days free of new cases" mark set by the<br />

WilD to qualify a coun try as free of SA RS. a single Malaysian man was positively<br />

diagnosed . Offi cia ls were disappointed. but still positive about the development; one case<br />

in twe nty days was considerably bette r than the large num ber of deaths reported in Apri l.<br />

"Si nga pore should take th is in its stride:' said Health Minister Lim Hog Kiang (Chuang<br />

2(03).<br />

The last two weeks of May did not prove as benevolent in Taiwa n. Ranked the<br />

second-highes t country in the world in terms of number of new cases repo rted on a da ily<br />

bas is. Taiwan faced increas ing criticis m over the way authorities were handlin g the<br />

SARS crisis. Th ese co mplaints concerned "disorga niza tion. lack of effective crisis<br />

management planning and political bickering: ' and eve ntua lly led to Health Minister<br />

T wu Shiing -jer resign ing his position . By mid-month. 274 peop le had tested positive for<br />

SA RS in Taiwan, and dozens of new cases we re report ed daily. Hundreds of doc tors and<br />

patients in two hospitals in and around Taipei were quarantined, and a hospital in the<br />

sout hern city of Kaohsiung migh t, by itself . have had dozens of cases. though officers<br />

said they cou ldn' t be sure until the end of a ten-day incubation period. Sources close to<br />

the Taiwanese government told reporters that the battle was at a crossroads: "u nless<br />

officia ls move quickl y to con tain the outbreak in hosp itals and do a more effective job of<br />

tracing co ntacts of suspected patien ts. the epidemic risks taking a further tum for the<br />

worse. with potentially serious co nseq uences for the co untry's health-care syste m"<br />

("Ta iwan hea lth chief ..... 2(03).<br />

109


Onl y four da ys later. Ta iwan became the country with the fastes t-grow ing<br />

casc load of SARS patient s in the world. On May 20th alone. thirt y-nine new cases we re<br />

report ed. and twelve new death s, the latter brin ging the island's toll to fifty-two. Thi s<br />

marked the third da y in a row where the number of reported cases had set a record .<br />

Taiwan was still third on the list of worst-hit co untries (follow ing China and Hong<br />

Kong). but was the on ly co untry where the number of daily cases was still rising ("SARS<br />

tall y soa ring .. ... 2003) . O ver the next two days. eight death s and 120 new cases we re<br />

report ed. but there were 99 1 sus pected cases that had yet to be co nclusively diagnosed.<br />

Members of U.S. team s assessing Taiwan ese SARS contro l procedur es weren' t even<br />

safe; one man, despite follo wing all recommended precaut ions, was transferred to the<br />

U.S. via air ambulance after developi ng SARS -like symptoms ("T aiwan SAR S cr isis.. ..<br />

2003).<br />

Despite the direness of the situation. Taiwan rejec ted an off er from China to help<br />

co ntro l the outbreak . cla imin g that everyt hing was under control. The rejection ca me on<br />

the same da y as health officers announced twent y-two new cases and twel ve fatalities,<br />

brin gin g the island's death to ll to seventy-two. By co mpariso n. on the same day, China<br />

announced seve n deaths and six teen new cases. In its official reject ion, Taiwan criticized<br />

China for inter fering with inte rnat ional attempts to help , as well as blockin g Taiwan from<br />

becomin g a memb er of the WHO (Huang 2oo3b) . The cases that Taiwan did announce<br />

did not includ e severa l hospit al patient s who had not passed the ten-day incubation<br />

period , raising the possib ility of dozen s of new cases (" New SARS deaths... " 2(03). The<br />

last article in Ma y. dated Monda y. May 26 lh , announced no death s. but fifteen new cases,<br />

110


and Taipei' s health bureau chief Chiou Shu-ti'v resigning over a major outbreak in a city<br />

hospital. Shu-n's departure marked the third official to resign over SARS ("Ca nada,<br />

Taiwan wrestle..... 2(03). It did appear, however, that a turning point had passed; the<br />

number of cases per day was dropping.<br />

Taiwan was not the only entity negatively affected. Businesses all over the world<br />

reported losses, and none worse than the airline industry. Thomas Andrew Drysdale,<br />

regional director for the International Air Transport Association, called the situation "A<br />

crisis of major proportions," and stated that 9/1 1, the Iraq war, and Britain' s foot-and­<br />

mouth-disease combined hadn't done as much damage to the airline industry. Estimated<br />

worldwide losses topped SIDbillion, and SARS had only been on the global scene for<br />

nine weeks (t'Airlines: SARS worse.. ... 2003). Northwest Airlines alone reported losses<br />

of $ 1.6 billion between January 1" and May 31"', and had 10 furlough 1,093 pilots and cut<br />

17,000 other jobs. Just to maintain profitability. the airline was also seeking over $ 1<br />

billion in wage, work rule, and benefit concessions from the remaining workers ("SA RS<br />

triggers more... .. 2(03 ).<br />

Airlines were not the only businesses to suffer. Worldwide, tourism was down,<br />

and business travel was stymied as workers avoided meetings. A survey of 2,015<br />

Japanese companies that conducted business in Asia revealed that roughly 70% reponed<br />

financia l damage. The largest numbers came from China. where 86% of Japanese<br />

businesses had been affected, including the temporary closing of two plants after five<br />

workers were diagnosed with SARS. In other areas of Asia, 85% of Japanese businesses<br />

I II


in Hong Kong reported dama ges. with 84% in Singapore. 39% in Indonesia, and 38% in<br />

Thailand making similar claims ("Japan Businesses Report..." 2(03).<br />

Internet business, however. was booming. as consumers relied more on methods<br />

of shopping thai avoided crowded marketplaces. As covered by CNN.c om. in China,<br />

" Internet sales had risen as much as 60 percent at firms pitching jo ke books. antiseptic<br />

cleaners or DVDs to keep the housebound clean and entertained during the virus-induced<br />

panic" ("'SARS driving shoppers.. .' 2003). One store, which in 2002 sold roughly I(X)<br />

million yuan worth of goods (about $ 12 million U.S.). reported daily sales of 500.000<br />

yuan in Apr il and May. or roughly an 182.5% increase in sales. Another business<br />

reported April sales doubling from 2002, and expected May sales to triple ("'SARS<br />

driving shoppers... " 2(03).<br />

For the medical community. the last half of May brought breakthrough s in<br />

discoveries of viral transmission vectors and origins. Though there were alread y reports<br />

that SARS might prove a reoccurring disease with seasonal patterns. cropping lip during<br />

flu seasons over the next few years (Miles 2003; Ross 2(03 ). researchers were still<br />

hopeful that the virus could be understood and eradicated. By mid-May, some researchers<br />

were already focusing on the animal markets in Guangdong Province. theorizing that the<br />

virus might have anima l origins. Other researchers pointed alit the similarities between<br />

human air travel and hauling animals long distances in cattle cars; under such conditions,<br />

animals often contract "shipping fever: ' characterized by cough. pneumonia. and<br />

mucosal drip. all caused by a coronavirus. Perhaps. these researchers said. we arc<br />

creating the perfect situation for viral spread: "When animals arrive from other locations<br />

112


and commingle. you see disease outbreaks : ' remar ked Linda Saif. professo r of food<br />

animal health at Ohio State Univers ity (Fox 2003b) . And there were theories that were<br />

seen by most of the virology comm unity as ridiculous. such as the CNN.com report of a<br />

British scien ti...t claiming the SARS virus may have outer space origins (Compton 2(03).<br />

However. these theories could not be entirely ruled out becau ...e there was no hard<br />

evidence either way .<br />

Such evidence arrived on May 2.J 1h • when re...carchcrs in 1I0ng Kong announced<br />

they had found evidence of the SARS virus in three small mammal s. one of which was<br />

the civet cal. It was still too ear ly at this point to determine whether the animals gave the<br />

virus to huma ns or caught it from them (though one of the ...rudy's leaders . microb iologist<br />

Yucn Kwok-yun g, stro ngly believed it was the former). But WHO expert Dr. Francois<br />

Meslin still declared the findings "quite exciting" CCat delicacy cou ld... .. 2(03). Further<br />

evidence was added when SARS antibodies were found in five traders of wild animals<br />

who had not developed symptoms of the disease. meani ng I) they contracted the d isease<br />

some time ago. and 2) the virus appeared to have mutated into a more lethal form since<br />

the traders caught it (based on genetic studies) ("SAR S antibodie s found.. ." 2003 ). By<br />

May 28 lh • researc hers in 1I0ng Kong openly declared that the virus jumped from animals<br />

to humans because of these antibod ies. Their findings " indicate workers caught the virus<br />

from the animals. developed a mild form of the disease. hut then the virus mutated into a<br />

more virule nt form before it was passed to other people : ' according to Shcnzhen<br />

microbiologist li e Jianfan ("Evidence SARS.. :· 2003).<br />

113


Thus. by May' s end, though a vaccine was still a long way off. significant<br />

discoveries had enlightened many of the mysteries surrounding SARS. In addition,<br />

according to the numbers of new cases reported daily. humans appeared to be contai ning<br />

the epidemic. May certa inly ended better than it began.<br />

In The Lancet , the last three editions published in May had sixteen SARS -related<br />

articles between them. including several research letters. editor ials. and commentaries.<br />

Once again, all of these articles were clinical in nature. The only glimpse of a piece that<br />

might look at the non-medical world's impressio ns of the disease carne in the form of an<br />

article tilled "SA RS, Lay Epidem iology. and Fear," published in the May Ir:edition.<br />

The article even began promising ly, summarizing the increase in stress and fear in a<br />

German hospital's outpatient depart ment, which was said to be due to a graph published<br />

in a local newspaper. In this newspaper, a jo urnalist had attempted to lay dow n an<br />

exponent ial curve on the outbreak, predicti ng an increasing surge in case numbers over<br />

the next few months. However. the remainder of '·SARS. Lay Epidemiology , and Fear"<br />

was an academic discussion of the failure of the jou rnalist to understand disease<br />

prediction methods, including examples of the difference between exponential and linear<br />

graphs. and the failure of graphs to take into account basic prevent ion and intervention<br />

measures (Razum et al., 2003).<br />

The British Medical Journal has not been mentioned for some time in this<br />

timcline. Recall that the last issue published in April of 2003 contained no less than seven<br />

pieces on SARS. all of which opened the sections in which they were published. Such<br />

proliferation proved almost a last-gasp effo rt. as the numbers of pieces that appeared<br />

114


sub..cqucntly dropped off greatly. There were only twelve SARS·related pieces in the<br />

five i..sues of 8MJ that were published in May: nine news articles, two reviews. and one<br />

short blurb that appeared in the journal' s "Filler" sect ion. Few of the..e t.....elve pieces<br />

offered any key insights into SARS. Even the May 3 N edition of the journal. publi...hed<br />

only a .....cck after the SARS+heavy edition of late April. contained only ne.....s article...<br />

about the outbreak: one noting that SARS may have peaked in Canada. Hong Kong. and<br />

Vietnam (Parry 2oo3e). one covering Canada's a.....urance that it .....a...a ...afe place to visit<br />

(Spurgeon 2oo3b). and the la..t covering UK Health Secretary Alan Milburn' s waming<br />

that SARS could ...till affect the UK (Eaton 2003). None of these articles mentioned<br />

rumors. legends. or gossip. Only t.....o .....eeks later. the May It h edition of the 8MJ<br />

contained only one ne .....s article and one "Review," (actua lly a ...hort. personal account of<br />

life in China by a ...enior lecturer in international health at the In..titute of Child Health in<br />

London. England: see Hesketh 2(03 ), and both of these pieces were located in the bottom<br />

two entries in their categories. The news that the UK had its first ca..c of SARS (Parry<br />

2(X>3 t) did appear as the second news story in the May 24 lh edition, but another news<br />

piece in the same edition-this one about Chinese scientists testing wild animals to find<br />

the host of SARS (Gottlie b 2003}-wao; almostthe lu...t entry. And the final May edition<br />

of the RMJ only had one SARS-related entry: a news story that detailed the resurgence of<br />

the virus in Toronto (Spurgeon 2003c).<br />

June brought a breath of fresh air to many countries. a...worldwide the SARS<br />

epidemic was in decline. Taiwan. after becoming the only country in the world with<br />

grow ing cascloads. successfu lly adopted quarantine and mon itoring policies and brough t<br />

115


its numbers down drastically. One of the more stringent measures adopted made news on<br />

June I, when Taiwan instituted a nationwide ten-day temperatu re check policy. Families<br />

everywhere-80% of which had thermometers, and nearly as many were willing to<br />

cooperate. according to surveys-were asked to monitor themselves daily and report<br />

anomalies. For those few who didn't have thermometers. there were 6,000 designated<br />

community pharmacies that would provide the service. Only four people were diagnosed<br />

with SARS on the first day of the month--demonstrating that the virus was already in<br />

decline- and the numbers went down from there ("Taiwan launches national. ,.' 2003 ).<br />

By the middle of the month, the WHO lifted the travel advisory against Taiwan.<br />

The UN health body commended Taiwan for its recent proactive stance, a large<br />

difference from the widespread condemnation of Taiwanese infection control systems<br />

that were handed down some five weeks earlier ("WHO lifts Taiwan..... 2003). Lastly,<br />

and almost a coda to Taiwan ' s struggle with SARS, on the 18 th of June two Taipei<br />

doctors were charged with "covering up SARS cases that allowed the deadly virus to<br />

spread through a Taipei hosp ital, leading to the island's first and worst outbreak"<br />

(vTaiwun Doctors Charged..." 2(03 ). Prosecutors sought an eight-year sentence for both<br />

Wu Kung-wen. former superintendent of the Taipei Municipal Ho Ping Hospital. and Lin<br />

Jung-ti. the same hospital' s head of infectious diseases. Accord ing to Taipei District<br />

Court prosecutor Chen Hon-da, "The investigation shows the defendants neglected their<br />

duties and failed to take necessary infection control measures, causing the deaths of<br />

several medical workers and allowing the epidemic to spread" (vTuiwan Doctors<br />

Charged, " .. 200Jl,<br />

116


Wednesday. June 18 th also marked the third day in a row Taiwan had not report ed<br />

any new SA RS infections . There wou ld be three more cases and one more death before<br />

Taiwan was given the all-clear on July s", but for now the tally stood at 697 infected and<br />

eight y-three dead . making the bland the third -worst hit area behind mainland China and<br />

Iiong Kong (v'Iuiwan Doctors Char ged .. .·· 2003).<br />

In Hong Kong. June began ominously. with three new infection" and three new<br />

deaths reported on the first day of the month . One of the fatalities was a female ward<br />

attendant who was involved in treating some of the city's first victim s. These new<br />

numbers brought Hong Kong' s total to 28 1 deaths from 1.743 cases . 1,3 18 of those<br />

patient s had been released from the hospital. leaving eighty-three still in treatment . and<br />

twent y-seven of those in intensiv e care ("l long Kong report s...·· 2003) .<br />

Over the next nineteen days. fifteen people perished. There were also twel ve new<br />

cases reported. hut all of those came on the second day of the month. meanin g that by<br />

June zo", Hong Kong was only days away from receiving the WHO' s twenty-day "all<br />

clear" stamp of approval. June 20 rn was also the day Hong Kong and Chinese health<br />

officials met to discuss a system wherein the former would rece ive prompt health reports<br />

from the mainland. hopefully thus avo iding future epidemic s ("·II K. China Discuss..<br />

20(3) .<br />

On Monday. June 23 00 • the WHO removed Hong Kong from its list of SARS ­<br />

infected areas. At the same time. the WHO warned Hong Kong' s health official s of the<br />

possible reoccurrences of SARS if guards were let down too early. drawing a direct<br />

comparison to Toronto' s resurgence of disease (Wong. Margaret 2003h ). All that<br />

117


emained now was for the region to revamp and re-stimulate its damaged economy.<br />

According to MSNBC.com. Hong Kong' s unemplo yment levels had recently reached a<br />

record 8.3 percent. and businesses all over the city were feeling the impact of the<br />

diminished tourism industry. To combat the fear still present among locals and tourists,<br />

Hong Kong' s government installed dispensers filled with antibacterial sprays in<br />

government buildings and busy areas. and carted in high-tech temperature scanning<br />

devices to major areas of activity such as jewelry trade fairs, airports. and border<br />

crossings (Allen 2003). It took time, but Hong Kong did recover.<br />

China. once the most-infected nation in the world. ended May with an entire week<br />

of single-digit reports of SARS cases , and began June by going twenty-four hours<br />

without a new case- the first day since April zo"it had been able to do so. No one died<br />

during the period either. and so China' s figures remained at 5.328 infected and 332 dead.<br />

Life returned to normal as well. with Yahoo! News reports confirming regular traffic<br />

jams and a distinct lack of face masks on buses and in crowded areas ("No China<br />

SARS... " 2(03).<br />

In mid-June, while not officially removing China from the list of SARS-infected<br />

countries. WHO members said that China appeared to have SARS under control. Th is did<br />

not mean thai there had been no reported cases since the first of the month; indeed. there<br />

was one reported case the day before the WHO statement surfaced. and roughly one<br />

person had died every day in China from SARS since the beginning of the month. The<br />

WHO statement in this case was based on data that suggested that China was no longer<br />

exporting SARS: its borders had been made impermeable to the disease. The WHO did<br />

118


state that there was still much work to he done in China. however. There were still many<br />

questions as to the disease' s origin. and contagion vectors-that is. who gave the virus to<br />

whom-were murkier in China than almost anywhere else. Some 70% of patients<br />

diagnosed with SARS in Beij ing since May 1'1did not know from whom they had<br />

contracted the virus ("SA RS under control.. ... 2(03).<br />

What didn' t appear to need work was controlling the apparent source of the virus:<br />

the wild game markets and concomitant businesses. Wild game restaurants in Shenzhen.<br />

south China, had been virtually empty for two weeks, some of them despite entirely new<br />

menus that did not feature their standard exotic fare. The markets themselves had faced<br />

similar fortunes: Xinyuan. Guangzhou'« largest wild game market. was now composed of<br />

empty cages , and not of eager buyers, a scene that pleased those who monitored and<br />

attempted to halt wildlife trade (Young 2oo3a).<br />

A scene that pleased the WHO was that of Singapore. which was removed from<br />

the list of SARS-affected countries on the last day of May. Singapore had only 206 cases<br />

and thirty-one deaths before controlling the outbreak. and June was mostly given over to<br />

planning contingencies for future outbreaks. Singapore was especially proactive in<br />

attempting to stymie future reoccurrences of SARS. and planned on implementing<br />

mandatory temperature checks for workers at shipyards. factories . and construction sites<br />

in mid-June. as well as revamping health forms to include recent travel itineraries,<br />

possible contact with SARS-infected people, and current health states. Providing false<br />

information on such forms could result in fines of up to $5.797 and six months' ja il time<br />

("S ingapore May Jail..... 2(03).<br />

119


So successful were the anernpts in Asia to control the epidemic that on June It h<br />

the WHO stated that SARS might be coming to an end. Worldwide. only seven new cases<br />

were reported on June n". and though there were still a few places in the world where<br />

the disease remained uncontrolled, the general consensus was that the end was near<br />

(Grauwels 2003).<br />

June' s successes, however. were not equal for every area of the world. While Asia<br />

seemed to have its problems mostly under wraps, Toronto was still in the middle of its<br />

second resurge nce of disease . On the first day of the month, fifteen people had suspected<br />

cases of SARS, bringing the number of second-resurgence probable cases to forty-six.<br />

and 150 others were close ly monitored as possible victim.. r-Canada waits for. .: · 2003).<br />

By Monday. the number of active cases jumped to fifty-two. and the death toll rose by<br />

one. The number of people in quarantine did drop by 2,(XX) people. bringing that total<br />

down to 5.300. hut Ontario's public health commissioner. Dr. Colin D'Cunha. still said<br />

that the province was in a state of "h ypcrvigilancc." and earlier had acknowledged that at<br />

least some of those quarantined had violated their isolation orders ("Anot her SARS<br />

death ..: 20(3 ).<br />

Thesc problem.. with.quarantine violators continued, bringing constant threat of<br />

public exposure to the virus. Ontario health minister TOllYClement became so frustrated<br />

that at one point in early June he threatened to chain people to their beds if they didn' t<br />

follow their isolation orders. He wasn't serious. but his concerns highlighted the<br />

problems Toro nto was facing in controlling the outbreak, and new laws did provide for<br />

fines of up to 53,650 for violators. By the lOthof June the number of active cases had<br />

120


isen to over sixty. and some 6.800 people-an additional l,Sao since the first of the<br />

moruh-c-wcre in quarantine. These figures did not. however. include the 5,000 health care<br />

employees under working quarantine who were required to wear masks, gowns, and<br />

gloves in public. and remain isolated during off-hours ('"Penalize quarantine violators"<br />

200 3).<br />

Almost unbelievably. the Ontario Ministry of Health had to issue a warning to<br />

Toronto hospitals in early June reminding them to comply with provincial anti-SARS<br />

directives. Officials in the Ministry had received reports from nurses at Mount Sinai<br />

Hospital complaining that they had been ordered not to comply with directives that<br />

required them to wear masks, gowns. and gloves-c-contradic tions that meant the possible<br />

exposure to and quarantining of infants, new mothers, and one hundred health-care<br />

employees . At North York General Hospital, nurses complained that their concerns about<br />

SARS re-emerging had been largely ignored by senior staff. and a nursing association<br />

official additiona lly reported that staff had been ordered to tell callers that facilities were<br />

SARS-free. even if said staff believed otherwise ('"Editorial: Eves needs..:' 2003).<br />

More bad news arrived on the to"of June when provincial officials reported that<br />

they had been investigating a new possible SARS cluster in Whitby. Ontario, located<br />

roughly fifty kilometers east of Toronto. If positive. this would have been the third cluster<br />

in Ontario (the first two being the primary and secondary Toronto outbreaks). This new<br />

group of suspected SARS victims consisted of fifteen people who were at the Lakeridge<br />

Health Corporation dialysis unit. all of whom had developed fevers and respiratory<br />

problems. Adding to the severity of this news was the report that a North Caroli na man<br />

121


Taiwan rema ined on the list at this point. and as stated earlier, it was cleared three days<br />

later. The epidemic was contained.<br />

It should come as no surprise. then. that few articles about SARS appeared in the<br />

British Medical Journal in June. and July brought only a single entry: a news story in the<br />

Jul y Ii h edition cover ing the WHO ' s announcement that SARS was over (Fleck 2(03).<br />

There was one major discrepancy to these statements: the June 21' I edition of the 8MJ<br />

was SARS-themed. the cover sporting magnified photographs of the virus and hearing<br />

the heading, "SARS: understanding the coronavirus." The journal carried only a single<br />

news article relating to the disease (evidence that the outbreak was waning). but it did<br />

hear two peer-reviewed papers. nine "Letters," and two reviews. The papers and<br />

"Letters" were all clinical in nature and tone, discussing the positive and negative<br />

strategies adopt ed by various organizations in dealing with the outbreak. and lessons that<br />

could be applied to future diseases in light of what had been learned on a global level in<br />

dealing with SARS. This SARS-themed 8MJ . howeve r. seems out of place when looked<br />

at in the context of the surrounding editions, few of which mentioned the disease (in fact,<br />

only one out of the next five issues referenced it: the aforementioned Jul y Ii h news<br />

entry).<br />

The Lancet did continue to print SARS -related articles throughout June and Jul y.<br />

though in increasingly smaller numbers. The first two issues in June had four articles<br />

each (though two of these eight articles were "News In Brief ' blurbs), But the last two<br />

issues only had three articles between them. and one of those merely mentioned SARS in<br />

the context of a recent ser ies of attacks on the WHO' s health system performance since<br />

123


eponed probl em s moving ware s in Asia. not ing that cell phon e and semiconductor sales<br />

were at new low s (t'Global tech giants.. :' 2(03). In Singapo re. consumer prices as a<br />

whole fell .7 percent in June. desp ite retailers offering rna....ive "a les to lure cu..tcmcrv<br />

("S inga pore prices fall... ·· 2(03).<br />

In Cana da. the S52 ·billio n-do llar touri..m industry was hea vily shake n by the<br />

W HO ' s trave l ad viso ries aga inst Toronto. But Toronto was not the on ly city affected. no r<br />

was On tario the only provi nce to suffer. PEL New Brun..wick. Manitoba. Alberta. and<br />

British Col umb ia also saw a dec line in tou ri..m. and ho tels. restaurants. and touri..t<br />

attraction.. in all five provinces showe d lower profit". Even the Formula On e race in<br />

Montreal-c-an eve nt that norm ally filled al l 20.()(x)of Mon treal' s hotel roo ms with fans­<br />

wa ..n' t ab le to draw its regu lar crow d. Altogether. Ca nadian Tou rism Co mmission<br />

spo kes wo ma n Isabelle Des Cbencs estimated nationw ide lo..se.. at 5300-500 million ove r<br />

the ..hort term. with larger los..cs probable over the ne xt year (t'Ca nadian touri..t<br />

industry.. : ' 2(03).<br />

Air Canada might have been able to claim the largest Canadian losses fro m the<br />

epidemic. and wa s definitely the hardest-hit airl ine in the world, Air Ca nada filed for<br />

bankruptcy protect ion in April afte r reporting 5 150 million in losses due to flight<br />

cancellations. and May bro ught a further 5200 milli on drop in gro.... rece ipts. with similar<br />

lo..scs ex pected for June. Summer bookings were abo weak. leading many to be lieve that<br />

the lo..scs mig ht continue 10 come for some month" ("SA RS fears co ntinue .. .' 2003).<br />

June did. however. look bright for further research on the or igins and<br />

developments of SA RS . Chine ..e animals were alrea dy ..trongly suspected as having<br />

125


passed the virus 10 humans, and in mid-June Yahoo! News covered the WHO' s launching<br />

of a new series of studies designed 10 lest the connection between SARS and other animal<br />

species. The civet cat was already strongly suspected as being the antagonist in the<br />

equation ('"WHO to conduct. .." 2003). The same day also brought an announcement<br />

from Chinese researchers that a potential test for SARS. using antibodies to diagnose the<br />

virus. had been created. Until this point. doctors had been forced to rely on signs of the<br />

disease. such as high white blood cell counts and damaged lungs- signs which could be<br />

misleading (Young 2003 b).<br />

Mid-June also marked a two-day gathering of health officials from around the<br />

world to discuss how to deal with future viral epidemics. Much had been learned from<br />

SARS in terms of controlli ng outbreaks. but delegates were quick to point out that things<br />

could have gone better: Shigeru ami, director for the WHO in the Western Pacific<br />

Region, said, "The SARS epidemic is now coming under control but the fight is by no<br />

means over. SARS is not defeated. other new diseases will threaten us in the future. we<br />

must be better prepared next time" ("Health officials ponder..... 2(0 3). The success of<br />

this gathering was mixed. as the I,OOO-plus attendees left with few new ideas on the<br />

origin of the virus or how it should be eradicated (Krishnan 2003).<br />

What did come of the studies laking place around the world were warnings that<br />

future outbreaks of SARS might be entirely possible, some perhaps as early as a few<br />

month s away. Some theories suggested that there might be a large reservoir of SARS<br />

viruses in China' s animal population that could cross over into the human populat ion at<br />

any given time. Other theories said that the disease was now so widespread that it might<br />

126


e impossible 10 ent irely co ntain. and that it might spring up again during flu seaso ns.<br />

such as wintertime. Man y people also pointed to the rece nt increases in globa l trade of<br />

animals and plants. and the cress-contaminat ion that occ urs from spec ies unintentionall y<br />

let loose in foreign coun tries as problemat ic (Chinoy 2003; Lodge 2(03).<br />

Whether or not such theo ries were valid. what was clear was that SARS had<br />

chan ged the way the wor ld thought abou t disea se. One example of this lay in attempts to<br />

netwo rk thousa nds of personal com puters around the world to form a massive<br />

supercomputer that cou ld be put to the task of crunching drug molecules . Under such a<br />

volu nteer -base d prog ram. the co mputers in peop le's homes and offi ces co uld. during<br />

spare cycles. he downl oaded with so ftware thai wou ld allow them to look for drug<br />

molecules that would bind with disease-associa ted proteins- in essence . to look for<br />

vacc ines and cures . Such netw ork ing was projected to cut the time needed to find<br />

promising dru gs from 1.5 years 10 a few months (Buckle r 20(3).<br />

Thi s reccnccptuali zation of disease was wides pread, In Singapore. a popular<br />

television character named Phua Chu Kang released . with the support of the Health<br />

Ministry. an anti-SA RS rap CD. The lyrics encouraged locals 10 maintain good hygiene<br />

to stop the spread of viral agen ts through phrases such as "S ARS is the virus that I just<br />

wan t to minus" and "Don' t 'kak-pu i' [spit] all over the place, you might us well 'kak-pui'<br />

on my fuce" ("Singapor e' s hip-hop ..:' 2(03). Rarely, if ever , had governments utilized<br />

such methods to spread knowledge. The CD was released just after a ser ies of<br />

crack do wns on public spilling, which had long been a fineab le offe nce in Singapore-<br />

127


one CNN.co m news story detailed a man ....'ho was fined $290 for sp itting in a sho pping<br />

district (Szcp 2003a).<br />

Publ ic effo rts to increase awareness and hygiene hadn ' t just stopped at sp itting. In<br />

Singapore. workers at food stalls and construction sites .....ere given twice-dai ly<br />

temperature readings . as were staff at more than one hundred of the city" s hotels.<br />

W idespread pub lic leaflets encouraged people to wash their hands . The govemrnent abo<br />

lau nched a "Happy Toilet" program which gave starred ratings to all public toilets.<br />

informing people of those faci lities that did not meet cleanliness standards. And ear lier in<br />

June. in a move tha t brought mass criticism. health officials began culling the city's<br />

80.00D-plus stray cats in response to China's civet cat-S ARS link stud ies (Szcp 2003a).<br />

O n July 5 th • the W HO decl ared the global SAR S out brea k over after removing<br />

Taiwan from its list. WHO Director General Gro Harlem Brundtland was quick to remind<br />

peo ple. ho.....eve r. that the virus co uld undergo resurge nce jus t as qu ickly if peo ple were<br />

not ca reful: there were still some 200 SARS patie nts in hospitals aroun d the wor ld. any<br />

one of whom


10 recovery seemed clear. and even more likely as Roche Holding AG. the wor ld' s<br />

biggest diagnostic finn. de veloped along-sought- after lest for SARS in mid-July (Shield s<br />

2003). Fast-forward a month. and articles were already hearing head lines such as "The<br />

vanished virus." a piece in TI,e Guardian that came out the same day that China released<br />

its last two SARS patients from the hospital ('The vanished virus" 2003). Warnings<br />

about viral resurgence still abounded. but for many. life had already returned to normal.<br />

Despite these warnings. there were no new SARS cases for the rest of 2003. The<br />

one case thai initially appeared to be an exception to this was announced in Singapore on<br />

September 9 th ("Timeline: Sacs [sic] virus.. 2003). The case involved a postdoctoral<br />

student who worked as a laboratory technician on the Wc...t Nilc virus. Reaction to this<br />

possible new infection was immediat e. but WHO officials were initially unsure of not<br />

only how the man contracted the virus-since his work did not include contact with<br />

SARS-hut whether he actually had the disease. as his symptoms did not include lung<br />

infections or respiratory problems ("Q&A : Sars [sic]" 2(X)3). Health official s in<br />

Singapore confirme d the case as SARS-related. but simultaneousl y staled their<br />

uncertainty about whether this new case signalled a return of SARS. or whether it was<br />

merely an isolated incident resulting from a laboratory accide nt (Szcp 2(X>3 b).<br />

Because of these uncertain ties and the lack of classic symptoms. the WHO<br />

declar ed their refusal to classify the man' s illness as SARS. Instead of reassurin g the<br />

public. this action in some ways only served to increase tension. drawing worldwid e<br />

attent ion towards the difficultie s of diagnosing the disease. Singapore stood behind their<br />

positive diagnosis. citing the two rounds of polymerase chain reaction and serology tests<br />

129


conducted on the patient. Th e WHO. co untering such claims. pointed to the small marg in<br />

of error endemic to such tests. Singapo re' s minister of stale for heahh added to the<br />

mudd le hy showing studies that demons trated that five percent of SARS patients durin g<br />

the last outbreak developed a fever, but did not go on to deve lop the disease (Szep<br />

2003 b).<br />

A local investigation into the two laboratories in which the postdoctoral stude nt<br />

worked revealed that one of them did, indeed. abo co nduc t research on SA RS, and thus it<br />

was possible that the studen t had co me into contact with the virus. Logs sho wed that the<br />

studen t visited this lab three days before becomi ng ill. Both lahs were closed in response,<br />

and forty-one people were quarant ined. The WHO , howeve r, still maintained its pos ition<br />

and declared the case "not an international public health co ncern:' say ing travel to<br />

Singapore was safe {Szep 200 3c). Their position seemed validated the next day when the<br />

student co ntinued to recove r from his illness. He had no fever for five days. and the<br />

hosp ital slated him to be released within a few days- a rapid recover y that only further<br />

confirmed the WHO' s suspicions that the man did not have full-blown SARS (Szcp<br />

21XJ3d ).<br />

In response 10 the case-and desp ite the WHO' s dcclurat ions-c-u team of<br />

intern ationa l ex perts was sent to Singapore on Septe mber 15 th 10 investigate the mailer.<br />

Th e team co nsisted of an eleven-member panel cha ired by a WHO biosafet y ex pert, hUI<br />

also co ntained mem bers of the U.S. Centers for Disease Co ntrol and Prevent ion<br />

("S ingapo re, Foreign Expert s... " 2(03). The results of their study, released a wee k later,<br />

stated the case the res ult of a lab acc ident and verified that the stude nt co ntracte d the<br />

130


virus while on the job. Genome sequencing co nfirmed the similarities bet ween the lab<br />

sample and the strain tha t infected the researcher. The stude nt him..e1fh ad fully recovered<br />

by this poin t and had bee n disch arged fro m the hospital. hut the lab where he co ntrac ted<br />

the di..ease wa.... hut down, and the SA RS virus samples conta ined therein ordered<br />

des troye d (Wo ng, Jacqu el ine 200 3).<br />

The study al..o poin ted to a few troub ling detai ls. The acc ident that caused the<br />

student' .. infec tion was the result of cross -contamination between West Nile and SARS<br />

viral samples, ind icating inap propriate proce dure .. in handl ing samples. Antony Della­<br />

Porta. the WHO biosafety expert, stated tha t ..It's obv ious the labs put in enormous effo rt<br />

and d id a fantastic jo b during the SAR S outbreak, but it led to some inco nsis tenc ies<br />

where labs were not rea lly prep ared to handle organisms at tha t level: ' and reco mmende d<br />

stricter guidel ines for lab researchers (Wo ng, Jacquel ine 2003).<br />

At roug hly the same time that Singapore was dealin g with these problems. Hon g<br />

Kong' s Chinese Universit y announced it would be finan cin g a top-le vel SARS<br />

laborator y. desig ned to he fully mo bile and available for usc with in a few months. Suc h a<br />

lab wou ld hopef ully mak e deal ing with future outbreaks far easier, and the planned level ­<br />

three status (the hig hes t international safety grade) would pre vent such occu rrences as<br />

Singa pore's leak t-Hong Kong uni versity.. : ' 200 3). Add itiona l safe ty measures taken by<br />

Hong Kong as a whole included an alert sys tem and increased numb ers of staff at bo rder<br />

checkpoi nts to scree n travelers, in addition to building a center for disease control to<br />

"speed up laborator y tests, strengthe n cont act traci ng and disease invest igations:'


measures against future outbreaks. making sure there were at least 300 rooms with<br />

isolation facilities and an extra 1.290 beds (Luk 2(03).<br />

But perhaps the best news to come from Hong Kong arrived on September 25 111 •<br />

whcn CN N.com covered the announcement that the HIV drug Kalctra. when used in<br />

combination with ribuvirin. had been shown to significantly reduce mortality rates among<br />

SARS victims. Hong Kong hospitals immediately announced that all future SARS<br />

patients would be treated with this cocktail for this reason. as well as the drug<br />

combination reducing the need for steroid use. These announcements came on the tail of<br />

a series of criticisms of Hong Kong' s earlier methods of treatment. which centered<br />

around a cocktail of steroids and ribavirin-not including Kalctra-c-which many experts<br />

deemed ineffective ("Hong Kong to use .." 2003). The new drug combination seemed to<br />

silence critics.<br />

Such a development was no doubt welcome after continued reports that SARS<br />

would likely resurface in future months (Walsh 2(03). The WHO only added fuel to the<br />

fire by announcing that many SARS-Iike disease s were likely to crop up in the next<br />

century, and that mankind needed to prepare for them (Kataria 2(03). As if proving this<br />

statement true, lIong Kong had a small scare in the last few days of the month when<br />

seven men were quarantined after developing high fevers and upper-respiratory-tract<br />

infcctions. Though all seven were soon cleared-thcir symptoms were not SARS­<br />

related- the incident did underline the possibility of a real situation (Sisc i 2(03).<br />

One of the immediately noticeable themes in post-SARS media reports concerned<br />

the assignation of fault and blame. One exa mple of this came from Canada. whose nurses<br />

132


declared Ontario unprepared to deal with a future outbreak due to lack of govern menta l<br />

direction r-N urse, Say Toronto.. ." 2003). Such finger-poi nting was not isolated to North<br />

America . A report released in early Octobe r, 2003, chided Hong Kong for "significant<br />

shortcomings" in the ear ly phases ofSARS, implying that had Hong Kong ' s airports been<br />

better controlled. the virus might not have escaped as it did to more than thirty nat ions<br />

worldwide. Hong Kong residents specifically criticized their government and Chief<br />

ExecutiveTung Chee-hwa for their slow responses. but the report-put together by "an<br />

outside panel of experts 't-c-avoided giving specific names, listing instead Hong Kong' s<br />

"poor links between the health department and private and public hospitals , ineffec tive<br />

chains of command. a lack of cont ingency plans, poor infection control in hospitals and<br />

staff that were not properly trained," while at the same time recog nizing that Ch ina's<br />

secrecy concerning the virus played a large pan in these shortco mings (Bray 2003:<br />

"S ARS report faults..... 2(03).<br />

Other report s faulted the treatments given 10 patients. By the second week in<br />

Octobcr-c-burely three month s after the WHO declared the out break containcd-c-dozcns<br />

of former SARS patients in Hong Kong and China were found to be suffering from<br />

avasc ular necrosis, a form of bone degeneration caused by the ribavir in/steroid cocktail<br />

administered In all infected victims (Lyn 2003b).<br />

Still other reports pointed 10 Chin a' s animal trade market. Banned in May by the<br />

Chinese govern ment after reports that the SARS virus may have come from wild ani mals,<br />

the markets and concomitant anima l trade industry were legalized again in August after<br />

Chi nese expe rts failed to verify the anima l-origin theory . In post-SARS China. the<br />

133


eported cases of children transmitt ing the virus to adults, no evidence of infected<br />

mothe rs transmitting the virus to their unborn children. and no incidences of children<br />

infecting other children ("Report : SARS ...·· 2003).<br />

The last two days of Octo ber brought a flurry of news . the most optimistic of<br />

which carne from the CDC . who stated that the chances of containing a new outbreak of<br />

SARS were much improved. thanks largely to improved global alert systems ("Cha nces<br />

of Containing..... 2003). At the same time. they caut ioned others not to relax their<br />

vigilance. re-emphasiz ing the possibility that the virus could return in the winter months.<br />

Add itional warnings took the form of cautionary rem inders that there was yet no test that<br />

would positively identif y SA RS in the first days of infection (" Keep up the guard..."<br />

!OO3).<br />

A second series of reports had a decidedly pessimistic tone. First came a study<br />

from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that stated China unnecessarily<br />

quarantined thousands of people in its efforts to prevent the spread of SA RS. According<br />

to the study. it was unnecessary to quarantine some two-thirds of the 30.000 peop le<br />

ultimately isolated in Beijing ("China Quarantined Too Many.v." 2003 ). A second study<br />

found that house cats and ferrets could become infected and pass the disease on to other<br />

anima ls. No evidence was found in the study to prove or dispro ve that the virus could be<br />

transmitted to humans from these animal s. and researchers argued publicl y for both sides<br />

(Kahn ! OO3).<br />

The final cautionary tales for October came from Taiwan . whose doctors worri ed<br />

that SARS coul d eas ily return among the three million people expec ted to fall ill during<br />

135


flu seas on. Su lh-jcn. the directo r-gene ral of Taiwan's Center for Disease Cont rol . stated<br />

that the pcuk of the seas on was December 15 th • und Taiwan wou ld resum e temperature<br />

checks in pub lic places by that date to watch out for early signs of an outbreak (v'Fuiwan<br />

Says SARS . .. ·· 2003 ). At the same lime. Health Minister Chen Chie n-jcn dec ided to<br />

retract ear lie r laws requiring com pulsory face rna..ks and blanket quarantines . Suc h<br />

mea..ure.. had earlier proved so frigh tening tha t one man committed suici de afte r learning<br />

thai his fami ly had been diagnosed with SARS . and a woman had threate ned 10 ju mp out<br />

of her ho..pital windo w whe n faced with Taiwan ' s mandatory ten -day qua rantine (Wu<br />

2(X>3). October ..eem cd to end in amb ivalence. the numbe r of po..itive and ca utio nary<br />

articles roughl y balancing.<br />

Con sidering this, the rest of 2003 seemed mild. Indeed . news report s see med to<br />

lessen cons ide rably in Nov ember and December. The only major report I was able 10<br />

gather for these mo nths co ncerned a SA RS vacci ne trial in China. Announ ced in late<br />

November. the human trials (scheduled to comme nce in 2(04) car ne after week s of<br />

studying the effects of ....'eakcned coronaviruscs on animals- stud ies that had shown the<br />

vaccin e very effective on monkeys (t'Ch ina plans SA RS..... 20( 3). In the first phases of<br />

anim al testing. the six rhesus macaques tha t were infected all showed "a de tectable<br />

immune syste m respo nse" against the SARS coronaviruscs -c-a result promising enou gh<br />

to warrant testing the vacc ine on animals more susce ptible to the virus. such as ferrets.<br />

The vaccine not onl y showed promise. bUIco uld he produ ced chea ply. Dr. Andrea<br />

Gambone. head of the re..earch learn cha rged with de veloping the vaccine. sa id that " it<br />

136


can be produced in a mill ion vaccine doses easily at very low cost" ("SARS trials Iift.. :'<br />

2(03). If October had ended in ambiv alence. December ended in victo ry.<br />

January of 2W. however. began in fear. By the 12 lh day of the month . there were<br />

three new cases of SARS in China . all in the Guangdon g province. and two scie ntists<br />

researchin g the disear..e in Taiwan and Singapore had also contracted the disease. The first<br />

Chin ese cas e appeared on January 5 th • when a thirt y-two-year-old television prod ucer<br />

somehow contracted the disease. Doctors were puzzled by his case as he had no regular<br />

contact with wild animals. The seco nd case-though it was still only suspected as<br />

SARS-was a twent y-year-old waitress who worked at a restaurant that served dishes<br />

containing exotic foods such as the civet cat. By the time the third case arrived-a thirt y­<br />

five-year-old male suspected of contra cting the virus-the T.V. producer had been<br />

discharged from the hosp ital. but the fear of a new outbreak had already spread.<br />

Guan gdon g official s had already begun a mass culling of civet cats-an effort started in<br />

late 2003 with the revelation of a possible link between the animals and SARS-hut the<br />

exterminations redoubled in effort to the point that one official at the Guangzho u Anti­<br />

SA RS Office told a CNN .cnln reporter that " Basically. most of the civet cats in<br />

Guangdo ng have been slaughte red" (v'Third suspected SARS .. .' 2()()..l).<br />

Mass culling of civet cats was not the only precautio nary measure taken in light of<br />

the new human case s: city cleaners made regular street-sweeping excursions. and<br />

exterminators targeted rats. cockroac hes. flies. and mosquitoes as potential disease<br />

spreaders. The Guangzhou newspaper Y(llI gcht'ug Evening N t'I\'J reported that a city-wide<br />

effort to eliminate rats drew over 10,000 peop le. and warned that more than ten tons of<br />

137


poison-la ced grain had been dep loyed in "millions of placcsv througho ut Guangzhou to<br />


The uncertain ty surrounding this new series of infections did liule to curtail public<br />

constern ation. In a new series of mass cullings, thousa nds of raccoon dogs were gathered<br />

and exterminated to prevent future outbreaks. The WIIO team, having barely arrived in<br />

the province, had yet to determine any connections between the three exta nt cases, and<br />

Dr. Robe rt Breiman did little to assuage fear when he said. "There is certainly no<br />

smoking gun at the moment with any of the three cases that wou ld enable us to say<br />

precisely where they got it.. .. II's still a little bit of a mystery, a bit of what you might<br />

call a jigsaw puzzle and at some point I have a feeling this will all rome together and<br />

maybe be fairly obv ious, but at the moment it's not clear" ("'Origin of ncw. ,;" 2()()..l).<br />

Public perception of this new strain of coro navi rus was only exacerba ted when<br />

two China Southern Airline flight attendants were quara ntined in a Sydney hospital after<br />

returning from China with sore throats and a fever ("'Australia probes two.. : ' 2()()..l).<br />

Their story qu ickly turned positive. as they were released only two days later. on January<br />

16 th • Also on that day. Dr. Robert Breiman announced his WHO team' s initial findings.<br />

which pointed strongly toward an animal origin for this new strain of coronavir us. Their<br />

virolog ic forays uncovered traces of the virus in the restaurant where the twenty-year-old<br />

waitress worked. and anim al cages in the back of the restaurant that were known to<br />

contain civet cats all tested positive for SARS. Breiman also countered his own earlier<br />

public statement in the same interview, stating that the one confir med case of SARS in<br />

2()()..l-the TV producer-seemed "mild er" than the 2003 strain (McDonald 2()().l;<br />

"SA RS virus uncovered .. :' 20Q..t).<br />

139


Anhui. where the mother lived. By the time this news became public knowle dge .<br />

howevcr. both cases were actually weeks old: the nurse cont racted SARS on April S 1h •<br />

and the mother died of SARS-relnted complications on April 19 1h (though the Chine se<br />

Mini stry of Health didn 't publicly confirm this death until the last day of the month) .<br />

Once again. Chinn had kCPI its outbreak secret for a period of lime. and news reports<br />

were quick to point out the consequences of such secrecy in the 2002-2003 outbreak<br />

(""China adm its fif!\t.. : · 200·t; "Two SA RS cases ..:· 20(4).<br />

These new cases wou ld prove to be the last. There was little SARS-related news<br />

in May. save one report that the Chin ese huma n vaccinc trials had been successful. the<br />

study's fou r volun tcers in good condition four days after inoculation (··SARS: Human<br />

vaccine.. ." 2()().l). and a second report that Toronto' s tourism industry was recovering<br />

rapidly (vforonto is back .. ." 2QO..l.).<br />

June' s news was equally light. On the first day uft he month . China announced it<br />

would discontinu e its daily SAR S report as there had been no new cases since the April<br />

outbre aks. and the last SA RS-relnled patient was discharged from the hospita l on May<br />

31sl (t'Chin n 10 stop... ·· 2004 ). Beijing shut down its anti-SARS headquart ers the same<br />

day ('"Beijin g shuts anti-SARS .. :· 20(4).<br />

The rest of the month ' s reports were cong rutulutory in nature: a review of<br />

Toronto's 2003 measures to control the outb reak applauded the cit y on its efforts<br />

(Doheny 2(04): an announcement that scientisis had developed a new method of<br />

detect ing SA RS utilizing a chip that wou ld reduce the length of molecular testing from<br />

one week dow n to three days r-S cfenu- rs Say Develop... ·· 2(04); and an Associa ted<br />

141 J


10 leave them ou t as my arguments deal mainl y with public narratives. and because the<br />

narrati..:es that I did reco ver do not extend past this point in time. My purpo se in creating<br />

such an extended (though admitt edly incomp lete) histor y us this was to create a<br />

corkboard on which I can now proceed to pin the narratives that will become the focus of<br />

the remaining chapters of this work. II is unnecessary to cont inue expan ding this<br />

corkboard. as there arc no narratives past thi.. point in time that deal with the limited<br />

topics with which the media continu ed to report .<br />

There is still one final aspect 10 consider before we move on. and that is the<br />

differences between the media and medical timclincs. Though I on ly examined the<br />

articles thai compri sed the medical timclinc between late March of .2003and the end of<br />

July four month s later. it should be obvious that the pages ofthc Briti."" Medical Journal<br />

and nit,Lancet were almost entirely absent of the rumors, legends. and goss ip that so<br />

permeated newspapers and televised news report s. This is. of course. 10 be expected:<br />

these journals arc scientific in nature. their articles peer-reviewed and carefull y selected.<br />

Still. it is odd that even the news reports that appeared in these journals were free of<br />

disease narratives. focusing instead on an unbiased. accurat e representatio n of facts as<br />

expressed through raw data and summariza tions of key events. Such reportin g stands in<br />

sharp contrast to the news stories published by Yahoo! News. l\lSNB C.com . and<br />

CNN.com. all of .....'hich relayed vernacular narratives. Wh ile the media' s timeline<br />

obviously draws in part on the med ical establi shment' s tell ing of the outbreak. the<br />

medical establishment can hardly be said to recip rocate. These differences in focu s<br />

co incide with what Peter Washer has noted: that "beyo nd the realist global epidem ic of<br />

143


(the:d isease) SA RS lies the globalizu tion of the phenomenon of the SARS panic, where<br />

the satura tion and speed of the world news media' s co verage leads to the (supposed) risk<br />

pose d by SARS bei ng .\'Od el/y constructed on a globa l ..calc " (2()().t, 2570) . Th is is not to<br />

...ay that thc med ical timel ine is the "rea list" version. bu t it doc s poin t out that the media's<br />

construction of eve nts co ntributed far more to the socia l con struction of the disease tha n<br />

did its counterpart.<br />

If media sources did nOI exist . or were scvcrely wea kened in influence, and<br />

humans were forced to tum to the page...of academic journals to ret rieve new s on<br />

epidemics. woul d there be as many rumors? The an ...wers to a question ...uch as this can<br />

only ever be spec ulat ive. and wo uld no dou bt vary widely and be argued over<br />

vehe me ntly . But the very fact that a ques tio n such as this cou ld be aske d poi nts to the<br />

corr ela tion between media sources and rumors . Keep ing this in mind, let' ...move into our<br />

first ...tud y.<br />

1-1-1


also true that origin stories have been present in other disease outbreaks. AIDS etiological<br />

narratives have focused on "government cons piracies. African or Haitian AIDS. ' patient<br />

zero' type characteristics. supcrbugs transmitting the virus through bites. Land] hundred-<br />

year-old AIDS cases" (Golds tein 2(X)..t, 77). and arguments over where AIDS came from<br />

and who is to blame for it parallel simi lar speculations about "the bubonic plague.<br />

smallpox. syphilis. and ...influenza" (Go ldstein 200·t, 78). It is the purpose of this chapter<br />

to explore the simi larities between these narrat ives- primarily between AIDS and SARS.<br />

though other diseases will not be ignored-pointing out how. in many cases. the<br />

narratives arc so analogous as to make it seem that the differenceslie o" ly in the name of<br />

the disease .<br />

Wc begin with a look at AIDS. Being a disease that has made newspaper<br />

headlines for a quarter of a century. it should come us no surprise that AIDS has spawned<br />

more origin theories than would comfortably fit in even a largish book. And there have<br />

been dozens ofthese largish books published about them. Goldstein' s 011('(' Upon tl Virus<br />

contains a litany of etiolog ical legends. and the bibliographic entries in chapter 4 of that<br />

hook alene constitute an extraordinary panoply of sources. Specifically. Gold stein states<br />

that there have been three main theories concerning the origins of AIDS :<br />

I. that AIDS has developed from a natural disease previously existing only in<br />

some other species of animal. which has recently managed to infect humans thus<br />

triggering the epidemic ... : 2. that AIDS has developed from a much older human<br />

disease not previously noted by science. either because it has always been<br />

confined to a small group with an acquired immunity or because it has only<br />

recently become virulent...: [nndl J. that AIDS is a man-made virus manufactured<br />

either accidentally or deliberately in a laboratory. (Go ldstein 2(X)..t. 80)<br />

146


Bonnie Blair O'Connor' s Healing Tradition... while primarily focusing on the alternative<br />

medicinal responses of the public to AIDS, still mentions the belief.. that I) the di..ease<br />

came from God, whether as a punishment (as in for the gay communit y as penalty for the<br />

licentiou..ness of their lifestyle) or a test of faith. and 2) the disease is the result of<br />

witchcraft practiced again..t the inflicted. including action.. of "evil spirits, demons, the<br />

Devil and witches" ( 1995. 152). Paula Treichler, in How 10 Ha ve Theory ill tJll Epidemic.<br />

notes humankind's continued attempts to blame AIDS on ..omecne else: African<br />

countries blaming other African countries: the U.S. blaming Africa; Ru....ia considering<br />

the di..ease a foreign problem attributable to the CIA or Africa: Caribbean and American<br />

peoples believing the disease came from U.S. biological testing: and the French saying it<br />

originated from an American pollutant (1999. 29-30). Patricia Turner's 1993 / Heard /t<br />

lIIrougll tile Grapevine: Rumor in Afr ican American Cutture disc usses the beliefs held by<br />

African-Americans that AIDS was created as a CIA biowcapon (mirroring thc Russian<br />

belief noted in Treichler), and Gary Alan Fine has extens ively discussed "the allegations<br />

that government conspiracies exist to create or spread the IIIV virus" (2(X)5, 5). So<br />

numerous arc AIDS ..origins" that early attempt ... (0 categorize the supposed sources alien<br />

referred to them as the "4 Hs": homosexuals (especially men), hypodermic needles.<br />

hemoph iliacs, and Haitians (sec Bennett 2005a. 128-9).<br />

Many (If these narratives share threads of conspiratorial paranoia. There arc<br />

numerous examples of stories that revolve around notions of purposeful germ warfare,<br />

where man-made bill-weapons have been set upon certain ethnicitics. countries, and even<br />

age groups. Paul Smith. in '''AIDS- Don' t Die of Ignorance'; Exploring the Cultural<br />

147


Co mplex of a Pandemic: ' summarizes exa mples of what he calls a "whole belief system<br />

which focuses on how AIDS developed : ' some of which include that it ",; .is an out-of-<br />

contro l germ warfare virus... it has been put in the fluoride in our water.. .1and) in the<br />

U.S.A.. the Centre for Disease Control put it in K-Y Jell to get at all the homo...exua ls"<br />

( 1990.7-1). Another example of this line of thought can be found in Vanessa Gamble's<br />

"Under the Shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans ami Health Care:' published in the<br />

American Journal of Public Heahh, in which appears the following:<br />

Beliefs about the connection between AIDS and the purposeful destruction of<br />

African Americans should not be cavalierly dismis sed as bizarre and paranoid .<br />

They are held by a significan t number of Black peop le. For exa mple. a 1990<br />

survey conducted by the Southern Chris tian Leaden-hip Conferencefound that<br />

35% of the 1056 Black church members who responded believed that AIDS was a<br />

form of genocide. (1997. 1775)<br />

The beliefs of these respondents. by the way. are justified by history: one of the more<br />

infamous experiments in the la...t one hundred years wa ... the 1932-1972 Tuskegee<br />

Syphilis Study. " in which [-lOO ) African American men who had syphilis were studied to<br />

follow the natural course of the disease. without being given any information about it nor<br />

any trcutmcnt even after antibiotics became avuilublc" (Whatley & Henken 2000. 83).<br />

Thus. for African Americans. believing in AIDS as a bio-weupon could be seen as little<br />

more than a shift in terminology.<br />

Again. AIDS is not the only disease other than SARS to boast etiological legends.<br />

nor arc such legends confined 10 modem epidemics. Pre-Revolutionary France' s houts<br />

with plague. and the nineteenth century's cholera problems generated many accusations<br />

of "voluntary spreaders of the illness. poisoners of fountains. greasers of doo r knobs.<br />

perverse doctors. nurses or grave diggers. killing vaccincc'' tncrce 2003. as quoted in<br />

148


for seve ral pages, but it is not my intention to give an exampic of every type of<br />

etiological legend found in the history of disease, nor is it to re-hash what has already<br />

been discussed at length by numerous authors. It is my intention to demo n..trate in this<br />

chapte r that SARS is abo bursting with story. and has many of the same tales told of it<br />

that other disea ..cs share . I am not. it should be made clea r. claiming that there i... a SA RS­<br />

relate d narrative that corresponds to any given narrative from any given di...ea ...e. I am<br />

..taring that SARS has. in its short life. gained a number of etio logical legends. all of<br />

which hear striking rese mblances to those narrative .. found in other diseases.<br />

I collected origin narrat ives from the Internet. from published news sources. and<br />

from perso nal interv iew... in the course of my researc h. Few of these narratives are ... irnilar<br />

at the sentence level- meaning that individual details vary widely and little resemble<br />

those found in other narratives-c-but at the story level they fall mainly under three<br />

headings: "Conspiracy Theories." "Experiments Gone Wrong" (recog nizing the oft-times<br />

thin line that can separate these 1\\'0 categories). and "Animal Origins:'<br />

In fact. I have so few concrete examples thai do not ti t into these categories that<br />

only one seems discussable: that SARS is extraterrestrial in origin. This theory comes<br />

from Cardiff University' s Chandra Wickramasinghe and lute astronomer Fred Hoyle. The<br />

story-repone d in the British tabloid Tile Slin-is that SAR S is an outer-space microbe<br />

that entered Earth' s atmosphere via a cornet or meteorite. This is actually an extension of<br />

a long-debated and non -mainstream scientific theory known as "panspe rmia:' or the<br />

hypothesis that life on Earth began from an extra-solar source. What is perhaps most<br />

interesting about this origin theory is that it did gain some cred it in the scientific<br />

150


community: microbiol ogist Milton Wainwri ght from Sheffield Univers ity has stated that<br />

the expansion of the SARS virus appears to follow general schemes laid down by<br />

panspermic theor ists.<br />

In an email to MSNBC' s Cosmic Log, Brig Klyce of the Cos mic Ancestry<br />

Website furthers his hel ief in Hoyle and Wickra masinghe's hypothesis, writing that the<br />

two scientists "proposed that the link betwee n new flus and China was caused hy the jet<br />

stream's bump over the Himalayas a long time ago... I think it's quite plausible, and<br />

could acco unt for the SA RS epidemic as well" (Boyle 2003). Klyce likens the spread of<br />

SARS to that of the Spanish Flu. which "first struck soldiers in outdoo r training camps in<br />

the Midwest. Later, it struck around the world almost simultaneo usly. but took weeks to<br />

travel from N.Y. to Boston ... And it spread to isolated indiv iduals who never carne into<br />

contact with any infected perso n" (Boyle 2003).<br />

Also interesting in relation to this is a statement from Francis Plumm er, d irector<br />

of Canada's National Microbiology. who voices his doubts concerning the corona virus<br />

origin of SARS. Plummer' s statements, made in April of 2003, revealed that labora tory<br />

work had onl y been able to find evidence of the SARS microbe in 40 % of Canada's<br />

SA RS patients, and that some who tested positive for SA RS showed no symptoms (Boyle<br />

20(3 ). Plummer' s work was later prove n incorrect, with more advanced testing resulting<br />

from better knowledge of the disease. hut suc h state ments seemed on ly to fuel the "SA RS<br />

from the stars" move ment for a short time.<br />

When it comes to conspiracy theories and experiments gone wrong. however.<br />

SARS hulgcs at the scams. Even the acro nym by which the disease is referred to has been<br />

151


appropriated in the popular medium to fit in with conspiratorial musings. the letters said<br />

to sta nd for "Saddarn's Aweso me Retaliation Strategy" instead or-Severe Acute<br />

Respiratory Syndro me" (Glazer 2(03). While this appropriation seems to be done most ly<br />

for humorous reasons- as an SMS, or Sho rt Message Service, joke-it still demonstrates<br />

the possibilities inherent in conspiracy. A IDS. too, has such acronymic exam ples: in<br />

1986, young men in Zaire rewrote "S IDA," the Frenc h word for AIDS, to stand for<br />

'''Syndrome lmaginairc pour Dccoumgcr l'Am our " (Imaginary Syndro me to Discourage<br />

Love)" (Wha tley & Henken 2000, 82). The motivatio n beh ind this was twofold. some<br />

believing "that Europea ns were using stories of an imaginary disease to discourage<br />

Africans from being lovers and that (their] motivation stemmed from jea lousy:' wh ile in<br />

America. African-American communities used much the same redefinition to disc uss a<br />

belief that they were being given misinformation 10 prevent them from reproducing<br />

(Whatl ey & Henken 2000, 82).<br />

The appropriation of the SARS acronym does not see m to be the result of any real<br />

fear of Middle-Eastern retaliation (even the one that directly refere nces Saddam Hussein<br />

seems more humoro us than fearful). but there are other conspiracy theories that do appear<br />

to stem from genuine concern. and these range from concerns over govern mental control<br />

to fears of biowca pons. An excellent exam ple of the for mer comes from the website<br />

"Educate- Yourself: ' which contains a section on "E merging Diseases." In this, the<br />

author-"Montalk"-specifically states that SA RS is "simply part of a hostile agenda<br />

imple mented by the world's political and military elite to keep earth's population locked<br />

dow n and under cont rol" (Mo ntalk 2(03). Discussions of the methodo logies implemented<br />

152


y the gove rnment to enable such an outcome center around the extreme measures taken<br />

by health officials to prevent mass outbreaks in Toronto in 2003. Montalk ' s view.<br />

however. is that SARS was not dangerous at all, but was promoted as such by the<br />

governmcnt-with the help of tile WHO-to "tenderize" the public into "acce pting<br />

increasingly restrictive cur bs upon their freedoms" (Montalk 2(03). This SARS "test<br />

run," as Montalk refers to it. was a means by which the Ameri can gove rnment could pass<br />

laws that wou ld allow them to quarantine anyone suspected of being infected , as well as<br />

lockdow n entire cities- laws that could be reinforce d at any time with only the slight est<br />

"clev er media hype of any manufactured disease" (Montalk 2003). The entire Toronto<br />

epidemic is furthermore cla imed to be nothing more than a test-targeting exercise in<br />

economic destruction (thoug h the webpuge does not state why the US gove rnment would<br />

specifically target a Canadian city for this purpose).<br />

This. however, is not the only SARS conspiracy theo ry fo und on this wcbpage.<br />

One of the other two examples relates to a larger concept of disease being the possible<br />

result of "v ibrational frequencies" broadcast to a target popu lation via "audio or<br />

microwave subliminals'' (Montalk 2(X)3). This theory does fit into the "fear of<br />

bioweapon" category, Montalk stating at length that:<br />

Because one' s mental and emotional states playa large part in immuni ty. these<br />

subliminal programming techniques would merely have to implant nega tive<br />

tho ughts and emotions in order to pry open a gap in a person ' s awareness for<br />

viruses to then successfully invade the physical bod y. Also. through sheer hysteria<br />

psychosomatic illness can result. a phenomenon which I don 't do ubt has played a<br />

hand in Asian SARS cases. (Montalk 2003. emphasis in original)<br />

The webs ite is not d ear on who is broadcasting these signals. or their purpose in do ing<br />

so. The only hint comes from a suggestion that wc arc all "s upporting the medical<br />

153


..ocicty" by watching television- the prima ry tool used to broaden..t these vibrat ional<br />

frequencics.<br />

The ..econd con..piracy theory forwarded by Montalk entails "chenurails,·· or<br />

chemicals that the military has been sprayi ng in our «kic.... ince. accord ing to Educa te­<br />

Yourself. 1998. Visible as vapor-trail-appearing ..treaks of white in the sky. Montalk<br />

claims these chemtrails contain many harmful sub..tancc.. purpo ..ely placed there by the<br />

military . including "immune suppres ..ing chemicals. such a.. ethylene dibromide...radar<br />

and microwave reflective metallic sub..tance (sicI. like barium or aluminum...dielectric<br />

hollow polymer fibers ... land) viral and bacterial vectors remnants [vic] of genetic<br />

engineering and replication procedures used to construct the pathogen ic vectors:' the<br />

ultimate purpo ..e of which is to "sup press human evo lution on a physica l. mental. and<br />

spiritua l level" by performing "tge ne thera py' upon targeted popu lation.. by spraying<br />

them with viral vectors capab le of shutting down the DNA activa tion process in those<br />

infected" (Montalk 2(03). SA RS is not specifica lly stated in this sect ion as being the<br />

re..ult of chcmtrails. but it seems clear that the author docs link the two in terms of the<br />

immune-suppressing effects of the chcmtruil chemicals: we contract SARS because our<br />

immune syste ms have been artificially lowered to sub-s tandard levels .<br />

Not all SARS-re lated co nspiracy theories exhibit the same leve l of organization­<br />

specific blame and paranoia us do those of Montalk. In fact. concern over the vague<br />

nature of the virus was so wides pread in the early ..tagc of the disease that "healt h<br />

officia ls were initially forced to que ll consp iracy theor ies about SA RS being an act of<br />

terrorism" or biological warfare ("SARS outbreak... ·· 2003). a fact noted in a high-profi le<br />

154


Australian newspaper. And while some of these rumors did place the blame for the virus<br />

on a specific source, others left the question open-ended. or merely pointed fingers in the<br />

general direction of a geographical region, such as the Middle East or Avian continent.<br />

An exce llent exa mple of this latter fonn of non-specific blaming comes from a<br />

blog entitled "SARS Paranoia: ' wherein the author refutes rumors of the virus being<br />

man-made and a biological weapon. The rumor in question quotes Nikolai Filarov. head<br />

of Moscow' s epidemiological services . who gives the following as grounds for SARS<br />

being man-made: "the composition of SARS is unkown [sic] ... there is no vaccine<br />

available for SARS ... 'The virus. according 10 Academy of Medicine member Sergei<br />

Kolcsnikov. is a cocktail of mumps and measles, whose mix could never appear in<br />

nature?' (Cindy 2003). Nowhere is there a mention of who or which organiza tion could<br />

have masterminded such a fusion of diseases-simply an announcement that it couldn' t<br />

have been done without man' s help.<br />

Astutely, the author of this article-"Cindy"-points out firstly that the<br />

compos ition of SARS is known. presenting the reader with a link to a .pdf document of<br />

the virus's genome. and secondly, makes a direct comparison of this conspiracy theory to<br />

a mid· 1980 ·s rumor that the government had released a "gay" virus (i.e . AIDS) into<br />

bathhouses to rid the "mid of homosexuals. "Of course," she says, "that wasn't the case.<br />

If H1V had gotten as much publicity in it's [sic] first six months of known infection, we<br />

might have a cure by now. Personally, I have a greater fear of coming down with a plain<br />

old cold then [sic ] of contracting the SARS virus" (Cindy 2003). Regardless of the<br />

dubitable nature of the HIV-publicity claims. it is very apparent that by the time this blog<br />

155


wax publi shcd-c-v May 2003-SARS-a,,-con"piracy was already entrenched in the public<br />

consciousness. and at least a few peo ple were noticing similar ities betwee n these new<br />

narratives and those they 'd heard abo ut other diseas es.<br />

A seco nd exam ple of this non-specif icblaming cernes from The Rumor Mill<br />

News Reading Room . In an art icle ent itled "S ARS Kills 50% Patient" Over 65 - Perfect<br />

Age-Specific w eapon," the author-c-t'Jzakovic't-c-bcgms by Quoting legitimate WHO<br />

data showing that the SAR S deat h rate was higher than origina lly estimated , and<br />

mortality rates varied by age: "50 % for patients of 65 years or older , 15i}. for peop le from<br />

45 -64, 6'K for patient s from 25-W, and below 1% for patients old (sic ) 25 years or<br />

young er" (Izakovic 2003). Furth er legitimate data is then presented in the fonn of<br />

summarizations of studies publi shed in the UK medical jo urna l The Lancet. which found<br />

that the SARS "co rona virus (sic) samples collected from patients do not show the<br />

mutation s and are remarkably stable" (Jzukovic 2003 l, though lzekovic docs not make<br />

the nature of these mutat ions clear. What he docs clea rly summarize arc The Lancet-<br />

reporte d findings that the stability of the virus poin ts to the strong possibi lity of a viable<br />

vacc ine bein g soon developed.<br />

From this poin t in lzakovics thread, speculation takes over, and I find it<br />

necessary to repr int the entirety of his three-para grap h conclusio n, exac tly as it appears in<br />

his essay :<br />

From this report it is clear that SAR S is not a Chinese bioweapon designed<br />

to target enemy forces becau se it. practically, docs not affect popu lation below 25<br />

which makes bulk of any armed forces. Even co mmanding structure thai is made<br />

most ly of people under oWis safe without any specia l measures.<br />

156


On the other hand, stab ility of virus shows that it is ne t a natural mutat ion<br />

and allows for secure vaccine for those in targeted age group that must not<br />

become victims.<br />

Sta bility and age specific death rate. an perfect weapon for age selective<br />

cu lling of older popu lation world -wide . (Izakovic 2003. errors in original)<br />

Again . there is no specific mention of the origin of the virus-simply that it cou ld not<br />

have been natura lly formed . Interestingly. lzakovic' s website . www.deep..pace-t.com.<br />

mention.. not only the chcmtrails-us-disea ..e-origin theory spoken of by Montalk. but the<br />

theory that A IDS was developed by the U.S. government as a method of thinning the<br />

black population-another example of a sing le author using roughly the same narrati ve to<br />

describe multiple disease origins.<br />

So far. the examples I have used implement non-specifi c blame -that is. they say<br />

that while someo ne some where i.. clearly responsible. the authors either do not know<br />

who m to blame. or decline to specula te. There are. however . equally as many exam ples<br />

that do point a figurative finge r at a specific gro up.<br />

The first exam ple here comes aga in from the Rum or Mill News Reading Room .<br />

and is actually a respon se to Montal k' s discussions of chcmtr ails. On the 29 th of<br />

Decemb er. 2(Xn, "Hobie" posted an article declaring that viruses arc in fad so lvents: that<br />

man-made chemica ls in our environment arc causing disease, Hobic' s information co mes<br />

from an article by "A ajun os [sic: actua lly Aajo nus ] Vondc rplanitz," in which this author<br />

cla ims that viruses don't dest roy ce lls. they merely show up whe n ce lls are destroy ed. and<br />

exist primari ly as so lvents that "ca rry toxins into the bloods tream for disposal" (Hobie<br />

2(03). Hobie furthe r quotes an ankle by Jim West. who state s: "The orthodox SA RS<br />

paradigm completely omits and amid.. tox icology for good reason: SA RS disease<br />

157


symptoms are ident ical to pesticide and air pol lution disease symp toms. And these<br />

poisons co rrelate in time and place with SAR S epidemics' (Hobie 2(03).<br />

The po inted finge r in this art icle is found later in the extensive quo te from J im<br />

Wes!"s article: airlines are the ones responsible for the outbreak. The reason'? " Airlines<br />

routinely apply pest icides 10 airpla nes. especially tho..e on A..ian routes" (Hobie 2(03),<br />

and the..e pesticides are causing people to become ill. AI least part of West' s claim can be<br />

co nfirmed: a CDC "Travelers' Healt h' release doc s ..tate Ihut many countries requ ire<br />

disinfection of inbound flights. and that the acceptable methods of d i..infecting planes arc<br />

to "eit her spray the aircraft cabin with an aero ..olized insectici de (usually 2% phenothnn)<br />

while passen gers are on boa rd. or treat the uircraft -s [sic ] interior surfaces with a resid ua l<br />

insect icide while the aircraft is em pty" (Ce nters 2006), Thi s C DC release doc s note that<br />

so me flight crew member s have repo rted reac tions 10 the spraying-rashes, lung<br />

irritat ion s. tingling and numbness of extre mities-c-but is qui ck to note "there are no data<br />

10 suppo rt a cause-a nd-e ffec t relation ship" (Cen ters 20(6). und that the WHO declared<br />

this method of disinfection safe in 1995.<br />

A sec ond example of a bla me-specific cons piracy theo ry-agai n from the Rumo r<br />

Mill New s Read ing Roo m-s-comes from author "Rayclan." whose chose n title for his 28<br />

A pril 2003 article details many of the und erl ying issues : " Is SA RS the Bio-Wecpo n I<br />

Was Told Ab ou t in the Early 90s?" Rayelan hegins his article by quo ting from legitima te<br />

news sources such as the Birmingham Post-Herald. who stated in an article " It may he<br />

thai some indi vid uals have a ge netic qu irk that makes them more efficient spreaders of<br />

the virus. some have said, Ot hers specula te that some ethnic or environmental difference<br />

158


may acco unt for the hot spo ts" (Raye lan 2(03). A seco nd quote from a legitimate source<br />

comes from the journal Science, which has a detailed paper in its March 1997 edition<br />

concerning a successful ge netic reco nstruction of the virus responsible for the 1918 flu<br />

ep idemic that killed betwee n 20 and 40 million peo ple worldwide. Usi ng information<br />

such as this, Rayelan bui ld!'> an hypothesis that SA RS is, in fact. the newly-cultured 1918<br />

flu virus. and has been genetically altered to infect primarily people of Asia n desce nt.<br />

From here, Rayelan reminds us that many of the North American peoples might<br />

have Asia n DNA as well, as a Disco very Channel program he recen tly watc hed sugges ted<br />

that Nort h, Central and South Amer ica might have been settled by Asia n peoples cross ing<br />

the "Alutian [vic ] Islands" during the last Ice Age. Thus, it is en tirely possi ble that man y<br />

North Ame ricans who do not appear to have any Asian blood in them will be affecte d by<br />

the virus. and so SARS might be part of what Rayclan terms "The Great Dying"; an<br />

Arma geddon -like scenario in which four-fifths of the world's popu lation per ish. Unde r<br />

this scenario, SA RS migh t only be the first in a series of viral waves sent crashing again st<br />

the shores of humanity (Rayela n 20(3)"<br />

Those responsi ble for these viral waves varies, dependi ng largely (apparently) on<br />

who and how man y arc affec ted: if the virus stays mainly within China's borders, then it<br />

was released there by the United Slates in an attempt to slow the progress ion of China' s<br />

economic and politica l importance. However. if thc virus spreads to other nation s and<br />

proves fatal for mill ions, then it was created and released by what Rayelan terms the<br />

"NWO"-New Wor ld Ord er- whose purpose is to weaken the wor ld's population to the<br />

poin t where no nation will be able to withstand the installment of a "One Wor ld<br />

159


Government" For reasons not fully fleshed out in this article. Rayclan claims that China<br />

and the former Sov iet Union are the primary members of this New World Order. and<br />

their main target is the United States-the only nation strong enough to withstand their<br />

geopo litical advances.<br />

A conspiracy theory that in many ways echoes the cataclysmic suspicion present<br />

in Rayelan' s narrative comes from Dr. Leonard Horowitz. DMD. MA. MPH . Dr.<br />

Horowitz' s contributions to these proceedings are in many ways singular. for he brings to<br />

the table not only an impressive list of degrees. but is a Harvard graduate in public health.<br />

an "expert in the fields of medical sociology. behav ioral scienc e. and emerg ing diseases"<br />

(Horowitz 2()()..1). and claim s ten bestsell ing books on the subjects of conspiracy . In the<br />

latest of these works. Emerging Yiruses: AIDS c..


simi lar to what Rayclan ment ions: that their "likeliest purpose is in facilitating evol ving<br />

eco nomic and politic al agendas that ultimatel y includ e targe ting approx imately hal f the<br />

worl d's cu rrent population for elimination" (Horowi tz 20(4). This is a requ ired step in<br />

achiev ing globa l domination beca use a sma ller. more frightened popu lation is easie r to<br />

con trol: as Dr. Horowitz poin ts out. we have already learned via the Homeland Security<br />

Act that popu lations under duress are more likely to agree to limitations in freedom in<br />

exchange for grea ter protection-i.e. governmental power and control.<br />

Not all blame-specific conspiracy theories exhibit this level of cataclysmic<br />

paranoia. Th e last two examples in this sect ion are rather mild in compari...on to<br />

Rayela n' s and Dr. Horo witz' s narratives. as neither of them involve glohal attem pts at<br />

wor ld domin ation . Th e first comes from the Assoc iation for Asian Research. which<br />

publi ...hcd an article in late May of 2003 co ncern ing a rumor crea ted by Beijin g of ficia ls<br />

that SARS was not Ch inese in origin. hut had in fact appeare d in the United States in<br />

Februa ry of 2002 . The rumor appear ed in at least four major Hong Kong newspape rs in<br />

early May of 2003 . at least one of which-the Well W{'; Po- is a recog nized mouthpi ece<br />

for the Chinese Communi st Part y. Accordin g 10 the rumor. an American woma n in either<br />

New Jersey or Philadelph ia (depending on the newspaper) fell ill with flu-like symptoms.<br />

then developed acute pneumonia and ex pired within hour s of hospitalization. Th e Well<br />

Wi'; Po was the chief ..ource for the transmiss ion of this rumo r, which pers isted amon g<br />

Co mmunist party officials in Hong Kong despite repen ted denials not only by the U.S.•<br />

hut by other Hong Kong newspape rs. some of who m accurat ely repo rted thai the U.S.<br />

ca...e was not SARS. but meningitis. The rumo r even made its way to the Guangdong<br />

161


provin ce, where Provincia l Governor Huang Huahua ment ioned the 2002 Amer ican-<br />

based case of "SARS" during a governmental meetin g in earl y May (Lin 2003).<br />

The last case of a blame-specific conspiracy theory comes from the interview I<br />

conducted with Angel Lim in Jul y of 2005:<br />

Angel: Yeah. I had a friend. we used to get together during Satur day. and<br />

he used to tell me, told me once that SARS originated from the States. the U.S­<br />

The reaso n is because Canada is not a friend o f U.S. Like. when they go to war in<br />

Iraq, Canada didn't go to war to Iraq with the U.S. So that's why the U.S. hates<br />

Canadian. So they produce this SARS to kill some people in Canada.<br />

Jon: Okay. And the seco nd part of that had to do with the Philippines.<br />

Angel: Oh . the Philip pines. yes. He also told me that the Philip pines is<br />

very close to China . and also very close to Hong Kong. And. I think there's only<br />

two people died during the SARS outbreak. right? And aga in. the reason is only<br />

two people has d ied is because the Philippines and the U.S. arc friends. And that's<br />

the reason too.<br />

Jon: So [in] both of these. the U.S. is almost trying 10 get reven ge on the<br />

Canadian s.<br />

Angel: Yes. yes. Right. right. (laughs)<br />

Jon: And because the Philippines are good friends with us. we protect<br />

them .<br />

Angel: Very good friends. yes. They are protected . (200 5)<br />

Echoed in Angel' s narrat ive are many of the concerns that have fueled the conspiracy<br />

theories we have looked at in this chapter: distrust of governments and overly-powerful<br />

organizations, fear of the unknown , conce rn over OIlC ' S own mortality (as well as friends<br />

and family). and apprehen sion at the loss of persona l privacy, all intermingled with points<br />

of blame and counterblamc.<br />

The final category of etiolo gical legends is "Animal Origins ." Diane Gold stein<br />

gives us a succinct summary of the types of beasts that have been assoc iated with the<br />

spread of the A IDS virus: .....monkeys of various types. regional origins. and colors<br />

(African green monk eys, blue monkeys. red monk eys, green-eyes monkeys.<br />

162


house cats and ferrets were named as potent ial spreaders of the di..ease. And still the list<br />

grew: in January of 2()()..l. in response 10 the threat of a new outb reak. Guangzhou<br />

officials ordered exterminators to sweep the city' s ..trccts clean. focusing especially on<br />

rats. cockroaches. Flies, and mosquitoes. Finally. at the same lime. government officials<br />

also banned the breeding. sale. distribution. and consumption of civet cat, raccoon dog.<br />

and badger.<br />

My interviewees were also asked if they had heard any origin stories concerning<br />

SARS. Only four of them recollected any of these that involved animals. and they were<br />

surprisingly unified : all four narrati..es circulated around China 's exotic animal markets.<br />

Three of those four interviewees-Angel and Rosita Lim. and Seny Zamora-s-even<br />

specifically ment ioned the civet cat as the animal associated with the spread of the virus."<br />

The fourth interviewee. Jennifer Lim. had this to say: " 1think the one that stayed with<br />

me. with regards to the origin. was that it came from animals. that it had to do with<br />

the...dose contact with exot ic animals in China. like monkeys or geese or something like<br />

that. Just exotic animals. that they were being eaten. or that they were being kept as pets.<br />

or for medicinal uses" (Lim. Jennifer 2(05). Later in the same interview. Jennifer<br />

defended her belief in these narratives by comparing their veracity 10 established fact<br />

concerning the origins of other diseases:<br />

Just because.. .I guess Ebola I think has been sort of linked with monkeys. if I' m<br />

correct, and that I think I sort of also know thai there are certain viruses or<br />

diseases that run through anima l!'. and don't affect them, but then due 10 the sort of<br />

l'l Technicall y. Angel and Rosita said "c ivet rats" and Scny said "cavot cat:' bUI il seems<br />

obvious that they all meant "ci..'et cat," the errors in termino logy no doubt due to my<br />

a..king them in 2005 to recollect the name of an animal they probably hadn't heard in<br />

over a year.<br />

ItH


inc..reas ingly. increasing contact betwee n humans and animals, that we're all of a<br />

..uddcn being expo ..cd to things that have, that might lay dormant in animals. but<br />

..omc how affec t us differently. (Lim. Jenni fer 20( 5)<br />

So while my informa nts ultimately only ca me up with a few sources . they do seem<br />

unified in their ideas. no doubt the result of having hea rd this information from the local<br />

media . And at least one of tho..e informants recognizes that her narrat ive has been shaped<br />

hy her exposu res to simi lar narratives abou t other diseases.<br />

The purpose of this cha pter has been to point out the similarities between these<br />

etiologica l legends. both within a single epidemic ..uch a.. SARS and aero....the disea ..e<br />

spec trum . II ...hou ld be clear afte r these investigation.. that diseasc-relatcd con ...piracy<br />

theories and animal orig in legends do indeed share much in common, and that many of<br />

the narratives found withi n a single epidem ic c1o...ely resemble narratives thai have<br />

sprung from other infectious outbreaks.<br />

There is one final point that can be made co ncerni ng the narratives exa mined<br />

here. While SARS and AIDS legends do share much in common. there is at least one<br />

critical d ifference: while the conspiracy theories that arc ..ccn with other diseases arc<br />

relevant and similar to the ones that are found with SARS, SA RS docs have speci fic<br />

characteristics that shape those theori es in spccificways. being that it waxed and waned<br />

with such rapidity that it becam e diffi cult to ide ntify a potent ial target group. SARS was<br />

never prese nt on a global scale long enough to be directly linked to one group of peo ple,<br />

a fact reflected in the ever-shifting "targets" mentione d in co nspiracy theories: SA RS was<br />

created to kill the elder ly; SARS was created to kill the Chinese ; SARS was crea ted to<br />

kill Canadians: SA RS was created to kill everyone. In contrast. A IDS, in its early stages.<br />

165


was linked almost exclusively to the homosexual popula tion. creat ing a direct sense of<br />

"target:' if not "creator" (though this. too. could he argued as definite. considering the<br />

num ber of legends surrou nding the divine origin of AIDS). The amorphousness of the<br />

legends present in SA RS may be due to the sense that the d isease never had a chance to<br />

run its full course : even into the summer of 2()()..J. newspapers were still running stories<br />

about the big outbreaks of SA RS expected during the upcoming winte r-e-ourbreak s that<br />

never came , Whatever the cause. the effect was definite : a series of conspiracy theorie s<br />

that stumble over each other-and somet imes them selves. as with Rayelan' s narrative ­<br />

in attempts to place blame and merit. The consequent multiplicity of potentially targeted<br />

peoples. while confusi ng. does by itself revea l an interesting under lying facet of<br />

conspiracy theories : that even if there is not a clear sense of who is being targeted. there<br />

is always a passio n for the conspiracy itself.<br />

166


Cha pter 5: We Gat her Toget her: SARS and Pub lic Space<br />

The common threads between SARS narratives and the genre of contemporary<br />

legcnd as a whole arc not limited to AIDS. or to diseases in general. While the previo us<br />

chapter focused on etiological legends and the commonali ties between those related to<br />

SARS and other diseases, the current chapter focuses on issues of physical locations<br />

where large numbers of people congregate. These gathering places, especially those<br />

pertaining to and involving people of Asian descent. were the nexus of many SARS<br />

narratives. providing a seeming feeding ground for public rumors. Especially releva nt are<br />

Asian food establishments. such as Toronto' s Ruby Chinese Restaurant. which collapsed<br />

financially due to rumors of a SARS -infected chef.<br />

For the purposes of this chapter . I define a gathering place as any stable business.<br />

organization. or conglomerate of smaller businesses that are fixed in space. Restaurants.<br />

marketplaces. bars. and malls fit under this definition. as de schools and hospitals.<br />

Mcagban Morris has noted exactly this in "Things To Do With Shopping Centres."<br />

wherein she states. "The use of centres as meeting places (and sometimes for free warmth<br />

and shelter) by young people. pensioners. the unemployed and the homeless is 3 familiar<br />

pan of the socia l function [of those tocatcsj -. often planned for. now. by centre<br />

management (distribution of benches. video games. security guards)" ( 1999.397). I leave<br />

aside for the moment discussions of mobile locations and businesses such as airp lanes.<br />

busses. and taxicabs. as those will be a central focus of the following chapter. Also<br />

temporarily set aside will be those buildings that cons titute integral parts of these motile<br />

167


usin esses. such as airports and bus terminals. A non-motil e gatheri ng place may thus be<br />

thought of a a buildin g or collec tion of businesses that are largel y immob ile or<br />

tempo rally table: they are located at the same phy...ical space at any point in time<br />

(ass uming the busi nesses are still viable). and do not. as a critical part of their ope ration....<br />

offer transportation services to the pub lic.<br />

Such businesses are widely prese nt in con temporary legends, and many specific<br />

exa mples of lege nds center around persons of Asian descen t- such as the numerous<br />

narra tives invo lving the d iscovery of vario us parts of rodents or domestic pets in the<br />

refrigerators or meals of Chin ese restaurants. Just as one of the unde rlying concerns<br />

present in the "Chinese Restaurant" legend (and its variants) is the con traction of disease .<br />

SARS brought abo ut the creat ion of dozens. if not hundreds of rumors conce rn ing the<br />

dangerou s potent ial ju xtaposition of large numb ers of people. Asian or otherwise. and the<br />

coronavirus. These new SARS legends not onl y bear ...triking resemb lances to the<br />

vers ions that have been around for decades. but carry the same basic warn ing: beware of<br />

other people.<br />

There arc also. as we have seen in the previou s chapters. numero us legends<br />

concerning the contraction of AIDS by an unwitting victim. One of the key differen ces<br />

between A IDS and SARS is that. while the former is almost exclusive ly co ntracted<br />

through bod ily fluid exchange- mainly blood and semen-the latter virus is airborne .<br />

and thus it is possible for a person to become infecte d by only be ing in the same physical<br />

loca tion as a carr ier. No matter how unli kely the chances of this happening (one<br />

new...letter proclaimed that the average perso n had a better cha nce of winning the<br />

168


Powcrfialllottery than of contracting SARS from standing next to a coughing strunger-c-<br />

see New Milford Visiting Nurse Assoc iation 2(03). the possibility is there. and this<br />

seems to have mutated the nature of many of the "gathering place" narratives that SARS<br />

borro wed from the contemporary legend genre.<br />

First. however. we take a look at non-SARS gathering place legends as a whole.<br />

exami ning the key features and stories that make up these narratives. An easy way to stan<br />

such an examination is through an exam ple. and so I offe r the following. being an extract<br />

from an 1888 poem titled "My Other Chinec Cook:' by James Brunton Stephe ns;<br />

"Go. do as you are bid: ' I cried. "we wait for no reply;<br />

Go ! let us have tea early. and another rabbit pic!"<br />

Oh. that I had stopped his answer! But it came out with a run;<br />

"Last-a week-a plenty pupp y; this-a week-a puppy done!"<br />

Just then my wife. my love. my life. the apple of mine eye,<br />

Was seized with what seemed "mal-dc-mcr.t'c-r'sick transit' rabbit pie!<br />

(Brunvand 1986. 102)<br />

This poem is admittedly problematic as an opening exa mple for several reasons. mainly<br />

that the action docs not occur in a gatherin g place. and there is not an explicit mention of<br />

disease as a consequence of action (though the wife' s becomin g ill after learning the<br />

species of animal she has been eating hints in that direction). However. the overt<br />

stereotyping and racism present here docs closely resemb le what might he found in a<br />

more modem version of the legend. and we still have the basic theme of Asian people<br />

serving forhidde n (by Western standards) foods to unsuspecting patrons.<br />

An example that more closely resembles the gathering-place narratives outlined<br />

above comes from author Mark Twain. who related in Chapter 50lof Roughing It . a near-<br />

encounter with rodents at the grocery store of one Mr. Ah Sing in Virginia City. Nevada.<br />

169


After sampling and enjoying Mr. Sing' s brandies. T wain and his co mpanio ns were<br />

offered "a mess of birds' -nests: also. small. neat sausages. of which we could have<br />

swallowe d several yards if we had chose n to try. but we suspected that each link<br />

contained the corpse of a mouse. and therefore refrained " (2003 . 353) . lA.G. Roberts. in<br />

Chit/a to Chinatown. offers an eve n mo re modem and exe mplary narrative. gathered from<br />

the pages of Saga staeazine. where a reader reca lls her husban d wanting 10 get Ch inese<br />

takeout despit e stories which were "rife of people who ate Chi nese food getting bones<br />

stuck in their throa ts which were later identified not as chic ken bones . but cats' or even<br />

rats' hones" (2002 . 178).<br />

These last two narratives very adequately summarize the Ch inese restaura nt<br />

legend as it has appeared for severa l decades now . Paul Smith, in The Hook ofNasty<br />

u gt'fIlJ.\'. gives what might he the ideal. Platonic form of the narrative: a group of friends<br />

arc at a Chinese restaurant enjoying their food when one of them hegins 10 choke. The<br />

victim is rushed to a loca l hospital where a surgeon removes a small hone from his or her<br />

throat. The hone is sent for analysis. and the returned report slates that it came fro m a rat.<br />

As Smith co ncludes the story, "The public health department immediat ely visited the<br />

restaur ant 10 inspect the kitchens and in the fridge they found numerou s tins of cat food ,<br />

half an Alsat ian dog and several rats all wailing to be served up" (Smith 1984. 54 ).<br />

Th e ending to this version of the story neatly tics together the mystery of tile rat<br />

bone' s ori gin with the distrust of foreig ners thai see ms to plague co mcmpo rary legends.<br />

or what Smith ca lls "our irrational fear of the unknown and exo tic imp inging on our<br />

traditional way of life" (S mith 1984. 54 ). Even bette r. Smi th's end ing gives the reader a<br />

170


sense of the true disgusting nature of Ch inese restau rants: that they not only eat rats. but<br />

dogs and cat food as well . Thi s legend. as Sm ith states. has been circulating in the British<br />

Isles since the 1950 ·s. and is well-known throu gh Europe as a whole- though the<br />

ethn icity of the offend ing restaur ateu rs docs vary. as doc s the denouement: some times the<br />

meat served to the patron s is in fact their own pet dog. coo ked up for them as the resu lt of<br />

a language harrier with a fore ign waiter who interp reted "Feed my dog" as "Feed me my<br />

dog: '<br />

In the examples given so far. the co nnect ion betwee n gathering place and disease<br />

has been inferred. for the most pan: the closest any victim has gotten to being " ill"<br />

invo lved choking or vomitin g. both of wh ich are co nditions that can he eas ily and<br />

rela tively quickly remedied . Other legend s are not so timoro us about the dangers of<br />

gathering places. A searc h in July of 2007 of snopcs.c om's index using only the word<br />

'"A IDS"' turned up at least five examples. Consider. for instance. the legends abo ut AIDS-<br />

infected needles stuck into the seats at movie theaters at just the precise angles so as to<br />

penetrate into unsuspecting patrons' derrieres. Variants of this legend that involve<br />

needles in puyphonc coin slots. or taped 10 gas pump handles wou ld also apply. if<br />

telephone booth s and gas stations are co nsidered as tempo rally-d isplaced gatheri ng places<br />

(i.c . while at any given time only one person may be occ upying the space. over the course<br />

of a da y several dozen peop le will have occupied il).7 A fourt h example (coun ting the<br />

payphon e slo t and gas pump handle variants as separa te narratives) invol ves lII V-<br />

7 For an exa mina tion of this phenomenon as recog nized and utili zed in traditional<br />

practice. sec Lynne McNeill' s upcomin g art id e "Portable Place...: Serial Co llabora tion<br />

and the C reation of a New Sense of Place" in We.\tan Folklore 66.3/4.<br />

171


pos itive blood being slipped into ketc hup dispens ers at restaur ants. and a fifth involves<br />

mv-pc sit ive semen turni ng up in the ga rlic sauce at a local pizza jo int. C learly, gat heri ng<br />

places and AIDS go hand- in-hand: what bette r way for the antagonist to infect others but<br />

to place the vim ...in a loc ation where dozens of peop le can 't help bu t come into contact<br />

with it every day? It is this same logic that might be found in legends surrounding<br />

Church's Chicken, as detailed by Patricia A. Turner in t Heard It Tlmmgh the Grapevine:<br />

that the Ku Klux Klan had put either spices or drug .. into the chicken "thai would cause<br />

..terili ty in black male caters " (1993, 139).<br />

It ..hou ld be ex plic itly stated here that the con ..cqucruial resu lts of being in a<br />

gathering place are not always inten ded. Many legends do invo lve victims coming to<br />

intentional harm at the hands of an antago nist-c-i.e. A IDS-i nfected needles left in public<br />

places-bu t others involve vict ims suffering unin tended misfort une. The Chinese<br />

resta ura nt stor ies mig ht fall und er this category, depend ing on how the story is told and<br />

where it is set. Rat s, cats, and do gs all have long and recogni zed histories as food stuffs in<br />

China-cspecially in the southern pro vinces (c.f Rob erts, J.A.G. 2002, 20)-and some<br />

restaurants in China still serve rats in modem times. as reported in the Wall Stree t<br />

JOl/rIlal in 199 1 (c.f "C hinese restaur ant rats.. :' 1994 ). It is conceivable for a Western er<br />

to wander into this resta urant and order a dish wit ho ut knowin g its nature. and the logica l<br />

reve rse of this happen s in some legends: that a Chinese cook in No rth Am erica. no t<br />

knowing that rats arc /101 eate n here. pe rhaps because he docs not speak English. simply<br />

continues to lise them in his mea ls as he has always do ne.<br />

172


It is also entirely poss ible that the relevanc y of the danger in the gathe ring place<br />

ha.. Iinle to do with disease . Many contempo rary legends detail public-space harm that is<br />

devo id of mention (or inference ) of viruses or bacteria. but specifically mention<br />

dangerous anima ls. such as "The Haple.... Waterskier: ' or "T he Incautiou.. Sw immer : '<br />

both of which involve water-sport participant .. at local lakes or ..wimmin g holes who dive<br />

or fall into a bed of water mocca sins (or some other specie.. of water-bound poisonous<br />

snake)"Also included in this category are the multipl e variant s of animal-in-store­<br />

merchandi se legend s: "The Snake in the Blanket:' "The Spider in the Yucca: ' "Spiders in<br />

Cacti:' "Snake.. in Dry Good s:' "T he Creepin g Comforter:' and "Snakes Alive'," to<br />

name a few (c.f Brunvand 1986: Brunvand :!()()..t).<br />

Finally, contemporary legend is abo full of narratives that involve non-disease ­<br />

related public-space harm caused by other human s. Because the numbers of legends that<br />

fall under this catego ry arc numerous. I will limit my exa mples to only a few. and focus<br />

specifica lly on those that occur in shop ping malls. Outside of the workplace . malls arc<br />

one of the most commonly-visited public gathering places for the general populace. The<br />

larger malls in North America arc designed to easily accommodate seve ral thousand<br />

people at any give n point in time, and even small-scale malls can comfort ably fit a<br />

hundred patrons . Such spots as these are rife for legend. It is human nature to be<br />

suspicious of those we don 't know (de Vos 1996). and in malls , we arc surrounded by<br />

scores upon scores of unfa miliar souls. any of whom may-at least in lcgcnd-c-turn out to<br />

have ulterior motive s. So it should come as no surprise that narratives such as this one<br />

have been making the round s:<br />

173


I ju...t heard on the radio about a lady that was asked to sniff a bottle of<br />

perfume that another woman was selling for S8.00 (In a mall parking lot). She<br />

told the story that it was her last bottle of perfume that sells for S49.00 but she<br />

was getting rid of it for only S8.00. sound legitimate?<br />

That's what the victim thought. but when she awoke she found out that her<br />

car had been moved to another parking area and ...he was missing all her money<br />

that was in her wallet (total of S800.(XJ). Pretty sleep for a ...niff of perfume!<br />

Anyway. the perfume wasn't perfume at all. it was some kind of ether or<br />

strong substance to cause anyone who breathes the fumes to black out. (Brunvand<br />

200-t 245)<br />

The protagoni ...t's ultimate motive in thi......tory-rubbery-is fairly benign . when<br />

compared to some of the other fates that befall people in ...hopping malls. Take. for<br />

examp le. the following plots of legends: women getting abducted after being lured into<br />

the parking lot with promises of cash and fame if they' ll appear in a comme rcial being<br />

filmed outside: ankle-slashers hiding under people's cars; the man who helps fix the<br />

woman's mysteriously Oat tire turns out to have a knife and length of rope in his<br />

briefcase: ...mall girls go rni...sing. to be found a half-hour later drugged. disguised. and<br />

being smuggled out of the mall to be sold into white slavery rings: and a small hoy goes<br />

missing. to be found minutes later in the bathroom. surrounded by black gang members<br />

who have kidnapped him so they can castrate him. The list could extend for page...and<br />

pages.<br />

What is clear. however. is that gathering places arc commonly equated with<br />

danger in contemporary legends. Nowhere is this me re present than in SARS. though it<br />

should be immediately noted that the narratives that will follow are not limited 10 the<br />

legend genre. but include hoaxes. rumor. and gos...ip: the critical commonality is the<br />

gathering place. One crucia l difference betwee n the legends that have been discussed so<br />

far in this chapter and what is 10 follow is that while the link between gathering places<br />

174


and dange r in contemporary legend may be either overt or merely suggested. and while<br />

the nature of that danger may be human. animal. or viral in origin. SARS narratives are<br />

marked by a luck of ambivalence: the danger is definite, the danger is here. and the<br />

danger is other people.<br />

As cha pter three 's timeline detailed. widespread public knowledge of the<br />

existence of SARS can be definitively traced to February zs". 2003. when an emerging<br />

Chinese disease was given its now-infamous namc. The earliest any citizen of Canada<br />

could have come into persona l contact with the disease inside that count ry was roughly<br />

two weeks later. the first reports of SARS coming from Toronto on the l-tlhof March.<br />

Two weeks after that. Chinese businesses in Toronto were already feeling the effects. An<br />

article in thc Toronto Star on the 29 th of March noted that Toronto' s Pacific Mall-North<br />

America' s largest indoor Asian shopping mall-was virtually empty. with some stores<br />

claiming sales drops of seventy percent (Oliveira 2003). This is quite a feat for a 4


March. thousands of Ontarians had been ordered into self-quarantine. and the WHO had<br />

asked Canada to begin screening passengers for SARS. Desp ite the low numbers of<br />

Canadian cases and dea ths. the public had learned from local and worldw ide<br />

governmental warni ngs that the potential for SARS was massive. and responded in kind.<br />

Part of this response included the dissemi nation of rumors. and according to mercha nts at<br />

the Pacific Mall. the sing le largest source of rumors was the Internet (Oliveira 2003).<br />

Also affected by this point in time was Toronto's Ruby Chinese Restaurant. and<br />

again the staff pointed towards email as the source of their problems : "Some lawless<br />

people spread rumours through the Internet that a staff member from our restaura nt<br />

contracted the virus:' said Frankie Lee. a spokesperson for the restaurant. " In addi tion to<br />

attacking our business' image. they cause d unnecessa ry public panic and affected the<br />

whole


placed under immediate quarantine. The hoax triggered massive and widespread panic:<br />

already frightened by the March 3'''' news that an entire apartment complex had been<br />

placed under quarantine. Hong Kong residents swept grocery store shelves dry of canned<br />

and preserved goods. and financial and stock markets plummcted-c-inc luding the Hong<br />

Kong dollar. Local authorities were forced into immediate action to counter the rumors.<br />

Director of Health Margaret Chan making a public statement that there was "no plan to<br />

declare 1I0ng Kong an infected area. We have adequate supplies to provide the needs of<br />

1I0ng Kong citizens and there is no need for any panic run on food" (Lyn 2003c) .<br />

The same day. a reporter for CNN residing in Hong Kong noted the drastic<br />

cha nges in the public that had happened in only the last week. The presence of surgical<br />

facemasks, he noted. had increased from ncar-zero to near-ubiquitous: he had even taken<br />

to wearing one. despite his initial skepticism of their usefulness. Most telling for the<br />

perception of danger in gathering places was an account from a Hong Kong friend of his<br />

who had traveled to his company's Singapore offices for business. Upon arriving. he was<br />

"politely requested' not to enter the offices. as news of his arrival hold frightened local<br />

employees (Havcly 20(3 ). In the desire to provide for the safety of those who were<br />

forced to gather in groups because of business. even the most remote possibility of<br />

infection had to be countered.<br />

Back in North America. an apparent April Fool's jo ke posted on a Massachusetts<br />

Institute of Technology website in Bou on.Massachusens. caused an uproar simi lar in<br />

nature- though not in scope-to the one in Hong Kong. The website claimed that an<br />

emp loyee of the China Pearl restaurant had been infected with SARS. and advised against<br />

177


visiting Chinatow n in general. Again. those who read the warning heeded its advice and<br />

pa....sed it on to others-though it is unclear whether that was out of belief or a simple<br />

"better safe than sorry" mindset. The effect on the Chinese community was immediate.<br />

the China Pearl restaurant's business dropping by seventy percent overnight . and other<br />

businesses in the area report ing similar damage . As one article put it. "There can actually<br />

be legal parking spaces found in Chinatown throughout the day. a clear sign that the April<br />

Fool's joke has damaged the normally bustling businc's community " ("Chinatown<br />

businesses hurt..." 2(03). Local business leaders were. after a few weeks. able to correct<br />

the situatio n. thanks in pan to a seminar conducted at the China Pearl to denounce the<br />

rumors. and fact sheets printed up by health officia l... and dissemina ted to Boston' s<br />

businesses and schools.<br />

Next door to Massachusetts. New York' , Chinatowns reported similar rumors.<br />

some of which were also attributed 10 April Fool's jo kes. Though none were considered<br />

humorou s by the business owners who were affected by them. one in particular was<br />

immediately damaging:<br />

For those of you who cal in chinatown Isic ]. plcusc be advised for that<br />

[sic ] SARS has hit that area. As of today I heard that the owner's sorus) & the<br />

enure staff of the restaurant BO KY located on Bayard st. [sic] bIt Mou &<br />

Mulberry SIS.has been infected with the SARS [sic]. The owner was infected &<br />

has passed away recently due to what have seemed to be Ilu like symptoms. I<br />

think its [vic] best that you either stay away from that area or cat in,<br />

Please pass this along for those who I might have missed. (Emery. David<br />

2(03)<br />

This rumor. circulated not only on the Internet. but by New York' s Chinese press. who<br />

had picked it up off the web. came as quite a shock to Mr. Chivy Ngo. owner of the 8 0<br />

Ky. who received condolence calls and flowers from even close friends. Though all of the<br />

178


umors were quickly dealt with. the damage had been done: the public stopped coming.<br />

Even store owners were prey to the fear. Kay Cheng. the manag er of New York ' s<br />

Exce llent Pork Cho p House. admi tted 10 a reporter thai he stayed in his house on his days<br />

off. too afraid to leave lest he catch the bug (Saulny 200 3).<br />

Businesses continued to falter around the globe as Apri l marched on. On the third<br />

day of the month, TIle AXe. an Australian newspaper. picked up a Reuters story thai<br />

carefu lly detailed the Hong Kong scenario. The picture it painted was grim : businesses of<br />

all types were being forced 10 drastical ly alter their daily routines because of customer<br />

lossc... Ca lifornia Red. one of Hong Kong' s largest karaoke bars. normal ly bust ling with<br />

activity. was forced 10 temporarily close three of its twelve outlets-s-and this after<br />

spe nding 11K S I million (US S I28.2(0) 10 disinfect the parlors. buy disposab le paper<br />

caps for thei r microphones. and publicize their clean-up efforts. Normally-crowded<br />

marketplaceslike the Causeway Bay were now pop ulated by spar..e. mask-wearing and<br />

fast-moving groups. Local gyms were nearly empty. and the few clients who did still<br />

exercise wore masks while doing so. Receipts at bars and restaurants in the trendy Lan<br />

Kwai Fong district were down by forty percent or more from the same period a year<br />

earlier- normally one of the busiest tourist seasons. as visitors come from ove rscas to<br />

watch the Hong Kong Seve ns rugby tournament. Restaurants of all types reponed so few<br />

customers that many establishments closed down their buffets to stem food spoilage.<br />

City-wide. employees worked half-shifts or took unpaid leaves of absence to avo id being<br />

laid off because of the losses. Yu Pang Chun. chairman of the Hong Kong Retail<br />

Management Associat ion. called it "the worst crisis we've had. worse than the Asian<br />

179


financial crisis. the bursting of the dotcom bubble and the 9/1 I attacks in the US" ("Hong<br />

Kongcrs shun..:· 2(03).<br />

On April 8 of 2003 . ABC News reported on the eco nomic losses in Boston. New<br />

York. and San Francisco. revisi ting many of the bu..messes reported on earlier in this<br />

chap ter. Their investigatio ns still showed wides pread fear of public places. as evide nced<br />

by mostly -em pty stores across the nation. Chinato wns in many major cities were hit<br />

especia lly hard. Boston' s Chin a Pearl restaurant was still at this point suffering from the<br />

April Fool 's jo ke mentio ned earl ier. and estimated their business was still suffering from<br />

..eventy percent losses. Surrounding stores were expe riencing a simi lar backla ..h by<br />

a....ocia tion. Across the country. San Francisco sales of ..urgical rna..h . rubbing alcohol<br />

swabs. and latex glove, were brisk. but restaurants. grocery stores and tourist shops<br />

weren' t faring well. The only positive note WJs that Chivy Ngo's Bo Ky restaurant in<br />

New York had rebounded from its initial losscs, thanks to comm unity leaders and news<br />

reports exposing the hoax (Emery. Theo 2003).<br />

April' s news also brought report s of other Asian markets suffering losses in<br />

California. The first of these arose in Sacram ento County. the rumors this time focusing<br />

on Wclco' s Fruitridge and Del Rio Avenue stores, both ow ned by brothers Jimmy and<br />

Tomm y Phong. Spread initially and predominantly by email, the hoax claim ed that<br />

Tomm y had died of SARS. his wife was in critical condition in the hospital . the<br />

employees at both stores were all infected. and police had been forced to shut the<br />

businesses down. Sacramento Count y Health Officer Glennah Troche t was quick to<br />

stym ie the rumor in an interview. noting that Sacramento Coun ty as a whole had only a<br />

180


single case of SARS. and that case I) was unrelated to any Asian market. and 2) had been<br />

handled efficiently. with the patie nt recovering well. Neverthel ess. locals began avoid ing<br />

not only the Phong brothers' businesses. but surround ing establishments as well. Hoang<br />

Van Nguyen. a resident of the area. stated that he had stopped shopping in local stores<br />

bec ause the message frightened him: "S ince this stuff is going on. I have been reluctant to<br />

go there as much as I used to" (Griffith 2003 ).<br />

The second California-related rumor sprung up several hundred miles south in the<br />

city of San Gabriel. located in Los Angeles count y. An ema il versio n of the rumor closely<br />

matches that found in relation to Mr. Ngo's Bo Ky restaurant in New York. though with<br />

different details and a longer plea for action:<br />

The SARS disease has spread to our neigh bor . Today 4·3· 2003. the police<br />

has [sic] shut down Hawaii and San Gabr iel Superm arket due to the employee<br />

somehow got hit by this virus. Also one of the chief [sic ] at Capital restaurant in<br />

Alhambra also got this virus. The Sam Woo restaurant in the FOCUS plaza was<br />

close [sic] early today to avoid getting it.<br />

Friends. please take care of yourself [sic] and your family. Avoid going to<br />

ASIAN areas !l! This is very serious about life and death and spreading them 10<br />

the love [sic] one. Pay dose attention to the Chinese newspaper and be alert about<br />

this deadly virus. Please pass this message to all of your friends so they can<br />

protect their love [sic] one too. (Emery. David 2(03)<br />

The article that covered this story-gathered from the debunking website<br />

urbante gend s.about.co m--opened its comments section with a quote from an Agence<br />

Francc-Pressc d ispatch: "Fe ar of the SARS virus is becoming a more dangerous epidemic<br />

than the disease itself:' This indeed seems true. as the article went on to note that. as of<br />

mid-April. not on ly had all of the rumors been found wanting for truth. but vno cases of<br />

SA RS [bad] been found in any Chinat own in the United States" (Emery. David 2003 ).<br />

Despite this. version s of "SARS in Chin atown! " rumors had been collected in San<br />

181


Francisco. Las Vegas. Sacramento. and Basion (Emery. David 2CMJ), as well as<br />

Honolulu. Hawaii (New Milford Visiting Nurse Association 2(03). Canada had also been<br />

hit by rumor emails at this point. of course. and the narrative popped up across the<br />

Atlantic only a few days later. when Britain' s Chinese restaurants began suffering losses<br />

in customers. prompting atleast one establishment 10 place an advertisement in a Chinese<br />

newspa per denyi ng that staff members had contracted the virus (Vasagar 2(03).<br />

This wasn' t to be the end of the SARS rumor mill's run. Possib ly the worst of the<br />

individual scenarios I collected happened at the end of April 2003. when a man at the<br />

Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital (TMHH)-already beleaguered by rumors of SARS<br />

dcaths-c-reacted to an apparently untrue story thai his wife had contracted SARS by<br />

hanging himself. TMHH staff. reacting to both the untrue SARS rumors and the true<br />

suicide rumor. attempted 10 force their way out of the hospital when authorities scaled it<br />

off to investigate the man's death. Within a matter of hours the incident was brought to<br />

the attention of a US CDC official slaying in Taiwan. who immediately reported back 10<br />

his headquarters that the entire city was "out of order." It look the intervention of Lee<br />

Luug-tcng, Deputy Director-General of the Department of Health in Taipei, to set matters<br />

straight. though that only happened after two CDC officials visited the TMHH to assess<br />

the situation (Chen 2(03).<br />

Rumors such as these spread throughou t Asia. but affected China most heavily.<br />

Hospitals in Beijing were quaranti ned on what seemed a weekly basis in April. and<br />

workers refused 10 show up for shifts. Restaurants. theaters and shopping malls stood<br />

empty. Elementary and middle schools closed for two weeks. Some universities confined<br />

182


..tudcnts to cam pu.. 10 prevent anyone from bringing in the virus. Entire villages near the<br />

city were block aded by citizens who refused to allow outsiders to enter. fearing the<br />

fKls..ibility of an outbreak. Tho se who were able left the city. and pes...ibly the count ry. So<br />

dcva...tating were the rumors and concomitant fear that by early May. Citigroup had<br />

lowered its estimate of Ch ina' s :2003 economic growth from 8% 10 6.5% ( Beech :2003).<br />

Nowhere in the world was the link betwee n gathering places and fear ..0 omnipresent.<br />

The SARS narrati ves used in this chap ter have 10 this point been gathered from<br />

media sources and the lntemet. and have been placed in a rough chrono logical order. I<br />

will ..top my examination of rumors from these sources at this point-e-bot h in this chap ter<br />

and in the SARS timeline-c-as it ...hould be obvious by now that many SA RS narratives<br />

do exhibit a correlation betwe en danger and gathering places. In addilion. most of the<br />

collec ted narrat ives from media and Internet sources thai arose after early May of 2003<br />

follow the same basic format as the examples I have already listed: empty shopping<br />

malls. grocery stores. and restaurants. most of which arc located in predo minantly Asian<br />

section.. of large cities.<br />

There i.. still one group of narratives remaining to he examined: those gathered<br />

from lily informants. Some of these narratives follow the same bu...ic format as those that<br />

have already been listed. but there are a few that ...tand out. whether they arc unique or<br />

simply excellent examples of their kind. One informant. Mike. was working as an EMT<br />

in Toronto during the outbrea k. Mike mentioned the abandone d nature of Chinato wn<br />

(though he could not recall avoiding it him...elf. nor cou ld he rememher any of his friends<br />

pllrpo..c1y not going to those areas) . but mo..t pre....ing nrc his experiences a.. a parame dic<br />

183


during this time. and how he was perceived by thc public. Some of Mike' s narratives<br />

were second-hand: stories from other medical personnel concerning patients in hospitals<br />

and nursing homes whose families did not visit them during the outbreak. But the larger<br />

number of his stories involved persona l experiences. especially when he was working in<br />

his capacity as a paramedic.<br />

Mike was quarantined in mid-March because hc had entered Scarborough Grace<br />

hospital without wearing a mask and gown. He had been authorized to do this. but was<br />

informed a fcw days later that all personnel who had not been protected. despite the<br />

authorization. were to enter into quarantine. When he returned to work "about seven-and­<br />

a-half days" later. his working environ ment "progressed sort of from wearing masks in all<br />

calls to wearing a mask and gown; up to mask. gown. gloves; then double-gow ning.<br />

double-gloving. face shields. hoods: and then other calls wc worc full Tyvck suits. so full<br />

head-to-toe. sort of like the fellows in the E.T. movie" (Larsen 2005). Aside from the hot<br />

and stifling nature of such protection. Mike commented that public reaction to medical<br />

personnel was affected dramatically by these suits: "There was sort of an air of<br />

apprehension. there was an ' I don' t know' to it. and of course media. all the footage. the<br />

transfer footage. the response footage. we're the guys outside, so we're the easiest ones to<br />

videotape. to record in our big hoods and gowns and masks. and so there' s the association<br />

there" (Larsen 2005). Additionally. Mike recalled "people... walking towards me. and<br />

crossing the street. even though I was by myself and there were no patients around. there<br />

was no one ill. Or people cover ing their face in their elbow. sort of the pit of their elbow.<br />

or holding their jacket sleeves and whatnot over their face. sort of to prevent themselves<br />

184


from breathing in ncar me" (Larse n 2005). Mike' ...mother. by simple dint of a......ocia tio n.<br />

was also treate d differently at work. as she wa...ccns tamly que...tioncd by cowo rkers and<br />

manager...as to when was the last time she had ...cen Mike. a...her answer cou ld mean<br />

po...... ible enda nge rment for peop le in her of fice bui lding .<br />

But the mo...t extreme cascs of fea r were reported to me by my interviewees Angel<br />

and Ros ita Lim. Angel freely reported being ...o concerned about contracting SARS that<br />

his fears went well beyond mere gathering place ....and included quite literally any public<br />

space out side of his house . For "around ...ix or seven month ..·· Angel and Rosita<br />

"basically... sta yed home. Like even Saturday we neve r [went] out:' and they "tried to<br />

amid peop le co ming to the house " (Lim. Angel and Rc sita 2005) as well. Angel ...eern...to<br />

have bee n the main source of these actio ns. as described by his wife : "For me. I' m not a<br />

worrier. but it affec ted me beca u...e it affecte d IAnge lI. prcu y much. beca u..c he o he.<br />

we didn' t go out anymore . He ...toc kcd up on water. He had thi...great big sign po ted on<br />

the hou ...c: ' Wa..h your hands.' (laugh) Even the children' ...friends, if they came. plea...e<br />

wash their hands" (Lim. Angel and Rosita 2(05 ). Ro...ita. however. wa...not without her<br />

ow n source...of conce rn. admittin g that ...he would have been wary to enter funeral parlor...<br />

during the outbrea k.<br />

Angel. on the other hand. offered a large list of place...he avo ided: malls, movie<br />

hou...cs, restaurants, and medical facilitie...: "So one thing. you know. I' m afraid to go to<br />

the cl inic. like if you arc sick. fike if you have colds, you would amid going to ...ce the<br />

doctor... bccuu se who knows. somebody before you has seen the doctors and left<br />

...omc thing . and then you go to see the doctors and you migh t have SARS" (L im. Angel<br />

185


and Rosita 2(05 ). Angel's avoidance of public places was made eas ier by the fact that he<br />

had reiired by this point, a fact he used to his advantage when grocery shopp ing-the one<br />

activ ity he could not avoid: .., go 10 [get] groce ries, but during not the rush hour. I try to<br />

avo id when there arc times that there are lots of peop le" (Lim, Angel and Rosita 2(05).<br />

Angel did recall a friend of his- also retired-whose fear even outstripped his own: " A<br />

good friend, he didn't go to see his barber , and he was, his hair was long and he had so<br />

many, because he was afraid" (Lim, Angel and Rosita 2(05).<br />

So great was public fear of SARS that even sneezing in a gatheri ng place war..<br />

likely to cause a react ion, as related to me by Jonathan Gou ld:<br />

I was studying at Robart' s Library at the Univers ity of Toronto, and it was a<br />

packed room, and I sneezed, and I heard a girl under her breat h at the table say,<br />

"SARS: ' this panic everyone had. And it was hard to tell how much it was just a<br />

pure jo ke on her part, if she was just goofing around, or if she really... l mean,<br />

when you' re in this enclosed space, I can imagine that, there is that kernel of fear,<br />

you know, you're kidding but. r.who knows what's around? (2005 )<br />

Jonathan ' s narrative is exemplary for its reve lation of the nature of fear. As Jeannie<br />

Thom as remarked in Featherless Chickens. lAllighillg \Yom,'", and Serious Stories.<br />

laughter can be caused by "the broaching of the taboo and emotionally charged topic of<br />

death" ( 1997, 46). Joking beha vior can co me from the same wellspri ng of emotion. and<br />

Jonathan' s remarks make this clear: was the girl who said "SA RS" really joking, or .....'as<br />

she serious? Or was it a lillie of both?<br />

Another issue that is relevant to many of the narratives presented in this chapter is<br />

that of "po pular ep idemiology:' defined by Phil Brown as "the process by which<br />

layperso ns gather scientific data and other information. and also direct and marshal the<br />

knowledge and resources of experts in order to understand the epidemiology of disease"<br />

186


(Brown 1992.269). Brown points out that a key differen ce in interpre ting disease<br />

between "professionals" and "laypcople" iiithat the ferme r focu s on d isease processes.<br />

while the latter arc more concerned with personal experiences of the illness. Thes e<br />

divergent approaches to disease often result in consi derable discord betwee n the two<br />

parties, where neither is entirely willing to meet thc other at that group 's worldvicw.<br />

Professionals are proc laimed as being too clinical and detached in their focus. while<br />

laypcople are acc used of being too unscientific and subjective . Laypco ple. howev er. can<br />

be extremely aggressive in their demand s for data. and in situations where the scientific<br />

world fails to meet those needs, they will search for data from other groups. and even<br />

create their own groups (sometim es comprised at least partially of syrnpatheric<br />

profess ionals) to conduct studies appropriate to the ir demands.<br />

Brown even presents a set of stages that arc common to popular epidemio logy.<br />

These stages reflect processes that occur during investigation , of correlations between<br />

pollutants and health effects-not diseases and health effects-but many of the stages<br />

still apply. They arc as follows:<br />

I) A group of people in a contaminated community notice separately both health<br />

effects and pollutants.<br />

2) These residents hypothesize something nut of the ord inary, typically a<br />

connection betwee n healt h effects and pollutants.<br />

3) Community residents share information. creating a common perspect ive.<br />

4) Co mmunity residents. now a more cohesive group. read abou t. ask around .<br />

and talk to government official s and scientific experts about the health effects<br />

and the putative contaminants.<br />

5) Residents organize groups to pursue the ir investigation.<br />

6) Go vernment agencies conduct official studies in response to commu nity<br />

groups' pressure. These studies usually find no association between<br />

contaminant s and health effects.<br />

7) Community groups bring in their own experts to conduct a health study and to<br />

investigate pollutant sources and pathways.<br />

187


8} Community groups engage in litigation and confrontation.<br />

9} Co mmunity groups press for corrobo ration of their findings by official expe rts<br />

and agencies. (Brown 199 2. 269·70)<br />

In the SA RS narrati ves that have been prese nted in this chapter. many of these stages<br />

appcar-c-especially if. in addition to "gov ernm ent offic ials" and "scientific expert s: '<br />

media sources are added to the list of groups con sulted and brought in by laypersons.<br />

What also needs to be made explici t is that. in many cases. there is only the need for there<br />

to he a perceived correlation between cause and effect .<br />

Unde r these criteria. the stages may be applied to SARS narratives as follows:<br />

I} A group of peop le notice separately a set of well-publicized health data<br />

associat ing SARS with people living in China. and the existe nce of local<br />

people of Asian ethnicity .<br />

2) These people hypothesize something out of the ordina ry. name ly a connect ion<br />

between SA RS and any person of Asian ethnicity .<br />

3) People share this information via oral and electronic means. creating a<br />

com mon connection and a community based around fear.<br />

4) This new community. now a more cohesive group. read s about. asks around.<br />

and talks to media sources. local officials. and other group memb ers about the<br />

correlation between Asian peoples and SA RS.<br />

5) The community reorganizes the media.....ia supply and dema nd economics.<br />

into an entity ded icated to providing infcrm ano n about Asian peop les and<br />

SARS .<br />

188


6) Gove rnment age ncies, in response to waxi ng xenophob ic pressure , issue<br />

offic ial denials of the presence of SARS in local Chinatowns and Asian<br />

neighborhoods.<br />

7) Co mmunity groups bring in further examples from their own expcrts-c-i.e.<br />

media sources and first-hand and/or "friend-o f-a-friend" testimony-to<br />

respond to the denials .<br />

8) Community groups continue to engage in confrontation with Asian peoples,<br />

mostly via avoidance of them. their busines ses, and their neighborhoods.<br />

9) Community groups may press for corroboration of their findings by official<br />

experts and agencies. but m3Yalso simply sec the dcscncdncss of Asian<br />

restau rants and neighborhoods as am ple evide nce of the verac ity of the link<br />

between Asian peop les and SARS.<br />

The comparison of SARS narratives to the rubr ic crea ted hy Brown is perhaps force d.<br />

and the resulting schema does n' t functio n as linearly as docs the orig inal. Man y of the<br />

SA RS stages may he happening simultaneously. while Brown stated that his stages<br />

usually occurred sequentially. Th is is largely beca use Brown is writing about a situation<br />

where the perceived connection between health effec ts and po llutants turned out, on<br />

officia l exa minati on, to he an actual connect ion. As such, he docs not co nsider the<br />

rami ficat ions to his set of stages that would co me from the co nnection being proven false.<br />

In othe r words. his stance does not dea l with false -positive narratives, and thus he is<br />

never forced into a situation where his theo ries must take into account why disease<br />

narratives can exist despite their incorrectness. What comes from taking such factors into<br />

189


acco unt is a realization that disease narratives ca n form their ow n authoritative grav ity.<br />

That is. the exi..renee of a rumor abou t SARS being loca ted in an Asian neighborhood or<br />

bus iness can be ..ccn by laypersons as providing its own proof: the narrativewouldn't<br />

e xist if it weren't true (or . at least. if it weren 't true some where), Brown doc s concede<br />

that "lay inve..tigators may pursue specific inquiries with their own agenda in<br />

mind ... [emphasizing ] certain health data and (minimizing) other reports " (Brown 1992.<br />

278) . but he never con ..iders the ramifications to his theonc.. that woul d come from the<br />

collected data be ing incorrect. but not recognized as such. Popular epidemiology can be<br />

based on the gathering of accurate. pro vable data . but it docs not ha ve to be.<br />

Th is is not to say tha t Brown' s conclusion.. and theories are witho ut merit. for he<br />

docs prese nt rub rics tha t are valua ble in study ing disease narra tives . Especially releva nt<br />

arc his co mments on the question of how it is possible to know whethe r lay invest igat ions<br />

provide acc urate information . Though even in th is ..ection Brown limits his co mments to<br />

defending the layperson' s findings . rather than discuss ing what wou ld happen if they<br />

were pro ven inco rrec t, he still offer s a posit ive message about the importance of paying<br />

attention to lay investigat ions. He states:<br />

Public hea lth officials wo rry tha t some communities might ex aggerate the risks of<br />

a hazard. or be wrong abou t the effects of a substance . Yet if this occ urs. it must<br />

be seen in context: community fears arc too ofte n brushed aside and data has been<br />

withheld. G iven the increa sing cases (or at least recogni tion of those cases) of<br />

techn ological disaste rs. dru g side effects. and scientific fraud , public sentime nt<br />

has beco me more critical of sc ience . In respon se. lay claims may be erroneo us.<br />

But thi s is the price pa id for past failures and pro blems . and is a cou nterva iling<br />

force in democratic participati on .... Exaggerated fears may be unders tood as<br />

sig ns of the need to expand publi c hea lth prote ction. rathe r than jus tifica tions to<br />

op po..e lay involveme nt. Even if a co mm un ity makes inco rrect conclus ions, their<br />

data ba..e may still rema in usefu l for different analyses. (Brown 199 2, 278)<br />

190


Relating these comments back to SARS. we might say that Brown would be of the<br />

op inion that disease narratives are important to study because I) they offer a glimpse into<br />

lay understa ndings of disease. and 2) the study of such a data base can reveal to medical<br />

profess ionals methods of better interacting w ith the public . We will return to these two<br />

points aga in and again throughout the remaining chapters. expanding them to offer<br />

examples of the insights that can be gained. and how professionals can use these insigh ts<br />

to improve their communicative skills .<br />

Though the full scope of narrative s that arose around SARS conta ins many entries<br />

that do not involve fear of gathe ring places. there are a significant number that do. as has<br />

been seen by the previous disc ussions . The very nature of SAR S facilitated and<br />

exacerbated the crea tion of these stories. being an airborne virus that was. even early in<br />

its existence. already humm ing with real stories of the now-deceased who had do ne<br />

nothin g more endangering than occupying the same elevator space as a contagious<br />

individual. Many of my informants reported feeling "trapped" by fear: a sentiment that<br />

seems to run throughout the narratives I collected from the Internet and from media<br />

sources. Reaction was immediate and widespread. to the extent that within a month 's<br />

time of the word "SARS" makin g its first newspaper headlin e. rumors and hoaxes<br />

conce rning infected individuals working in restaurants. malls. and other gathering places<br />

arose in places as distant and different from each other as Beijing and New York. I clo se<br />

this chapter with a quote from my informa nt Luis Tan. who perhaps best summarized<br />

what it was like 10 live in fear of gatheri ng places:<br />

11 was a really scary time for everybody. ltlimirs your movemen t. and you're not<br />

free. You feel you're not free when you go outside the door . You want 10 go here<br />

191


and then you think. "Oh. because of SARS let's avoid this: ' If somebody put the<br />

chain on you that you are [on] the leash, y()Uknow, you can only go so far and so<br />

much, that's how you feel. (Tan 2(0 5)<br />

192 J


Cha pter 6: Pr ivate Actions in Public Spaces: SARS and Paradigm Violat ions<br />

According to Linda C. Garro. "to understand the impact of illness ... on a person's<br />

life. it is ncce s..ary to develop an understanding of the narrat ive context" ( 1992. 133). In<br />

othe r words . any true study of the action.. unde rtaken by a group suffer ing from an illne..s<br />

must lake into account "the mean ing thai they place on these action s" (Calnan 1987. 8).<br />

In the SA RS epi dem ic of 2003. publ ic transportation becameanathema. with airports in<br />

Toronto. Singapore. Au stralia. and numerous othe r coun tries showing marked decrease..<br />

in passengers. Man y narratives expres..ed fear and co ncern over long -di..ranee and<br />

interco ntinental travel . Plane . trai n. and bus-related services suffe red as a resu lt.<br />

Howe ver. the flow of inform at ion betwee n countr ies. due largely 10 the Intern et and<br />

medi a sources . increased greatly. Thi s led to a curio us ..ituation in which, though<br />

inform ation al globalizat ion waxed prolifi c. cultural and socia l globa lization was st ilted:<br />

the wide spr ead diffusion of technology tha i enabled publ ic kno wledge of foreign affairs<br />

only served 10 make people wary of other cultures 411 best. At its wo rst. this technolog y<br />

made possible the circulation of narratives thai proved entirely counte rproductive to<br />

cultural global ization throug h the rapid diffusion of inaccurate ethnic information. Ma ny<br />

of the..c e rroneous narrat ives ult imately dea lt with the concept of private action s<br />

performed in publ ic spaces as sources of endanger ment. and these narrat ives will he the<br />

foc us of this study . The ultimate goa l of this chapter is to demonstrate that the anti­<br />

globaliza tion narrati ves present in SARS were intricatel y and insep arabl y linked with<br />

193


incorrect cultural stereotypes, and these were ultimatel y the result of w'idespread<br />

incompetence in determi ning the meanings other cthnicities placed on actions.<br />

As James L. Watson said. "Glo balization is a process that is replete with ironies.<br />

One of those ironies hides behind the SARS crisis: a premodern agricultural system-c.<br />

based on pigs. ducks. chickens. and centuries -old technology-c-could well tum oUIto be<br />

the greatest threat to the postmodern globa l system" (2005. 202). A second irony is that<br />

the ultimate tally of SARS- Ihe 9 16 fatalities-is in hindsight highly disproportionate to<br />

the reactions and conspiracy theories. as indeed these reactions arc in response to most<br />

diseases . Our concep tions of globa l security arc thus largely skewed . Jeanne Guil lemin.<br />

in discussions on the nature and realities of biorerrorism. notes that biologica l warfare<br />

"by humans against humans has been rare and historically inconsequential" (qtd. in<br />

Watson 2(X>5. 202). and that by far the larger number of disease-related death s come from<br />

nature.<br />

Given these two ironies. we can quickly establis h thai diseases such as SARS are<br />

not only a consequence of globalization. hut arc in fact to be expected because of it.<br />

Many of the largest novel epidemics of the last one hundred years-AIDS, SARS. Avian<br />

Infl uenza. Ebola-c-and still more of the most common historical and modem diseases-a-<br />

malaria. rubies. salmonellosis. trichinosis. typhus- arc all zoonotic in nature. resulting<br />

from human-animal microbial transfer. Those parts of the world where such transfers arc<br />

the most likely 10 lake place are deve loping world-c-vprcmodcrn," as Watson calls them<br />

above-areas. places like China's Guangdong province or Africa's Congo. Historically.<br />

these places were isolated from other parts of the world. and thus non-airborne infectio us<br />

19-1


diseases had far fewer chances to spread. Today. it takes little more than a plane ride for<br />

these diseases to spread halfway aroun d the globe. So while globalization theorists in the<br />

19


populat ion whi le SARS was waxing and waning: contaminated n ights. busses. airport s.<br />

hotel s. etc. If one of the markers of global izat ion is the increased ability to travel quickly<br />

to distant places. then businesses and modes of transport ation that sup port this ability<br />

ca nnot help but be inexorably intertwined with the narrat ives- both good and bad-that<br />

surro und globalization.<br />

Of co urse. one conse quence of plac ing these businesses at the cen ter of the<br />

problem is that the employees of these businesses arc also placed there . Rumors and<br />

realiti es involving so-ca lled SARS "superspreadcrs " who worked for the airline indus try<br />

were common in newspapers . and as such were sprea d ora lly by those who read abo ut<br />

them . One such case involved a single airline attenda nt named Esther Mok who is<br />

believed 10 be the "index case" for more than 160 of the Singapore infectio ns in April of<br />

2003. Infected herse lf by a man who caught the disease in Hong Kong. th is flight<br />

attendant is know n to have unsuspectingly passed on the virus to do/ ens of passengers.<br />

including nne man whos e genera l poor healt h. including diabetes and kidne y disea se.<br />

masked his symptoms. making it poss ible for him to infect at least forty doctors. nurses.<br />

patien ts. and guests in two wards of the Singa pore Gene ral Hospital befor e his SA RS-<br />

posit ive status was caught ("A re some better.,." 2003).M<br />

M Mok's story parallels that of another supersprcadc r: Gactan Dugas. the so-ca lled<br />

"patient zero" of the AIDS outbreak . who used his capa cities as a night attendant for Air<br />

Canada to travel the world and purpo sely infect peop le with the AIDS viru s. At least nne<br />

report stales that seventeen percent of the first 2"8 AIDS cases in the U.S. were linked to<br />

Dugas (see Goldstein 200·k 113· 115). Though Mok did not purposely infect people with<br />

SARS. the co nsequences of her actions were jus t as severe . and the fact that she. like<br />

Dugas. was a flight attenda nt provide s the two narratives with an ee rie sim ilarity.<br />

1%


passengers was a doc tor who had been treating SARS patients in Singapore only days<br />

ea rlier. Ultima tely none of the flight's four hundred passengers tested pos itive for SARS.<br />

but the story still made headlines (Cohen. Naik. and Pottin ger 2003 ). Lookin g at the<br />

history of SARS. it may easily be said that had thc airline industry not existed. the disease<br />

wou ld have never had the impact it did .<br />

My own research has turned up severa l narratives concerning the negative effect s<br />

of globalization on ethnic identit ies and disease panic. Man y of the people I intervi ewed<br />

mentioned general fears of traveling by bus. plane. and train . but two interviews in<br />

parti cular stand out as exemplary. The first was conducted in late Septembe r of 2005 with<br />

Heather Read. During 2003 . Heather was livin g in Hamilton. Ontario . attending<br />

university. but making regu lar trips to see both her brother in Toronto (rou ghly an hour ' s<br />

drive northeast) and her parents in Ajax. Ontario (an additional half-hour 's drive<br />

northeast).<br />

Heather repo rted that Toronto' s outbreak had very little effect on her day-to-day<br />

life. Hami lton being far enough away that its reside nts only "got the tail end of the<br />

paranoia" (Read 2(05). Her visits to her family. however. we re another mailer. especially<br />

since her mother worked in a caretaking capacity at the time. Heather described her<br />

mot her as "a lillie bit of a hypochondriac. I think bcca u:..c of her medical train ing ... . She<br />

works in a nursing home. so she had to go through the who le experi ence of gow ning up.<br />

putting on mask [sic] every day that she went to work" (Rea d 2(X)S). This consta nt<br />

reinforcement of care and precaution. as well as natu ral parent al instincts. Jed Heather' s<br />

mother to reque st her children take as much ca re in their lives as she was forced to in<br />

198


hers. Among other details, one care package Heather received from her parents included<br />

"socks, some barbecue sauce. some ja m.. .a book I had left behind... a hairbrush:' and a<br />

package of medical-grade filtering masks accompanied by a note that read "I'd like you<br />

to please wear them when you go outside" (Read 2005).<br />

The largest response. howeve r. came when Heather wanted to go home for a<br />

weekend . In Heather' s words:<br />

To do that I'd have to take a GO bus, which is the common public transit system<br />

between Hamilton and Toronto. and I think [mother] had jus t been reading about<br />

how they had been tracing SARS to the initial spread being on an airplane . and so<br />

she got really paranoid about me taking any kind of public transit. and said. ··No.<br />

you're not allowed to ro me home. If you're gonna come home. we"Il co me get<br />

you in the car: ' (Read 2005)<br />

In total. the drive her parents made to have Heather avoid the public transit system totaled<br />

six hours: 1.5 hours' drive from Ajax to Hamilton times four. This is double the time it<br />

would have taken Heather to make the trip by bus. hut the security her mother felt in<br />

having Heather avoid this method of transport was worth the time and effort.<br />

Th is first narrative deals heavily with disease panic and the length to which some<br />

people went to protect themselves and loved ones, but Heather' s second narrative<br />

combines this panic with ethnic identity. creating a narrative that reveals much about the<br />

mindsct of the general population. During 2003, Ileather was living with two roomm ates:<br />

one male, one female. both Chinese. As Heather says. " it was interesting going out with<br />

them because... if they coughed ever they'd get some strange loo ks" (Read 2(05). These<br />

reactions didn't seem to bother the male roommate. who because of allergies would<br />

sneeze often in public. and would immediately afterwards engage Heather in a jo king<br />

banter that Heather recounts as beginning with "Ha ha ha: you have SARS" (Read 2(05).<br />

199


But Heather' s female roommate, "Rita:' was more heavi ly affected by the<br />

situation, espec ially co ncerning how she was perceived by the pub lic. Even though this<br />

roo mmate was not overly concerned about the outbreak, laughing at Heather' s mother's<br />

contributions of face masks to her daugh ter's care package, she was still stigmatized<br />

beca use of her ethnic identity:<br />

She lived in downtown Toronto, and wou ld go back between Hamilton and<br />

Toronto frequen tly. She, when she was on the subway, she 'd sit, ...he'd describe<br />

several times sitt ing down beside ...omebody and having them get up and move<br />

over. And so I think that's ...she started driving her car a litt le bit more often<br />

because that ju ...t started to make her uncomfortable. (Read 2(05)<br />

The effects of this ...tigrna tization were not isolated to Rita: the re...t of her family also<br />

experienced similar react ions (as did some of my Filipino-Chinese informants). In Rita' s<br />

family's case, reac tions aga inst their being Chinese were ...trong eno ugh that the whole<br />

fami ly po...tponed an important trip to Ch ina to attend a wedding because of fears that<br />

they wou ld not be allowed back into the co untry.<br />

The ...cco nd of my intervi ews that is particularly penin cnt ro the current<br />

discussions was with a man named Benjam in, who at the lime I interviewed him in mid -<br />

200 5 was working as a bartender in Sa n Francisco, California. According to Benjam in,<br />

there was not a great reaction against SARS in the Sa n Francisco area, other than<br />

Chinatow n experiencing "somewhat of a lull" (Sa ndler 2(X)5), as w'3S co mmon in many<br />

Chinatow ns across North America. But during the summer of 2003-frnm roughl y May<br />

15 th to Ju ne 15 th - Benjamin was traveling through China's Hubei prov ince and its<br />

neighbor. Chongqing mun icipality. Benjamin admits that man y of his friends and family<br />

in the States had urged him to cancel his trip, and it had taken him quite some time to<br />

200


convince them that his travels would not lead him into any viral danger. His fami ly had<br />

fallen into the general mindset that anything Asian was dangero us, and it took<br />

Benjamin' s interven tion to show them how their fears were "exacerbated by their lack of<br />

knowle dge of China and how big it is. and maybe the lack of preciseness about how<br />

concentrated the cases were" (Sandler 2005) .<br />

Benjamin' s purpose in China was to pursue a personal project of his involving the<br />

Three Gorges Dam. Though a barte nder by trade. Benjamin had a keen interest in the fate<br />

of the people who lived along the banks of the Yangtze River. and since December of<br />

2001 had made severa l trips to Ch ina to take videos for a photo-docu mentary . His 2003<br />

trip was especia lly important for him as it allowed him to witness the closing of the slu ice<br />

gales at the Three Gorges Dam on June t''. which permanently blocked the natural now<br />

of the Yangtze and starte d the buildup of the reservoir behind the dam-a reservoir that<br />

didn't completely fill umil Iate 2008. and now ultimately stretc hes some 375 miles,<br />

covers over t ,3oo archaeological sites, and has resulted in the displacemen t of betwe en<br />

one and two million people (wikipc dia.orgj.<br />

Benjamin' s documentation of this act and the conse quences that would eventually<br />

come of it meant that he spent May and June of 2003 traveling along the length of the<br />

Yangtze, encountering dozens of villages that had rarely seen outsiders. He had read that<br />

many of these small villages were actively blockading their streets to prevent foreigners<br />

and travelers from entering beca use of the SA RS outbreak, and the fact that "travelers<br />

were dub bed the carriers of the disease" (Sa ndler 2005) by locals weighed heav ily on his<br />

mind:<br />

20 1


That \....as something that reall y fueled my fears at first. because I was going to be<br />

go ing to a lot of small towns in rural China that do n't sec a lot of foreig ners , and I<br />

was worried that I would see a lot of. that I would be met with fear of getting<br />

SARS. you know. from me .... Well that was what I was worried about I mean.<br />

because I was dubbed. I wou ld be a traveler. coming, going from one place to<br />

another place. possibly picking some thing up from one place and bringing it to<br />

anot her. As would any travele r within China. you know. a Chinese traveler as<br />

well. (Sandler 2005)<br />

On the other hand. once inside those towns , Benjamin recalled rarely seeing anyone<br />

weari ng a face mask. He placed the numbe r at "maybe one out of ever y IO,(XXl, " and<br />

Quite often the masks people were wearing were "dirty and falling off' (Sandler 2005) .<br />

According to these reports. people in China evidenced the same reactions to<br />

foreigners as did people in North Ame rica: people of different ethnic identity. or<br />

strangers in general, were suspect: local, familiar people were less so. This is especi ally<br />

apparent in Benjamin ' s descr iptions of travelin g along the Yangtze. Villages far preferred<br />

having outsiders stay as outsiders-even to the point of openly barricading their<br />

bordcrs-c-but peop le inside those villages were free to do as they chose, and were not<br />

considered harmful .<br />

This sharp division is in contradiction of the realities of viruses and disease<br />

vectors. for it lakes little effort for an airbo rne disease to cross a man-made barricade .<br />

Even blood -borne diseases may cross through the act ions of insects and roden ts. As in<br />

Edgar Allen Poe's "The Masque of the Red Death: ' no barrier is impenetrable . and<br />

disease can creep inside even the best-maintained walls. Worse. once inside that barrier.<br />

the virus can multiply quick ly and eas ily. The common co ld is more present in winter<br />

precisely because humans ...pend ...0 much time indoors and in contact with other people<br />

202


during the cold months. and this situat ion provides the perfect breeding ground for<br />

disease.<br />

We have to. howeve r. draw the line somewhere. and attempt to make as much of a<br />

divi sion betwee n those who are potentia lly diseased and those who are "known" to be<br />

healthy . In the case of ..mall villages in central China. the location.. for the..e Jines are<br />

ohv iou..: the town limits . These lines are seeming ly independent of race. age. and sex . All<br />

that needs to be known is who is from the town and who is not. Even if it i.. recognized<br />

that such geographical barriers are frail. their exi..tcnce ..till provides relief. and may in<br />

fact help greatly 10 keep out that which is not wanted . In large cities . the possibilities of<br />

such geographical barriers grow excee dingly ..mall. It is po....ible to quarantine houses or<br />

apartme nt com plexes or even whole cities. but the people living inside those citie.. still<br />

have to go about their daily dut ies. including working. shopping. and even using public<br />

transportation to access the more remote parts of the city. People living in these<br />

circumstances will thus be constantly surro unded by the potentially diseased . Wher e<br />

geog raphical barriers fail or arc impossible. lines are instead drawn aro und those who are<br />

unknown or different. and around race. sex. and age. and so strangers and other<br />

ethnicitics becom e the targets of suspicion.<br />

The basic ideas behind these separations were recognized and laid out as ear ly as<br />

1959 by William Hugh Jansen. who designated his theory the "esoteric-exo teric factor in<br />

folklore." Acco rding to this. "the esoter ic app lies to what one group thinks of itself and<br />

what it supposes others think of it. The exoteric is what one group thinks of another and<br />

what it thinks that other group thinks it thinks" (Jansen 1959. 206·7). Esoteric though ts.<br />

203


then. arc turned inward... ponde ring the self; exoteric thoughts are about others.<br />

Furthermore. esoteric thought s stem "from the group sense of belonging and [serve] to<br />

defend and strengthen that sen..e" (Jansen t959. 207). As a result of this. Jansen claims<br />

that smaller groups are more likely to have stronge r esoteric ele ments.<br />

The..e arguments are visib le within the narratives given by Heather and Benjamin.<br />

Heather' s statement-in itself a collection of ..mailer narratives about several peop le­<br />

demo nstrates especially well how Jansen' s theories apply to at least two different<br />

cthnicities . On the one hand. we have Heather' s interactions with her mother (as..uming a<br />

fami ly constitutes a folk group, as per Dundee" definition of "folk" as "unv group oj<br />

people whatsoever who share at lea..t one common factor" (qtd. in Oring 1986. l,<br />

cmphasi.. in original», which demonstrate her mother'.. perceptions of her own family as<br />

"safe:' and Torontonians as a whole as "dangerous:' Interesting in this case is the<br />

grouping of. including Toronto's Census Mctropofitan Area. roughly 5 million people<br />

into a single category. regardless of age, sex. or race. On the other hand. we have<br />

Heather's reports of what her Chinese roommates experienced during the SARS<br />

outbreak. i.c. the incidences of people avoiding them Oil busses and subways. which are<br />

d early cuscs of Asians a !'> a whole being stigmatized a!'> potential carriers of disease.<br />

Benjamin' s reports show similar Ilcxibilnies in the lines between who is<br />

considered safe and who is considered unsafe. The very comments that Benjamin chose<br />

to open hi!'> story wilh- " J was worried... that I would be met with fear of getting SARS,<br />

you know, from mc"- are an exce llent summarization of the esoteric factor. Benjamin<br />

knowing hi!'> own SARS-ncgative status. but recognizi ng that the people he would


encoun ter might possibly see him as dangerous. Switching groups for a moment, it is<br />

perfectly clear from Benjam in's narratives what the exoteric thoughts of the sma ll<br />

villages he encountered along the Yangtze were, namely that other people are dangerous.<br />

regardless of who they are. Here, as in the case of Heather' s discuss ions with her mother,<br />

age, sex, and race are irrelevant.<br />

In both cases involving the disso lution of racial and ethnic lines in the<br />

determi nation of who is possibly diseased and who is not. we find that the groups making<br />

the determinat ions are relatively small: Heather' s family and Chinese fishing villages.<br />

The abso lute determinations of Asians as potentially diseased that were exper ienced by<br />

Heather' s roommates occurred in situations where the deciding group was amorp hous,<br />

and large. Not just a bus-full of people made the determination. but Torontonian society<br />

as a whole. Jansen' s original esoteric-exoteric arguments did not include discussions of<br />

disease, hut it docs seem that they apply. Sma ll groups have stronger esoteric elements,<br />

and are more easily capable of grouping large numbers of people of varying identities<br />

into an "o ther" category. while large groups have weaker esoteric clements (perhaps a<br />

consequence of the amorphous nature of the group. where it is more difficult for one<br />

member of the group to know what every other member is thinking or doing). and more<br />

frequently draw lines along race and ethnic borders.<br />

These narratives may also reflect a different kind of fear. as discussed by Mikel J.<br />

Koven in his article '''Buzz Off!' : The Killer Bee Movie as Modern Belief Narrative:'<br />

Koven hypothesizes that "killer bee" movies. which involve swarms of genetically­<br />

altered bees racing up from South America and attacking U.S. border towns, may reflect<br />

105


acia l undertones and anxieties. Moreover, there arc atleast two races of peop le alluded<br />

to in these stories as being fearful and Other. One of these races is obv ious. given that the<br />

hccs in question arc ofte n referred to as "Africanizcd" or " Brazilian:' and so Koven states<br />

that "Specifically with Irw in Allen's [mo vie ] The Swann .... the Brazilian honeybee<br />

seems 10 act as a metaphor for wh ite paranoia abou t African -Americans in the U.S:'<br />

(Koven 200 1. 6). Howe ver. Koven states that a secon d race may be alluded to in these<br />

stories. if certain key contex tua l facts are noted -c-specifically that the decade in which<br />

mnny of the killer bee movies and books were popularized (the 1970s ) was also the end<br />

of the Vietnam War. As suc h. Allen' s nit: Swarm ( 1978) and Jack Laflin's novel nit'<br />

Bees ( 1975) may also be reflectio ns of the American people 's growing hesitat ion with<br />

Vietnam. as well as their embarrass ment at not having secured a concl usive victory.<br />

Koven states:<br />

Implicit in these narrat ives is the idea that the United States needs a military<br />

victory to coun ter their defeat in South East Asia , See n racially. the bees co uld<br />

even be seen to repr esent the Viet Cong themselves-the bees' yellow and black<br />

markings represent ing both the racial stereotyping of East Asia ns as "y ellow"skin<br />

colored and the black of the Viet Co ng uniform s. These military victories<br />

over the bees Iin the movie and the novel I ca n therefore be seen us symbolic<br />

victories against a Vietnamese that the American military machine could not<br />

defeat in rea lity. (Koven 200 1. 10)<br />

If SARS narratives are exa mined in the same vein. then it becom es immediately apparent<br />

that many of Koven' s co nclusions ca n be applied, Not only arc many of the SA RS<br />

narratives ove rtly racist in tone and message. but eve n in those narra tives that exclude<br />

ment ion of race and focu s specifically on transm ission vectors-such as Heather' s<br />

mot her's co ncern over the virus being spread by airpla ne and bus-racial undertones may<br />

206


still be present because SARS came f rom China. In fact. it may be said that the<br />

coronavirus is a metaphor for the Chinese. or perhaps Asian peoples as a whole.<br />

Such a hypothesis stands in line with many of the sentiments pervading the<br />

United States today. revea ling deep-seated distrust of the Chinese. While the U.S. has not<br />

had a major military battle with China. it has several other factors that influence public<br />

perception. First among these is the ever-present reminder that China is a Commu nist<br />

country. and as anyone who grew up during the Cold War was taught. "Communist<br />

countries are evil." Then there arc the frequent news stories relating China's Human<br />

Rights violations. A quick Google.corn search for "China human rights violation:' for<br />

example (though without the quotation marks). resulted in a stagger ing 9.5 million<br />

webpages. Economic concerns also come into play here. such as the incr easing amounts<br />

of money the U.S. government borrows from China. or the outsourcing of jobs by U.S.<br />

businesses to Asian countries. And. of course. there are the perennial concerns with<br />

immigrants-Asian or othcrwis e-c-moving into U.S. cities and taking jo bs from U.S.<br />

citizens. Other exa mples could be brought in to strengthen these tics further, but such<br />

efforts arc hardly needed. These few illustrations alone evidence the strained relations<br />

between the U.S. and China. Like killer bee stories being a metaphor for U.S. relations<br />

with Vietnam. SARS narratives reflect American opinions about the Chinese.<br />

Examined under yet another light these narratives reveal concern over actions<br />

performed out of place. or more specifica lly. private actions performed in public places.<br />

Mary Douglas. in discussing the concept of din and its relative mctaphor­<br />

unclea nlincss-notes that the very notions society holds about hygiene are relative:<br />

107


"Shoes are not dirty in themselves. but it is dirty to place thcm on thc dining table: food is<br />

not dirty in itself. but it is dirty to leave cooking utensils in the bedroom. or food<br />

bespattered on clothing: similarly. bathroom equipment in the drawi ng room ... out-door<br />

things in-doors; upstairs things downstairs...·• (Douglas 1988. 35-36). In SARS<br />

narratives. many of the underlying fears involve similar matters of sanitat ion and objects<br />

out of proper place. What separates SARS narratives-and disease narratives in<br />

general-is the object which is considered to be out of its proper place: the infecting<br />

agent. in this case the SARS virus.<br />

Though disease narrati ves have many forms and come in multiple varieties. they<br />

can all be ultimately traced back to this infecting agent. whether it appears on a needle or<br />

razor blade. is present in semen or saliva. or can be transmitted only through bodily fluids<br />

or through the very air we breathe. It is interesting to note that. while Douglas states that<br />

food is dirty when present in the bedroom or on clothing (implying that food is sanitary<br />

when located in the kitchen and on plates). there arc no such defin ite lines for infecting<br />

agents. The SARS virus is clearly seen as dirt y in all the narratives collected for this<br />

study, hUI the best line that can he draw-n10 identify where it docs and docs not belong is<br />

between anywhere else and me. That is. while the "improper" location for the virus can<br />

he definitel y identified as the narrator' s persona l space. or perhaps the personal spaces of<br />

a small group of people surrounding the narrator. the "propcr'tlocation is rarely spoken.<br />

and is instead left as an ambiguous. amorphous location that is to be found anywhere<br />

other than where the narrator currently stands.<br />

108


If the location of the narrator is sacrosanct. and is the "improper" location for the<br />

virus. then it stands to reason that any actio ns that cause a virus 10 enter the perso nal<br />

space of the narrator are abo improper . Sneezing and coug hing. for example. are widely<br />

recog nized as methods of transmitting d iseases. Even sma ll children are told to cove r<br />

their mouths and noses when performing such actions . Public and widespread knowledge<br />

of scient ific germ theory may be inaccurate and incomp lete by medical standards, but it is<br />

sufficie nt to recognize that sudden expu lsions of breath from the lungs can resul t in the<br />

airborne dispers ion of disease-causing materials . which is one reason why people prefer<br />

not 10 shake the hand of someo ne who has jus t sneezed into that hand.<br />

Sneezing is. in add ition. a private act ion. Not only is it recognized as a poten tial<br />

spreader of disease. and thus something that should be shielded from the rest of the world<br />

hy the hand or handkerch ief. but it is an involuntary act ion-something that cannot be<br />

controlled. Sneezing results in the tempo rary loss of the sneczc r's hold ove r his or her<br />

own bod y. The eyes involuntarily squeeze shut. and the respiratory syste m is subverted<br />

from its normal job of supplying the body with oxyge n and is instead given over to the<br />

single. uncontrollable work of expe lling a large amount of air forcefu lly and rapidly.<br />

Sneezing leaves a person at his or her most vulnerable: sightless and powe rless. To a<br />

great extent. the only action a person is capable of performing while sneez ing is. in fact.<br />

sneez ing. Speec h. visio n. and activities involving highly-co ntrolled muscle movements<br />

(painting. running. playing a musical instru ment. typing. ctc.) arc all greatly hindered. if<br />

not made out right impossible. and it may be argued that even thought processes are<br />

retarde d. Sneez ing leaves us naked. It should come as no surprise that we hide our faces<br />

209


when we sneeze, or excuse ourse lves from conve rsations to tum around (if given<br />

sufficie nt warning). and sometimes apologiz e for our act ions afterwards.<br />

In SARS narratives, the private nature of act ions such as sneezing or co ugh ing<br />

(the latter also marked by a soc ially-i mposed covering of the mouth) are made all the<br />

more relevan t beca use they are performed in pub lic spaces. Heather' s interactions with<br />

her male Chinese roo mmate upo n hi" sneez ing in public-c-vl la ha ha: you have SARS"­<br />

show at least some leve l of awareness concerning the danger of such an action . Heather<br />

menti on" that such an exc hange was "t rivializing" the otherwise serious nature of a<br />

sneeze in the middle of an epidemic, an act ion that fits three of Jeannie B. Thomas' four<br />

funct ions of laughter, in this case "inco ngruity," "su perio rity." and "recognition of a<br />

taboo topic" (Thomas 1997.43). Thomas' defin ition of " incongruity" is especially<br />

relevant in relat ion to this scenario: "this thing that is out of place here" (Thomas 199 7.<br />

48). The ju xtaposition of private action and public space creates the same recognition of<br />

uncle anlin ess as is presen t in Mary Douglas' quote. i.e. things that arc out -of-place are<br />

dirt y. And while a sneeze by itself might not bring about a large response. when<br />

combined with its diseas e-spreading potentia l cnul the outbreak und general panic over<br />

SA RS. the act ion creat es an immediat e and noticeabl e reaction .<br />

The fina l layer in these narratives is that of stereotyping ethnicities, or outsiders<br />

and strangers . as diseased or disease ca rriers. The attribution to an ethnic gro up of either<br />

careless or purpo sefu l introd uction of a disease into a previo usly-sa fe co mm unity adds<br />

the final nail to the coffi n. as it were. Not only arc these peo ple different. but they arc<br />

dirty. they act inappropriately. and they arc harming us. The stereotypes and reactio ns<br />

210


present in SARS narratives are laid out especia lly well by Jcn. a Chinese -Filipino<br />

informant I interviewed in Toronto in 2005 :<br />

There was one time I was on a bus and ... at that point we were living in<br />

Scar borough. which is. it' s made up of a lot of immigra nt co mmunities. and there<br />

are a lot of Chinese peop les who are prima rily in the northe rn area of<br />

Scarborough. going into Markham- Markham is a huge Ch inese community. I<br />

think primaril y from Hong Kong and Taiwan-and I was on the bus one day . and<br />

1 was sitting bes ide this Caucasian girl. and this black guy sitting besi de her . and<br />

they. I think were teen agers. thereabou ts. and I thin k I coughed. No. I didn't<br />

cough. the girl startcd.fikc. fake coughing beside me. and the guy beside her was<br />

kind of gigg ling. but in an uncomfortable way. and I felt that to be son of a joke.<br />

like because I was As ian. and because we were in Scarborough. and because we<br />

were on a bus. they were making fun of the fact that I was Chi nese . I co uld<br />

possi bly have SARS... . Maybe it was an oppo rtunity to ... a reason for thei r<br />

stereotypes. Like for them to have certai n stereotypes. it was a perfect opportunity<br />

for them 10 co me out with jo kes about it. (Lim. Jen 2(05)<br />

In this particula r instance. there was not eve n a spec ific actio n such as a co ugh or sneez e<br />

to incite the respo nse. All thai was needed was simply the presence of an individual<br />

perce ived 10 be from a dangerous group.<br />

The ultimate causes of narratives such as this arc many. and depend on socia l as<br />

well as familial factors. but sociologist Stephe n L. Muzzani places much of the bla me<br />

squarely on informational globalizatio n as it is present in the media. In an exa mination of<br />

media reports of SARS. Muzani notes that many of the articles present in popular<br />

newspape rs were sensationalistic at best. repo rting excl usively a ll negative occurr ences<br />

such as deaths. quarantines. business failures. and masses of masked faces. li e states.<br />

"this type of co verage made SARS appear far more wides pread. co ntagious. and<br />

dangerou s than it truly was. It also served to tea r away the thin ami flimsy venee r of<br />

'tolerance' in America. revealin g dee p-seated racism and xenop hobia" (2005 . 123).<br />

Asians as a whole beca me "folk de vilv," or what Stanley Co hen ca lls "unambiguously<br />

211


unfav orable symbols" (200 2. 41) beca use of their associat ion with the d isease. Thu s. it<br />

may be argued that experiences such a, the ones su ffered by Jen and Rita (Heather's<br />

female roo mmate) are direct co nsequences of Ii..-ing in an era when a news report filed in<br />

Ch ina can appear in an American newspaper only hours later.<br />

Terr y Ann Knopf pointed out over thirty years ago that rumor often begets<br />

violence. prejud ice. and disc rimination. and as legend overla p' rumor ( 1975). the same<br />

Qualities can he said of it. In the modem era. where rumor and legend spread-for the<br />

first time in history-c-faste r than the speed of sound. the real ities of Knopf' s cla ims<br />

beco me ever-more apparent . Narratives such as the ones prese nt in this chapte r represent<br />

the worst oflegend and rumor. The ease with which information is passed between<br />

disparate parts of the modern worl d has at times resulted in significant benefits for<br />

humank ind. but it has also enabled the widespread and rapid diff usion of panic and<br />

negative stereotypes. The public reactio ns and revulsion s experienced by Jen. Rita. and<br />

Benjamin were no doubt fueled. at least in part . by rumor and legend. Simil ar react ions<br />

occu rred around the wor ld. where it was only a mailer of week s. perhaps days. before<br />

SARS becam e inext ricably . globally linked with Asians, The result ing narrat ives left<br />

Asia n-Ame ricans who had never set foot outside North America accu sed (however<br />

lightly or humorously) of being potential infectors. In cases such as these. informational<br />

globalization promulgated pejorati ve stereotypes. In other cases. know ledge of the<br />

ex istence of SARS resulted in the mass-labe ling of stra nge rs and outsiders as dangerou s.<br />

somet imes resulting in the literal barricadin g of those peoples from entering into towns.<br />

By "rucial izing illness" (Muzaui 2005. 125) in this manner. the world was left in the<br />

2 12


midst of a wave of racism that was not only widely practiced by "official" news sources,<br />

hut publicly encouraged and tolerated.<br />

213


Furth ermore. it is my co ntention that many of the collected narratives do not fit neatl y<br />

into the categories ass igned by stigma literature. especially as seen in the wor k of Erving<br />

Goffman.<br />

"S tigmas." archaically. were brands burned into the skins of slaves or criminals<br />

for identification purposes. Modem defi nitions of the word have branched out<br />

dcnotatively. referring to several types of blemishes rangin g from crucifi xion wound s to<br />

common birthmarks. However. the connotations of these modem renditions still evide nce<br />

many of the term's negative archaic implications . To be stigmatized-to be marked-is<br />

to be labeled as somehow wro ng or impure . E..pecially as the term is used in reference to<br />

medicine and disease. stigma is characterized by discri mination . negative labellin g.<br />

os trac ism. and excl usio n (Goffman 1963: Kleinman and Lee 2(05). St igma. in this sense.<br />

affect alllevels of society. and results in such varied problems as workplace losses in<br />

produ ctivity. violations of basic human right s. med ical non -comp liance. the scapcgoating<br />

of marginal groups. familial breakdown. and individual suffer ing (Klein man and Lee<br />

2( 05). At best. being stigmatized mean s being perceived differen tly. At worst. it mean s<br />

personal and financial ruin. and can lead to suicide.<br />

Various defin itions of the more modem meanings of vstigmu' have been<br />

forw arded. some of the earliest attempt s co ming from Erving GotTman: first. "The term<br />

stigma ... will be used to refer to an attribute that is deeply discreditin g" (Goffman 1963.<br />

3); and seco nd. from later in the same book. "an undes ired differen tness from what we<br />

had anticipated" (Goffman 1963. 5). Gerhard Falk expa nds on this by exp laining the mos t<br />

co mmo n modem American uses of the word. where 'vstigma' and 's tigmatization' refers<br />

215


to an invisible sign of disappro val which permi ts insiders to draw a line around<br />

'outsiders' in order to demarcate the limits of inclusion in any group" (Falk 200 1, 17).<br />

Thou gh not actua lly providing a dictionary definition of the word. Falk' s comments do<br />

clearl y demonstrate the nature of what it is to be stigmatized: it is to be set apart and<br />

marked somehow as unclean or unhealthy.<br />

The initial statements in this chapter regarding the nature and discussion of stigma<br />

are based on Goffm an' s 1963 book Stigma: Notes 01 1 the Management of Spoiled Identity.<br />

At the time Goffm an wrote his book. stigma studies were relatively new. The preface to<br />

Stigma states that much of what had been done in the field before the publication of<br />

Goffman' s book had come from social psychology, and even there the field was hardl y<br />

"over a decade" old (Goffman 1963. n.p.). The footnote on the same page that<br />

summarizes the previous decade' s work on stigma references five psychologists. but only<br />

one sociologist, and tellin gly, it is one of the psychologists whom Go ffman speci fically<br />

highlights as having provided the most useful data (Goffman 1963). Goffman'x efforts<br />

were thus in many ways the seminal attempts to introduce the field of stigma to the<br />

discipline of sociology. The arguments throughout the remainder of this chapter are based<br />

largely on Stigma not only because it was perhaps the first book to attempt to codify and<br />

set down rules for the academi c study of stigma. but because almost every more-recentl y­<br />

written source I consulted for the preparation of this chapter referenced Goffm an' s work .<br />

Unfortunately, Goffmon' s meditations on the natu re and mechanisms of stigma do<br />

not. in several key ways. include discussions of the types of stigma that were associated<br />

2 16


with SAR S. Fur instance. Goffman gives the followi ng as.the three ma in "types" of<br />

stigma:<br />

First there are abominations of the body-thc various physical de formitie s. Nex t<br />

there are blemi shes of individua l character percei ved as weak will. domineering<br />

or unnatura l passions. treacherous and rigid beliefs. and dishonesty. these being<br />

inferred from a known recor d of. for example . menta l disorder. impri sonment.<br />

addiction . alcoholism. homosexuality. unemp loyment. suicidal attempts. and<br />

radical political behaviour. Fina lly there are the tribal stigma of race. nat ion. and<br />

rel igion. these being stigma that can be rrunsmiued through lineages and equa lly<br />

contaminate all members of a family . (Goffman 1963. -t)<br />

I give thc full quo te here. rather than a summarization. to show exactl y the arguments<br />

Goffman makes and the types of stigma that hc lists. carefull y broken down into their<br />

sections and supporting exam ples. But eve n a cursory glimpse shou ld suffice to show that<br />

Goffmcn's list does not include the stigma that is associa ted with many dise ases.<br />

Briefly summarize d. the types of stigma above ca n be broke n into the categor ies<br />

of I ) ph.Him l deformities. 2) charac ter flaw ... and 3) tribal association. Polio and<br />

Hansen' s disease. both of which Goffman uses as exa mples of the first category. are<br />

indeed diseases. but in these instan ces physical defor mities O(..'ClIr as a side effect of an<br />

untreated viral or bacter ial infect ion. respectively. In other words. Goffman's inclusion of<br />

these diseases into 1* spectrum seems based not on the presence of the infecting age nt-<br />

to wit. the polioviru s or the Mvcoh acter ium 1('prlU,that ca uses Hansell' s disease-s-but on<br />

the prese nce of the dis figurements that co me abo ut as the result of these infect ing age nts.<br />

There ca n be lillie argument that those who co ntracte d SARS in 2003 were stigmat ized.<br />

hut the SARS virus did not cause the kinds of physical disfigurements or deformities<br />

present in Go ffman's catego ries. Like those infected with AIDS, SARS victims initially<br />

appeared on the surface to be no different than anyo ne else. It was not unti l very late in<br />

2 17


the progression of the disease that the similarities cease d. and even then this was not due<br />

to physica l deform ities. but to high fevers and respiratory prob lem... SAR S victims. then.<br />

were stigmatized not beca use of the presence of any visua lly-distinguishing features. but<br />

simply beca use of the presence of an invis ible infecting agent. Thus it seems that<br />

Goffman's types of stigma merits a fourth category: the injected. which includes anyo ne<br />

who is curren tly (or. we coul d argue. has ever been) host to any virus. bacte rium. fungus.<br />

para..ite. etc.. deemed in sorne way offensive. dangerous. contagious. or di..gusting by the<br />

public .<br />

But even with the inclusion of this fourth category. there is still at lea..t one key<br />

form of stigma within the SA RS ep idemic that is not adequate ly described: the<br />

stigmatization of perfectly healthy individuals such a.. hcuhhcare workers and A..ians.<br />

The stories of these group.. of people have been di..cussed elsewhere in this work. so I see<br />

no poin t 10 reiterate them here. exce pt to say that hcalthcurc workers and Asians were<br />

stigmatizcd-c-most of them wrongly-as potential d i..ease carriers. It is this last concept<br />

that is missing from Go ffman' s list: the potenti al of someone to belong to a stigmatized<br />

category. All of the exa mples used by Goffm an to support hi.. arguments come from<br />

peop le who arc aireadv recog nized as members of the stigmatized categories into which<br />

they have been placed. and actuall y have the cond itions for which they have been<br />

stigmatized: peop le with Hansen' s disease and amputees for being "de formed"; suicides<br />

and drug add icts for having recognized character flaws: African -Americans for belongi ng<br />

to a different race. None of Goffman' s exa mples incorporate the idea of potentiality, or<br />

the fear or worry that someo ne who is not immediate ly recog nized as being a member of<br />

2 18


could affect large numbers of people , because his argume nts indicate thai the range of<br />

this "co urtesy stigma" extended only to the reaches of the family.<br />

Goffm an also approaches the concept of the potentially discreditable in his<br />

discussions of the differences betwe en the "discredited" and the "d iscred itab le" (fro m<br />

which arguments I constructed the term "po tentia lly discreditable") . According to<br />

Goff man. the "discredited't label can be app lied to someone whose "differentness" from a<br />

"normal" person is immediately visible or already known about. People suffering from<br />

Hansen's diseas e easily fall into this category because of the disfigu ring natu re of the<br />

disease , as do people who are widely and publicly recogni zed as homosexuals.<br />

murderers. unem ployed. etc. The label "disc reditable" is applied to someone whose<br />

differentness "is neither known about by those present nor immediately perceivable by<br />

them" (Goffman 1963. 4 ), i.e. a person with Hansen' s disease who is able to hide his<br />

disfigurement s under his clothes, or a murderer (homosex ual. unemp loyed person. etc.)<br />

who is nor suspected of being such. While this latter category of the "di scredit able" docs<br />

admit the possibilities of the unseen stigmatic, it is still bused on the presence of a<br />

differentness. The discreditable person is only someone whose discrediting attributes<br />

have not yet been d iscovered. Nowhere in this two-part paradigm exists the possibility of<br />

a perfectl y health y, unsullied PCf'>OIl being wrongly stigmatized,<br />

The narrowness of this view has since been updated. Kleinm an and Lee, for<br />

instance. state that it is not "surprising that stigma assoc iated with SARS quickly<br />

transferred to ethnically Chin ese communities in many pans of the world" (Kleinman and<br />

Lee 2005 , 181). and note the historical commonness of such transferences. Among other<br />

220


examples, Kleinman and Lee point to a study sponsored by the American Medical<br />

Assoc iation in the late 1800s which investigated "the hypothesis that Chinese women<br />

were spreading a unique and particularly virulent strain of so-called Chinese syphilis"<br />

(Kleinman and Lee 2005, 18 1). They also note the torching and razing of Chinese<br />

neighbourhoods in both Hawaii and San Francisco after the bubonic plague surfaced in<br />

those areas in 1899 and 1900, respectively. despite the lack of any evidence of an Asian<br />

origin of the disease. Gerhard Falk describes this kind of stigma as "soc ietal deviance":<br />

"a condition widely perceived. in advance and in general. as being deviant" (Fulk 200 I,<br />

22). In thc two exa mples cited by Kleinman and Lee. this societal deviance is apparent in<br />

the automatic assumpti on of Chinese culpability. In these cases . the condition perceived<br />

as being deviant is simply the condition of being Chinese. Falk' s descriptions of the<br />

nature and origin of stigma prove far more capable here of accounting for the widespread<br />

stigmatization of Asian peoples in the 2003 SARS epidemic. for rather than attempting to<br />

break down the roles of the stigmatized and their reasons for being placed into negative<br />

categories. Falk simply states that "stigma and stigmatization can occur whenever and<br />

wherever some people find behaviour or characteristics of other people offensive and/or<br />

reprehensible" (Falk 200 1. 24).<br />

Having spent the first part of this chapter examining the nature of stigmatized<br />

individuals and the reasons behind their stigmatization. we now tum to the reactions the<br />

public has towards them. In this area. the literature is fairly consistent, and reads more<br />

like an extended series of variations on a theme. As Kleinman and Lee state. the<br />

stigmatized individual can expect "disc rimination. negative labelling. menacing societal<br />

22 1


esponses such as ostracism and exc lusion. and even violence" (Kleinman and Lee 2005.<br />

173), In responding to the stigmatized. thc public constructs a mind-set to create what<br />

Coffman calls a "st igma-theory": "an ideology to explain his inferiority and account for<br />

thc danger he represents. sometimes rationalizing an animosity based on other<br />

differences . such as those of socia l class" (Goffman 1963.5). In discussing this reaction.<br />

Falk notes that Emile Durkheim claimed that the "function of creating a boundary in any<br />

human group is group solidarity " (Falk 2001. 32). and furthermore summari zes Edward<br />

Sapir's recognition of stigma and stigmatization-producing language as "


they arc different. and we know they are differe nt because they are labelled. Such a self-<br />

fulfilling prophecy explains in large part the continued presence of long-stand ing<br />

stereotypes. We "know" that Mexicans are lazy because they are Mexicans. and all<br />

Mexicans are lazy; we "know" that the Irish are drun kards because they are Irish. and all<br />

Iri..h people arc heavy drinkers. Obviousl y. it is difficult for an individua l in a stigmatized<br />

community to escape such labelling . for the very fact that they are a member of that<br />

community "proves " the label to be correct. all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.<br />

Sim ilarly. the existence of a label on a stigmatized commu nity can be used to "prove" the<br />

culpabi lity of that commun ity for any related offences . If the Chinese were historically<br />

blamed for Chinese syphilis and the bubonic plague. they can also easily be blamed for<br />

other. newer diseases. for the existence of the older stories "proves " that they are dirty.<br />

disease-laden people.<br />

Finally in our discussio ns of the literature. we examine how the reactions of those<br />

who have been stigmatized have been described and accounted for. I again tum to the<br />

\\'OTk of Goffman. and begin this section with an extensive quote from Stigma:<br />

How does the stigmatized person respond to his situation'! In some cases it will be<br />

possible for him to make a direct attempt to correct what he sees as the objective<br />

busis of his failing. as when a physically deformed person undergoes plastic<br />

surgery. a blind person eye treatment. an illiterate remedial education. a<br />

homosexual psychotherapy"... . Here proneness to "victimization" is to he cited. a<br />

result of the stigmatized person' s exposure to fraudulent servers selling speech<br />

correction. skin lighteners. hody stretchers. youth rc..torcrs ...cures through faith.<br />

and poise in conversat ion. Whether a practical technique or fraud is involved. the<br />

quest. often secret. that results provides a ..pccial indication of the extremes to<br />

which the stigmatized can be willing to go. and hence the painfulness of the<br />

II Though it bears lillie ramification to the overall thrust of this chapter . it should be<br />

pointed out that in the curre nt. post-millennial era the notion of a homosexua l seeking<br />

treatment for "his failing" is quaint at best. and at worst. homophob ic and dosed-minded.<br />

113


situation thatleads them to these extre mes .. .. The sng matizcd individual can also<br />

attempt to correct his conditi on indirectly by devoti ng much private effo rt to the<br />

mastery of areas of activity ordinarily felt to be closed on incidental and physical<br />

grounds to one with his shortcoming . Th is is illustrated hy the lame perso n who<br />

learns or re-learns to swim. ride. play tennis. or f lyan airplane. or the blind perso n<br />

who beco mes an expert at skiing and mountain climbing.... Finally . the person<br />

with a shamefu l diffe rentness can break with what is called reality. and<br />

obstina tely attempt to employ an unconventional interpretation of the character of<br />

his socia l identity. ( 1%3 . 9-10)<br />

I have included a quote as extensive as this for two reason s. First and foremost. it<br />

is important to notice here-as with his arguments about the nature of stigmatization-<br />

that Goffman is only dealing with the reactio ns of people who actually ha ve a cond ition<br />

or differ entness that has led them to be placed into a stigma tized category. The above<br />

quo tation lists only three of some fourtee n react ions Goffman catego rizes. hut all of his<br />

exa mples follow the forma t of this quote. and are of people trying to cope with or fix<br />

their real differences. What is missing from these arguments is. again . the notion of the<br />

f' (lw lt ;all y discre ditab le: in this case . the perfectly healthy individ ual who has been<br />

wrongly placed into the category of those who arc suspected of being infected with<br />

SARS. It might he true that the reactions of these individuals arc in part the same as those<br />

staled by Goffman as reactions of people who have been categorized based on an actual<br />

diagnosis of SARS. but the point is far from semantic. There nrc definit e differences<br />

between the two groups of peop le on enough levels 10 warrant their separation. For<br />

example. while those who have and have not been infected with SARS may both chafe at<br />

their being included in a stigmatized category . and be th may feci the placement and<br />

concomitant reactions of the public unwarra nted. the reasons behind such reactions are<br />

va..tly differ ent. \Vhile individuals who have been infected with SARS may feel their


stigmatization as undeserved and unpleasant for a number of reasons- their having<br />

successfully fought off the disease. their rejection of the diagnosis. their rejection of or<br />

lack of understanding of the serious nature and contagiousness of the infect ion. general<br />

stubbornness. ctc.c-fhe individuals who have not been infected with SARS feci their<br />

being stigmatized is undeserved precisely because they have not been infected with<br />

SARS . So while the reactions of these two groups may be similar. the reasons behind<br />

their actions are different enough to warrant their being categorized separately.<br />

Secondly. I have included an extended section from Goffma n'.. work because it is<br />

also important to point out the commonalities and differences between his theoretical<br />

reaction.. and the real-life reactions reported by those stigmat ized in the SARS ep idemic.<br />

Restating Goffman' s theories on stigmatized individ uals' reactions to their situations in<br />

the above quotation reveals three areas: I) direct correction of the failing through surgery.<br />

therapy, or education; 2) mastery of activities thought 10 be difficult or impossible. given<br />

the stigmatized individual's condition: and 3) the employment of an "unconventional<br />

interpretation of the character of his social identity" (though this last point is left<br />

unexplained and without an example. making it difficult to ascertain Goffm an' s exact<br />

meaning), As previously stated. however. there arc at least fourteen points in total to<br />

Goffmans list (a more careful reader may find more, but Goffman'.. luck of sub-headings<br />

or numbered entries. combined with the stream-of-consciousness style writing employed<br />

in Stigma. makes exact count difficult). Briefly. the remaining eleven reactions arc as<br />

follows. noting that these do not form a sequence of progress ion. nor docs every<br />

stigmatized individua l experience them all:<br />

225


4) stigma as an exc use for ill success:<br />

5) stigma as a blessing in disguise;<br />

6) (ofte n followi ng from number 5) stigma as evidence of rhe limitations of<br />

"non-nab";<br />

7) avoiding contact with "normals":<br />

8) paranoid feelings. such as hostility. depression. and anxiety:<br />

9) uncertainty about status and placement when in contact with "normals":<br />

10) having to be constantly self-conscious and calculating about first impressions<br />

when meeting "normals":<br />

ll ) feeling that everyday accompl ishments are misinterpreted or exagge rated by<br />

"normals." as in whe n people are amaze d that a blind man can make his own<br />

dinn er. or excuse the failures of the stig matized because of their situa tion. such as<br />

making it "okay" for someone with a learning dis abil ity to nOIunderstand;<br />

12) feelin gs of invasio n of privacy. as when peop le with amputated limbs are<br />

stared at:<br />

13) defen sive co wering; and<br />

14) hostile brav ado (Goffman )963: Low 20()4).<br />

II is not my intent ut this point to go through all fourteen poin ts and co mpare them<br />

indiv idually (0 (he reac tions I collecte d during my fieldwork. for such an effort would be<br />

ultimately self-defeating and pointl ess. The sma ll range of expe riences narrated by my<br />

inforrnu nts does not constitute a suffic iently large exam ple 10 prove or disprove<br />

Coffman's theo ries. It is. howeve r. my inten t to move from here into a series of studies of


those narratives. and hold them individua lly up to Goffman's fourteen points show ing<br />

how each docs or does not fit. Such an effort will be strained in many ways. as none of<br />

my informants ever contracted SARS and are all thus only potentially discredita ble. while<br />

Goffman's theories all center on those who actually had the conditions for which they<br />

were stigmatized. However. the results will shed new light on the proverbia l cave wall. as<br />

it were. and thus are worth the effort.<br />

It is first. however. useful to examine Goffman's points from a different light. for<br />

not all of them apply to the studies undertaken in this chapter. Recall that the ultimate<br />

efforts here are to examine the ways that stigmatized individuals and commun ities<br />

mediated the fears associated with SARS. Mediation. by definition. is an act of<br />

agreemen t. compromise. or reconciliation. usually conducted between two parties in an<br />

attempt to strike some accord or peace (dict ionary.corn). Used as it is in this chapter. the<br />

word still carries the meanings of reconciliation and peace. but the act of mediation docs<br />

not necessarily occur between two physical parties. Instead. it can he an internal strugg le.<br />

where a conscious effort is made to come to some inner peace. For many of my<br />

interviewees, these efforts were made to balance the stresses associated with being<br />

stigmatized: "mediation:' as I use it here. is a loose synonym of the infinitive "to cope:'<br />

The act of mediation is thus a positive act. a movement toward learn ing to<br />

constructively deal and live with a given situation or circu mstance. By elimination. then.<br />

any act that is not positive is not one of mediation. A negative act is destructive. not<br />

con..tructive. An exam ination of Goffman's fourteen points reveals that the majority of<br />

them arc in fact destructive or negative. Ten of his fourteen points lit into this category .<br />

227


Only points one, two, five, and six (from the above list) nmy qualify as positive,<br />

constructive reactions to being stigmatized: direct correction of the failing; mastery of<br />

difficult or impossible activities: stigma as a blessing in disguise; and stigma as ev idence<br />

of the limitations of "normals."<br />

Though Goffman gave no ev idence in Stigma that he intended his list to be all-<br />

inclusive. it seems obvious from this analysis that there is much that could be added to it.<br />

especially as his ideas are so heavily weighted in favour of the negative and destructive.<br />

For exa mple, a basic and common method of alleviating the tensions of stressful<br />

situations makes virtually no appearance whatsoever in Goffman's book: the concept of<br />

humor as relief. Take the following exce rpt from the interview I conducted with Jonathan<br />

Gould as example:<br />

My cousin by marriage. his mom was coming in. He must be like thirty, his early<br />

thirties. He was picking up his mom at the train station, and when she got off the<br />

train when he met her, he was wearing a mask, and he was all serious and he<br />

quickly handed her a mask and gloves to put on. telling her how dangerous<br />

everything was. So after a while. when she was wearing the mask and the gloves.<br />

then he started laughing and told her he was just joking. it wasn' t necessary. But<br />

the whole family wanted to kill him. they thought it was, he was a real jackass for<br />

scaring his sixty-year-old mother like that (laughs). (Gould 2(05)<br />

As Elliott Dring says, the distrihution of tension in a narrative is the key to its<br />

interpretation as humorous or non-humorous. A humorous narrative requires some<br />

tension to make the topic interesting. but too much tension or emotional involvement for<br />

either the narrator or audience cancels out the humor. Jokes about cancer can be<br />

humorous. but are probably less so if your sister died of it (see Dring 1992. 12-13).<br />

Jonathan' s story is a perfect examp le of this concept: for the cousin, the tension in the act<br />

228


of tricking his mother was appropr iate for the determination of the act as humorous. But<br />

for the family, the tension exceeded those levels.<br />

Humor is, of course. relative. and it should come a... no ...urpri...e that a narrative<br />

...uch a... this would be seen as humorous by some-including Jonathan. as ev idenced by<br />

his laughter-but as disturbing and inappropriate by others . Jonathan himself recog nized<br />

the breaking point in this equation in a sepa rate ...ectio n of his interview. when he<br />

di..cussed a trip he too k to visit his sister:<br />

Yeah. we jok ed abo ut it. about not telling peop le when we'd got to Newfoundland<br />

that we had just come from Toronto. becau..e it was in the middle of the SARS<br />

hysteria. In the cab or.. .just anywhere. like our first couple of days there. I'd<br />

forgot all about this, there was jus t so much fear that. we wanted to jo ke abo ut it<br />

with people. hut we were afraid that some people would jus t leave the room<br />

(laugh). It' s crazy. (Gould 2005)<br />

A similar comparison of the tensions involved in the creation of humor came from my<br />

interview with Luis Tan. When asked if he remembered hearing any jokes abou t SARS.<br />

Luis' first rcsponse was. "No. Because people I deal with. peop le.. .everybod y too k it<br />

ser iously. Evcrybody look it seriously. Because how can you make c jo kc when you see<br />

peop le dying and there' s no cure? You yourself gel scared. 10 0 . You ju st hope and pray<br />

thalthis will stop and there will be a cure for this particular disease" (Tan 2(05 ).<br />

Howe ....cr. Luis acknow ledged that there were peop le in Toronto who did employ humor<br />

in their response s to the crisis. and said of them:<br />

Well. they might have the ir own reaso n. But in my opinion. maybe some people<br />

want to.. .because everybody's too ..erious, they want 10 make a lillie. they want<br />

to make people relaxed or... they maybe make jo kes like that. But I don' t think<br />

in..ide them. whee ver makes that. I don' t think they have a bad intention of<br />

putting the real meaning on it. because it' s a serious matter. (Tan 2005)<br />

229


The poi nt is that people used hum or to medi ate fea rs du ring the SARS cris is.<br />

Sev eral of my info rmants related humoro us sto ries. jok e....or anecdo te...abo ut their<br />

expe rience s with the outbreak. Recall from the previous chap ter tha t Heather and her<br />

Chine ...e roommate regularly and openly joked about con tracting the discase-v'Ha ha:<br />

you've got SA RS"-in response to coughing. Mike, the Efl.1T. recalled ...evcral in...tances<br />

where humor was used as a coping mechanism by peop le in the widely-stigmatized<br />

health profession. First. M ike recalled at least two instances of the SA RS acronym being<br />

appropriated and recontextualized to comment on the outbreak. Though he had lost the<br />

new definition of one of the reco ntext ualiznt ions by the time I interviewed him in 2005.<br />

he did reca ll that it had ...omething to do with "'Summe r Recreation' ... some th ing abou t<br />

getti ng 3 vaca tion throu gh qu arantine"-but co uld not remember wha t the rest of the<br />

lett ers stood for. li e did. howe ver. quite clearly recal l peo ple jo king that SARS stood for<br />

"S hit ty Acute Respir ator y Sy ndro me:' in re...ponse to the quarantines and hassles.<br />

Mike' s largest contribution to this discussion was an extende d section of<br />

interview relat ing ho w he and his colleag ues in the health profession used humo r to cope<br />

with the stresses of the outbreak. His narrative, which I present here in full, revea ls much<br />

about how a st igmatized community uses such a respon se:<br />

Jon : And what about SA RS jo ke...'! lmcun.Ict' s start off, did yo u hear<br />

many jokes dur ing this time about SA RS?<br />

Mike : Goodness. SARS jo kes specifically. No. peopl e used it in hum or .<br />

yo u know there W3S some jest. mostly beca use peop le were nervo us and anxio us.<br />

and certa inly in my pro fess ion we were. we have a hit of a wide sense of humor.<br />

yo u know. wh at else can you do whe n you're stuck in a ma-..k and gown and<br />

headdr ess all afternoo n? I can' t think of anyt hing offha nd. There was a lot of<br />

humor. peop le tried to keep it light. but. .<br />

Jon: Not any form ali zed jokes like. " Knock . knock ?"<br />

230


Mik e: " Knoc k. knock:' or "What do you get when you have a SA RS<br />

pauc m. . .... No.<br />

Jon: 50 it was mostly ju st like. a situation woul d come up. there wou ld be<br />

tens ion. and someone would make a jo ke to break the tension of the situation?<br />

M ike: (affirmative noise ) I remember walking into a bar. this bar on<br />

Yonge Stree t. where the y call Bingo and it's offensive and it's sort of a char ity<br />

game for hum or. It' s also a bit of a sho w. And walk ing into the bar and. "Oh.<br />

there' s Mike. and he' s got SAR S: ' you know . and people wou ld tum around. Or .<br />

one rea lly good one that I used to do. and I still do all the time . is if we<br />

[hcalthcare practitioners) get into an elevator. let' s say in a busy office town<br />

downtown where you get fifteen people in the elev ator . and )'ou (mak es coughing<br />

noise). and someo ne. "S AR5 : ' And people gigg le or they cover their face. When<br />

we wou ld get into elevators and peo ple would cover their mouth s. you know .<br />

there ' s no patient . it's ju st us goin g up to a ca ll. you'd (ma kes cou ghin g noi se)<br />

ju st to sort of. you kno w. a ruse. But.. .<br />

Jon: And it sounds like all of these. they're not cruel. they're used to kind<br />

of acknowledge in some way the seriousness of the disease by. . .<br />

M ike: (affirmative noise) It' s wh at' s on e ver yone's mind . and when you<br />

get in an ele vator with two guys who arc in ma sks . gowns. gloves and e yegogg<br />

les and headdre ss. e veryo ne ' s thinking about it. You can' t. you know .<br />

elevato r' s quiet eno ugh. they're all. the y know what' s go ing on. Everyoncs<br />

thin king abou t it.<br />

Jon : And you might as we ll make a jo ke out of it rather than have<br />

everyonc..<br />

Mike: Lighten the mood . yeah.<br />

Jon: Oth er jo kes. humorou s situat ions'!<br />

Mike: Humorous situa... whenever I put the full-body white suit on.<br />

because downtown Toro nto we mostly wore masks and gloves and gowns. but<br />

you could put the white full-body suit on. and peo ple in public would look at you<br />

just like you're insane. you look like the Michelin Man . so it was funn y to do that.<br />

And there were times when you'd wa lk in some place and. just to watch. just to<br />

watch peop le' s react ion to you order co ffee. you know. white gown. Th ere wa s an<br />

ema il that went around as we ll tha t was "SARS On Icc: ' versus "Stars On Icc."<br />

where someone had taken pictures of. all these stillshots of the "S tars On Icc"<br />

peop le doin g thei r ice dancin g. and then cut-and-pa ste or painted 0 11gowns and<br />

gloves and masks on these people. Just stupid things. but they' re cute nonethel ess.<br />

(La rse n 2005)<br />

In Mike' s narra tive. not on ly is the active. spoken usc of humor as a co ping mechani sm<br />

apparent. but also the impo rtance of learning how to interpr et situat ions as humorous. It<br />

wou ld be easy to react negat ivel y to walking into a coffee shop and havin g the pub lic<br />

231


" look at you jus t like you're insane: ' but Mike see ms to stress in his interview that such a<br />

react ion is ultimately self-defeating. Negat ivity only begets negativity: stress on ly bege ts<br />

more stre ss. Mike comments on this further later in the interview:<br />

It' s really important not to lose sight of the fact that we've been going for<br />

thousands of years with all kinds of diseases and plagues, and there's so much<br />

hype. I don 't mind , I guess , and I have a very ope n sense of humor. Certainly<br />

peop le who were losing family membe rs to the disease might not find it funn y,<br />

probabl y won 't. But, and again, that's a manc r of perspect ive, and from the<br />

perspective that I have, having had to deal with it, having bee n accuse d of havi ng<br />

SARS, hav ing people cover their face when I wal k arou nd, my neighbors in my<br />

apartment building neve r came by to see me. I don' t mind, myself. I think that's<br />

norm al. Peop le react to any kind of stressf ul situation, often with extremes, and<br />

often with the extremes of nervou sness. humor, laughing. They cut the stress by<br />

making a jo ke. (Larse n 200 5)<br />

Humor, then, is a natura l react ion to stressfu l situations. The spec ific types of<br />

humor shown in these pages fall main ly under the classi fication of "ga llows humor: '<br />

defined by Amoni n J. Ob rdlik as "humor which aris es in co nnection with a precar ious or<br />

dangerou s situation" (Obrdl ik 1942, 709 ). Ob rdlik wrote the article in which this quote<br />

appcnrs as a sociological study of gallows humor as it appeared in Cze chos lova kia dur ing<br />

its WW II Naz i invasion and occupation. The correlations between this event and the<br />

SARS outbreak may he slim (though epidemics arc often referred to in militaristic terms.<br />

and it is no stretch to say that SARS " invaded" Ca nada ), hut Obrdlik's co mments on the<br />

nature (If anti-Nazi jokes in Czec hoslovakia still find purchase when applied to a modem<br />

disease crisis. Obrdlik says:<br />

Peop le.. .found in anecdotes an intelle ctual and emotional escape from the<br />

disturbing realities. It was symptomatic that the more ominous the news co ming<br />

from invaded Aus tria. the more numerous and pointed were these anecdotes. Th ey<br />

bec ame a means of soc ial con trol in that they bolstered the mora le of the Cz ech<br />

peop le. and, although they were so often but the ex press ion of wis hfu l thinking,<br />

232


their impo rtance as a compens ation for fear cou ld not be overest imate d. tObrdlik<br />

1942. 710)<br />

These co mments co incide with what James A. Thorson has said of gallows humor: that it<br />

··... is both intentional (not circumstan tial) and has a copi ng motive . It is hu mor that is<br />

generated for a reason. Thai is. it's not just a funny thing that happened. like mourners<br />

with no place to go: rather . gallows humor is created knowingly and for a purpose"<br />

(Thorson 199 3. 18). And since . as Ob rdlik noted. this type of humor seems 10 be more<br />

common the stro nger the negative entity that enac ts it. the proliferation of black and<br />

gallows humor in hospital settings shou ld come as no surprise (see Bosk 1980: Kuhlman<br />

1988: Maxwell 2003: Sayre 200 1: and van Wormer and Docs 1997).<br />

There we re other activi ties that similarly evide nced the usc of humor as a co ping<br />

mechanism in deali ng with the SARS outbreak. The animated telev ision progra m South<br />

Park. for instance. aired an episode on Apnl Jo" of 2003 titled "Re d Man' s Greed:' in<br />

which a gro up of Native Americans attempted to dr ive out the reside nts of the town of<br />

South Park to enable the destruction of the town and the subseq uent co nstruc tion of a<br />

superhighway connecting their reser vation ' s casino to Deliver. Co lorado. The Native<br />

American s' first few attempt s were all stymied by the tow nsfolk


South Park, of course , can on ly he used as evidence that humor was used to<br />

respond to the SARS crisis: show creators Trey Parker and Matt Sto ne did not belong to a<br />

stigmatized community. But public efforts such as the irs were not limited to Ame rican<br />

televisio n. As Toromonians as a whole constitute a stigma tized group. Toro nto's 2005<br />

Fringe Festival provided the ultima te exa mple of a stigma tized comm unity respo nding to<br />

their situation throug h lISC of humor. The Festival hosted. among its many productio ns.<br />

the musical "SA RS ical," written by Brando n and Kurt Firla (aka the Rumo li Brothers)<br />

and Waylen Miki (aka the Severe Acute Repertory Theatre Company). The show mocked<br />

the marketing of the SARS epidemic through skits and songs. two titles for the latter<br />

being " I Kissed the SA RS Babies" and "Tee n in Quara ntine." The original prod uction<br />

was met with scorn by many critics. who were offended by the show's light-hearted<br />

stance on death and disease, hut ticket sales were strong enough that it was picked up by<br />

Toronto' s Factory Studio Theatre in 2006 for a seco nd run. and in late 2007 was being<br />

revamped for a full-scale production (Pedersen 2006: ..SA RSical..... 2(06). Aga in, the<br />

poin t is simple: stigmatized individuals used humor as a coping mech anism during the<br />

SA RS ep idemic.<br />

Restating my earlier point. this use of humor as a coping mechan ism is large ly<br />

absent from Coffman's work. This is not to say that it is cntirelv abse nt. for the concep t<br />

of humor does make a few brief appeara nces. For exa mple. in responding to a stigma,<br />

Goffman notes that. "In addition to matter-of-fuctness. levity is also recomm ended"<br />

(196 3, 116). and provides as illustration. quoting Macgregor. ct ul.. the story of a woma n<br />

whose face had been damaged by beauty treatments. and who dealt w-ith such scarr ing by<br />

234


Toro nto. it is very likely that at least some of the parishioners kne w someone who was.<br />

Heather doc s state that Prayers of Intercession arc a regu lar pan of this partic ular<br />

church's services. and so it vwo uld just have seemed like a natu ral. normal thing" to<br />

include SARS victims into the recitation (Read 2005 ).<br />

The two rema ining narrat ives make the fear -media ting nature of church practices<br />

quite appare nt. and as well. evidence the extents to which people were willing to niter<br />

basic rou tines to pro vide for their own safety . These two narratives are especially releva nt<br />

beca use be th come from the highly-stigmatized Filipi no-Chinese community in and<br />

surrounding Sca rbo rough . Luis Tan. for exa mple. reca lled the following:<br />

When the SAR S was at its peak. meaning you sec people die here and there . you<br />

try to [avoid] restaurants ... publ ic places as much as possible you avoid . Even in<br />

the chur ch. the priests always say. normall y you shake hands when you say<br />

"Peace he with you:' even the prie st was tellin g peo ple just to he cautious. we just<br />

greet each other. "Peace be with you: ' instead of shaking hands. Those are the<br />

preca utions that even in church was good pract ice. Th at was at the height of the<br />

SARS crisis. (Tan 2(05)<br />

A seco nd narrative. which both encapsu lates and ex pands upo n Luis' entry. co mes from<br />

interviewee Seny Zamora. who related to me the follow ing story about her church.<br />

showi ng how even holy ground can become tainted by fear:<br />

Scuy: So it' s like. if you have [SARSI. almost you feci that you' re<br />

doom ed, People recover. but because it was so contagious. that they can spread it<br />

by. say. air, coughing, sneezing and everyth ing. right? So whatever you hold.<br />

right? So you' re being paranoid . wash your hands. "Happy Birthda y!" washing of<br />

the hands.... (laugh) People don 't even want to shake hands even church. right?<br />

In the Ca tholic. I' ve been pure Cath olic. I don't know. but when we have the mass<br />

you go around, you turn and you shake hands. right'! Peopl e. the priest would say.<br />

"Ok ay. becau se of the SARS, you just how your head ." (laugh) So peo ple bow<br />

their head. And also you're going to the church. you have the holy wate r and the<br />

"1" on your forehead and you make the sign of the em..s. They took out the holy<br />

water! (laugh)<br />

Jon: No holy water at all?<br />

137


Se ny: No. Because it conta minates the qui ckest. They' re say ing that SARS<br />

is spread by hold ing. like the handv, so you always need to was h yo ur hand s after<br />

co ntact. physic al contact . no nobod y shoo k hands.<br />

Jon: What abo ut co mmunion'! Wa.. that altered at all'!<br />

Se ny: I thin k they stopped. yeah. because the priest had . .. usua lly<br />

sometimes people sip com mun ion through the mouth . right '! So the priest made<br />

this announcement. "Please receive communion through your hands :' (laugh)<br />

Jon: Did they even pass out the little. the wafers '!<br />

Seny : They passed out the wafers . but through the hands , But not. net . . .to<br />

get at the priest hold ing it. because the saliva wou ld cau se the SARS . right ? So if<br />

you stopped putting communion and the host into the mouth. righ t. but just done it<br />

through the hand. right '! So everything was like that.<br />

Jon: Did the wine disappear as well?<br />

Sen y: Yeah. the wine disappeared, They didn't... wel l. the wine was there .<br />

hut then ..orne peop le. there were some churches that they offered wine for the<br />

communio n guys to drink. but that stopped for a while. 'Cause when you go to<br />

communion. some churches offe r wine separately from the wafers and the bread,<br />

(Zamora 2005)<br />

Sc ny' s co mments ev ide nce a meta phorical "line in the sand" in rela tio n to dange r<br />

and gatheri ng places. The dese rtedness of bus inesses and large areas of Toronto-c-such as<br />

Chinatown- is indicative of high le vels of con cern and fea r. but many of the<br />

establis hments that were largel y empty during the SA RS crisis were of an ulti matel y<br />

entertai ning. dispensable natu re. People do not immed iately need to cat at resta uran ts. nor<br />

do they imm ediatel y need to go to the movies or shop for clo thes . These are all activ ities<br />

that cun safely and eas ily be at least te mporarily done away with. and their absence<br />

provide s min ima l disrup tion 10 the basic. day-to-da y workings of the household ,<br />

However . there are act ivities that need to be performed on a regular basis. and for the<br />

religious ly devou t. Sunday morning churc h is as critica l to the soul as bread is to the<br />

bel ly. Many of Seny 's congregation con tinued to atte nd mass during the 2003 ou tbrea k<br />

because of this. bUI there sti ll existed at tha t church the potential of a dangerous<br />

juxtapo..ition between large numhers ofpcople and a con tagious . deadly virus . Since<br />

238


ceas ing to attend church was not an option. offi cial services were altere d to reduce the<br />

poss ible avenues of disease transmissio n. Physical con tact with other human bein gs was<br />

either eliminated altoge ther or. where that was not possi ble (as in the pass ing of<br />

com munion wafers). kept to a minimum and performe d in ...uch a manner as to redu ce<br />

po...sible co ntact with "dangerous" body fluids like saliva. The methods that churc h-goers<br />

and church officia ls cho...e to deal with this problem highlight the extents to which they<br />

were willing to endange r them selves for the sake of what were perceived as basic needs.<br />

Such changes in church activit ies evidence a paradigmatic need for security. as<br />

reflec ted in the alterat ions of perso nal actions and behaviours . and ...imultaneously a<br />

...yntagma tic need for stability. as the intended meanings beh ind the actions remai n<br />

cons tant despit e the changes. Scarborou gh ' s Filipi no-Chin ese co mmunity was heav ily<br />

stig matized dur ing the SAR S outbr eak. and the membe rs of that co mmunity were aware<br />

of their stigmutization. Futhcrmore. the members of that community were affected by that<br />

...tigmati zation. and many of them attemp ted to avoid conta ct eve n with members of their<br />

own community-as evidenced by Ange l' s statement in chapter five that he hardly left<br />

his home for six month s. Luis' narrative abo ut parishioners bein g a...ked not to shake<br />

hands wh ile saying " Peace he with you" is a perfec t example of how membe rs of a<br />

stigmatized co mmunity dealt with the fear that encapsulated their lives. The churchgoing<br />

sentiments of broth erl y love and well-wishing arc ...till present . as the mem bers of the<br />

co mmunity ...till recognize the import ance of grou p solida rity. but the actions have bee n<br />

altered in response to the threat of disease and contamination to facilitate the safety of<br />

indi viduals. Scny's narra tive evide nces similar reactions: the recognition of others is still<br />

239


prese nt. but the act i.. change d from a handshake to a bow of the head. Similarly. the<br />

recep tion of communion and the concomitant rel igious experience and import ance are<br />

still present. parishioners simply recei ve the wafers in their hands . rather tha n throug h<br />

the ir mouths . Senys comments do evidence at least one alteration that falls outside of<br />

this catego ry-the complete remova l of holy water from the fonts, with no apparent<br />

attempt to rep lace it with a different action or gesture-but even then I would argue that<br />

the overall meaning of the religious nature of church participation has not changed.<br />

Scny's comments do not demonstrate that the absence of holy water changed her<br />

churchgoing experiences on any fundamental level. especially as she continued to attend<br />

church during the out break. Nowhere in Seny's narrative is the alteration of these actions<br />

and behaviours anno unced as a nega tive experience . Instead. the alte ratio ns simp ly see m<br />

to be acts that thc parishioners accep ted as co nseq uence of the outbreak -acts that only<br />

change d the ways ch urch was conducted on a physical level. but not the way church was<br />

ex perienced on a religious level.<br />

Returnin g to Goffman' s list. only point two-s-ma stery of nctivitics thou ght to be<br />

difficult Of impossi ble. given the stigmatized individual' s condition-e-appears 10 apply to<br />

the churchgoing ex periences report ed by Luis and Scny. But aga in, Goffman's co mments<br />

arc focused only on those who actua lly have the co ndit ions for which they have been<br />

stigmat ized, Furthermore. the examples Goffman uses to support th is point-lame peo ple<br />

learning to play tennis and blind peop le learning to ski-all focus on the impossibilities<br />

assumed to accompany significant losses of physica l capa bilities such as sight or<br />

movement. Both Seny and Luis are perfect ly healthy indi viduals who had full control of


-- - - ---- ------_._-- - - _.. _--<br />

their facilities. both mental nod physical. Nor can the act of attending church be thought<br />

of as a dif ficul t or impossible physical activ ity for a healthy indi vidual. Once again.<br />

Go ffmcn's po ints do not offer adequ ate headings for the categorization of the respo nses<br />

reported by peop le durin g the SARS outb reak.<br />

But then . when it co mes to SAR S. Goffman's reliance on the usc and<br />

categorization of individuals who actua lly have the conditions for which they have been<br />

stigmatized mea ns that the larger numbe r of his argume nts cannot be used (0 examine<br />

public reactions to the outbrea k. unless his arguments are dccontex tualized or otherwise<br />

twisted 10 fit the situation. One of the few of his statements that doc.. see m to apply to the<br />

respon ses given 10 me by any of my informants is that "since the stigmatized perso n is<br />

likely to be more often faced with these [awkward social) situations than we are. he is<br />

likely to beco me the more adept at managing them" ( 1963, 19). Jokes and humor provide<br />

exactly this type of stigmatization management. as do the churchgoing narratives<br />

provided by Seny and Luis. But even here, there arc reported actions that do nOI see m to<br />

til into this neat statement. Does Angers ncar-comp lete avoidance of peop le for six<br />

months constitute an adept social management strategy'? What about the public' s<br />

uvciduncc of Chinatown and Asian-thcmcd or -cricntcd businesses? Of non-Asian­<br />

oriented businesses such as theatres and airports'! What about reports from interviewees<br />

who said they avo ided funerals (Sen y) and Slopped shopping for birthday presents<br />

(Heather's mother. as reponed by Heather) durin g the outbreak'! Do these actually<br />

constitute "adept' socia l management strategies, since they generally entail the complete<br />

avoidance of social situations? Wouldn' t an adept social management strategy email


learning how better to successfully navigate social situations. rather than avoid them<br />

uhogether?<br />

As seems dear by now, Goffman' s work on stigma-while influential and<br />

groundbreaking-in many ways does not provide an adequate framework for the study of<br />

SARS narratives and communities stigmatized by SARS. Goffman's lad of a general<br />

category for those stigmatized by disease, and the similar lack of a category for the<br />

potentially discreditable, means that the larger portion of the stigma-related narratives<br />

collected for this study are left without a neat slot to fit into. And even when forced into<br />

the study despite this problem. Goffman's heavy emphasis on stigmatized individuals'<br />

"l'gillin' reactions to their situations means that many of the collected narratives that<br />

exhibit positive mediatory actions are similarly left unshclvcd and uncategorized. Even a<br />

small study such as the one conducted here demonstrates the necessity of the inclusions<br />

of humor and other more positive reactions to Goffrnan's lists, and a larger, book-length<br />

study would no doubt find more areas hitherto uncovered. Sociological analyses of<br />

stigmatized individuals and communities have revealed much about the nature of stigma.<br />

Folkloristic, exper iential analyses call reveal yct more, and should he conducted more<br />

frequently. as there is much that our field can add to these arguments.<br />

242


Cha pte r 8: T he Ca use a nd the C ur e: Folk :\h.'d icin e und SA RS<br />

When confron ted with a disease . it i'i a natura l human reaction to want to escape.<br />

Self-preservation is deeply ingrained in our psyche. Barr ing this possibility. the next<br />

logical step is to find a wa y to prevent the dise ase from affectin g us. And if those<br />

attempts fail. we then begin to search for ways to heal ourselves. and to rid our bodies of<br />

the invading forces . The SARS outbreak provides a uniqu e opportunity for examining all<br />

three of these appro aches . because the border-crossing and airborne nature of the virus<br />

led to situations in which individuals found thems elves suddenly confronted with a<br />

disease tha t only a few hours earlier had not exi sted in their neighbourhoods, or even<br />

countries.<br />

The escapist reactions of the publ ic in respo nse to the outbreak have already bee n<br />

covered in the examinat ions of desert ed restaurants. airports. and neighbourhoods. This<br />

chap ter ope ns a new foru m in looking at the ways peop le respond ed to the encroaching<br />

co mo navi rus when escape was not an option. whether for econo mic, personal, politica l.<br />

or ot her reason s. Wh at will result from these studies is proo f that SA RS is unique in the<br />

types of c ures that were created by the layperson in response to the threat of disease.<br />

We first. however. begin with a look at the history of the study of cures and<br />

remedies in medicine. Exam ining previo us work on the subject will prov ide background<br />

infor ma tion that will prove use ful in demonstrat ing why SA RS is unique. It will also<br />

provide a necessary loo k at how the study of folk remedies has changed over the past 120<br />

2·0


years. thus presenting data thai will frame the theo retical approaches taken in this<br />

chapter.<br />

Discussions of the natures of cures and remed ies present in folk medicine are<br />

numero us. having occup ied volumes' worth of scholars hip and covering areas as diverse<br />

as philosophy. psycho logy. and ethnopharrnacology. Much of the early work in folk<br />

medicine was text-oriented. in keeping with the philosophies present in the field of<br />

folklore at the time. and consisted largely of long lists of collected remedies for various<br />

problems. One example from this era will be a sufficient illust ration . William George<br />

Black ' s Folk-Medicine: A Chapter ill The History ofCulrllrt'.lhe preface of which dates<br />

the work to 1883. but which was reprinted in 1967. is an excellen t example of such an<br />

approac h. His work contains chapters on both "Personal" and "Animal" cures. as wel l as<br />

the importance of charms. saints. colors. numbers. the sun and the moon. magic writi ngs.<br />

rings. and various forms of "domestic folk-medicine." thai altoge ther cons titute some 130<br />

pages of a 220-page book . The scholarship necessary to prod uce such voluminous lists is<br />

impressive. and the categories Black form s to organ ize his collections are useful. bUI<br />

from the current perspective the work as a whole is lacking such critical contextual<br />

information as the beliefs and values of the practitioners of these cures and remed ies. A<br />

typica l passage from Black' s work. chosen at random, reads:<br />

To avert the destruction of an entire drove it is still known that the burial of one<br />

cow alive may be usefu l. More cruelly. there are instances of a cow being rubbed<br />

ove r with tar. and driven forth from the stricken herd. The tar is set on fire. and<br />

the poor animal is allowed to run till death puts an end 10 its sufferings . To bum to<br />

death a pig has been recomm ended by a wise woman of Banffshire as a cure for<br />

cattle d isease. The ashes were to be sprinkled over the byre and other fann<br />

buildings. (Black 1967. 74 )


While Black docs list the source for his infonnation- Lccky' s History of England ill the<br />

Eighteenth Century, which is itself citing Mitchell' s Superstitions of North-We.H<br />

lIigll!{md!j- no further information concerning the practitioners of such traditions is<br />

forthco ming. Pessimistically. Black' s work at times reads as little more than a list of<br />

curious or barbaric and outmoded trains of thought in folk medicine. such as the<br />

paragraph that succeeds the above-quoted one, which is devoted entire ly to examples of<br />

human sacrifice-as-cure from history and begins with the subjective sentence "Human<br />

sacrifices are, happily, now rare" (Black 1% 7. 74).<br />

Black' s work did advance the study of folk medicine in its own way. for in his<br />

textua l studies of cures and remedies he contradicts earlier sociological thought that "al l<br />

primitive theories attribute disease and death to the spirits of the dead" (Black 1967. 205).<br />

Instead. Black advances the theory that there arc three main "primitive explanations" of<br />

disease, which arc. in order of most to least common and important, "( I) the anger of an<br />

offended external spirit; (2) the supernatural powers of a human enemy; and (3) the<br />

displeasure of the dead" (Black 1967. 205). the studies of which can lead mankind to a<br />

greater understanding of itself. While these theories may no longer be considered correct.<br />

they still evidence a progression in analytic thought. But in terms of contextual analyses,<br />

Black' s work falls short of current standards.<br />

Fast-forward almost a century. and the textual analyses practiced almost to<br />

exclusivity by Black arc slowly giving way to more context-based approaches . Text­<br />

based studies do still appear in print. (cf Brandon 1976: Emboden 1976: Fox-Baker<br />

1981: Guerra 1976: Lacourcie re 1976; Radbill 1976: Smith. Truman 1981; Stallings and<br />

245


Tilton 1981: Sullivan 1981: Vogel 1976). and one of the more prominent tcxtuali sts of<br />

the last thirty years was Wayland D. Hand. His 1980 MII!(iw l ,\It'theine: TIle Folkloric<br />

Component ofMedicine ill 'he Folk Belief. CUMom. and Ritual of 'he Peoptes ofEurope<br />

"tid Amaim. a collection of twenty-three of Hand's articles on folk medicine. consists<br />

almost entirely of text-based studies. Like Black, Hand i' meticulous in citing the sources<br />

of his data. but rarely docs the reader get a look into the lives of the people who practiced<br />

these medicines. For all of its excellent research. ,\ItI!(im l ,\Ietli eill t' offers three hundred<br />

pages of various cures and remedies. and virtually no discussion of the practitioners.<br />

This is not to say that Hand' s work was not important in advancing the field.<br />

What William George Black was able to do in terms of codif ying and orga nizing folk<br />

medicine in the latter part of the 19 th century, Hand did for the middle third of the zo".<br />

His essays greatly detail how folk medicine can be broken into distinct categories of<br />

CUTes and remedies, and he provides numerous examples for each of his groupings. Hand<br />

docs claim in an essay written in 1975 that "the magical clement in folk curing is a<br />

somewhat neglected field in folk medicine" (Hand 1980. I). a statement that seems<br />

exagge rated given the lengthy tracts devoted to it by Black. hut other of his theories<br />

provide interesting insights into the field as a whole. For exa mple, in his discussions of<br />

the "conditions and circumstances that may enhance the [magical I folk medical act or<br />

insure its success:' Hand chooses to categorize his entries hy "the adverbs of time.<br />

manner. and place" (iland 1980. 2). Under these discussions. Hand avoids the normal<br />

pattern of naming a malady and then listing possible cures for it. instead choosing to look<br />

at. for example. cures that take place at crossroads. regardless of the malady they arc


designed to treat. A reshuffling of categories such as this illuminates similarities between<br />

widely dispersed items. allo wing researchers to make connect ions that were previously<br />

hidden. 1o And so Hand provides lists of cures categorized not by disease. but by how.<br />

when and where they are administered .<br />

Hand' s work was also usefu l in expa nding the field of study to all areas of<br />

humankind. rather than jus t focusi ng on third-world or impove rished peoples . In an<br />

article on disease aetiology. he states that:<br />

IForrest E.) Clement's seminal paper on the causes of disease deals largely with<br />

ideas held within the primitive communi ty in various parts of the world. yet for<br />

almos t all of his five main theories of the cause of disease (sorcery. breac h of<br />

taboo , disease-o bject intrusion. spirit intrusion. soul loss) parallels can be add uced<br />

from medical and folk medical aetiologies that derive from people of high culture.<br />

modem as well as ancient. (Hand 1980. 251)<br />

Present within this quote is not only a more modem and inclusive version of Black' s<br />

"pr imitive explanations" of disease. but the idea that it is not only the "pr imitive<br />

community" that continues using such explanations. Instead. humankind as a whole is<br />

correctly po inted out as maintaining these belief s. and thus limiting research in the<br />

manner evid enced by Clement only impoverishes folk loristic understandin g of the topic.<br />

Within Wayland D" Hand' s lifetime-though not evidenced as being practiced by<br />

him in the works cited in this chapter-a critical shift in the field of folklore came with<br />

the insistence that context-based studies would provide even greater understanding of a<br />

given area. The presence of this con text-based approa ch is eviden t in Bruno Gebhard' s<br />

10 Such efforts are not confined to the study of folk medicine. and have proven useful in<br />

other area...of folklore. David Buchan' s article "Propp 's Talc Role and a Ballad<br />

Repertoire" (Jol/nwl of American Folk/ore 95.376) provides the same ...c rt of<br />

illumination·through·ca tego rical-reshufni ng for the field of ballad study. ultimately<br />

proving that Child ballads separa ted by dozens of numbers have virtua lly the same plot.<br />

247


The shift from text to context resulted in an exp losion of articles in the 1970s and<br />

' 80s centered 0 11the reasons patients used cures. rather than just the cures used by<br />

patie nts. Attemptin g to exa mine the field of folk medicine from the viewpoint of the<br />

practitioners and consumers forced academics to look at the "why" of the situation­<br />

more succinc tly asked ax. wh y are peop le still using folk. or "unofficial" remedies in an<br />

era do minated by the success of scienufic. "official" med icine? After all. by 1980<br />

scientific medicine had eradicated smallpox. drastically reduced throu gh vaccines the<br />

number of yearly deaths from disease . transplanted human hearts . kidneys . and lungs. and<br />

delivered the first test-tube baby. In light of such astounding achievements. why wou ld<br />

peop le still tum to mag ic and religion for medical help. much less the weed s growi ng in<br />

the ir back yards?<br />

Some of the earliest efforts to answer this question came in the form of scient ific<br />

studies of the folk medicines themselves. George G. Meyer' s 1981 article "T he Art of<br />

Healing: Folk Medicine. Religion and Science" devotes part of its length to a summary of<br />

the studies that have tested the pharmacolo gic properties of various plants. Specifi cally<br />

ment ioned is Ortiz de Montclla no. ....'hose work in the mid· '70s found thal of twenty-five<br />

plants commonly used in Aztec folk medicine. sixteen were proven in laboratory studies<br />

to produ ce the cla imed effects. and four more had poss ible activity (the rema ining five<br />

were nonactive). In addition. Meyer notes J. L. Dinzs study of plants used by curanderos<br />

which concludes that most of the remedies make "pharmacologic se nse" (Meyer 1981.<br />

10 ). The ultimate goa l of studies such as these is stated to be proving that folk medicine<br />

docs often make "scientific sense:' and that many of the plants arc specificall y chosen


after long periods of investigation by curanderos and the ir globa l co unterparts. As such.<br />

folk med icine ought 10 be taken more ser ious ly by scie ntific medicine.<br />

Pharmacologic efforts such as these we re relatively common throughout the<br />

1970s and ·SOS. Much of the wor k of Social Scicnti ...t Virgil 1. Vogel. for instance. was<br />

devoted to studies of the efficacies of Native American medicines. His opus magnum in<br />

this respect is American Indian Medicine , a 1990 pub lication thai approaches six hundred<br />

page s in length. almost nil of it devo ted to the pharmacologic ...tudies of various plants .<br />

Ralph W. Moss' s 1991 Cancer Therapy: TIlt' independent COIISlIIlIeT'S Guide 10 NOll­<br />

Toxic Treatment & Preventionand 199 8 Herbs Against Catlct'rdid much the same wor k.<br />

tho ugh for the more tight ly-focused field of herbal cance r therapies. And my own<br />

Master ' ...thesis look a similar. admittedly text-based pharmacologic approach 10 the study<br />

of the effectiveness of herbs co mmon to four popular folk-based cancer treatments (Lee<br />

2(XJ1). demonstrating that studies such as thi...nrc still being undertaken in the new<br />

millennium.<br />

However. the strengths of George G. Meyer' s article lay not in the summaries of<br />

other authors' works. but in the statement thai "cle ments of folk medicin e. religiou s<br />

healin g, and scientific med icine need to be incorpor ated into all healing practices. Indeed.<br />

when integration has not occurr ed. the patient will seck sepurutc care in all these areas"<br />

(Meye r 1981. 7). While pharmacolog ic studies that prove the ult imate scie ntific<br />

effectiveness of remed ies arc a step in the right direc tio n. the ultimate goa l of folk<br />

medicine research shoul d be patient-or iented. and Meyer' s statement direct ly reflects this<br />

philosophy. Researchers and medical practitioners need to take into account the beliefs<br />

250


and att itudes of the patien ts. because d isrega rding them only leads to situat ions where the<br />

patients seek add itional help elsewhere. The prob lem with this approac h occurs when the<br />

types of help sought by the patients prove harmfu l or contrad ictory. such as in the case of<br />

herbs that counteract or prove toxic in conjunction with hospital -based treatments and<br />

medica tions . In a conversation with Lynnette Lee. a Radiation Therapist at Massachusetts<br />

General Hospital. she commented that patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer. for<br />

example. arc supposed to amid foods containing antioxidants. as such compounds inhibit<br />

or negate the effectivenevs of the radiation-but many patients begin taking antioxidant-<br />

rich vitamin pills after a cancer diagnosis because they believe such efforts will prove<br />

beneficial. If for no other reason than safety. then. the beliefs and attitudes of the patient<br />

must be taken into accou nt. and medical pract itioners needto learn to address such issues<br />

with tact and opcn-ruindcdness.<br />

Further steps in building the patient-oriented approac h examined both the<br />

similarities between the folk and scientific medical systems. and the structure and nature<br />

of folk medicine as a whole. Sometimes these approaches were used simultaneously. or<br />

within the same article. to build an extended series of bridges between the fields. The<br />

Nord ic Research Symposium of 1981, held in Kuopio. Finland . resulted in sever al<br />

published articles central to these points. Tuula Vaskilampi. working out of the<br />

University of Kuopio in Finland. looked at both scientific and folk medica l syste ms in his<br />

article "Culture and Medicine: ' Vaskilampi' s sociological ana lysis. according to Caro l P.<br />

.. .suggests two fundame nta l elemen ts in all medica l systems : I) a cognitive and<br />

ideo logical sub-system. and 2) an organizational sub-system . The former<br />

251


enco mpasses perce ptions of disease etiology. explanat ions of illness. the natural<br />

,..curs e of illness. and treatment. The organizational sub-system includes soc ial<br />

relations . especial ly between patient s and heale rs. as well as legal entitlements<br />

and constraints. (MacCormack 1982. II)<br />

In stating that both folk and scientific medical syste ms contain these elem ents.<br />

Vaskilampi is pointing out the rationalit y and complexity of such systems. stating in<br />

much the same way as proponent s of the pharmacolo gical approac h do that folk medical<br />

system s arc far from the simpleminded and illogica l bits of quackery that they are so<br />

frequently assumed to be. Instead. folk systems can boast the same levels of comple xity<br />

and ingenu ity as scientific systems. and their treatments are just as well researched.<br />

The remainder of'Va skilampi's article provides an excellent exa mple of the study<br />

of folk medicine as a whole. specifically attempting to organize and de fine common ideas<br />

within the field. despite the differences in values that com e with cros s-cultu ral<br />

philosophies. Natu re is staled as a highl y-valued idea within folk medicine. especially in<br />

the sense of the whole ness and liveliness of natural things. Such a value is present within<br />

such diverse medic ines as "vegetarism. homeopathy. hcrbalism . naturopathy. osteopathy<br />

and spiritual healin g" (Inglis. qtd. in Vaskilampi 1982. 4 l, but despite the variety of such<br />

medicin es, the ultimate meanin g and impo rtance of nature is that it is "seen as containing<br />

message s and truths of deep emotional impac t" (Twigg. qtd. in Vaskilampi 1982.4).<br />

"W holeness ' is another concept com mon to folk medicine s. the study of which<br />

reveals much about the reasons folk medicine s remain popular in the modem era .<br />

Wholeness is "expressed in the em phasis of the balance of the bod y and the mind . The<br />

aim of care is to treat the whole person and not only symptoms of the disease. We find<br />

health in the harmon y between individu al and nature and universe" (Inglis. qtd. in<br />

252


Yuskil am pi 1982. 4·5). Wher e scientific medicine is often criticized for treat ing the<br />

disease and carin g little for the patient-or perha ps better slated. focusing on the sing ular<br />

disease 10 the excl usion of all other po..sible and multiple healt h-re lated issues- folk<br />

med icine exa mines the person as a who le. Sti ll prese nt in these examinations is the<br />

importa nce of treat ing the body. but folk med icines are also will ing to examine the spirit<br />

and soul.<br />

In total, Vaskilampi states that "The cultu ral conte nt of belief systems involves<br />

severa l positively valued ideas: nature. wholeness. purity . humanity and individualism<br />

These ideas arc beco ming salient in other spheres of life. too . They form co untertrends to<br />

the rcductio nistic technolo gical development which many people reject as unsa tisfactory"<br />

(Vaskilarnpi 1982, 12). Folk medicine. then. provides more than the simp le ext irpat ion of<br />

virus and bacter ium of fered by hospit als. In..tend of being trea ted as anonymo us broken<br />

and empty vesse ls that must be quickly and all-too-oft en surgica lly repaired. practitioners<br />

of folk medicines treat people as full and impo rtant hea rers of life who must be slowly<br />

and carefully mended from the inside out using a variety of largely non-invasiv e<br />

..trategics.<br />

Bente Alvcr. another participant in the Nordic Research Sy mposiu m. carried this<br />

idea to a cleare r co nclusio n in "Folk Medicine as an Ope n Med ical Syste m." wherei n she<br />

states that "T he reaso n so man y peopl e seek treatm ent by nltemative mea ns is that folk<br />

medicine i.. an open system capable of respo nding to human needs as they arise in space<br />

and time in co ntrast to offic ial med icine which is locked into a system of a priori<br />

a....urnptions " (Alve r 1982. 12-1-5). Alver specifically states that there are four types of<br />

253


-- - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - -<br />

illnesses that most frequentl y result in the consultation of folk healers: "c hro nic<br />

illnesses... fatal illnesses...various psyc holog ical db-orders ... I.1and conditio ns which<br />

acco rd ing 10 [he physicians are not illnesses at all" (Alvc r 1982. 130). In each of these<br />

cases the scien tific medical system is seen as failing the sick and inflicte d by either not<br />

effec tively treat ing the disease. or by reject ing the patient 's c1aim of disease. Alvers list<br />

may actually be too restrictive. for it does not include the various folk medic ines used to<br />

treat such eve ryday prob lems as up...et stomachs and hangnails. bUI it doe.. illuminate the<br />

underlying issues of cold and clinical di..ranee thai freq uently accompany stories of<br />

hospit al "bits.<br />

Two more articles are needed to fully demo nstrate the transition from the text-<br />

based to the context-based app roach. Th e first is another of Bente Alver' s articles. 'The<br />

Bearing of Folk Belief on Cure and Healing: ' this one published in 1995 in the Journal (if<br />

FolkloreResearch. Alver 's discussions in this art icle co nstitute a fuller and more<br />

extended version of the argumen ts made in her earlier article, building on her previous<br />

concepts to flesh out the patien t-ce ntered nature of folk medicin e. One of A lvers first<br />

points in this article is to outline not only the importa nce of folk medicine as a whole, but<br />

the importan ce of the beliefs inherent to folk medicine as they appl y to the broader<br />

concept of culture:<br />

In all cul tures. people's percept ions and bel ief systems regarding health are<br />

closely tied to fundamental values, such as those concerned with the maintenance<br />

of life and the loss of life and to certain conception s of "the goodlifc." Therefore.<br />

the resea rch domain with in which one deals with people's beliefs relating to<br />

disease and treatment is highly import ant for our understand ing of cultu re seen as<br />

a totalit y. (Alver 1995,22)<br />

254


Folk medicine. then. ontoge netically recapitulates the phylogenetic development of the<br />

larger culture. the former enca psulating and mim icking the import ant aspects of the latter,<br />

but on a relat ively sma ller scale. A lvers statement.. on this matter arc given as<br />

unidi rectio nal. but it seems apparen t that they ca n he reverse d. and thus an understa nding<br />

of culture ca n lead to a strong impres sion of what a researc her might find upon first<br />

encoun tering that cu lture ' .. folk medicine. Cultu res that. as a whole. emphasize the<br />

quality of life over the qua ntity of it will carry those altitude s over to their folk<br />

medicines.<br />

The impo rtance of such a statement lie.. in the differences betwe en folk and<br />

..cicnufic medicines. as hinted at in Alvcr"s earlie r work. but restated in this later article<br />

as follows :<br />

Man y peo ple feel they are being helped with in the folk sector . Th ey report that<br />

they lead more functional lives than they had before treatment. have grea ter<br />

..uccc ..s in what they do. and are happier. On the whole. they desc ribe an<br />

improved general condition. However. their doctor s seldom feel convinced. The<br />

doctors. whose judg ment stems from a biological perspect ive, u..ually conclude<br />

that the patient is as sick as befor e. though sometimes they will concede that the<br />

patient is experiencing a good period, espec ially in the case of the chronically ill<br />

or those with life-threaten ing sick nc..scs. (A Ivcr 1995, 26)<br />

Ultimate ly. folk medicine and scientific medicine attempt to treatthe various maladies<br />

that plague humanity, but the approaches taken differ va..tly in their co ncepts of what<br />

con stitutes "health" and "c ure:' Folk medicine. as we have seen, mimics culture as a<br />

whole. and thus concepts found in the culture as a whole are likely to also be found<br />

with in the domains of folk medici ne. It is because. in part. of such similarities that folk<br />

medici ne is the easier form of treatment to slip into ; it.. conce pts arc familiar and friendl y.<br />

Scie ntific medici ne. on the other hand. preci sely because it is based solely on reason and<br />

255


logic. hypothesis and laboratory-based proof. and emotional suppressio n in favor of co ld.<br />

hard facts. is not seen as reflecting culture as a whole. Its concepts are alien and clinical.<br />

and it\ pract itioners prone to disrega rd anything that docs not co incide with their schoo l-<br />

learned worldvicw .<br />

Alver. in desc ribing such differ ences . uses the work of several scholars to<br />

supp lement her own :<br />

Health disorders have a biophysical as well as a socio-cultural a..pect. In medica l<br />

anthropology these two features are designated di..case and illness. Disease is<br />

viewed as the biologica l disturbance in the bod y. while illness refers to the<br />

cultural and social meaning attributed to the disorder (Young 1982). One may<br />

visualize the two aspects graphically as partly over lapping one another and join tly<br />

constituting the total health field with a particular culture (Hastrup 1984: Elsa..s<br />

and Hastrup 1986:10-1 1). On the whole. profe..siona l medicine is oriented toward<br />

disease. while the folk (la y) sector has its orie ntation toward illness. The medical<br />

strategic.. in relation to disease are designated curing, while tho..e in relation to<br />

illness are termed healing (Hastrup 198-1: Kleinman 1980:82). (Alver 1995.25)<br />

Such a radica l d iffere nce in philosophy freque ntly serves to alienate the layperson. who<br />

feels that his or her needs are not being met by the scientific approach . Drawing these last<br />

few con cepts together- folk medicine as a smaller vcrsion of culture and the differences<br />

between folk and scientific medicin e-s-Al ver completes her arguments with the<br />

followin g:<br />

In a modem folk belief system. health and quali ty of life arc connecte d to<br />

concepts like harmon y and balance. Sickness is linked with disha rmony and<br />

disequilibr ium: it is understood as a luck of balance within the body. as a<br />

disequilibr ium between bod y and soul. and between human beings and the<br />

immediate environment. Also. it may be seen as a lack of balance between human<br />

beings and the "fo rces." Healin g. then. involves help to d islodge the cause of the<br />

appa rent disequilibrium and to re-instate harmony. (Alvcr 1995. 28-9 )<br />

Alvcr goes on to state tha t concepts such as these. when large enough. can he adapte d to<br />

ideas present in scie ntific medicine. but the empha sis ..cern.. to he on the larger scale.<br />

256


Individual treatm ents are ncr often seen as pan of this balancing act. a view thai only<br />

serves 10 further distance the relativity of scientific medicine to the life of the ave rage<br />

person.<br />

Alvcr does recognize the importance of scientific med icine. of course. and<br />

acknowledges its marked ability to treat and cure many diseases. what she docs say in<br />

re-pon..e i.. thai ..ciemific medicine "dea ls with sickness in terms of how. while<br />

alternative medicine asks u'hy" (Alver 1995. 31). and note.. that while each of these<br />

questions are importa nt. human beings are only satisfied when they have answers to both<br />

of them. And so the con tinued presence of folk medicine can once aga in be attribu ted 10<br />

its meeting needs that are not adequa tely addressed by scientific med icine.<br />

The last article that needs to be mentioned in this section comes from Bonnie B.<br />

O'Connor and David J. Hufford. Published in Erika Brad y' s 200 1 book Ifl'ali llg Login :<br />

Cutture all d Medicine ill Modern Health Betief Svstems. "U nderstanding Folk Medicine"<br />

provides a succi nct overview of the field . and echoes many of the state ments made by<br />

previous scholars in regards to the reasons folk medicine remains valid and present in<br />

modem socie ty. O'Connor and Hufford state:<br />

However. it is precisely the health promoting capacities of any system or<br />

therapeutic modality that are of grea test impo rtance 10 its propo nents and users.<br />

People dealing with health prob lems are typic ally quite pragmatic in approaching<br />

and eva luating any form of treat ment or remedy: if il ...ecms ne tt o wor k. or<br />

produces effects thai are 100 unp leasant. ittends to be rejec ted; if it seems 10<br />

work. it lends 10 be supported and retained in the repertoire of hea ling resou rces<br />

likely to be tried again (and reco mme nded to others). This pragmatism ope rates at<br />

both individual and collect i..'e levels. Folk healing tradit ions' reputations for<br />

efficacy . based on aggregate observa tion and exper ience. are cen tral to the ir<br />

pers istence and co ntinued vitality. (O'Connor and Hufford 2001. 15- 16)<br />

257


Important to note here is the underlying notion that folk medicine is not without logic or<br />

reaso n. Its treatments are chosen carefu lly and specifica lly. eva luated over long periods<br />

of time by hundreds. if not thousands of practit ioners and patients, and only absorbed into<br />

the category of useful treatme nts if such long-term obse rvations conclude them worth<br />

their merit . Folk medicine is thus the ultimate patient-centered approac h. especially<br />

consi dering the abandonment of treatments deemed too harsh. Not only is folk medicine<br />

interested in heal ing. it is interested in doing so in a manner comfortable to the patient.<br />

O'Connor and Hufford also attem pt a brief list of the common practices found in<br />

folk medicine-much like William George Black attempted over a century earlie r. The ir<br />

list is much shorter . however, as they free ly acknowledge that "the enormous diversity of<br />

American folk medicine makes it imposs ible to enumera te every therapeutic practice<br />

found in every system" (O'Connor and Hufford 200 1, 28). Instead of listing cures based<br />

on such categories as "sa ints," "co lors," and "numbers," as Black did, or even on such<br />

broader categories as "time, manner. and place," as did Wayland D. Hand, O'Connor and<br />

Hufford simply state that "there are... broad com mon categories of preventative and<br />

therapeutic modalities in use across systems, including physica lly applied therapies,<br />

medicinal herbs and other naturally derived substances, sacramental objects, and prayers<br />

and other religious and spiritual actions" (O'Connor and Hufford 2(XJI, 28), the article<br />

then providing a hrief paragraph for each of these modalities that lists exa mples of the<br />

treatmen ts that might fall under them.<br />

What O'Connor and Hufford do describe in the clos ing paragraphs of their article<br />

are the links betwee n folk and officia l medici nes. They state that most peop le use folk<br />

258


medicine more frequentl y than offic ial medicine. and that these people continue to use<br />

folk medicin e while being treated by doctors and other practitioners of official medic ine<br />

for the same illness. Oftent imes. these doctors are not aware of such practices. This is<br />

made all the more complex by the fact that peop le are often recommended hy their folk<br />

healers to seck treatment from hospitals . and these folk healers will sometimes enter the<br />

hospitals to continue their methods of treatment after or even while the patient is<br />

receiving treatment from hospital staff. "The conventional medical model:' O'Connor<br />

and Hufford conclude. "can be incorporated rather easily along with folk models of<br />

illncs s, and in some in..ranees may even serve to reinforce them" (O'Connor and Hufford<br />

200 1.32). Folk medicine is thus more than willing to accept the presence and wj..dom of<br />

scien tific med icine. but suc h an att itude is still a long way from be ing reciprocated. This.<br />

100. makes folk medicine the easier choice for the public: not only is it "comfortably<br />

consonant with their general worldviews" (O'Connor and lI uffon.l 20(» . 32). but it is<br />

more adaptable and willing to recognize the benefits- and sometimes super ioritie..--{)f<br />

other systerns of healing.<br />

Tak ing all of these articles into acco unt. one secs the history of folk medicine as<br />

varied. but generally pointin g toward contcxtuality. especia lly within the field of folklore.<br />

The larger proportion of modem ..cholars have adop ted a patient-oriented approac h in<br />

their ..tudics. focusing on the beliefs and attit udes of their interviewee.. regarding the<br />

treatments they u..c and the disease s for which they are ..elected. This patient-oriented<br />

approach appears across the wide field of folk medici ne. and has been applied to<br />

numerous health is..ues, both psychological. spiritua l. and corporeal . Applying such<br />

259


theories to SARS is at first blush no different than applying them to any other health<br />

issue, for the prim ary purpose of such investigations is simply to gain an understand ing<br />

of the interview ee 's culture, worldvi ew. mindsct . etc . To atleast some extent, many of<br />

the same questions cou ld eve n be asked of a SA RS interviewee: How do you treat this<br />

disca ..e? where did you learn of these treatments? wh y are the y important to you? What<br />

do they mean to you'! Why do you u..e them?<br />

From ano ther perspective, to at least some ex tent the answers to these quest ions<br />

might he the same for SARS as they would be for any other di..ea..e. Alver ' s concl usions<br />

that folk medicine co ntinues to present itself in modem culture because it fills niches and<br />

answe rs question s that scientific medicine docs not arc also applica ble to SA RS, even<br />

though thi s disease did not exis t when Alver penned her texts. Interviewee answers to a<br />

question such as "Why do you use these treatments?" or eve n more basically, "What<br />

treatments do you use?" co uld therefo re he ex pected to exhibit anti-medica l<br />

establishm ent and/or pro-natur e sentiments. Take, for example, the following excerpt<br />

from my interv iew with Ange l and Rosita Lim:<br />

Jon: What did you do to prevent yourselves fro m getting SA RS?<br />

Angel: Preventing, like, avo id going to public places, like mall. like movie<br />

houses, restaurants spec ifica lly, restaurants. because they say that if you ate<br />

something and you. they did n't wash the dishes w'ell. yOll know , you easily get<br />

SARS from eatin g [with] , like, utensils they didn 't wash well. 50 we try to avoid<br />

going to the mall or the fast food s or restaur ant.<br />

Rosita: Also, this fear, good thing we didn' t have to go to, but this fear of<br />

going to fune ral parlors . If somebody had died and you don' t know why they<br />

died ..<br />

Angel: Yeah , yeah.<br />

Rosita: ...the SAR5 they said that if you were even in the funeral parlor<br />

you might get sick. (laugh ) Or some how transmit.<br />

Ange l: So one thing, you know, I'm afraid to go to the clin ic, like if you<br />

are sick, like if you have colds, you would amid going to see the doctors. because


who knows. so mebody before you has seen the doc tors and left somet hing. and<br />

then you go to see the docto rs and you might have SA RS. So that's one point. we<br />

are afraid 10 go to the docto rs. Even lif l we. we arc sick . (Lim. Angel and Rosita<br />

2(05 )<br />

Clearly present in Angers narratives-especially in the last paragraph-is the distrust of<br />

the medical community. Angel saw cl inics not as places of healing . but as place s where<br />

people were likely to get sick. .....hether that illness came from the medica l profe ssionals<br />

or from other pat ients. For Angel . the word "ho spital" became synonymous with "dirty ,"<br />

or perhaps "diseased:' and as such . hospitals became place s to amid. Such fears were<br />

ca used and exacerbated by the medi cal profe ssion ' s apparentlack of co ntrol over the<br />

virus: eve n after news broke wor ldwide abou t the co ronavirus having spread from Ch ina.<br />

SARS continued ove r the next few weeks to spread els ewhere . The World Health<br />

Organization. poss ibly the face most readily ident ified as respo nsible for containing such<br />

outbrea ks. seemed to be losing the battle . On a smaller level. hospita ls and clinics also<br />

expe rienced grea t difficulties in co ntaining the virus-cvide nced by the numerous<br />

instances of doctors. nurses. and other patien ts contrac ting the disease from infected<br />

patients. Avoiding restaurants and funerals seems a natural exte nsio n of such a negative<br />

perception. for if trained medical pro fessional s have not proven them selves capable of<br />

preventing the spread of SA RS. what ass urances of safety could a waiter or funeral<br />

director poss ibly of fer'? In light of such failings. the only acce ptab le respon se for Angel<br />

wax to take matters into his own hands.<br />

The reaso ns why patients "take mailers into the ir ow n hands"- a phrase used here<br />

in the larger . metaphorica l sense of "removing some or all of the decision -making powe r<br />

from Western medicine in treating illness and discase't-c-are the crux of modem .<br />

261


contextua l folk medicine study. The reasons stated hy my interviewees as to why they<br />

chose these approac hes over, or at lea...t in conju nct ion with Western medici ne, are<br />

exact ly those forwarded by Alver and O'C onnor & Hufford: Western medicine. at least in<br />

some small part, is failing them, and folk medicin e has the capabi lity of offering more<br />

sound shori ngs.<br />

Angel's avoiding the medical clinic because of a perce ived risk of contracting<br />

5A R5 is just one example of this failure . When I asked my informant Luis Tan abou t his<br />

precau tionary measures , he responded, 'There is the the mo...t su ...ccpuble is if your<br />

resistance is low. 50 what we did during tho...e time...i we tried to boost our immune<br />

system by taking vitamin pills and extra milligrams or capsu les or tab lets of vitamin C.<br />

Those are the... and then don't over work yourself, that way your resista nce won' t go<br />

down" (Ta n 2(05). Luis' response is subtler than Angers, as Luis never open ly admitted<br />

to discontent with Western medicine. He did admit to being afra id dur ing the outbreak,<br />

hut seemed to bel ieve in the power of local hospitals and global medica l worke rs to<br />

combat the virus. Luis also watched the news and read local newspapers daily, following<br />

and appa rently completely trusting any advice given to him from those "o fficial" sources.<br />

However. his inclusion of vitamins in his dai ly regime, and especially his notions of<br />

overwork ing oneself lead ing to decreased resistance, still indicate that ...omehow hi !'><br />

needs hadn 't been fulfilled by those official sources.<br />

What is interesting to note about 5 AR5-what, in some small part sets it apart,<br />

and what may explain Luis' actions-is that almost all of the examp le...of folk medicine<br />

mentione d either by my interviewees or through Internet and media sources were<br />

262


preventatives . and not curatives. My thirteen interviewees specifically discussed having<br />

either used or see n others use the following precautionary measures, in orde r of most to<br />

least noted:<br />

I) masks or other covers of the mouth and nose while breathing (ten mentions);<br />

2) avoid ing places (nine mentions);<br />

3) wash ing hands/antibacterial sanitizing hand gels (seven mentions) ;<br />

4) tied at two each were<br />

a) taking vitamins<br />

b) not shaking hands. and<br />

c) using herbs:<br />

5) and tied with only one mention each were<br />

a) using Windex as a surface dis infecting agent<br />

h) altered communion practices. and<br />

c) daily washing of clothes.<br />

The reasons for such a proliferation of preventative medicines and efforts-to the virtual<br />

exclusion of curative medicines and efforts- arc no doubt multiform . One of the largest<br />

reasons is also the most obvious: not many people contracted SARS. and far fewer died<br />

of it. Under such circumstances. "cures" make far less sen..e than "p reventatives," a"<br />

there is little need for a "cure" to a disease that has not yet affected a large number of<br />

peop le: preventing it from getting to them is sufficien t.<br />

If. for example. the list of cures and preventatives for AIDS and SA RS are<br />

compa red. the natures of these differences are more appare nt. AIDS. of course. has<br />

263


dozens of pre.....entat i.....e measures that could be taken. Whatley and Henken give sc .....eral<br />

examp les.I ! including that "A shower afte r sex reduces the risk of getting AIDS "<br />

(Wha tley and Henken ::!OOO. 88); "Withdrawa l by a man before orgasm preve nts<br />

transmission of HIY" (Wha tley and Henken 2()(X). 88); that on ly anal sex transmi ts<br />

AIDS. and therefore vaginal sex is safe (this contrasted with the oppos ing belief that only<br />

gay men get the d isease through anal intercourse. so it is safe for heterosexual cou ples to<br />

practice anal sex to prevem contracting it vaginally); and that a I;10 dilution of bleach<br />

....·iII kill the virus (which is true for surfaces on which bodily fluids have spilled. but is<br />

misinterpreted by women who use this dilution as a douche).<br />

In terms of cures for the virus. Wh atley and Henken note the belief that a man can<br />

cure himself of AIDS by having sex with a virgin and "g iving away" the disease to her-<br />

a belief that surfaced in rape trials of lil Y pos itive men in Zimbab we and South Africa in<br />

the 1990s (Wh alley and Henken 2000). A news report from MSNS C.cOln. dated<br />

February ::!oth. 200 7. covered the story of Gamb ia' s President Yahya Jammeh claiming<br />

that he had a cure for the virus. consisting of a green herbal paste that he rubbed on the<br />

ribcugcs of victims. followed by the ingestion of a bitter yellow liquid and two bananas<br />

("Ga mbia' s President.. : · 2(07). Jonath an Campbell. who states himself to he a "Health<br />

Cons ultant" in Boston. MA. writes of one Dr. Ian Brighthope. whose book The AIDS<br />

Fi ghta.\' details his success ful use of zinc and mass!vc oral and intraveno us doses of<br />

vitamin C to cure patients (Campbell n.d.). Pam Rotella' s webs ite. devo ted in roughly<br />

equal pan s to vegetarian coo king. cons piracy theor ies. travelogues. and stories about<br />

I! Readers should note that the examples that follow vary in accuracy and efficacy. and<br />

should not be undertaken withou t first consulting a doctor .


4) Tremclla (white fungu.. and ..ilver ear). 5) Chrysanthemum . and 6) Androgruphis<br />

(Dresser 2(04): a concoction that requires boiling 10 grams of dead silkworms and to<br />

grams of cicada skins in water with five herbs for 20 minutes and drinking the water for<br />

"even to ten days (Dresser 20(4); that having the Ace of Spades with Saddam Hussein' s<br />

face on it will keep away SARS (r'Bouncin' around... ·· 2(05): etc. etc. etc.. including. of<br />

course. the ever-present surgical Iacema..k. Pessimistically. one might wonder if there is<br />

anyt hing that doesn 't keep away SARS.<br />

Conversely. "cures" for SARS are few and far between. The televi..ion ..how<br />

South Park. a.. noted in chapter 7. did claim satirically that the cure for SARS was a<br />

combin ation of chicken noodle soup. Da}Quil. and Sprite. However. real-life "cures" arc<br />

more difficult 10 find. As previously mentioned. not one of my informants was aware of a<br />

"cure." A scouring of the Internet reveal.. that there was at least one in..tance of a Hong<br />

Kong religious group claimin g that drinking hydrogen peroxide would rid the body of the<br />

vim.. (Cline 2(04). as well as a web..ite claiming that hydrogen peroxide cured not only<br />

SARS. hut ..evcra l other ailments (McCabe 2(03). Further surfing revealed a claim that<br />

intravenous vitamin C would cure SARS (similar to the above claim about an AIDS cure)<br />

(Cathcart n.d.), us well as that a man named Clive Harris claims to be able to cure SARS<br />

(as well as Ebola. cancer, malaria. AIDS. heart problems, and other diseases) because he<br />

has learned how to "download the Mother lode of energy fields. then (separateI them.<br />

then further [tailer] each individual's need to the specific energy form needed." which<br />

apparently resolves "e nergy field" problems in patients and allows the body to naturally<br />

kill off the virus/bacteria/etc. (Clinic Clive Harris n.d.). There was also mention of a<br />

266


doctor who claimed that "u ltraviolet blood irradiation therapy" wa.. effec tive again..t viral<br />

pneumonias (Gupta 2003). Finally. one web..ite wa.. written by a man who claimed that a<br />

process called "Schlenzbath' was effect ive in treating almo..t any disea..e. including<br />

SARS. The process involved sitting in water heated to -tI degrees Ce l..iu... or I05.8F<br />

(with a note that "Li ndenbl uetcn or Lime blo....om" herb.. could be added to the water for<br />

greater effectivcnessI, unti l the body ' s internal tem perature-as measured by a fever<br />

thermometer-s-reached between 39 and -to degree .. Celsius. or 102.2-IO-tF. At thi.. point<br />

the patient wa.. in..tructed to lie do wn, wrapped heavi ly in towels. for the better part of an<br />

hour, or until their body tempe rature returned to norma l t'-There's An Ancient Cure.. ..<br />

n.d.}.<br />

Several notes should be made concern ing these "cure..:· First. lack ing any specific<br />

exa mples of cures from interviews or the initial investigations I cond ucted, I was forced<br />

to tum to the Internet for materials. I conducted my research by using one of thc<br />

lntcmcr's most-frequent ly-used search engines-Google-and selected the searc h term<br />

"S ARS cure" (though I om itted the quotation marks) as the most obvious opt ion,<br />

reasoning that these wou ld be the first words the avera ge web-surfer would think to usc.<br />

Goo gle returned some 774 ,(X>o results, and I elected. in the name of thoroughness. to scan<br />

through the first two hundred-a far greater number than the average wcbsurfcr would<br />

choose to look through. U And while I was able to locate five distinct cures through these<br />

11 In fact. at least one ethnographic study of ..eve ntecn individual s using ..earch engines<br />

concluded, in part, that "The majority of partic ipants never clic ked beyo nd the first page<br />

of ..earch results. They tru..ted search engi nes to prese nt only the best or most accurate.<br />

unbiased results on the first page .. .. 88 percent of the result links selected were located<br />

on the first page: ' and "not onc participant explo red search result.. beyo nd the fifth<br />

267


methods . this should by no means be taken as evident ial of a panop ly of easily-locatable<br />

remedies. My investigations took several hours. and were exhausting to the point that I do<br />

not believe many people would choose to repeat them. Second. and tied in with the first<br />

point. by far the larger number of the websues I had to look through to find these "folk"<br />

cures were. in fact. legitimate website, from legitimate sources about legitimate scientific<br />

advancements in the search for a vaccine or cure . Many of these websites included<br />

published reports by the WHO. the Food and Drug Admini stration (FDA). or the Federal<br />

Trade Commissio n (FfC) on the status of scientific progress in laboratories around the<br />

world. Third. along with these legitimate reports of potential cures were dozens of<br />

websitcs warning the public about spam emails containing claimed SARS preventions<br />

and treatments. and noting the 2003 FDA and FfC crackdown on such bogus email s.<br />

Given these three points. it seems unlikely that any member of the public in search of a<br />

SARS cure on the Internet would be able to locate one without first coming across<br />

several dozen wehpages noting that a) there is no cure for SARS. b) vaccines take years<br />

to develop. and c) many people have been scummed hy bogus claim s of "cures" that<br />

turned out (0 he little more than sinkholes for naive consumers' moneys.<br />

A fourth note docs not involve the nature of the surfed-through wcbsites. but an<br />

examination of the discoveredvcures." A close took ut the remedies mentioned in the<br />

previous paragra phs will reveal that only the first of these- the Hong Kong religious<br />

group's suggestion of ingesting hydrogen peroxidc-c-invol....es the claim of curing only a<br />

single disease. The rest of the entries all revol ....e around treatments that are claimed to be<br />

delive red page" (Marable 20(3 ). At ten links per page. my research took me through page<br />

twcmy-c-four times the research of the most hardy of Marable' s individual s.<br />

268


panacea". curealls for virtually any malady.l-lSARS seems related to them only in the<br />

sense that it is a disease. and these trea tments cure all diseaxes. In this light. the claims<br />

that these treatments cure SA RS can only be seen as the post -event addition of a disease<br />

to an already- long list of maladies that can be cured. In other word... the statu .. of these<br />

treatment .. a" SA RS cure" is on ly margina lly related to SARS itself. as the treatment s<br />

were not specifically formulated to deal with the coro navirus , but were crea ted long<br />

before hand in an effort to rid the body of any illnc..s. Any new disca ..e that might come<br />

along is simply added to the treatment's list of "treatable ailments ." since the eureall<br />

nature of the treatment entails its being able to cure anything, includ ing diseases that have<br />

not yet ..urfuccd.<br />

It is possible. of course. that I have mi....ed ..omething in my resea rch. and that<br />

there is, some where. a folk SARS cure that was created specifically to treat SARS. But<br />

given that none of my informants were aware of one. and that a large quantity of effort on<br />

my part did not result in a positive hit. it seems safe to say that a legitimate exam ple of a<br />

SAR S cure is difficult to locate. Again. I believe this to he a function of the coronaviruv's<br />

limited presence in public consciousness. combined with its com paratively low mortalit y<br />

rate.<br />

More important than my academic analysis of the types and numbers of cures and<br />

prevent atives for SA RS. however. arc the op inions of the people who would have been<br />

surrounded by them. Interviewee Jen Lim. who identified herself as Filipino with strong<br />

1-1 However. even the ingestion of hydrogen peroxide ha.. been historically claimed a" a<br />

curcall-c-see not only the aforementioned McCabe 2003. but Douglass 1992: Leb eau<br />

200 1: t\kCahe 2()()..l; and Trud eau 2007. The "Clin e' article "imply did not mention this<br />

connection.<br />

269


Chinese roots. was quite vocal about her op inions of these remedies . Asked what she<br />

though t about the idea of people attempt ing self-treatment to ami d contracting SA RS•<br />

...he rc...ponded by using an example from her own culture:<br />

Jen : Again. it' s sort of part of that human need for self-preservation. But<br />

it"...entirely possible that you wou ld, I mean in the Chinese cultur e. you<br />

would ...animals and their bod y parts are sort of linked to human attributes of<br />

...trcngth. and so I could see how people would think up. "Oh . if the bull is<br />

immune. or if the monke y was immune, that if we took"- and I think that's like<br />

what they base vaccine s on, that you take a part ... of the animal where it's the<br />

animal that is not affected or impacted and apply it to yourself. and that somehow<br />

you obtain their qualit ie...of immunit y.<br />

Jon: So it seems to you like a very rational decision to try and trent<br />

yourself for a disease by using part of an animal that seems immune to the<br />

di...ease'!<br />

Jen: I think becau se it doe s have a scientific basis. and that it is also rooted<br />

in these old medical pract ices, then yes. it fulfils both an old tradition of drawing<br />

upon nature, but it also does have a basis in science, in modem science. (Lim,<br />

Jennifer 2005 )<br />

Jon' s proclivities toward empathy are strongly apparent here. as she s ems to take some<br />

care in not judging the practitioners of these remed ies. Interestingly, Jcn claimed to have<br />

been mostly unaffected by the outb reak, and changed little about her hab ib . She never<br />

....'Orea mask. did not see the need to take extra vitamins or herbs. and did not change her<br />

daily routines-which included walking through Chinatow n to get to work, When<br />

pressed. the only thing she could recall having felt hesitant about was hypotheticall y<br />

travel ing to Asia .<br />

However. her genera lly non-judgme ntal attitude evid enced some wear when<br />

asked if she knew anyone who had avoid ed public places dur ing the outbreak:<br />

Jcn: I think my dad . I don't know if I can say that up to that point we ate<br />

regularly at Chinese restaurants. because we do n't reall y eat at Chin ese<br />

re...taurant s anym ore. bUI I can't say if that wa... the date or period . But my dad ' s<br />

son of a clean freak, and so is my younger brother. Charl es, And I think for sure<br />

270


my dud said. "Okay, let' s not cat at Chinese restaurants." Because he docs have<br />

the perception that Chinese restaurants are not us clean. just regularly anyway. as<br />

other restaurants.<br />

Jon: Kind of an awkward question. considering it' s your father. but what<br />

did you. or do you. think of peop le who avo id those kind of places'!<br />

Jen: I think it's whatever a person is co mfortable with. I mean. I sort of<br />

did feel as though it was unfounded. I mean. it was discrimin atory. it is<br />

discrimin atory. I don 't know. I don' t think I judged him on it. or I think my<br />

brother. Cha rles. would nct. c.you know. he' s also kind of a neat freak. and I think<br />

he avoided (Toronto' s public transportation system ] because of that. (Lim.<br />

Jennifer 2(05)<br />

Jcn is dearly tom here betwee n her ope n-mindedness and what she sees as discrimina tory<br />

behavior. This is made all the more conf using for her because of her ethnicity. and the<br />

fact that her father. who was born in the Philippines and whose paren ts were born in<br />

China. has these discrimin atory attitudes about peop le from his own culture. In an<br />

outbreak such as SARS . it is not surprising to see lines such ::IS these being renego tiated.<br />

As we have already seen. anyone perceived to be of Asian cthnicity was treated poorly<br />

because of it. but Jeri's father' s actions show that this d iscrimination was not limited to<br />

outsiders fearing Asians. In fact. even somc Asians feared contact with other Asians. and<br />

thus it seems that outbreaks such as this at least temporarily disturb the cohesiveness that<br />

might exist within a comm unity. When one's neighbor might be carrying a potentially<br />

deadly virus. one lends to avoid that neighbor. regardless of his age, sex, or race. Disease.<br />

it may be said. is the great leveller: it makes everyone afraid of everyone else.<br />

Not nil of my inform ants evidenced such positive attitudes toward the use of folk<br />

med icine. While no one actually spoke negatively and seriously about peop le using herbs<br />

and teas to treat themselves, there were informants who joked about the methods they<br />

saw people using. Mike. the EMT. recalled several times having people cross the street<br />

271


when they saw him co ming towards them in his medical unifo rm. "ev en though I was by<br />

myself and there were no patie nts around. there was no one ill. Or people covering the ir<br />

face in their elbow. sort of the pit of their elbow. or holdin g the ir jacket sleeves and<br />

whatnot over thei r face. sort of to prevent themselve s from breathing in ncar me" {Larsen<br />

2(05). Asked what his opinion was of the efficacy of such a pre ventative method . Mike<br />

jokingly dism issed it as a "put garlic in your sock and tie it over your head kind of thing "<br />

(Larse n 2(05). Coincidentally. Mike did later reca ll a rumor about a method of creat ing a<br />

bette r facernask that involved stuffing the standa rd musks w ith garlic and laic- an act<br />

that crea ted what he referred to as a mask looking "like a big do ily or a Maxi-Pad stuffed<br />

with hems " (Larsen 2(05) that peo ple .....ould anernpt to breathe through . In general.<br />

Mi ke' s reactions to the panic he saw in 2003 followed this same sort of good -natured<br />

fun-po king, though it is important to note thai he did not ultima tely sec these methods as<br />

poi ntles... Whi le the act ual efficacies of these various methods might be questionable.<br />

Mike did quickly point out. when asked what he thoug ht abo ut peo ple who avoi ded<br />

public places:<br />

I mean, paranoia strikes deep. People avoid ed Toronto as a whole. The number of<br />

out-o f-prov ince Iicense plates you saw that summer was few and far between.<br />

You can't blame one ... peopl e would like to blame China. and you ca n't do that.<br />

You can't blame the Guangdong province or the physicians there. or the<br />

rcprcscntativcs from that country . I guess peo ple were responding out of their<br />

own fears and conce rns. (Larse n 2(05)<br />

Mike' s final comments here echo Jeri's feeli ngs about Chinese medicine. and in ge nera l.<br />

this is the viewpo int that mo..t of my informants held : that scared individuals should not<br />

he judged for trying whatever they felt might help .<br />

272


There were differing opinions, such as one gathered from my informant Seny<br />

Zamo ra. Asked if she remembered hearing of any teas or vitamins that people took to<br />

prevent themselves from contracting SARS, she responded, " I don't think we had any of<br />

those. No, I don't think we had any of those. Because it was an unknown disease. right?<br />

It was [a ] very new disease. So it wasn't something that you can strengthen your body to<br />

fight against. because it was still unknown" (Zamora 2005). The media may have heavily<br />

influenced Sony' s unique take on these matters, as she admitted to watching televised<br />

SARS updates "all the time.. .even at work" (Zamora 2005). and most of the informat ion<br />

she remembered gathering came from these sources . Seny's opinions-that folk<br />

medicines cannot be used to treat diseases until those diseases arc understood-stands in<br />

sharp distinction to the opinions of the rest of my interviewees. and moreover. seems to<br />

parallcl the operations of official medicines. That is. while the response of folk medicine<br />

to the SARS crisis was to offer a large list of potential preventatives (as per my earlier<br />

list). the respo nse of official medicine was to try and stop the disease from spreading until<br />

the coronaviruss genome could be sequenced. allowing for the search for drugs that<br />

could halt or eradicate it altogether. Put more simply. official medicine's policy in the<br />

SARS crisis was to stop it from getting worse until more was known about the virus.<br />

Scny' s remarks thus more resemble the action sequences of official medic ine than folk<br />

medic ine- though they are an interesting hybridization of the two. as she still apparently<br />

believed in the importance and validity of folk treatments.<br />

At the same time, however. it is hardly possible to say in the modem era that any<br />

response by folk medicine i.. not in some way a hybridization of folk and officia l<br />

273


Chapter 9: Full Circle: The Recycling orHisease Narra tives<br />

The disease-related narratives that have filled the pages of this thesis have b en<br />

collected from hundred s of oral and written sources. have in some cases existed for<br />

scores of years. and have circulated in dozens of countries. In addition. these narratives<br />

have been told at varying times about a significa nt number of diseases. as outlined in<br />

chapters three and four. The SARS narrat ives alone constitute an adequate cross-section<br />

of the rumors. goss ip. legends. jo kes. and other ora l forms that circulated duri ng the 2003<br />

outbreak. bUIwhen placed against the narratives about AIDS. Hansen' s disease.<br />

influenza. syphilis. etc.• patterns begin to emerge. Like photo mosaics. where thousands<br />

of individual photos are grouped by shade. pancm. and coloring to form a single larger<br />

picture. the individual disease narrati ves in this thesis construct a larger representation of<br />

reality. This new. larger picture can bc interpreted in multiple ways. but underlying all of<br />

these is how this new picture is representatio nal of the health beliefs of millions. if not<br />

billions of people.<br />

This is. of course. not to say thai everyone has the same beliefs-c-uny statement 10<br />

thai effect would he made in ignorance of decades of scholarship. It is to say that. at least<br />

concer ning novel diseases. there arc certain sets of narratives that people lise to discuss<br />

the presence of illness. 10 mediate their fears of it. to come to terms with it. and to<br />

otherwise incorporate its presence into daily routines. Past experience with disease docs<br />

influence future perception (see Duffin and Sweetman 2006 ). Some of these narratives<br />

evidence a harsher. more paranoid view of reality than others. some are open ly racist and<br />

275


xenophobic. and some are more co ncerned with issues of treatment and prevention than<br />

blame. but all revo lve aroun d a sing le emot ion. evidenced in its many forms : fear .<br />

Let's look at this mosaic again . but from a d ifferent ang le. taki ng into accou nt the<br />

narrative I have created . If all of the individual narrat ives that comprise this larger picture<br />

arc borne of fear. and if all these narra tives can he separated into a finite ...ub...et of<br />

mediating reac tions . and if the narratives in these ...ubscts can be org anized by common<br />

themes and elements. then it is possib le to establish at least a basic typo logy of disease<br />

narra tives . This docs seem to be the case . and though this volume is one of the first to<br />

exam ine SARS narratives at length in relation to this method of organization. it is not the<br />

first volume to recognize the existence of such a method. As Diane Goldstein 'iays in the<br />

Introd uction to Once UPOIIA Vin l.\':<br />

As I write this introduct ion. anot her deadly disease. SARS (Severe Ac ute<br />

Respiratory Syndro me) has hit the worl d stage . In these initia l weeks of the<br />

outbreak of the disease. one cannot help but notice thaI epide miologists and the<br />

ge nera l publ ic alike have become obsesse d with story making. While mem bers of<br />

the public engage in rumors about who has the disease. places and people to<br />

avoid. mandato ry quarantines. and gove rnment health conspiracies.<br />

epide miolog ists create and recreate plots that they hope will establish link s of<br />

tran smission . Both sets of stories mirror the narratives discussed in this volume.<br />

They ex plore notions of animal or igins. supcrinfcctors. hidden carriers. and<br />

num erous other themes entren ched in our stories abo ut AIDS hut also seen in<br />

reaction to virtu ally any devastating disease we have experienced historical ly.<br />

Alread y. only a few wee ks into the SARS outbreak. we can sec how story comes<br />

to define risk. (2004. xiv )<br />

Narratives . then. arc re-circula ted from one outbreak to the next. mod ified not in their<br />

themes. but in the specific details necessary to link the narratives to curre nt situations.<br />

An exa mple of a sing le narrative that exe mpl ifies this proce ss of modification is<br />

the "blood libel" legend . This legend is at least two thousand Yl'ar.. old. and in its earliest<br />

276


forms was ei ther anti-Se mitic. descri bing the murder of Ca tholics by Jews. or ann­<br />

Ca tholic , describin g the murder of Roman children by recen t co nverts to Catholi cism. In<br />

bot h cases the murders were do ne rituall y. as part of reli gio us ceremonies. In the several<br />

cen turies that have passed since this lege nd's ince ption. many different groups have bee n<br />

accused of ritual murder. and the narrative has been altered to fit. Communists. Chinese<br />

people. nco-pagans. Satanists. and gang members have all bee n fingered as guilty of suc h<br />

crimes . In eac h case . while the ma in theme of ritual murder has remained. the spec ifics of<br />

the story have been altered: names. date s. place s. and othe r details have beenupda ted to<br />

increase the story's rele vance. be lievab ility. and impact (Alexander. Tamar 1987: Benn ett<br />

2005h: Dund cs 1991 : Rives 199 6).<br />

It is true that not every disease narrativ e has a history as lon g as the blood libel<br />

legend . or with as man y permutations. But a significant eno ugh number of these<br />

narrat ives do contain suffic ient examples to allo w for the co nstruc tion of a typology (see<br />

Ap pendix I). The impo rtance of such a typo logy is that not only will it allo w scholars 10<br />

cross- reference and ex amine previous narrativ es. hut also it will presen t to those scholars<br />

a list of co mmo n themes and clem ents that can he expected to appear in futur e outbreaks.<br />

More spec ifically. since xenop hobia is a common cle ment in the narrati ves that have<br />

already been collected. it is logical to assume that it will also he a co mmon clem ent in<br />

future narrati ves. Or. since most major outb reaks have resulted in co nspiracy theori es<br />

abo ut gove rnmental decep tion. secrecy. and miscondu ct. it ca n be ass umed that future<br />

outbreaks will co ntain similar theories. Recognizing that patte rns such as this do ex ist.<br />

and arc relat ively easy to isolate. is a boo n for health care workers e verywhere who arc<br />

277


forced to deal with the negative effects of such narratives. Understand ing that any new<br />

diseu...e outb reak is going to result in conspiracy theories. xenophobic gossip. etio logical<br />

arguments. and so forth. and that these will appear in a finite number of permutauons,<br />

allows health workers the opportunity to better prepare themselves for the onslaught.<br />

An initial examinat ion of this idea also points to the possibility of this information<br />

being used to counter such narratives even before they arc born. But narrative forms such<br />

as lcgcnds-c-cspccia lly contemporary legends-and con...piracy theories arc notoriously<br />

difficu lt to eradicate post-creation. and while knowledge of impending racist narratives is<br />

beneficial. predicting the exact narrative forms that ...uch racism will take in future<br />

narrat ives is an extraordinarily complex task. and perhaps even an impossible one. It is<br />

conceivab le that this could be accomplished by taking a sample of narrati ves that have<br />

been collected about a disease (or possibly about a series of diseases). and statistically<br />

analyzing those narratives for the distribution and occurrence of key themes or motifs.<br />

The results of such a study. while they would not predict narrative forms. would at least<br />

provide markers for common elements. However. such a study is beyond the scope of this<br />

work , not to mention my current abilities and resources.<br />

What elm be addressed here is the possibility of eradicating or countering<br />

narratives that already exist. This is not a new ideo. having been discusse d in academic<br />

circles for the last few decades. The problem. as has already been stated, is that narratives<br />

have a troubling tendency to exist: "cry little seems to affect them. Kimmel and Keefer<br />

discove red in regards to AIDS rumors thnt their transmission was strong ly linked to the<br />

anxiety caused by the rumor: that is. the more anxious someone felt about the information<br />

178


contained in the rumor. the more likely they were to pass it on. In addition. those rumors<br />

that were seen as personally consequential and relevant were more likely to be believed,<br />

and thus cause anxiety ( 1991). Spreading rumors is thus a purposive action for both<br />

narrator and narratec (Bordia and DiFonzo 2(05) . This information alone points out the<br />

difficulties inherent in eliminating a narrative : any rumor (and presumably some other<br />

narrative forms such as legend and gossip) that is deemedimportant or pertinent enough<br />

to provoke a fearful reaction is very likely 10 be passed on. Such is the nature of peop le.<br />

Wc naturally want to warn those close to us about danger,<br />

But rumor-telling is not an action that merely involves uuempting 10 protect those<br />

close to us. It is abo a social act. shaped by the com munities we have beenraised in. We<br />

think in patterns that have been taught to us by friends and family (Fine and Khawaja<br />

20(5). Rumors arc in this sense understood within the context or-toea! meanings and<br />

recent histories" (White 2005. 2oll), and "are drawn from a store ofhi..torical and<br />

contemporary allusions that have been kept alive and given new and renewed meanings<br />

by the fractiou s arguments of diverse social groups" (White 2005. 244). Rumors are often<br />

grounded in prejudices and misunde rstandings so old that they are not recognized as<br />

being inaccurate, so any attempt to challenge the rumor inherently challenges belief<br />

systems and ingrained ideas.<br />

Making the issue of dealing with racist rumors more difficult is that, as Gary Alan<br />

Finc has noted. the modem world has proven their model breeding ground:<br />

The transformation of the global economy and the expans ion of transnational<br />

migration pauems have proven to be a rich SO UH.'C of rumor and fears for national<br />

identity. Moreover. eve n in thc most remote comers of the globe peop le are<br />

increas ingly awa re of diversity. With expanding migration between developing<br />

279


and developed nations , the character and act ions of migrants have beco me more<br />

salie nt. As the homogeneous cultures of indus trialized nation -stales mutate.<br />

beco ming more multi cult ural. rumors that target recent imm igrants (legal or<br />

illegal. tem porary or perm anen t) frequ ently appea r. These wor kers bring their<br />

ow n cultural patterns, including such diverse maile rs as food prefe rences,<br />

standa rds of clea nliness. public decorum. sexuality. fami ly dyna mics. and<br />

religious beliefs. These patterns of behavior and disp lay may co ntrast with those<br />

of the receiving natio n. leading to mis understa nding . suspicion. and mistrust.<br />

Observations of cultural diversity are tran..formed into rumo r alleging that these<br />

cultural choices are immoral or dangerous. Thc majori ty transforms even ts. ..orne<br />

real and some imagined. into patterns of dep ravity through truth claims reported<br />

in rumor. (F ine 2005. 3-l)<br />

Deal ing with rumors in this light seems a truly Herculean task. for not only can racis t<br />

sentiment .. be deep-seated. but they can also be cont inually aggravated by the influx of<br />

fore ign peoples into "our" territory. lt is not even necessary that a narra tor believe a<br />

rumor to have some impetus for passi ng it on---o nly a bel ief that the events in the<br />

narrative could have happened (Fine and Khawaja 2(05).<br />

Moving beyo nd rumor . Veroniq ue Campion-Vincent has noted the popularity of<br />

co nspiracy theo ries. and how they are used "to provide meaningful and accura te<br />

ex planations of the world's condition:' and nrc "part of an every day strugg le to make<br />

sense (If a rapid ly changing world" (Cam pion-Vincent 2(X)5. 103). In additio n. these<br />

narrati ves arc used- wittingly or not- to increase group cohesion throu gh the naming of<br />

enemies. These enemies can be other races or cthnicit ics. but they ca n also bc members<br />

of different classes within the ethnic ity of the co nspiracy theorist. Fine has remarked that<br />

the telli ng of anti-gove rnment consp iracy theories reveals "uncerta inty abo ut procedural<br />

democ racy... (the narratives ] frequ entl y reflect thc inchoate disaffection of citizens.<br />

diverti ng allegia nce. butlacking any positive program of change" (Campion-Vince nt<br />

2005.5). In these senses. consp iracy theo ries constitute important and cr itical avenue.. for<br />

280


the discussion of unknown situations. providing form and shape to. and release from.<br />

stress. Like rumors. conspiracy theories exist because they serve a purpose. and because<br />

the need for informational vacuums to be filled is strong enough to support the existence<br />

of the narrat ive.<br />

Not surprising ly. then. those articles that have dealt with the issue of eradicating<br />

rumors and conspiracy theories are mixed in their judgments of the effectiveness of any<br />

given method. Bill Ellis discusses several methods in his essay "Legend/AntiLegend:<br />

Humor as an Integral Part of the Contemporary Legend Proce ss," beginn ing with the note<br />

that most scholars have focused their efforts on the birth and spread of such narrati ves.<br />

rather than on their demise. He then states:<br />

Only three factors. according to Fine and Turner. combine to make a rumor (or<br />

legend) disappear: boredom. saturat ion of the community. and intervention of<br />

social interest groups.... That is. legends are news. and when everyone has heard<br />

them. they cease to have the attraction of novelty. and so when more credible<br />

information is available. they have no reason for being. (Ellis 2005. 123)<br />

So one possible response to the question of eradicating a narrative is to simply wait it out:<br />

it will eventually get rid of itself. Proof of this is found in the SARS outbreak. As soon as<br />

the virus disappeared and ceased to make headlines. the stories died. This tack. however.<br />

is problematic in the case of an outbreak. where the narrative can cause massive<br />

psychological. and even real-world damage hefore it ceases to circulate. In such instances<br />

it would be better to contain the narrative to the largest extent possib le. Waiting for the<br />

legend to take care of itself is also problematic because. as we have already seen with the<br />

blood libel legend. there are narratives that. some two thousand years after their creation.<br />

arc arguably more popular than ever. And as we have also already seen. narratives are<br />

281


continually reshaped. and are almost infinitely flexible in their ab ility to he adapted to<br />

new situations. Quot ing Fine and Turner again. Ellis notes that "so me legends may not<br />

die so much as they dive, that is. remain latent in the communi ties in which they<br />

circulate. ready to he verbalized later as a social need arises" (Ellis 2005.123-4.<br />

cmpha..i.. in original).<br />

If waiting for the legend to die out is not an option. then the next logical ..rep is to<br />

ancmpr to force it.. early demise. Again. Ellis provides us with exce llent scholars hip on<br />

effort.. that have been made in this direction:<br />

Fine and Turner concede that fonn al rumor control has had "mixed success:' and<br />

in any case there are no control data available to determine what might have<br />

happened in the absence of such efforts. Official denials do no harm. they<br />

conclude. but whether they in fact do shorten the duration of rumors by providing<br />

"authoritative informat ion" is unclear .... Some research by Jean-Noel<br />

Kapferer...on the Mickey Mouse LSD legend. in fact. suggests that forma l effo rts<br />

to debunk legends arc not especial ly convincing and may in fact commun icate the<br />

rumor to those who have not yet heard it. If the authority challenging the legend is<br />

seen as a low-credibility source. then taking time 10 deny a claim suggests that it<br />

may be doing so 10 cover up its own culpability. (Ell is 2(Xl5. 12-t)<br />

Additionally. as Renard points out. Western postwar generations have been found to be<br />

more likely to question and distrust governments. and arc thus more receptive to<br />

conspiracy theories and other such negative narratives (Rcndard 2(05). Further problems<br />

with official denials ore pointed out by Patricia Turner ( 1993). who notes that African-<br />

Americans often dismiss such denia ls-c-such as the C IA creat ing AIDS. or the KKK<br />

owning Church's Fried Chicken-s-because of deep-seated di...trust of a primarily while<br />

government and economy . Because of this. any attempts to deal with rumors and gos...ip<br />

mu..t not only take into account the tenacity of such narratives. but race and ethnic<br />

relations that may prohibit or lessen the effectiveness of communications.<br />

282


One potential avenue for dealing with unwanted narratives is the antilegend, a<br />

parody narrative designed to counter a lege nd by presenting its information in a<br />

humorous. satiric. or scomful light. By "creatively distorting" (Ellis 2005. 124) the<br />

narrative structure of a legend. the antilegend can prove more effect ive in demonstrating<br />

the logical flaws and absurdities present in legends, Ellis note that antilcgcnds have. at<br />

times . prm'en effective . citing the Good Times com puter virus legend. whose aruilegends<br />

have not only fairly effectively halted the circu lation of the original legend. but have<br />

proven more popular in the long run than the original legend (Ellis 2005), The problems<br />

with untilcgends, however. are I) that they have been found to exist co mfortably beside<br />

the original legends. com menting on them rather than negating them (Degh 1995. cited in<br />

Ellis 2005 ). and, 2) "the dynamics of the nntilegend require a conduit that supports both<br />

belie f in and skepticism about some of the clements of the legend on which it is based"<br />

(Ellis 2005. 135), In other words, in order for an amilcgend to succeed. there must<br />

already be some skepticism about the original legend, or at least an environment in which<br />

a skeptical altitude can be fostered. Given the right circumstances. then. an antilcgcnd<br />

might prove effective. In the case ofTumer' s African-American dismissal of official<br />

denials. however. an antilegend would stand far less of a chance of succeeding in<br />

negating the original legends. as those legends ex ist because of deep-seated distrust and<br />

strong emotions. There are few chinks in such armor for an antilegend to sink into.<br />

Similarly. it is questionable whether an antilegend would prove effective in dealing with<br />

narratives that espouse racism and xenophobia. Such sentiments arc al..o deep-seated, and<br />

283


test was rc-udmini stcred. and this time the participants misidentified 15% of the incorrect<br />

statements as true. while the percentage of correct statements wrongly idcnufied as false<br />

remained stable. These findings were nOIunexpected. the authors exp laining that the<br />

huma n brain has a tendency to assume that familiar stateme nts arc truc-e-which explains<br />

why the number of false positives increased. as well a.. why the number of false negat ives<br />

d id not (Schwarz cr at. 2007).<br />

A ..econd ..tudy-reponed in the same article-expo..ed groups of "younger<br />

adu lt.. and "o lder adu lt.. participants either once or three times to statements that were<br />

clear ly marked as "true" and "false". The subjec ts were then tested immedia tely on the<br />

contents, and again three days later. In almost all cases. the number of true ..tarcmcnts<br />

misidentified a.. false was low. and rose only marginally over the three-day wait (by<br />

roughly 6% across the board . by my estimate). However. the resu lts for the number of<br />

false statements misidentified as true varied widely-not only over time. hut also<br />

accordin g to age. The young adults who were only given the informat ion once increased<br />

their incorrect answers from 10% to 24% over the three-day period. while the young<br />

adu lts who were given the information three times only increased their error s from 7% to<br />

14%. showing that. for younger adults. increa sed repetit ion improved accurat e recall. For<br />

the older adults. however. the numbe r of errors for those who heard the information once<br />

remained steady at 28% between days one and three. while the older participants who<br />

heard the information three times actually increase d their numbe r of incorrect responses<br />

over time. from J7% on day one to 40% on day three-..hewin g that. for older adults.<br />

increased repetition lessened accurate recall. Schwarz ct al. state that this is the result of<br />

285


the dccrca..cd memory function of older adults. which forces them to rely more on<br />

"fami liarity" as evidence of truth than recollection of accurate facts (Sch warz et al.<br />

2(07).<br />

Additio nal psychological ..tudies add to the co mplexities of rumor perception.<br />

Weaver. Garcia. and Schwarz determined that. not only docs repetition increase the<br />

likelihood of a statement being determined as prevalent among a group. but the statement<br />

docs not have to be made by all members of that group. In fact. an outsider who only<br />

hears a statemen t repealed by one member of a group is ju..t as likely to assume that<br />

state ment holds true for all members of the group us if the participant had actualtv heard<br />

it from all members. And within that group. participants were more likely to agree with<br />

that frequently repeated statement. even though they knew it came from only one member<br />

(Weaver. Garcia, and Schwarz 2(07).<br />

Finally, a study by Mayo. Schul. and Bum..tein exa mined the effects of time on the<br />

memor y of certain statements. The researchers gave particip ants a series of descriptions.<br />

then examined recollection over time bused on the presence of "hi-polar" and "uni -polar"<br />

negations. Briefl y. "a hi-polar description has a well-defined oppo site construct which is<br />

easily accessible. whereas a uni-polar description docs not" (Mayo. Schu l and Burnstein<br />

24.440). An exa mple of a bi-polar description might be "wa rm:' which has the easily­<br />

understandabl e opposite of "cold." whereas a uni-pola r description would be<br />

"respo nsible:' The word "respo nsible" docs not have an easily-accessib le opposi te; the<br />

most immediate antonym is "not responsi ble" or "irrespo nsible:' which is linguistically<br />

far closer to the parent word than "bot" is 10 "coldv-c-and in fact "not responsible" and<br />

286


"irr esponsible' both contain the parent word in the negation. The results of the study<br />

found that. while 83% of respon dent s accurately remembere d the hi-polar description<br />

"not warm" as meaning "not warm : ' only 62% accura tely remembered the lini-polar<br />

desc ription "not responsible't-c-the other 38% misrcmcm bcrcd it as "responsible " {Mayo.<br />

Schul and Burnstein 2004. ++t). In real- wor ld terms. this study gives reasons for why<br />

people who are cleared of cri minal charges are still stigmatized afterwards: so meo ne who<br />

is decl ared "no t guilty of harassmeIll" is more likely to he remembered as "guilty of<br />

harassment" due to the uni -polar nature of the word "harassment: ' In fact. the study<br />

co ncludes in part that. at times. it is far better to amid de nying a false claim altogether.<br />

Instead. a more effect ive approach i-,to crea te a new. positi ve claim that makes no<br />

refere nce to the false claim-i.e. sayi ng " I am innocent" instead of " I am not guilty:'<br />

The implications of these studies in terms of rumor negotiation are vast. As we<br />

have see n. many rumor control methods have been historically ineffect ive. and have often<br />

res ulted in the dispersal of incorrect infor mation. rather than its correction. Th e above<br />

studies help provide reaso ns for such results. and point in a direction of act ion that. at<br />

least theoretically. should provide rumor debunk ers with a better outcome. Not all rumor s<br />

arc harmful. of co urse. and thus not all merit such attention as might result in their<br />

demise. But for those rum ors that are dangerous or harmful. there are a few strategies that<br />

ca n be em ployed to help cou nter their effects. Summarizing the information laid out in<br />

the previou s paragraphs. we come up with the followin g series of state ments: I) if we<br />

naturally ass ume that familiar statements are true. and 2) we tend to misrc membe r false<br />

state ments as true. and 3) if hi-polar descrip tions arc better remembe red than their uni-<br />

287


polar coun terparts. then 4) accurate. oft-repea ted, positive descriptions are obviously<br />

superior to rc-hashings of narratives followed by denials of veracity. Stud ies would be<br />

needed to confirm these conclusions. but I would suggest that. in the case of a selec tion<br />

of disease narratives. the following courses of action would find better results:<br />

I) Instead of denyi ng the presence of SARS in an Asia n neighbo rhood.<br />

city officia ls coul d comment that the disease has equally affected all<br />

parts of the city; or alternately. that SA RS has only been discovered to<br />

exist in other cities (if there is no evidence that the virus has broache d<br />

city limits).<br />

2) Instead of denying that AIDS can be given away by having sex with a<br />

virgin (or any other harmful. unofficial course of action). health<br />

officia ls could comme nt that the only proven treatme nts are the FDA­<br />

recognized drugs.<br />

3) Instead of denying that smoking preven ts people from contracting<br />

SARS. healt h officials cou ld com ment that the best courses of action<br />

are to wear a mask, avo id crowded places. and stay away from peop le<br />

who are already infected.<br />

4 ) Instead of denying consp iracy theories about the origin of AIDS. health<br />

off icials could comment that current evidence points toward an animal<br />

virus that has adapted to humans as the source of the infections.<br />

In each of these cases , the negat ive rumor has been bypassed entirely. and the answers<br />

instead rely on repea ting acc urate. positive information. Inaccurate information is neither<br />

288


epeated nor summarized, to avo id its further spread. For hest resu lts, the accurate,<br />

posit ive information should be repea led frequent ly to hel p so lidify its public recogniti on<br />

and fam iliarity, Any phra se tha t begins with "X is not true" shou ld he avoid ed altoget her.<br />

as should. in general. the wor d " not," as it too ofte n lead s to con fusio n. espec ially whe n<br />

used in conjunct ion with uni-polar de scriptions. Response to rumors sho uld he rapid. for<br />

best resu lts. and where poss ible. prese nted by people who have some recognized<br />

autho rity. eit her on a loc al or national leve l.<br />

Who sho uld these authori ties be"!Ch urch leaders, mayors. polic e and doc tors arc<br />

all finc can did ates. However. individually. these peop le have only limited exposure to a<br />

sma ll section of a city. In orde r to get the ir messages across. a dispersal system is<br />

n e ded-c-one that is nearly ubiq uitou s. high ly visible, and frequently used . Such a sys te m<br />

already ex ists: the media. Co nsider this select ion from my interview with Luis Tan :<br />

Jon : Accord ing to what you saw. how did the public react to the outbrea k?<br />

Luis: Based on what I see. I said. you cou ldn't go on the bus. Peopl e tried<br />

to avoid sneez ing and cou ghin g. (laughs) Tha t was very, very obvio us sight you<br />

ca n see in the publi c. Even in churches or public places. people sneez ing. peopl e<br />

try to tum their head awa y. you kno w? (laughs) lr' s rea lly ver y scary during that<br />

time. Becau se espec ially new spape rs sny that it can be transm itted by. when you<br />

sneeze. saliva or something from your nasal excretion. Th ose arc the things I<br />

remem ber qu ite well.<br />

Jon: Do you think that the react ions that you did sec from peop le were<br />

justified, or did you th ink they were over don e?<br />

Luis: I don 't think it' s overdone. It' s just hum an nature to be cautious. It' s<br />

norma l. You try to avoid. you know ? Especia lly newspapers. how this can be<br />

co ntracted. then they tell you what to do, what to avoid, We just follow most of<br />

this from what we heard in the news.<br />

Jon: So were you following the new s fairly regularl y'?<br />

Luis: Oh yeah. You open the TV , you hear SAR S stor ies. You see the. you<br />

read the newspaper . you have SARS stor ies front page. It' s almos t. eve n in the<br />

wo rkplace. the company sends out memorandum. and if yo u visit the hospital or<br />

...omct hing .. .the company is ver y [u nders tanding ]. they' re okay you can ha ve<br />

a...what do you ca ll this. you secluded yourself. there i...a term for that. .<br />

289


Jon : Qua rant ined?<br />

Luis: Quarantined yourse lf. yeah. We were even told that if you vi..it like<br />

this. the bank would be very, very [understandin g ]. As a mailer of fact. I ha ve a<br />

coworker that. withou t knowing that. she visited certain hospital. and then ..he<br />

self- quarantined herself at home for x number of days. She got paid. everything<br />

was ... she worked from horne. things like that. Most companies are very<br />

sympat hetic. they support peop le. thei r emp loyees. (Tan 2005)<br />

Another example. this one from Angel and Rosita Lim. who gave the following when<br />

asked if they had heard any rumors about the origin of SARS:<br />

Rosita: Well for us. there's always it's coming from civet rats or<br />

some thing from China. so that's in our mind that that's where it cam e from. And<br />

then it moved to li an g Kong. and one person from Hong Kong brough t it over.<br />

That was very clear in my mind. that was what eve rybody kept saying. I did n't<br />

hear any other sources, did you?<br />

Angel: That's the only one. yes.<br />

Rosita: Because it was very clea r. they kept saying. "This is exact ly where<br />

it came from" (Lim. Ange l and Rosita 2(05)<br />

In fact. of the fourtee n people I interviewed. thirtee n mentioned that media so urces<br />

provided them with at least part of the informat ion they'd gathered abo ut the coro navirus,<br />

and several informants stated that media sources prov ided them with the larger part of<br />

their critica l information. II is true that some of this information wasn't correctly<br />

reca lled-the SARS virus came from the civet ca l, not the civet "rat." as Rosita stated-<br />

hut even here the wrong answer is still very close to the right onc. More importantly,<br />

Rosita' s an..wcr ..till demon strates the powe r of media sources in dispersing informat ion.<br />

Th ese find ings agree with at least two studies of the SARS cris is. The first was<br />

conducted in Qatar. and examined the knowledge. altitudes. and practices of the peop le of<br />

the region in respo nse to the outbreak. The resea rchers handed out quest ionnaires at<br />

airpo rts and health ce nters. and ultimate ly received 1.386 respo nses. The resu lts showed<br />

that 73% of respondents were aware of the high ly-infectious nature of SARS. 69.9 %<br />

290


ecognized that close contact with an infected person was a primary transmission vector.<br />

and 67.4% knew that a high fever was the first symptom of infection. Roughly half of the<br />

subjec ts reported having gained most of their knowledge of SARS from media sources­<br />

primarily television and radio programs (Bener and AI-Khal 2(04). The second article<br />

detailed the results of a study of community responses in Hong Kong to the SARS<br />

outb reak. The study consisted of a number of telephone surveys conducted during the<br />

crisis. examining the measures people thought effective in preventing the spread of the<br />

virus. Of the 1.397 participants. 82% rated mask-wearing as effective in preventing<br />

infection. 93% said the same for hand-washing. and 75% said the same for home<br />

disinfection- and these numbers remained constant throughout the epidemic. The<br />

researchers concluded that govern ment and media-based dissemination of accurate<br />

information in a timely manner was responsible for the high numbers of people who<br />

provided knowledgeable answers and who so quick ly adopted the appropriate SARS<br />

prevention measures (Lau et 'II. 2(03).<br />

The media thus does work. at least in the sense of being an effective vehicle for<br />

the distribution of information. The problem lies only in the type of information that is<br />

dissemin ated. Following the steps laid out in this chapter would greatly increase the<br />

dispersal of accurate information. and inhibit the spread of negative and harmful rumors.<br />

Additionally. using local spokespersons recognized for their honesty and authority 0 11the<br />

matter would increase the chances of this accurate information being trusted and<br />

believed. Knowing that certain narratives are more likely to appear in epidemics. health<br />

officials could better prepare themselves for the kinds of rumors and goss ip that they<br />

291


would encounte r. and perhaps even prepare a short list of accepted responses-a-much like<br />

the four examples give n earlier. Again. real-wo rld tests need to be conducted to prove or<br />

di..prove the..e Iheorie.., but the ..implicity and c1canl ines.. of the logic that brings us 10<br />

the..e theo ries is compelling. With any luck , the next outbreak-whatever it may bring­<br />

will he better dealt with in light of the..e conclu sions .<br />

292


Cha pter 10: Epilogue: ...And the World :\lnH'd On<br />

As I write this epilog ue in Boston. Massachusetts. in late Februa ry of 2008. the<br />

coronavirus is but a distant memory . Since it:'.last fluttering in early 200·1..the virus has<br />

faded into thc background. a.. have many of the narrat ives that accompanied its existence.<br />

It is still possib le that SARS is lurking in the bodies of civet cats and other wild anima ls.<br />

waiting only for that one chance to make again the leap between species and wreak havoc<br />

on the world. However. there is nothing in the public consciou ..nes.. to ..uggest the<br />

slightest concern over such an occurrence. Even now, only five years after SARS was the<br />

biggest story in the world. I find people looking at me quizzica lly when I expla in my<br />

researc h topic. and I have even had to remind people of what SARS was on more than<br />

one occasion. It has been three years sincc I remember seeing the word "SARS" in a<br />

newspaper headline. and longer still since I'v e heard anyone voluntarily bring up the<br />

outbreak in conversa tion-c-exccpt for friends and colleagues asking me abou t the<br />

progress of my research. The world has truly moved on.<br />

Or has it'? While SA RS itself may he forever wiped from the earth. the fears and<br />

attitudes that underscored the narratives that sprang lip around the disco..e are a.. present<br />

now as they have ever been. Racism and xeno phobia still seethe just under the surface of<br />

humanity. and legend s-though they may currently focus more on computer than<br />

biological viruses-c-are ubiquitous. As evidence of both of these. one needs only to tum<br />

to the Internet. The popular website snopes.com. for examp le. currently (as of the 28 th of<br />

Fehruury. 2008) li..ts legends about Presidcntia l Cand idates Burack Oha ma and Hillary<br />

293<br />

-


Clinton as its second and eighth "Hottest Urban Legends: ' respectivel y. All six of the<br />

legends about Obama. the U.S: s first black candidate, that arc listed on the website are<br />

either openly racist and xenophobi c or otherwise question hililoyalty to the United States.<br />

A number of the legends about Clinton are markedly anti-femini..t,<br />

Just aliequally, the media is as guilty now of exaggera ting and overstating facts a..<br />

they were in 2003. In the la..t two weeks. the local "7 New.. New England" television<br />

news show has run several promotiona l commercials for "Specia l Reports" that seem<br />

little more than attemp ts at fear-mongering for profit. Each commercial ha.. been more<br />

lurid and exaggeratedly important than the la..1. with ..ubjccts such as the dangers of<br />

badly-manufactured playground equipm ent, armrests on chairs at local movie theaters<br />

that laboratory tests have revealed are swarming with bacteria, and non-inspected and<br />

un..afc semi trucks trawling our roads at highway ..pccds (ready to break down and hurl<br />

part.. everywhere at any given moment!) . American novelist and polemicist Upton<br />

Sinclair is reported to have once said. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something<br />

when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." In the current climate, it seems<br />

more appropriate for this to be modified to instead say, " It is difficult 10 get a journalist<br />

not to make a big deal out of a little situatio n when his salary depends upon his making a<br />

big deal out of it." It is important that med ia sources begin to recognize their roles in<br />

..preading rumor and legend, and the damage that they can cause. By repeating racist<br />

nurratives-c-cven if only as examples-newspaper and televisicn joum ali..rs. as well as<br />

their editors and managers, are complicit in the hate crimes and xenophobia that follows.


But such blame cannot be solely placed upon jou rnalists and media sou rces. They<br />

arc indeed selling a probl ema tic product. but they can only kee p se lling it because<br />

someo ne is buying. We. the people. arc creati ng the informa tion vacu ums that these<br />

xeno phobic narrat ives fill. and if fingers are to be poin ted anywhere . they should point<br />

toward the pub lic. Wh y then place so much emphasis on having media sources alter the ir<br />

practices. when the prob lem lies with tho..e who dema nd the narratives'! Because it is far<br />

easier to ask a score of busi nesses 10 change than it is to demand the ..arne from millions<br />

of individuals. For if the forme r task seems daunting. the latter is truly Sisyphean.<br />

The purpose of this thesis has been 10 demonst rate the links between disease<br />

narratives. to study the various vectors through which those narra tives have been<br />

transferred. and to examine the effec ts that these narra tives have had on the world. It<br />

seems to me that disease pan ic and racism are 10 diseas e narratives as the chicke n is to<br />

the egg: each exists because of the other. whirling together in a ge nerative dance that<br />

began long before living memo ry. and will continue to ex ist long after the child hom<br />

today dies of old age. But it is not enough to say that these narratives define us. Th ey li re<br />

us: body and soul. flesh and idea. mora l and ethic. a co nnectio n that gocs beyond mere<br />

metap hor. And j ust as these narratives are our friends and homes, they arc also our<br />

enemies. and the things we hale and fear. Whcn in story we cruc ify and ridic ule Others<br />

for being dif ferent. we reveal to the wor ld our true fuccs-c-the ones that arc on ly loosely<br />

held hac k otherwise by our co ncerns over po litical co rrectness and maintaining socia l<br />

niceties.<br />

295


I believe tha t disease narratives arc vastly unrcgardc d by health offic ials. Not only<br />

do they revea l what peo ple be lieve about a specific disease. but studying the m on a larger<br />

sca le reveals ovcrarching beliefs that pass between diseases. high lighting areas of<br />

concern and cul tural importance that do not always coincide with those espoused by<br />

doctors and scientists. Unders tanding these differences ....ill icad to improved<br />

communications be tween laypersons and medical personnel. It may also point to<br />

preventive measures that could be undertaken by entities such as the World Health<br />

Organizat ion to preemptively combat the racist and xenophobic narratives that come out<br />

of epidemics.<br />

The prob lem. ho weve r. lies less in understanding wha t the narra tives say about<br />

peop le than it does in getting the appro pria te officia l sources to conceive of these sto ries<br />

as anyt hing other than. we ll. stories. The only way to ach ieve this is for the medical<br />

profession 10 begin think ing of patients as inte lligent. reasoni ng bei ngs ....he arc equa l<br />

participants in health-related decisions. rather tha n just as bodies thai must be made we ll.<br />

Or as Bonnie Blair O'C onnor has said. "This will require the ca pacity of health<br />

prof essionals to accept the pat ient as an active co-s hapc r of the relationship and of healt h<br />

care cho ices and actions. rather tha n as a limited partn er to whom va rious dut ies arc<br />

merel y dele gated " (1995. 193). O nly by incl uding the puticnt-c-and his or her stories-in<br />

the eq uation call doctors tru ly begin to und erstand how to help peo ple. rath er tha n just<br />

treat disease.


Refer ences Cited 15<br />

Airlines: SA RS worse than 9!11 on industry. 2003. May 15. CNN.com. No longer<br />

available (accessed May 17, 2(03).<br />

Alexander, D.A. 2003. Bioterrorism : Preparing fort he unthinkable. Journal oftilt! Royal<br />

Army Medical Corps 149.2: 125-30.<br />

Alexander. Ta mar. 1987. A legend of the blood libel in Jerusalem: A study of a process<br />

of folk-talc adaptation. 11I1ernatiol/al Folklore Review: Folklore Studies from<br />

Ow n-cas 5: 60-74.<br />

Allen. Ron. 2003. Hong Kong fights stigma of SARS. June 23, MSNBC.com. No<br />

longer available on line (accessed July 7. 2003).<br />

All port, Floyd B., and Milton Lepkin. 1945. Wartime rumors of waste and special<br />

privilege: Why some people believe them. Journal ofAbnormal and Socia l<br />

PsycholoK)' 40: 3-36.<br />

Altman. Dennis. 1986. AIDS ill the mind of America. New York: Ancho r Press!<br />

Doubleday.<br />

Alver, Bente Gu llveig. 1982. Folk medicine as an open medical system. In Folk medicine<br />

and heal th culture : Role offolk medicine in modem health care, ed. Tuul a<br />

Vaskilampi and Caro l P. MacCormack, 124-139. Kuopio . Finland: The Universi ty<br />

of Kuopio.<br />

___. 1995. The bearing of folk belief on cure and healing. Journal ofFolklore<br />

Research 32. 1: 21-33.<br />

Anderso n. W. H.• B. B. O'C onnor. R. R. MacGregor. and 1. S. Schwanz. 1991. Recourse<br />

15 Due to the large amount of time that passed between the initial researc h and<br />

completion of this work, many of the referenced Internet-based sources are no longer<br />

available at the URLs on .....-hich they originally appea red. Both MSNBC.com and Yahoo !<br />

News, for example, do not appear to archive their news articles -c-ut least nor as far back<br />

as 2003 (a problem I only became aware of while cond ucting initial revisions in 20(8).<br />

Where possible. I have attempted to find alternate sources for these news articles<br />

(reflected in an "accessed" date of the year 20(8). Many of these articles. unfortunatel y.<br />

now only exist at pay-per-article news databases. or worse . as printouts in my files. If no<br />

alterna te sources were found. the citation will reflect this by stating that the article is "No<br />

longer available online."<br />

297


Bauman. Laurie J.. and Karolynn Siegel . 1987. Mispercep tion amon g gay men of the<br />

risk for AIDS associated with their sexual behavior. Journal ofApplied<br />

Soc ial Psycho logv 17: 329-350.<br />

Becker, Howard S. 2002 . Outsiders. In Deviance : Tile interactionist perspective. ed. Earl<br />

Rubin gton and Martin S. Wein berg. 7-10. Boston : Allyn and Baco n.<br />

Beech. Hannah . 2003. How bad is it? May 5. TIM E As ia. http ://www.time.comJtime/asial<br />

covers/50 10305 05/story. html (accesse d Januar y 24. 2004).<br />

Beijin g hopeful of SARS decline. 2003. May 9. CNN .com. http://www.cnn .comJ2003/<br />

WORLD/asiapcf/eastJ05/09/sars/index.html (acce ssed May 14. 200 3).<br />

Beijin g shuts anti-SA RS headqu arters. 2004. June 2. Yaho o! News. http://findarticles.<br />

co mJp/articies/ mi_kmafplis_200406/ai_kep m479235 (accessed Apr il 2. 20(8).<br />

Boner, Abdulbar i. and Abdullatif AI-Khal. 2004. Knowledge. attitude and practice<br />

towards SA RS. l oum al ofthe Royal Societyfor the Promotion (lj'Jlealth 124.4:<br />

167-70.<br />

Bennett. G illian. 1997. Bosom serpents and alimentary amphibians: A lang uage for<br />

sickness. In Illness and heali ng alternatives ill We,\"1erll Europe, cd. Marjswijt ­<br />

Hofstra. Hilary Marland. and Hans de Waardt, 224-242. London: Routledge.<br />

_ _ _ . 2(XJ5a.Bodies: Sex, violenc e, disease . and death ill contemporary legend.<br />

Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.<br />

___ . 2005 b. Towards a reva luation of the legend of "Sai nt" Will iam of Norwic h<br />

and its place in the blood libel legend . Folklore 116.2: 119-39.<br />

Bennett, Gillian, and Paul Smith. cd. 1996. Contemp orary legend: A reader . New York:<br />

Garland Publ ishing.<br />

Berger. Michele Tracy. 2004 . Workable sisterhood: The political journey ofstigmatirrd<br />

women with HIVIAIDS. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.<br />

Berger. Peter L.. and Th omas Luckmann . 1967. The social construction ofreality. New<br />

York: Anchor Books.<br />

Berger, Stuart M. 1985. Dr. Berger 's immune power diet . New York: New American<br />

Library.<br />

Berkeley eases SA RS restrictions. 2003 . May 10. MSNBC.com. No longer available<br />

online (accessed May 14. 2003).<br />

299


April 23. MSNBC.4 . Be afraid. he vel)' af raid: Til t' boo k of,H'lI l)· /Irbtlll lt'gn ItI.L New York:<br />

W. W. Norton & Company.<br />

Buckler. Grant . 2003. PC grids take aim at SA RS in battle agai nst disease . Jun e 19.<br />

globeandmail.co m, hltp :/Iwww.evalu8.orglstaticpage?pagc=review&siteid=2597<br />

(accessed April 1. 2( 08).<br />

Calnan. Mich ael. 1987. Heulttt and illness: nit! IllYperspective. London : Tavistock .<br />

Campbell. Jonathan. A cure for AID S'?hup:/Iwww .


22.2(06).<br />

----------------<br />

Chan-Young. Moira. and W. C. Yu. 2003. Outb reak of Severe Acute Respira tory<br />

Syndrome in Hong Kong special administrat ive region: Case report. British<br />

Medim l JOI/rt/lII 326.7394: 850-852.<br />

Cha nces of co nta ining SA RS much imp roved---e xpert . 2003. October 30, Yahoo! News.<br />

No longer available online (accesse d Octo ber 30. 2003) .<br />

Chang. H.J .. N. Hua ng. C. H. Lee, YJ. Hsu. C.J. Hsieh . and Y.J. Chou. 2004. Th e impact<br />

of the SARS ep ide mic on the utilization of med ical serv ices: SA RS and the fear<br />

of SA RS. American Journal ofPublic Health 94.4: 562-4.<br />

Che n. Melod y. 2003. SA RS epide mic: DOH den ies rumor of disease fatalities. Ap ril 27.<br />

Ta ipei Tim es. http://www.laipcitimes.coml Ncws/taiwanlarchi vcsl200 3/04127/<br />

203 669 (accessed Janu ary 24. 2(04).<br />

China: SA RS bat tle rema ins "grave". 2003. May 6, CNN.com. http://www.cnn.com/<br />

2003 /W ORLD/as iapcf/e astl05/06/sars/index.h tml (accessed May 14. 2(03).<br />

China: SA RS won', de lay first hum an space trip . 2003. Ma y 12, CN N.com. No longe r<br />

available online (accessed May 14. 2(XH).<br />

China admits firs t 2004 SA RS death. 2004 . A pril 30. CNN.com. http.z/www.cnn.com/<br />

2004 /WO RLD/as iapcf/04/30/china.sars/index .html (accessed Ap ril 30, 2(04).<br />

Ch ina chec ks SARS rum or messages. 2003. May 13. MSNBC.com . No longer avai lable<br />

on line (accessed May 14, 2(03).<br />

China plans SA RS vaccine tria l. 2003. Nove mber 23. CNN.com. http ://www.cn n.com!<br />

2003/JIEAL T H/ I I/ 23/sa rs.vaccine.ap/ (accessed Novembe r 23. 2(03).<br />

Chin a quarantined too man y in SA RS ou tbreak-study. 2003 . October 30, Yahoo! News.<br />

No longer avai lable on line (accessed Novem ber 4, 2003).<br />

China SA RS numb ers pass 5.000. 2003. May 12. CNN.cum. httpJ /www.cnn.coml200 3/<br />

HEALTH/05/ 12/sars/i ndex.html (accessed May 14. 2(03).<br />

China to stop da ily SA RS report. 2004. June I. Yahoo ! News . No longer ava ilable online<br />

(accessed June 5. 2(04).<br />

China vs SA RS: A good dog is a dead dog. 2(XJ3.May 3 1. Asia T imes. lutp.z/www.<br />

atimes .comlatimes/ChinalEE3 IAd04. ht ml (accessed Apri l 27. 200S).<br />

303


com/2003rrEClllspaceI05/23/sars.fromspacc/indcx.html (acce ...sed May 26.<br />

2(03) .<br />

de Vos. Ga il. 1996. Tales. nlnlOn. and ):on ip: £'l:pforill):COlllt'", pomryfolk literature ill<br />

grades 7-/2. Englewood. CO : Libraries Unlimited .<br />

Dcgh. Linda. and Andrew Vazsonyi. 1973. The dialectics of the legend . Ffllkft,re Reprint<br />

Se ries. Ind iana University 1.6.<br />

Dodds. P.S.. and DJ. Watts. 2QO...t. Universal behavior in a generalized model of<br />

contag ion. Phys ical Review Letters 92. 21: 218701.<br />

___ . 2005 . A generalized model of social and biological contagio n. Journa l of<br />

Theoretical Biology 232A : 587-6Q.t<br />

Doheny . Kathleen . 2QO...t. SARS review shows Toronto fought a good fight. June 2.<br />

Yahoo ! News. http ://www .lifeclini c.comlh ealthne wslarticle _view.asp'lstorye<br />

5 1930 1 (accessed April 2. 2008).<br />

Dougla... Mary. 1988. Purit y and danger . In All wwly.'iiJ of the conce pt..ofpollUlioll and<br />

taboo . Londo n: Ark Paperbacks. Rout ledge & Kegan Paul.<br />

___. 1992. Risk and blam e: Essays ill cntturaltheorv, London: Routled ge.<br />

Douglass. William Camp bell. 1992. Hydrogen peroxid e. Mt'dim l mira cle. Atlanta. GA :<br />

Second Opinion Publishing.<br />

Dresser. Nerine. 200·t. SA RS - No Laughing Malter'! hup:/Iwww.norincdresser.coml<br />

surs.html (accesse d April 20. 2008).<br />

Duffin. Jaculyn. and Arthur Swee tman. cd. 2006. ,)'ARS in Context: Memory , History.<br />

Policy. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.<br />

Dundcs, Ala n. cd. 199 1. The blood libel legend: A (·{/.\,t'!lOok in anti-Semiticfolklore.<br />

Madison. WI: U of Wisconsin P.<br />

Eaton. Lynn. 2


Editorial: Eves needs to call SARS review soon. 2003. June 10. torontostar.com. No<br />

longer available online (acces sed June 18. 2


Fea gin. Joe R.. and Pinar Batur. 2()()4. Racism in comparative perspect ive. In Ham/hook<br />

ofsocia l problems: A compa rative international pe rspective, cd. Geo rge Ritzer.<br />

12 1-138. Thou sand Oak s. CA : Sage Publications.<br />

Federa l agents trained 10 spot SA RS . 2003 . May 7. MSNBC.co m. hllp :/lcmhi.hjmu .edu .<br />

cni ne wslO305/85.hlm (acc essed April 2. 2(08).<br />

Fine . Gar y Alan. 2005 . Rumor matte rs: An introductory essay. In Rumor mills: The<br />

social impact ofnmlOr and legend . ed . Gar y Alan Fine. Vercnique Campion­<br />

Vincent . and Chip Heath. 1-7. New Jersey: Aldin e de Gru ytcr.<br />

Fine . Gary Ala n. and Irfan Khawaja. 2005 . Celebrating Arabs and grateful terrori sts:<br />

Rumor and the poli tics of plau sibility. In Rumor mills: nit' social impac t of nmlOr<br />

and legend. cd . Gar y Alan Fine. Veronique Cam pion -V incent. and Chip Heath.<br />

189-205. New Brunswick. NJ: Aldin e Tran ..action.<br />

Fine. G ary Alan . Veronique Campion-Vincent. and Chip Heath. cd. 200 5. Rumo r mill...:<br />

nit: ,w eial impact ofnmlOr and legend. New Jersey: Aldine de Gruyter.<br />

Flaskcrud . Jacquelyn H.. and Ceci lia E. Rush. 1989. A IDS and traditional health beliefs<br />

and practi ce s of black women. Nursi ng Research 38A : 210-2 15.<br />

Flaskcrud. Jacquelyn H.. and Eve lyn Ru iz Ca lvillo. 1991. Beli efs about AIDS . health.<br />

and illness among low-income Latina wom en . Research in N"n;llg 01/(/ Health<br />

14 : 43 1-438.<br />

Fleck . Fiona, 2(Xl3. W HO says SA RS outbrea k is over . but fight should go on. British<br />

Medical Joltma I 327.7406 : 70.<br />

FlorCru z. Jaime. 200 3. China censors CNN SA RS report. May 15. C NN,co m.<br />

http://www.cnn .coml2 00 3IW OR LD/asiapcflea.•tJ05/ 14/sar s.censorI (accessed<br />

Ma y 25, 2(03).<br />

Forema n. William . 2003a . SARS virus keeps schoo ls shut in Beijing. May 4. Yahoo !<br />

News. hup:/lwww.redorb it.com/n ews/science/4 576/sars_virus_keeps _schoo ls_<br />

shuc in_beijing! (accessed A pril 2. 2008) .<br />

___. 2(Xl3h. Villagers attack Chi na offi ces over SA RS . May 5. Yahoo! News.<br />

hltp:/l www.redorbil.comlnewslsciencel58261villagers_auack_chinu_offices_o\.er<br />

_sarsl (ac ces sed April 2. 200 8).<br />

Foucault . Miche l. 1980. Tw o lectures. In Power/Kno wledge: Selected interviews and<br />

other writings / 972-/ 977. ed . and trans. Col in Gordon. 78-108. New York :<br />

307


Pantheon .<br />

Fox. Maggie. 2oo3a. West Nile seen scar ier than SA RS for U.S.• Canada. May 15.<br />

Yaho o! News. hltp:/Iwww.planetark.orgldailynewsstory.cfmlnewsid/20804/<br />

newsDate/ 15-May-2 003/story.htm (accessed April 2. 2(08).<br />

_ __. 2003 b. "Ca ttle car syndrome" offers SARS insights. May 20. Yahoo! News.<br />

hllp Jlww w.planeta rk.orgldailynewsstory.cfmlnewsid/20859/story.htm (accessed<br />

April 3. 2(08).<br />

Fox-Baker. Jack. 198 1. Mex ico: Folk med icine. magic and mind -molding. In Folk<br />

medicine W Il } herbal healing, ed. George G. Meyer. Kenneth Blum. and John G.<br />

Cu ll, 121-1 38. Springfield. Illinois: Charles C Thomas.<br />

Frankfurter. David. 2003 . The satanic ritual abuse panic as religious-studies data. Numcn:<br />

International Reviewfor the History of Religions 50. 1: 108-17.<br />

Fresh SA RS outbreaks feare d in As ia. 2003. May 14, MSNBC.com. No longer avai lable<br />

on line (accessed May 14, 2(03).<br />

Gambi a' s President claims he has cure for AID S. 200 7. February 20. MSNBC.com .<br />

http://www.msnbc.msn.comlidl l 7244005/ (accessed October 3.2(07).<br />

Ga mble. Vanessa N. 1997. Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Amer icans and hea lth<br />

ca re. American Journa l ofPublic Health 87: 1773- 1778.<br />

Gard ner. Amanda. 2003. Life "surreal" for nurse under SA RS quarant ine. May 30.<br />

Yahoo! News. hn p:/lfin da rticles.comlp/articles/ mi_kmhealis _2oo3 05/aL<br />

kepm413923 (accessed Apr il 2. 2(08).<br />

Garro, Linda . 1992. Chron ic illness and the construct ion of narr atives. In Pain as human<br />

experience. ed. Mar y Jo Del v ecchio . P. Brodwin . B. Good. and A. Kleinman.<br />

JOO- 137. Berkeley: University of Califo r nia Press.<br />

Gaudet. Marcia. 2004. Carville: Remembe ring leprosy ill America. Jackson : Universi ty<br />

Press of Mississippi.<br />

Gebhard. Bruno . 1976. Th e interrela tionship of scien tific and folk medicine in the United<br />

States of America since 1850. In Ame ricanfolk medicine: A symposium, ed.<br />

Wayland D. Hand. 87·98. Berkeley: Univers ity of Ca lifom ia Press.<br />

Gilman. Sander L. 1988. Disease and representation: lmagcs ofiltness frommadness to<br />

AIDS. Ithaca: Co rnell University Press.<br />

308


hell. Croatian Medim l JOllmal-W .6: 674-80.<br />

Lichtenstein. Bronwen. 2()().t. AIDS as a social problem: The creation of socia l pariahs in<br />

the management of an epidemic. In Handbook ofsocial prob lems: A comparative<br />

internationa l perspective . cd. George Ritzer. 3 16-334. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage<br />

Publications.<br />

Lim. Angel. and Rosita Lim. 2005. Interview by author, 12 July. Toronto. Tape<br />

recording.<br />

Lim. Jennifer. 2005 . Interview by author. I I July. Toronto. Tape recording.<br />

Lim. S.. T. Clo....on. G. Howard. and M. Gardam. 2()()...l. Collateral damage: The<br />

unforesee n effects of emergency outbreak policies . Lancet tnf ectious Diseases<br />

4. 11: 697 -703.<br />

Lin. Paul. 2003. China ha.. coo ked up "American SARS" ..cam . May 27. A..sociation for<br />

Asian Re..earch. http://www.asianre..enrch.orglarticlesl I387.html(accessed<br />

January 24. 2()()...l).<br />

uu, C. 200 3. The battle again st SARS: A Chinese story. A ustralian Hl'lIlth Review 26.3 :<br />

3- 13.<br />

Lodge. David M. 2003. Biological hazards ahead. June 19. NYTimes.com. hnp :llque ry.<br />

nytimcs.co mlgsllfullpnge.html?res=9C02 E7DFI I38F93AA25755COA9659C8 B6<br />

3 (accessed June 20. 2003).<br />

Loury. Glenn C. 2002. The lIIU1to",y of racial inequality. Cambridge. MA: Harvard<br />

University Press.<br />

Low. Colin, 200·to Widening participation and dealing with di fference-moving beyo nd<br />

the rhetoric of inclusion. March 15·16. CEDA R's 10th International Conference<br />

on Widening Participatio n: Research. Policy and Practice. http://www2.warwic k.<br />

ac.uklfaclsoc/cednr/publicalions/papcrsl (accesse d June 1K.2007).<br />

Lui. John. 2003. Ce ll phone firm offers SAR S alerts. April 18. t\.1SNBC.c()Ill.<br />

hltp:llwww.ncws.com/C ell-phone-finn -uffers·SARS.nlertsl2100- 1039_3­<br />

997457. hln1l(accessed April 4. 2008).<br />

Luk. Hclen, 200 3. Hong Kong 10 set up SARS alert ..ystcm. September 22. Yahoo! News.<br />

No longer available online (accesse d September 23. 2003) .<br />

Lyn. Tan Ec. 2003a. Virus spreads in Hong Kong. cockroaches eyed. April 8. Yahoo !<br />

News. No longer avai lable online (acccs..ed April S. 20(3).<br />

315


New SARS dea ths a blow for Taiwan. 2003. May 25. C NN.wm. No longer available<br />

online (accessed May 25. 2003).<br />

New SA RS travel warn ing issued. 2003 . April 23. MSNBC.com. http ://hb s.dutchf ans.<br />

nctlarchi velind ex.phplt-56 190 .htm l (accessed Apr il ... 2008).<br />

No China SARS death s for first da y in six weeks. 2003. June I. Yahoo! News. No longer<br />

ava ilable online (acc essed June I. 200 3).<br />

Nokia sinks on latest warn ing. 2003. July 18. CNN .com. hup :/Iwww.cnn .coml200 31<br />

BUS INESSI07/1 7/nok ial (accessed April 3. 200 8).<br />

Nurses say Toronto nor prepared if SARS reappears. 2003 . Sep tembe r 22. Yahoo ! News.<br />

No longer available online (acces sed Septem ber 23. 2(03 ).<br />

O'Conn or. Bonnie Blair. 1995. Healing traditio ns: Alternative medicine and the health<br />

professions. Philadelphia: Universi ty of Pennsylvania Press.<br />

O'C on nor. Bonnie B.. and David J. Hufford . 200 1. Unders tanding folk medi cine. In<br />

lI eulillg login : Culture and medi cine in mod ern ht'cl!rh belief syste ms. cd. Erika<br />

Brady. 13-35. Logan: Utah State University Press.<br />

Obrdlik. Antoni n J. 19.t2. "Ga llows humor't-c-a socio logical phenomenon. The Amerin ll!<br />

J,mmal lif Sm·it,logy47.5: 709-7 16.<br />

Oliveir a. Mik e. 200 3. Local businesses punished by SARS rumo urs. March 29.<br />

TheStar.com . No longer available online (accessed Apri l 7. 2(03).<br />

Omi . Michael . and Howard Winant. 1986. Racial formation ill the United States: From<br />

tilt' /960.\" 10 the 19 90.\'. New York : Rout ledge.<br />

One "probable" SARS case in India: WHO . 200 3. May 12. Yahoo ! News. No longer<br />

available online (accessed May 1... 2(0 3).<br />

Oren. M. 2004 . Quarantine after an internat ional biol ogical weapons attack : Medical and<br />

public health requ iremen ts for co ntainment. tsr ael Medim l Ass ociatio n Journal<br />

6.11: 658 -60 .<br />

Origin of new SARS outb reak in China a mystery. raccoo n dogs culled. 200 ·t January<br />

I.... Yahoo ! News. http ://fi ndartides.comlplart icleslmi_kmafplis_2()()..J0 1/a i_<br />

kepm35 1337 (accessed April 2. 2(08).<br />

319


Rcm arman. Craig. and Ce res Duskin. 200 2. The culture's drug add ict imagery. In<br />

Deviance: The interactionist perspective. ed. Earl Rubington and Martin S.<br />

Weinberg. 32-U. Boston : Allyn and Bacon .<br />

Renard. Jean-B runo. 2005. Nega rory rumors: From the denial of rea lity to cons piracy<br />

theory. In Rumor mills: The social impact ofnmlOr and legend. cd. Gary Alan<br />

Fine. Veronique Campion-Vincent. and Ch ip Heath. 223·239. New Brunswick.<br />

NJ: Aldine Tr ansact ion.<br />

Report : Iron set to unvei l herbal AIDS cure . 2007 . Februa ry 6. FOXnews.com. hup:/I<br />

www .foxnews.comlstorylO.2933.25028 1.00 .html(3cce.ised October 3. 2007).<br />

Repo rt: SA RS not airborne virus . 2003 . October 20. CNN.com . http ://www .cnn.coml<br />

2003I\VORLD/asiapcf/southeastlI01201who.sars .aplindex.html (accessed Oc tober<br />

21, 2003).<br />

Report blasts 11K chiefs over SAR S. 2(X)..l.. July 5. CNN.com. No lon ger available online<br />

(accessed July 5. 200.t).<br />

Research puts Sars (sic) mortality rate at 20%. 2003 . May 7. The Gua rdian .<br />

hn p://66 .70.1-t0 .2 17/va ccinclsars l.h tm l (accessed Ap ril 20. 2008) .<br />

Rives. Jam es B. 199 6. The blood libel aga inst the Mon tanists. V;gi/i(/(' Christianae: A<br />

Review ofEarly Christian Life and Ltmgllllgt' 50.2: 117· 24.<br />

Rob erts. Dexte r. 2


SARS im pactin g higher ed ucat ion. 2003 . May 7. CN N.co m. http J /www .cn n.coml2003/<br />

EDUCAT IONI0510 7/sars. higher.education.ap/indcx .html (acce ssed May 14.<br />

2(03) .<br />

SA RS kill.. two more in Ca nada . 2003 . June 22. CNN .com . hup ://ww w.abc .net.aul<br />

ncwv..torie v2003106123/886 I82.htm (acces..ed Apri l 3. 2008) .<br />

SA RS ou tbreak a medical version of bio-terror" 2003 . Apri l 3. The Age. http ://www.<br />

thea ge.com .;:aulanide sl2003fO..tI03/10-t8962870262.htm l (acces..ed May 12.<br />

2()()..J.).<br />

SA RS relapses stump doctors. 2003 . May 3. CNN. com . http ://w ww .cnn .coml2003/<br />

Jl EALTHI0 5103/sars .mutate/index.html (acce ssed May 14.2003).<br />

SA RS report faults government. 2003 . October 2. MSNBC.com. No long er available<br />

online (accessed Oc tober 2. 2003).<br />

SARS tally soaring in Taiwan. 2003. May 20. CNN.com . hnp ://www.cnn .com l2003/<br />

JlEALTHI05/20/s;:ars/ (accessed May 25. 2003) .<br />

SAR S trials lift vacc ine hope. 200 3. December -toCNN .co lll. http://www.cn n.coml2oo 3/<br />

Jl EALTIUI 2I0-t/sars.vaccin e.reut/index.html (acce ssed Decem ber 5. 2003) .<br />

SARS triggers more pilot furloughs at Northwest. 26. May 25. C RC.ca Ans Onlin e.<br />

http ://www.cbc.calans/story/2006105125/sarsical.html(accessed Jun e 19. 200 7).<br />

Saul ny. Susa n. 2003 . In Chinatow n. an ou tbre ak of fear . Ap ril 4. N'r'Times.ccm . http ://<br />

query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html'!res=9402E5DB1738Fq37A35757COA9659<br />

C8 B63 (accessed April 7. 2003) .<br />

Sayre. 1. 200 1. The use of aberrant med ical humor by psychiatr ic unit staff. issuesill<br />

Mellltil J/(·tlllll Nursing 22.7: 669 -89.<br />

324


Schabes. Richard. 2003 . SAR S: Prudence. not panic. Canadian ,\It'dim l Association<br />

JOllrJIaI1 68.1 1: 1432-4 .<br />

Schra m. Justin. 2003. How popular perceptions of risk from SAR S are fermenting<br />

discrimi nation. British Jledical JO/lrJIaI 326.7395: 939 .<br />

Schwartz. Richard D.• and Jerome H. Sko lnick. 2002. Lega l stigma. In Devia nce: The<br />

interactio nist perspective, ed. Earl Rubington and Martin S. Weinberg. 203·207 .<br />

Boston : All yn and Bacon .<br />

Sch warz, Norbert. Lawrence 1. Sanna . Ian Sku mik . and Carol yn Yoon. 2007.<br />

Mctacognitive expe riences and the intricacie s of setting people straight:<br />

Implications for debia ving and public information campaigns. Advances I"<br />

Experimental Social Psychology 39: 127-61.<br />

Scientists say develop new SARS tracing method . 2()()4. June -I. Yahoo! News . http://<br />

www.\·irtualresp iratorycenlre .comlnews.asp.?anid = 1874 (accessed April 2. 2008) .<br />

Seizer. Susan. 2005. St igmas ofthe Tamilstage: All t'lhllogmphy ofspecial drama<br />

artists ill Soutti lndia. Durham. North Caro lina: Duke University Press.<br />

Sckhri. Rajiv . 2003. Canada doctors find SARS link to U.S. visitor. June 11. Yahoo !<br />

News . No longer available online (accesse d June 16. 2003).<br />

Scrinus. Jason. ed. 1987. Psychoimmunity and the IU'ali"g pr ocess : A 1101i.\"/;c approach<br />

to immunity and AIDS. Berkeley: Celestial Arts.<br />

Shibutani, Tamot su. 1966. Improvised lIew.\·" A .w d olog;m l ,'tudy ofrumor. Indianapoli s:<br />

Bobbs -Merrill.<br />

Shields. Michael. 2003. Roche launches test for SARS virus. July 15. Yahoo ! News.<br />

hup :/lwww .sihs .ac.cn/sarslkbdctail.asp.?did=2071 (accessed Apri l I. 2008).<br />

Shilts. Randy. 1987. And the band played 011. New York: Penguin Book s.<br />

Shurtleff. A.C. 2004. Bioterrori sm and emerg ing infectious diseuse >unrimicrobials,<br />

therapeut ics and immune-modulators. SARS coronavirus. investigational Drugs<br />

7.2: 9 1-5.<br />

Singapore. foreign experts start probe in SARS case . 2003. September 15. Yahoo! News.<br />

hup: /Iwww.planetark.comldailynewsMor y.d mlnewsid!22242JnewsDate/16-Sep·<br />

100 3/story.htm (accessed April I. 2(08).<br />

325


Singapore's hip-hop SARS hope. 2003. July 3, CNN.c om. http://www.highbeam.coml<br />

doc/IPI-75345704.html (accessed April !. 2008).<br />

Singapore may jail patients for dishonesty on SARS. 2003. June 10. Yahoo! News. No<br />

longer available online (accessed June 10. 2003).<br />

Singapore prices fall on SARS. 2003. June 23. CNN.com. No longer available online<br />

(accesse d June 23. 2(03).<br />

Singer. P.A.. S.R. Benatar. M. Bernstein, A.S. Daar. B.M. Dickens. S.K. Mack ae. R.E.G.<br />

Upshur, L. Wright. and R.Z. Shaul. 2003. Ethics and SARS: Lessons from<br />

Toronto. British Medical j Ollrl/aI 327.7427: 1342-4.<br />

Sisci. Francesco. 2003. SARS and rumors of SARS. September 18, Asia Times Online.<br />

hup :llwww.alimes.comlalimes/ChinalEI18Ad05.html (accessed October 30,<br />

2(03).<br />

Sloan, Rennie. 2003. Will SARS wreak havoc here? April 2. MSNBC.cnm. No longer<br />

available online (accesse d April 23. 2(0 3).<br />

Smith. C.B., M.P. Battin. J.A. Jacobson. L.P. Francis. J.R. Botkin. E.P. Asplund, GJ.<br />

Domek. and B. Hawkins. 2004. Are there cha racteristics of infectious diseases<br />

thai raise special ethical issues'! Developing World Bloethk:s 4. 1: 1-16.<br />

Smith. Paul. 1984. The book ofnasty legends . London: Fontana/Co llins.<br />

_ __. 1990. "AIDS--don't die of ignorance": Exploring the cultu ral complex. In A<br />

nest ofvipers: Perspectives 011 conte mporary legend. vol. 5. ed. Gillian Bennett<br />

and Paul Smith, 113-14 1. Sheffield. Eng.: Sheffield Academic Press.<br />

Smith. Truman. 1981. Herbs from private resources in the community. In Folk medicine<br />

and herbalheating, cd. George G. Meyer. Kenneth Blum. and John G. Cull. 197­<br />

2 12. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas.<br />

Snow. Loudell. 1974. Folk medical beliefs and their implications for care of patients: A<br />

review based on studies among black Americans. AIII/als ofIntemat Medicine<br />

8 1: 82-96.<br />

South Park. Episode no. 707, first broadcast 30 April 2003 by Comedy Central. Directed<br />

and written by Trey Parker.<br />

Spurgeon. David. 2003a. Canada reports more than )(X) suspected cases of SARS. British<br />

Afedim l JoumaI 326.7395: 897.<br />

326


Tim clin e: Sa rs [vic] .... irus. 200 3. Se pt. 9. BBC News . htlp :llnews.bbc.co.ukll lh ilwor idl<br />

a !'> ia- pacificI2973..U 5.stm (accessed Septembe r 9.2003).<br />

Timclinc for SARS. 2003 . April 24. MSNBC.l.. 'Om. No longer avai lable onli ne (acc essed<br />

April 24. 2(03).<br />

Toelk en. Barre. 1975. Folklore. worldview. and co mmunication. In Folklore:<br />

Perjonfumce and communication. cd . Dan Ben -A mos and Kenn eth S. Gold stein.<br />

265 · 286 . Th e Hague: Mouton.<br />

Toron to is back a year after SARS. 2()().t. May 27. C NN.co m. No lon ger available online<br />

(accessed May 27. 2()()..J).<br />

Toronto report s 25 pos sible new SARS cases. 200 3. May 23. C NN.co m. hltp :lledition.<br />

cnn .coml2oo3 /HEA LT HI05123/sar.J index .html (acc essed May 25. 200 3).<br />

Toronto reveals SAR S source . 2003 . May 26. CNN .com . hllp:lledition.cnn.co ml2oo 31<br />

}IEALTHI0 5/261!'>ars.wrup.inIUindcx.hlml (access ed June 2. 2003) .<br />

Toron to SAR S death toll reach es 40 .2003. Jul y 14. Yahoo ! News. hllp:llwww.ircl und .<br />

comlne wspape rlbreakingl1003107 14Ibreaking83 .hlm (accessed Apr il 1. 2(08).<br />

Toronto' s economy lakes SARS hit. 2003 . April 24. f\.tSNBC.l.. 'Om. No lon ger available<br />

online (acc ess ed May 14. 200 3).<br />

Treichler . Paula A. 1999. How to ha re theory ill 1111epidemic: Cultural chro nictes of<br />

A/DS . Dur ham and London : Duke University Pres !'>.<br />

Troll er. Robert T.• and Juan Anto nio Cha vira. 1981 . Curanderismo. MexiClIII Am erican<br />

jt,lk healing, Athens: Univ ersity of Geor gia Press.<br />

Trudeau . Kev in. 2OU7. Natural cures "th ey " do,, 't IWIIII YOI/ to know about . Allia nce<br />

Publish ing.<br />

Turne r. Patricia A. 1993. / heard it through the grapevine: RUII/or in African Amer ican<br />

vulture. Berkele y: University of C alifornia Press.<br />

Twa in. Mark. 2003. ROllghing it (enriched dan k series]. New York: Poc ket.<br />

Two SARS cases co nfirme d in China . :!()().l. . A pril 23. CNN.com. hllp:llww w.cnn.co m/<br />

2()().l./WORLD/asiapc fI04123/chin a.sarslindex .html (acce ssed Ap ril :!3. 2()().-t).<br />

UK has first confirmed SARS ca se. 200 3. May 15. CNN .com . hllp :llwww .cnn .coml<br />

200 3I\ VO RLD/e uropeJ05 / 15/uk.sarslimlex .hlm l (accessed May 25. 200 3).<br />

329


Update #57 - Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome . 2003. May 13. Public Health Age ncy<br />

of Canada. http ://www.phac-aspc.gc.calsars-sras-gen/up date/2003/up date57•<br />

eng.php'loptione cmail (accessed Apr il 2. 2008 ).<br />

U.S. hospitals ready for SARS outbreak '? 2003. May 17. CNN .com . No longer available<br />

online (accessed May 25. 2003).<br />

US cr iticised China ove r death penalty for SA RS quarantine violations. 2003. May 17.<br />

Yahoo! News. http ://www.acccssm ylihrary.co mlcom s2/summ ary_0286­<br />

23299265_ITM (accessed Apri l 2. 20(8).<br />

US holds plane in virus scare. 2003 . Apri l I. sse News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2!hi/<br />

hcallh/2908021.slm (acc esse d March 23. 2006).<br />

van Wor mer. K.. and M. Boes. 1997. Humor in the eme rgenc y room: A social work<br />

perspective. Health & Sodal Work 22.2: 87-92.<br />

Vasagar, Jecvan. 2003 . Ch inatown hit by SA RS rumours. Apri l 18. The Guardian . http://<br />

www .guard ian.co .uk/ uk/2003 /apr/ 18/sars .world (accessed Dece mber 5. 2(04).<br />

Vuskilam pi, Tuula . 1982. Cult ure and folk medicine. In Folk medicine and hl'llltll<br />

culture: Role oj folk medicine ill modem health care. ed. Tuula Vaskilam pi and<br />

Caro l P. Macf' ormack. 2-16 . Kuopio. Finland: The Universit y of Kuopio.<br />

Vcdan tam. Shankar . and Rob Stein. 2003 . Death rate for globa l outb reak rising. April 25.<br />

MSNBC.com . hnp: /Iwww .encycloped ia.com/doel I P2-256557 .html(accessed<br />

April 4. 20(8).<br />

Verma. S.. S. Mythil y, Y.H. Chan. J.P. Dcsl ypcre. E.K. Teo. and S.A. Cho ng. 2004 . Post­<br />

SARS psycho logical morb idity and stigma amon g general pract itioners and<br />

trad itional Chinese medicine pract itioners in Singapore . Annuls Acad emy of<br />

Medicine Singapo re 33.6: 743-8.<br />

Victor. Jeffery. 1993. Satani c panic: Tile creation of a nil/temporar y legend. Chicago:<br />

Open Court .<br />

Voge l. Virgi l J. 1976. American Indian food s used as medicine. In Americanfolk<br />

medicine: A symposium. ed. Wayland D. Hand. 125-14 1. Berkeley and Los<br />

Angeles: Univers ity of Californ ia Press.<br />

___. 1990. Amaimll tndiunme dkine. Norma n: Univer sity of Okla homa Press.<br />

330


Young. Doug. 200 3a. SARS disrupts China's wild game business. June 21. Yahoo!<br />

News. http://www.geocities.comlgentilekoshcr/wi ldgame.hlm (accesse d April 3.<br />

2008 ).<br />

_ _ _ . 200 3b. China says ant ibod y offerv a way to diagnose SAR S. June 12. Yahoo !<br />

News. hup :llwww.rsnz.orgl newslindex. php.!vicw=searchd


A IDS 264.265<br />

SARS 263<br />

Hosp ital Gowns<br />

SA RS 184<br />

Hydrogen Perox ide<br />

SARS 266<br />

Kaletra<br />

AIDS 132<br />

SARS 132<br />

Mon ey, Burning of<br />

SARS 100, 265<br />

;\Iun g Bean s<br />

SA RS 265<br />

Plants (Ge ner ul/Un speclfled )<br />

Cancer250<br />

Publi c Spitting, Pr eventi on of<br />

SARS 127<br />

Radio Frequencies<br />

AIDS 265<br />

Cancer265<br />

Schlenzhath<br />

Various/Gcneral lllncsscs 267<br />

Sex With A Virgin<br />

A IDS 264<br />

S moking<br />

SA RS HX1, 265<br />

So rcerers<br />

SARS 100. 265<br />

Sprite<br />

SARS 233<br />

Teas (Various)<br />

SARS 265-266<br />

Tyvek Suits<br />

SA RS 184<br />

Ultr a violet Blood Irradiation Th er ap y<br />

Pncumonias 266-2 67<br />

Vinegar<br />

SARS 265<br />

Vilamins<br />

AIDS 264<br />

SA RS 262, 263. 265. 266<br />

Vodk a<br />

SARS 98<br />

Washin g Clo thes<br />

335


A IDS 147<br />

SUI'EKSI'KEAIIEKS<br />

AIDS 196<br />

SARS 196-197<br />

340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!