18.07.2013 Views

View - K-REx - Kansas State University

View - K-REx - Kansas State University

View - K-REx - Kansas State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

another restaurant that provides comparable prices, services, or benefits. In particular, positive<br />

switching barriers refer to inhibiting factors that provide an affirmative reason to remain,<br />

reflecting wanting to be in a relationship, and negative switching barriers refer to inhibiting<br />

factors that provide a passive reason to stay, reflecting having to be in a relationship.<br />

Switching Barriers in Consumer Research<br />

In recent years, many studies have focused on inhibiting factors of customer switching<br />

decisions. Table 2.3 represents the switching barriers identified and used in the previous<br />

consumer literature. As shown in Table 2.3, the switching barriers can be easily divided into<br />

positive and negative. While positive switching barriers provide a positive reason to remain<br />

(wanting to be), negative barriers provide a negative reason to stay in a relationship (having to<br />

be). Most of their findings showed that these barriers generally reduce the likelihood of<br />

customer switching even when other factors (e.g., distrust, and low perceived quality) encourage<br />

switching decisions. Table 2.3 also reveals that barriers in the previous research could be<br />

generally organized into two negative categories (i.e., switching costs and lack of attractiveness<br />

of alternatives) and two positive categories (i.e., relational benefits and service recovery).<br />

Switching Costs<br />

Based on previous research, switching costs, which were the major category of switching<br />

barriers (Colgate & Lang, 2001; Jones et al., 2000), primarily consist of time/effort costs,<br />

psychological costs (e.g., unfamiliarity, uncertainty and undesirable consequences), and<br />

economic/financial costs. Porter (1980) described switching costs as the perception of the<br />

magnitude of the additional required costs, such as termination costs from the current<br />

relationship and joining costs with an alternative. Morgan and Hunt (1994) viewed switching<br />

cost as economic only. In contrast, Jackson (1985) categorized switching costs as psychological,<br />

physical, and economic in nature.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!