strategjia kombetare shqiptare per luften kunder ... - Legislationline

All other answers, go to 15
14. If the interviewee made any of these arrangements personally can s/he adequately describe how
s/he made those arrangements?
If person cannot answer this clearly or does not know the process required to get a passport or visa,
it may be indicative of trafficking.
15. Who paid the interviewee’s travel costs?
Self Family Boyfriend Friend Recruitment Company
Other: ___________________________________
Existence of a third party may be indicative of trafficking
D. Determination
Potential Victim of Trafficking - Adults: If interviewee gives at least one answer that is indicative of
trafficking in each section – A, B, and C, the interviewee must be classified as an actual, presumed
or potential victim of trafficking. The interviewer should offer the interviewee assistance through
the National Referral Mechanism. The interviewer should also explain that those who did this to the
interviewee have broken the law; and if s/he wishes,s/he can file a complaint with the police.
Potential Victim of Trafficking – Children: In the case of children (anyone under 18 years old), any one
answer indicative of trafficking in section A and C only, requires that the interviewee be classified as an
actual, presumed or potential victim of trafficking. The interviewer should explain to the minor that the
family will be contacted. The following situations may result:
1. The child does not want to return to the family: In this situation, the interviewer must take
responsibility for the minor/[child] and bring him/her to a safe shelter approved by MOLSA, in
accordance with the National Referral Mechanism, until more appropriate accommodation can be
found. The interviewer should contact state social services who will immediately file a petition
with the court for a temporary custody order and will contact the family to inform them that their
child is temporarily in state custody. State social services will then conduct a family assessment to
aid in the determination of the best long-term solution for the child.
2. The child wishes to return home and the family does not appear to have been involved in the child’s
exploitation: In this situation, the child can be released to the family. However, a report must be
filed with both the local police in the region to which the child is being returned and with State
Social Services. Both the local police and the local office of state social services must make a
follow-up visit to the family within one week. The family of the child must be informed that the
police and social services will be making a visit to their home to follow-up and ensure the child’s
welfare.
3. The child wishes to return home but it appears from the child’s statements that the family was
involved in the child’s exploitation: In this case the child should not be released to the family until
state social services have had an opportunity to meet with the family and conduct a preliminary risk
assessment for the child. For this purpose, the social worker and border police should contact the
local authorities in the child’s home community immediately. If the preliminary risk assessment
does not reveal any immediate risks or threats to the child, the child may be returned to the family,
but both local police and the local office of state social services must make a follow-up visit to the
family within one week. A social worker should accompany the child home under police escort
to ensure their safety. Before turning the child over to the family, the border police and social
65