Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 54, No. 1 ...

20
3 4 miles
Figure 1. Location of Lambert Farm Site in R.I.
(graphic by A. Leveillee; 1 mile = 1.6 km).
trolled excavation of the two acre site. By all
measures, the program has been a successful one.
Over 500 50x50 cm 2 test pits and 125 lxl m 2
excavation units have been dug across Lambert
Farm (Kerber et al. 1989; Kerber 1990).
Based upon diagnostic projectile points,
ceramics, and radio-carbon dates, it appears that
the Lambert Farm site was occupied intermittently
during the Terminal Late Archaic and more
intensively in the Middle and Late Woodland
periods. Uncalibrated (and uncorrected for O l3 C
or reservoir effect) radiocarbon dates on shell
cluster around 850 14C years before the present.
Below the 25 cm plowzone, approximately 50
truncated features and activity areas have been
Leveillee: Canine Burial Practices. WalWick. RI
identified.
Of particular interest was feature #2.
Excavated in two contiguous 1 x 1 m 2 units in 5
cm levels, the feature became obvious at the
plowzone terminus as a generally circular, dense
concentration of shellfish remains. The diameter
of the feature was approximately 1 meter. The
feature had been constructed as follows. Initially
a pit was dug, then filled with layers of shell. It
appears that shell was then mounded over the pit.
The shellfish consisted primarily of quahog,
softshell clam, oyster, bay scallop, knobbed
whelk, razor clam, and ribbed mussel. Many of
the shells were whole, and their distribution
within the feature appeared stratified, scallop
shells in particular located at the bottom levels
with oyster and quahog above. Mixed within the
shell layers were burnt rocks, aboriginal ceramics.
local and exotic lithic debitage, deer and bird
bone fragments, mica fragments, and a steatite
platform pipe. The shell extended to a depth of
73 cm below the surface, where the articulated
skeletal remains oftwo canines were encountered.
Both had been buried in an extended position.
One skeleton was situated on its right side, facing
north, the other had been placed on its left side
facing south. An uncalibrated, uncorrected radiocarbon
date of 870+/-80 14C years B.P. (Beta
#27937) was obtained from shell in association
with the remains.
Both dogs were immature. Although one
of the individuals was slightly larger than the
other, they are both estimated to have been between
five and six months old at the time of
death, based upon the sequence oftooth eruption.
It was not possible to determine the sex of either
individual (Kerber et al. 1989). The cause of
death could not be ascertained, nor were there any
visible post mortem injuries or cut marks (Kerber
et al. 1989).
A second occurrence of a canine burial
was encountered in feature #22, in excavation unit
5, and subsequent contiguous units 62 through 64.