19.07.2013 Views

Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 54, No. 1 ...

Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 54, No. 1 ...

Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 54, No. 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BULLETIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. VOLUME <strong>54</strong>(1). 1993 21<br />

Figure 2. Canine burial, Lambert Farm Site, feature #22 (photo by J. Kerber).<br />

This burial was located approximately 50 meters<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first. As before, a dense shell<br />

feature was observed below <strong>the</strong> plowzone. Mixed<br />

shell, with some degree <strong>of</strong> stratification, occurred<br />

to a depth <strong>of</strong> 85 cm beneath which an adult male<br />

dog had been carefully buried (Figure 2). The<br />

dog had been placed on its left side facing sou<strong>the</strong>ast.<br />

The immediate feature fill was darkened by<br />

a mix <strong>of</strong>soil and charcoal. Several large s<strong>of</strong>tshell<br />

clam shells were placed beside <strong>the</strong> remains.<br />

Again -- lithic debitage, deer bone fragments, and<br />

occasional bifaces, including a Levanna projectile<br />

point were recovered from within <strong>the</strong> feature. A<br />

shell from <strong>the</strong> feature has been radiocarbon dated<br />

to an uncalibrated, uncorrected 610+70 14C years<br />

ago (Beta 43486). The Levanna point supports a<br />

Late Woodland temporal affiliation, culturally<br />

contemporaneous with <strong>the</strong> initial find (although<br />

several hundred years more recent). As in <strong>the</strong><br />

first instance, examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bones found no<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> trauma. However, <strong>the</strong> severe angle<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spinal column attests that <strong>the</strong> body was<br />

folded to accommodate placing it in <strong>the</strong> pit. The<br />

positioning <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> skeleton confirms that death had<br />

preceded burial. This was less clear in <strong>the</strong> case<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> immature pair due to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> bone<br />

fusion and <strong>the</strong> fragile nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remains.<br />

It is certain that careful burial <strong>of</strong> canines<br />

took place at Lambert Farm in <strong>the</strong> prehistoric<br />

Woodland period. In recent decades, similar<br />

features have been noted regionally. In <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>No</strong>r<strong>the</strong>astern United States, <strong>the</strong> inventory includes<br />

burial features in which dogs accompany humans<br />

as well as those in which dogs are interred exclusively<br />

(Lopez and Wisniewski 1958). <strong>No</strong>table<br />

among <strong>the</strong> later are Kipp Island, New York<br />

(Ritchie 1965), Squantum, <strong>Massachusetts</strong> (Nelson<br />

1989) and Grannis Island, Connecticut (D. Thom-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!