19.07.2013 Views

survey of the irrigation potential of the lower tana river basin kenya

survey of the irrigation potential of the lower tana river basin kenya

survey of the irrigation potential of the lower tana river basin kenya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 7 -<br />

2.4 Costs <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Agronomio Considerations (see Chapters VII, VIII and IX)<br />

During <strong>the</strong> project studies, two levels <strong>of</strong> possible <strong>irrigation</strong> development were<br />

considered, namely 250,000 acres, and 300,000 acres. The estimated direct capital<br />

expenditure necessary worked out at 53 million and 60 million East Africa pounds<br />

respectively (see details in section 2.5 below). Direct investments in institutional<br />

and social infrastructure were estimated to cost an additional £E.A. 400 per net acre,<br />

and processing facilities a fur<strong>the</strong>r £E.A. 200 per net acre. The foregoing did not<br />

include <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> supporting productive activities such as forestry and fisheries,<br />

nor <strong>the</strong> external infrastructure related to project development.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>irrigation</strong> development per acre seemed to be so high, attention<br />

was concentrated on cash crops which could <strong>of</strong>fer fair to good returns.<br />

Agronomic trials at Galole covered cotton, sugar cane, kenaf, groundnuts, castor,<br />

beans, maize, sorghum, rice, and fodder crops. Except for cotton, already well<br />

established at Galole, <strong>the</strong> tests made could not be sufficiently comprehensive in <strong>the</strong><br />

time available, and more testing remains to be done. However, on <strong>the</strong> studies made<br />

and information available, a cropping pattern was evolved which included cotton,<br />

sugar cane, kenaf and groundnuts as major crops.<br />

Table 9-2 shows that,<strong>of</strong> 8 crop-acres in 6 years, 6 crop-acres would be devoted<br />

to <strong>the</strong> cash crops cotton, sugar cane, and kenaf and only 2 crop-acres to groundnuts<br />

and beans. No staple food crop is included at all. The adoption <strong>of</strong> such a rotation<br />

would involve <strong>the</strong> assumption that supplies <strong>of</strong> staple foods for <strong>the</strong> whole population<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area could always be imported from elsewhere, at reasonable prices and with<br />

sufficient certainty. Considering <strong>the</strong> location and circumstances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> projeot,<br />

in a somewhat remote and semi-arid part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country, this is quite unrealistic.<br />

Few prospective cultivators would be attracted by an economy consisting essentially<br />

<strong>of</strong> cash cropsj a man's first ooncern is to secure hie food supply, and it is essential<br />

to grow sufficient basic foodstuffs every year, within <strong>the</strong> rotation.<br />

The efficient production and handling <strong>of</strong> sugar cane calls for higly organized<br />

plantation methods, ra<strong>the</strong>r than cultivation by individual tenants. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, a<br />

factory is essential, under skilled direction; to justify its heavy cost, <strong>the</strong>re must<br />

also be grown from <strong>the</strong> start a sufficiently large area <strong>of</strong> cane.<br />

The cutting, retting, and processing <strong>of</strong> kenaf requires much labour which, for<br />

efficiency, must be well organized, and even mechanized methods <strong>of</strong> decortication<br />

need fur<strong>the</strong>r development. As was brought out in <strong>the</strong> studies made, casual labour<br />

does not exist in <strong>the</strong> area, nor is it likely to be easily attracted <strong>the</strong>re in future,<br />

unless it is well organized and continually employed, at fair rates.<br />

It is considered that <strong>the</strong> whole question <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oropping plan to be adopted<br />

requires more and very careful investigation, including trials and tests on a field<br />

scale <strong>of</strong> varieties and yields <strong>of</strong> crops over a sufficient period to establish what<br />

benefits may be expected. Such investigations are matters <strong>of</strong> some urgency.<br />

Meantime, data are not yet available on which to make specific suggestions<br />

as to <strong>potential</strong> cropping patterns which might be fur<strong>the</strong>r considered. It does,<br />

however, appear possible to envisage a pattern which omits sugar cane and kenaf,<br />

but maintains cotton as <strong>the</strong> main cash crop, with groundnuts and maize or sorghums<br />

as food crops. Cropping intensity would be slightly less than that envisaged in<br />

<strong>the</strong> pattern originally suggested, but it might never<strong>the</strong>less provide a rate <strong>of</strong> net<br />

farm revenue oomparable with <strong>the</strong> figure <strong>of</strong> E.A. Sh 950 per acre <strong>of</strong> holding, forecast<br />

in Table 9-2 for <strong>the</strong> original cropping pattern.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!