20.07.2013 Views

habilitation`a diriger les recherches - LUTH - Observatoire de Paris

habilitation`a diriger les recherches - LUTH - Observatoire de Paris

habilitation`a diriger les recherches - LUTH - Observatoire de Paris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 Improved constrained scheme. . .(Cor<strong>de</strong>ro-Carrión et al. 2009)<br />

refers to ζ = −2 and σ = 1. It rather corresponds to a conformal transverse trace<strong>les</strong>s (CTT) <strong>de</strong>composition<br />

of the trace<strong>les</strong>s part of extrinsic curvature introduced by Lichnerowicz [291]. Notice that we<br />

have <strong>de</strong>fined Âij := (A (−2) ) ij , not to be confused with Ãij := (A (4) ) ij . The relation between Âij and<br />

à ij is given by<br />

 ij = ψ 10 K ij = ψ 6 à ij . (3.27)<br />

In terms of Âij , the CFC momentum constraint can be written as<br />

Dj Âij = 8πψ 10 S i = 8πψ 6 f ij Sj = 8πf ij S ∗ j . (3.28)<br />

Consistency between the CTT-like <strong>de</strong>composition (3.26) and the CTS-like one (3.25) generically re-<br />

in Eq. (3.26). However, as it is shown in Appendix 3.A,<br />

quires a non-vanishing tranverse part Âij<br />

TT<br />

this Âij<br />

TT is smaller in amplitu<strong>de</strong> than the non-conformal part hij of the spatial metric and Âij can be<br />

approximated on the CFC approximation level as<br />

 ij ≈ (LX) ij = D i X j + D j X i − 2<br />

3 DkX k f ij . (3.29)<br />

From Eqs. (3.26) and (3.28), an elliptic equation for the vector X i can be <strong>de</strong>rived,<br />

∆X i + 1<br />

3 Di DjX j = 8πf ij S ∗ j , (3.30)<br />

from which X i can be obtained. With this vector field, one can calculate the tensor Âij via (3.29).<br />

Notice that in the case of spherical symmetry, Ârr = ψ 10 K rr = ψ 6 K r r is the quantity used by Shapiro<br />

and Teukolsky [410].<br />

The elliptic equation for the conformal factor can be rewritten in terms of the conserved hydrodynamical<br />

variab<strong>les</strong> and Âij :<br />

∆ψ = −2πψ −1 E ∗ − ψ −7filfjm ÂlmÂij . (3.31)<br />

8<br />

This equation can be solved in or<strong>de</strong>r to obtain the conformal factor. Once the conformal factor is<br />

known, the procedure to implicitly recover the primitive variab<strong>les</strong> from the conserved ones is possible,<br />

the pressure P can be computed using the equation of state, and therefore S ∗ is at hand. The elliptic<br />

equation for Nψ can be reformulated by means of the conserved hydrodynamical variab<strong>les</strong>, Âij , and<br />

the conformal factor:<br />

∆(ψN) = 2πNψ −1 (E ∗ + 2S ∗ ) + Nψ −77filfjm ÂlmÂij .<br />

8<br />

(3.32)<br />

From this equation Nψ can then be obtained, and consequently the lapse function N. Note that, since<br />

 ij is already known at this step, no division by N 2 spoils the good sign for the maximum principle.<br />

Using the relation between the two conformal <strong>de</strong>compositions of the extrinsic curvature, Âij =<br />

ψ 6 Ã ij , Eq. (3.25) can be expressed as (Lβ) ij = 2Nψ −6 Â ij . Taking the divergence we arrive at an<br />

elliptic equation for the shift vector,<br />

∆β i + 1<br />

3 Di Djβ j <br />

= Dj 2Nψ −6 Â ij<br />

, (3.33)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!